[Cast XMR] high speed XMR/CryptoNight miner for RX Vega GPUs (2 KHash/s)

[oxzhor]

You mean the Frequency (%) -30 and Frequency (MHz) 1100 right?

yes

Hehe it gives a blue screen with 1100 - 1105   and HBCC is disable now.

[Kaezar]

You mean the Frequency (%) -30 and Frequency (MHz) 1100 right?

yes

Hehe it gives a blue screen with 1100 - 1105   and HBCC is disable now.

vega 56 or vega 64?! 1100 - 1105 for vega64(or vega 56 with vega64 bios). 955-960 for vega56!

[oxzhor]

You mean the Frequency (%) -30 and Frequency (MHz) 1100 right?

yes

Hehe it gives a blue screen with 1100 - 1105   and HBCC is disable now.

vega 56 or vega 64?! 1100 - 1105 for vega64(or vega 56 with vega64 bios). 955-960 for vega56!

Hehe Vega 56's stock. I will do the bios mod to 64and the powerplay mod .

[Kaezar]

You mean the Frequency (%) -30 and Frequency (MHz) 1100 right?

yes

Hehe it gives a blue screen with 1100 - 1105   and HBCC is disable now.

vega 56 or vega 64?! 1100 - 1105 for vega64(or vega 56 with vega64 bios). 955-960 for vega56!

Hehe Vega 56's stock. I will do the bios mod to 64and the powerplay mod .

for Vega 56's stock try 955-960. With 64 bios 1100-1105. I already updates my v56 bioses, no problem) if something wrong, you always can switch to 2nd bios

[oxzhor]

You mean the Frequency (%) -30 and Frequency (MHz) 1100 right?

yes

Hehe it gives a blue screen with 1100 - 1105   and HBCC is disable now.

vega 56 or vega 64?! 1100 - 1105 for vega64(or vega 56 with vega64 bios). 955-960 for vega56!

Hehe Vega 56's stock. I will do the bios mod to 64and the powerplay mod .

for Vega 56's stock try 955-960. With 64 bios 1100-1105. I already updates my v56 bioses, no problem) if something wrong, you always can switch to 2nd bios

Successfully flash 4x Vega 56 to 64 now busy with the powerplay mod 

[oxzhor]

You mean the Frequency (%) -30 and Frequency (MHz) 1100 right?

yes

Hehe it gives a blue screen with 1100 - 1105   and HBCC is disable now.

vega 56 or vega 64?! 1100 - 1105 for vega64(or vega 56 with vega64 bios). 955-960 for vega56!

Hehe Vega 56's stock. I will do the bios mod to 64and the powerplay mod .

for Vega 56's stock try 955-960. With 64 bios 1100-1105. I already updates my v56 bioses, no problem) if something wrong, you always can switch to 2nd bios

Wow bad H/s now  

Code:

[Pool: 'pool.supportxmr.com:7777' | Connected: 2017-11-29 22:29:18]
  0:01:37 (100%) Online
  0:00:00 (  0%) Offline

[Job: #4 | Difficulty: 60810 | Running: 22.0 sec | Avg Job Time: 24.7 sec]

[Hash Rate Avg: 5346.3 H/s]
  1336.8 H/s GPU0
  1333.9 H/s GPU1
  1336.7 H/s GPU2
  1338.9 H/s GPU3

Only the power use is ok 535W peak.

Wattman settings:
Frequency (%) -30
Frequency (MHz) op 1100
Speed (RPM) Min 3000 target MAX
Temperature 85 / 75
Power limits 0

[ShirKhan76]

I'm wondering if anyone tried to mine Electroneum with Cast XMR miner.

I guess it should work because both are based on CryptoNight algo.

The ETN rewards are pretty good at the moment.

Regarding https://whattomine.org and my 6100 h/s

Monero: 0.090978 XMR per day = $16.78 (1 XMR = 0.01761003 BTC)
Electroneum: 534 ETN per day = $23.99 (1 ETN = 0.00000426 BTC)


Greetz

ShirKhan76

Yes, it absolutely works.  You can mine ETN with Cast.

thx mate!

I'll check it out. ETN looks realy promising to me

[c-doug]

Having a problem connecting to EasyHash. I have confirmed the pool is working with XMR-Stak, but I would much rather use this miner. If anyone has any ideas, please let me know!

