DJstone
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
March 23, 2014, 01:17:46 AM |
|
Same.
BTW I tried your last version DJstone, with Fugecoin on dwarfpool : no shares. Did you integrate dwarfpools' version for Fugue algo or only the initial one from shp (which do not work on stratum)?
phm.. looking for the differences now Would pls someone test this build with fixed fuguecoin issue? http://ul.to/0ofppj9f
|
|
|
|
tabnk
|
|
March 23, 2014, 01:30:03 AM |
|
NOT WORKING >... !!! http://dwarfpool.com/fcThanks phm for groestlcoin implementation. Anyone can compile it for Windows, plz Yes that would be wonderful please anybody On my way There are the actual binarys from phm's last merge: http://ul.to/mqn3ueqgSeems like not the last version, as there is no groestlcoin.cl in kernel catalogue. Here is the final source with groestlcoin: https://github.com/prettyhatemachine/sph-sgminerCould someone compile it? I can't install MinGw on my PC- getting errors there is groestelcoin.cl in kernel folder. So dunno what u are meaning Downloaded sph-sgminer-DJstone.rar. Extracted: no groestlcoin.cl in kernel catalogue. Running sgminer with -k groestlcoin parameter gives an error in setting -k parameter. What does this mean? It's not compiled from the latest source... I could compile it myself, but can't get MinGw installed maybe i did pack the wrong files. Give me a second try... sry guys Sooooo This one should work: http://ul.to/gsyb7o17thank you now it works Could you share it by uploading it to dropbox or similar service? This is a DropBox link: https://www.dropbox.com/s/a7ha1trod7yh8xr/sph-sgminer-bin.rar
|
|
|
|
|
tabnk
|
|
March 23, 2014, 02:37:16 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
badman74
|
|
March 23, 2014, 03:11:01 AM Last edit: March 23, 2014, 04:36:56 AM by badman74 |
|
Thanks phm for groestlcoin implementation. Anyone can compile it for Windows, plz Yes that would be wonderful please anybody On my way There are the actual binarys from phm's last merge: http://ul.to/mqn3ueqgSeems like not the last version, as there is no groestlcoin.cl in kernel catalogue. Here is the final source with groestlcoin: https://github.com/prettyhatemachine/sph-sgminerCould someone compile it? I can't install MinGw on my PC- getting errors there is groestelcoin.cl in kernel folder. So dunno what u are meaning Downloaded sph-sgminer-DJstone.rar. Extracted: no groestlcoin.cl in kernel catalogue. Running sgminer with -k groestlcoin parameter gives an error in setting -k parameter. What does this mean? It's not compiled from the latest source... I could compile it myself, but can't get MinGw installed maybe i did pack the wrong files. Give me a second try... sry guys the groestlcoin algo is -k myriadcoin-groestlalso newest binaries are in my github repo the link is in my sig edit: sorry adding the new groestlcoin algo now
|
|
|
|
DJstone
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
March 23, 2014, 03:47:20 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
badman74
|
|
March 23, 2014, 04:21:38 AM |
|
my build is updated and working i got 370Mh/s on drwarfpool with 2 290x at 150Mh/s each, 2 7750 at 25Mh/s each, and 2 6850 at a pitiful 10Mh/s each (usually they do 2 to 3 times the output of my 7750's)
|
|
|
|
restless
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 23, 2014, 06:38:32 AM |
|
my build is updated and working i got 370Mh/s on drwarfpool with 2 290x at 150Mh/s each, 2 7750 at 25Mh/s each, and 2 6850 at a pitiful 10Mh/s each (usually they do 2 to 3 times the output of my 7750's)
Yup, something in Fugue doesn't like non-GCN cores Badman can you share your conf file for ANI ? I'm getting 20-25% les hasrate with 6870 vs your 6850 :O Also van't increase worksize above 128, while 6970 happily makes 2MH with -w 256 :S
|
|
|
|
badman74
|
|
March 23, 2014, 06:45:06 AM |
|