[Kaezar]

Wow bad H/s now  

Code:

[Pool: 'pool.supportxmr.com:7777' | Connected: 2017-11-29 22:29:18]
  0:01:37 (100%) Online
  0:00:00 (  0%) Offline

[Job: #4 | Difficulty: 60810 | Running: 22.0 sec | Avg Job Time: 24.7 sec]

[Hash Rate Avg: 5346.3 H/s]
  1336.8 H/s GPU0
  1333.9 H/s GPU1
  1336.7 H/s GPU2
  1338.9 H/s GPU3

Only the power use is ok 535W peak.

Wattman settings:
Frequency (%) -30
Frequency (MHz) op 1100
Speed (RPM) Min 3000 target MAX
Temperature 85 / 75
Power limits 0

After reboot always disable and enable all cards. Or go to AMD tool and turn HBCC On, accept, wait, and off. On all cards separately.
And set Temperature to 50-55!!!

[SmokinCache]

Wow bad H/s now  

Code:

[Pool: 'pool.supportxmr.com:7777' | Connected: 2017-11-29 22:29:18]
  0:01:37 (100%) Online
  0:00:00 (  0%) Offline

[Job: #4 | Difficulty: 60810 | Running: 22.0 sec | Avg Job Time: 24.7 sec]

[Hash Rate Avg: 5346.3 H/s]
  1336.8 H/s GPU0
  1333.9 H/s GPU1
  1336.7 H/s GPU2
  1338.9 H/s GPU3

Only the power use is ok 535W peak.

Wattman settings:
Frequency (%) -30
Frequency (MHz) op 1100
Speed (RPM) Min 3000 target MAX
Temperature 85 / 75
Power limits 0

After reboot always disable and enable all cards. Or go to AMD tool and turn HBCC On, accept, wait, and off. On all cards separately.
And set Temperature to 50-55!!!

no need to save and accept twice per card. If you must use wattman you only need to make it think there has been a change so you can hit the app button. After applying the settings wattman will restart the driver which is the slight bump in fan RPM you hear. You can simply turn off then on or move the slider and move it back then hit apply. getting devcon.exe installed and placing this <devcon.exe restart PCI*DEV_687F> above cast call in your start bat will make things allot faster on a reboot. or a crash. no need to reboot after a crash just run the start bat again.

[SmokinCache]

You mean the Frequency (%) -30 and Frequency (MHz) 1100 right?

yes

Hehe it gives a blue screen with 1100 - 1105   and HBCC is disable now.

vega 56 or vega 64?! 1100 - 1105 for vega64(or vega 56 with vega64 bios). 955-960 for vega56!

Hehe Vega 56's stock. I will do the bios mod to 64and the powerplay mod .

for Vega 56's stock try 955-960. With 64 bios 1100-1105. I already updates my v56 bioses, no problem) if something wrong, you always can switch to 2nd bios

Successfully flash 4x Vega 56 to 64 now busy with the powerplay mod  

My 4 56s have higher hash and less power usage on the stock bios. I fact that reminds me I never did flash the original back. all of my switches a flipped currently. I have a post in this thread somewhere. seems like they did 1960-70 on 64 bios and all are at 2k with a few less watts on 56 bios. Just my experience. give it a shot and let us know what you find out

[R0mi]

Does anyone have the new --remoteaccess feature working on v0.70?

I launch Cast 0.70 and the Windows firewall screen comes up, I hit allow, but I cannot get a live hash rate window via my browser (I can without any problem on the same machine with XMR-STAK).

[Morgon]

Does anyone have the new --remoteaccess feature working on v0.70?

I launch Cast 0.70 and the Windows firewall screen comes up, I hit allow, but I cannot get a live hash rate window via my browser (I can without any problem on the same machine with XMR-STAK).

Yes, it works for me on both localhost (same machine) and even across the internal network. Double-check the Firewall settings is the only thing I can suggest.

[phuocduong]

compare with claymore crytonight?

[R0mi]

Does anyone have the new --remoteaccess feature working on v0.70?

I launch Cast 0.70 and the Windows firewall screen comes up, I hit allow, but I cannot get a live hash rate window via my browser (I can without any problem on the same machine with XMR-STAK).

Yes, it works for me on both localhost (same machine) and even across the internal network. Double-check the Firewall settings is the only thing I can suggest.

I did that.  Tried two different machines.  Where are you placing "--remoteaccess" in your .bat file and are you adding any arguments after --remoteaccess ?

When Cast launches, it says it is starting the server, but absolutely can't bring it up -- two different machines, two different processors, 1 Ethernet, 1 Wireless, and so on...

[StellarX88]

Does anyone have the new --remoteaccess feature working on v0.70?