my build is updated and working i got 370Mh/s on drwarfpool with 2 290x at 150Mh/s each, 2 7750 at 25Mh/s each, and 2 6850 at a pitiful 10Mh/s each (usually they do 2 to 3 times the output of my 7750's)
Yup, something in Fugue doesn't like non-GCN cores Badman can you share your conf file for ANI ? I'm getting 20-25% les hasrate with 6870 vs your 6850 :O Also van't increase worksize above 128, while 6970 happily makes 2MH with -w 256 :S sgminer.exe --gpu-engine 950,920,950,950 --gpu-memclock 1150,1100,1400,1400 -I 16 -g 2 -w 256 --config ANI.conf
|
|
|
|
boubou
|
|
March 23, 2014, 09:04:55 AM |
|
Could I have opinion of specialist about my Problem? I suspect a bug of the programm because that'is the only thing I had not check, someone can tell me if it's possible? I offer on the other topic 30 Darkcoin Bounty to solve that problem, a nobody has a clue, but I get in touch with other that had the same problem. Here is the facts: I have 3 different R9 290, other people has 6 290 of other brand, after 10 minutes, the cards looses 10% of Hash. That probelm happend only on R9 290 cars. I'm on Bamt 1.6 from Bajawa, He is on windows 7, same problem. All 290 on the same rig experiment the loss in the exact same secondif you put another card in the rigg that is not a 290, all the 290 had a loss, but not the other card The cards are cold. The problem happened only with sph-darkcoin miner, if I mine Litecoin, I'm stable. I split the cards with 2 PSU, does not change a thing, cards crashed at the same time, no matter what psu they are plugged. I change motherboard, does not change a thing. I run 4 different sgminer, each one with one card activated: even I did launch them with a delay of 3 minutes, 10 minutes later, all the instance with a 290 had a 10% loss at the same timeI launched sgminer without a .conf: only intensity in the parameters: happened with I:18 and I:21 (0% rejected, cards should worked with high intensity) Once I got the loss only a cold reboot can recover the missing hash. If I mine restart only the miner, it restart but is capped to 90% of max hashrate. I'm getting out of hints. If the problem is in the programm, I shoud stop wasting my time. If it is not, I will keep investigate, even if I think I already get pretty far. PS: as usual, english is not my first languagae, so if I offensed any-one, it was not intended.
|
BEHNZiP6UZunp41vurNaQi4r2hvgG57yzi : BdG
|
|
|
azhago
|
|
March 23, 2014, 11:28:32 AM |
|
A noob question :
At the same hashrate, what's the difference between 1,2 or 4 threads ? Is it better to have 4 threads giving 5MHs than 1 thread giving 6.5 MHs ? (groestlcoin algo for example)
|
|
|
|
|
azhago
|
|
March 23, 2014, 11:49:20 AM |
|
Thanks for your answer, For example, i get ~5MHs for a each 280x on my rig with Groestlcoin algo. (and ~11 with Myr-groestl) with 2 threads or 4, as showed as example on OP. If i use only one thread, i get better hashrate (6.5 with groestlcoin.. !) So i wondered if the hashrate is the only thing we have to check, or if a 5MH/s with 4 threads is better than a ~6.5MHs with one thread
|
|
|
|
zuludrag
|
|
March 23, 2014, 11:51:43 AM |
|
Thanks for your answer, For example, i get ~5MHs for a each 280x on my rig with Groestlcoin algo. (and ~11 with Myr-groestl) with 2 threads or 4, as showed as example on OP. If i use only one thread, i get better hashrate (6.5 with groestlcoin.. !) So i wondered if the hashrate is the only thing we have to check, or if a 5MH/s with 4 threads is better than a ~6.5MHs with one thread Using 10 threads on 6770 Difference on groestl coin is not so big : ~3.1 vs 2.9 with 2 threads. But on Myriad-groestl i get 5.8 vs 4.4Mh/s So it's worth it... edit: by the way, also using 256 work size... With -w 64 much lower hashrate...
|
|
|
|
azhago
|
|
March 23, 2014, 11:56:35 AM |
|
So, the hashrate is the unique thing to worry about ?
|
|
|
|
zuludrag
|
|
March 23, 2014, 12:11:02 PM |
|
So, the hashrate is the unique thing to worry about ?
As I understood from that tutorial: most important is hashrate and WU.
|
|
|
|
restless
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 23, 2014, 01:21:03 PM |
|
sgminer.exe --gpu-engine 950,920,950,950 --gpu-memclock 1150,1100,1400,1400 -I 16 -g 2 -w 256 --config ANI.conf
What about ANI.conf ? Are your cards with 2GB ram? Mine is with 1GB, can't think of anything else that could prevent it.. the system is with intel cpu with 12GB ram ;/ And win8.0&Cat13.12 ... but my 5850 which also cant compile with -w 256 are on Win7, so its not the OS then :S IS there a possibility to try a run on my GPU with bin from yours?
|
|
|
|
badman74
|
|
March 23, 2014, 01:52:41 PM Last edit: March 23, 2014, 02:05:40 PM by badman74 |
|
sgminer.exe --gpu-engine 950,920,950,950 --gpu-memclock 1150,1100,1400,1400 -I 16 -g 2 -w 256 --config ANI.conf
What about ANI.conf ? Are your cards with 2GB ram? Mine is with 1GB, can't think of anything else that could prevent it.. the system is with intel cpu with 12GB ram ;/ And win8.0&Cat13.12 ... but my 5850 which also cant compile with -w 256 are on Win7, so its not the OS then :S IS there a possibility to try a run on my GPU with bin from yours? { "pools" : [ { "poolname" : "Solo", "url" : "192.168.1.197:2121", "user" : "badman74", "pass" : "x", "pool-priority" : "1", "state" : "enabled" }, { "poolname" : "CPU Pool", "url" : "stratum+tcp://ani.cpu-pool.net:3550", "user" : "badman74.2", "pass" : "x", "pool-priority" : "0", "state" : "enabled" }, { "poolname" : "ZCoins P2Pool", "url" : " http://ani.zcoins.org:9792", "user" : xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx "pass" : "x", "pool-priority" : "1", "state" : "enabled" } ] , "kernel" : "animecoin", "temp-hysteresis" : "5", "kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin" } hmm all mine are on win 7 you may be able to use my bins if everything is the same... not sure since yours are 6870's and mine are 6850's also you will have to use my build of sgminer as it supports n-factor-scrypt and builds the bins a little differently also my cards are 1 gb and catalyst 13.12 here are my .bin files, not sure which is which though https://mega.co.nz/#!bVwmmbYB!LFSkJJzKpiSxvtZGVFUH3L3Sbi7Y0DyRTkDt7NOSlpQhttps://mega.co.nz/#!OdIXHRZR!3o59gVZMR907giSI6Z2xpYQt6hbCX2aR_c77tsdybas
|
|
|
|
jeanjean15
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
|
|
March 23, 2014, 02:22:08 PM |
|
Hi badman74 . Can you explain why a radeon 5850 give me 14 mh/s with your groestl algo and why my radeon 290 give me approximately the same score ? Don't you think that your algorithm is not enough optimized for last generation of radeons ?
|
|
|
|
badman74
|
|
March 23, 2014, 02:29:55 PM |
|
Hi badman74 . Can you explain why a radeon 5850 give me 14 mh/s with your groestl algo and why my radeon 290 give me approximately the same score ? Don't you think that your algorithm is not enough optimized for last generation of radeons ? i didn't build the algo so i don't know about that part but that does seem odd it sounds like it is optimized specifically for the 5850... my 290x gets 9.5Mh/s, 6850 gets 3.9Mh/s, and 7750 get 1.28Mh/s
|
|
|
|
|