I launch Cast 0.70 and the Windows firewall screen comes up, I hit allow, but I cannot get a live hash rate window via my browser (I can without any problem on the same machine with XMR-STAK).

Yes, it works for me on both localhost (same machine) and even across the internal network. Double-check the Firewall settings is the only thing I can suggest.

I did that.  Tried two different machines.  Where are you placing "--remoteaccess" in your .bat file and are you adding any arguments after --remoteaccess ?

When Cast launches, it says it is starting the server, but absolutely can't bring it up -- two different machines, two different processors, 1 Ethernet, 1 Wireless, and so on...

I added in at the end of the .bat file. just --remoteaccess.

You should see a line mentioning "starting remote server access on 127.0.0.1:7777"

Just go to that http if it's on local machine and you should see the json output. Make sure you have port forwarding if you intend to access the information remotely.

[R0mi]

Does anyone have the new --remoteaccess feature working on v0.70?

I launch Cast 0.70 and the Windows firewall screen comes up, I hit allow, but I cannot get a live hash rate window via my browser (I can without any problem on the same machine with XMR-STAK).

Yes, it works for me on both localhost (same machine) and even across the internal network. Double-check the Firewall settings is the only thing I can suggest.

I did that.  Tried two different machines.  Where are you placing "--remoteaccess" in your .bat file and are you adding any arguments after --remoteaccess ?

When Cast launches, it says it is starting the server, but absolutely can't bring it up -- two different machines, two different processors, 1 Ethernet, 1 Wireless, and so on...

I added in at the end of the .bat file. just --remoteaccess.

You should see a line mentioning "starting remote server access on 127.0.0.1:7777"

Just go to that http if it's on local machine and you should see the json output. Make sure you have port forwarding if you intend to access the information remotely.

Yes, I see that line "starting remote access server on 127.0.0.1:7777" but I cannot access it locally.

I can access XMR stats this way, I can access EWBF this way.  I don't get it.  Checked firewall.  Moved it to the end of the .bat, thanks for that.

[abudfv2008]

Is there any console utility for AMD to get GPU usage like nvidia-smi?

[Kaezar]

You mean the Frequency (%) -30 and Frequency (MHz) 1100 right?

yes

Hehe it gives a blue screen with 1100 - 1105   and HBCC is disable now.

vega 56 or vega 64?! 1100 - 1105 for vega64(or vega 56 with vega64 bios). 955-960 for vega56!

Hehe Vega 56's stock. I will do the bios mod to 64and the powerplay mod .

for Vega 56's stock try 955-960. With 64 bios 1100-1105. I already updates my v56 bioses, no problem) if something wrong, you always can switch to 2nd bios

Successfully flash 4x Vega 56 to 64 now busy with the powerplay mod  

My 4 56s have higher hash and less power usage on the stock bios. I fact that reminds me I never did flash the original back. all of my switches a flipped currently. I have a post in this thread somewhere. seems like they did 1960-70 on 64 bios and all are at 2k with a few less watts on 56 bios. Just my experience. give it a shot and let us know what you find out

v56 with 64bios, hbcc off, -10, 1105, but +20% power.
   {
      "device": "GPU0",
      "device_id": 0,
      "hash_rate": 2017450,
      "hash_rate_avg": 2016779,
      "gpu_temperature": 54,
      "gpu_fan_rpm": 4709
   },
   {
      "device": "GPU1",
      "device_id": 1,
      "hash_rate": 2013106,
      "hash_rate_avg": 2014324,
      "gpu_temperature": 58,
      "gpu_fan_rpm": 4653
   },
   {
      "device": "GPU2",
      "device_id": 2,
      "hash_rate": 2019154,
      "hash_rate_avg": 2018082,
      "gpu_temperature": 62,
      "gpu_fan_rpm": 4644
   }

[oxzhor]

Oke i set the follow:

Frequency (%) -10
Frequency (MHz) 1100
Speed (RPM) Min 3000 target MAX
Temperature 75 / 75
Power limits +20
HBCC disable

Disable all cards and enable.

Power use + - 605watts

And get poor results. Before the bios v56 to v64 flash i get between 1880 - 1910 H/s per card and now 1800 - 1816 H/s.

Code:

[Job: #5 | Difficulty: 182044 | Running: 77.0 sec | Avg Job Time: 87.5 sec]

[Hash Rate Avg: 7246.6 H/s]
  1816.4 H/s GPU0
  1805.6 H/s GPU1
  1814.2 H/s GPU2
  1810.5 H/s GPU3

Any idea whats wrong?