Bitcoin Forum
November 03, 2024, 07:47:41 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 ... 326 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3  (Read 2145046 times)
seljak
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 101
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 05, 2014, 04:57:12 AM
 #101

MRO/QCN/FCN/BCN
so which one of these is the most profitable?

...and if there are merge mining options we are really missing out by not implementing it as soon as posible.
surfer43
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 250


"Trading Platform of The Future!"


View Profile
June 05, 2014, 05:07:48 AM
 #102

MRO/QCN/FCN/BCN
so which one of these is the most profitable?

...and if there are merge mining options we are really missing out by not implementing it as soon as posible.
Just mine MRO. The others are not worth your time for a few % more profit. And pretty sure MRO is most profitable..
restless
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001


View Profile
June 05, 2014, 05:23:12 AM
 #103

I don't see how MRO is better than QCN Tongue
SpeedDemon13
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
June 05, 2014, 05:27:37 AM
 #104

Profit calculator on whatmine.com shows out of the CryptoNight coins that QCN and FCN are more profitable than XMR most of the times.

CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
surfer43
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 250


"Trading Platform of The Future!"


View Profile
June 05, 2014, 05:31:49 AM
 #105

I don't see how MRO is better than QCN Tongue
1. MRO was first
2. QCN was originally a relaunch of Monero
3. QCN has added no improvements to the code
4. MRO has contributed many bug fixes, 20x improvements in hashing speed, the pool software, has a reasonable fee so the blockchain can't be spammed, etc.

Profit calculator on whatmine.com shows out of the CryptoNight coins that QCN and FCN are more profitable than XMR most of the times.
The volumes for QCN and FCN are very low. Good luck selling much for those pumped prices.
th00ber
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 789
Merit: 501


View Profile
June 05, 2014, 06:18:20 AM
 #106

No linux ?
Mergam
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 05, 2014, 06:38:21 AM
 #107

Is it possible to mine solo with this miner?
ivan1975
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2954
Merit: 1169


View Profile
June 05, 2014, 06:47:20 AM
 #108

5870 only ~ 70 h/s.
slimdim
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 05, 2014, 06:56:37 AM
 #109

2*r9 280x + 5770

06/05/14-10:55:53 - New job received
Speed: 578 h/s, TotalHashes: 218K, DevHashes: 10K Mining time: 00:06
06/05/14-10:55:59 - SHARE FOUND! - (GPU 0)
digicoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 05, 2014, 07:08:58 AM
 #110

5870 only ~ 70 h/s.

A little bit faster than my core i5 model M, the slowest core i5 CPU. Also, if you are using Claymore GPU miner you are charging a developer fee of 5%. Actually, GPU miner may mine at loss: high developer fee + high power consumption + pool fee
digicoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 05, 2014, 07:12:35 AM
 #111

2*r9 280x + 5770

06/05/14-10:55:53 - New job received
Speed: 578 h/s, TotalHashes: 218K, DevHashes: 10K Mining time: 00:06
06/05/14-10:55:59 - SHARE FOUND! - (GPU 0)


80% faster than my single core i7, 4 cores (OC-ed). 3 high-end VGA card combined <> 1 single core i7 CPU, 4 cores
digicoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 05, 2014, 07:18:22 AM
 #112

I don't see how MRO is better than QCN Tongue

QCN is a Monero clone which bring the following "advantages":

+ Incompetent dev: see commits from QCN devs in github  Wink
+ Weak network: orphan blocks all the time (too many, too frequent). Find them in any QC pool
+ Weak community
Keyboard-Mash
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 05, 2014, 07:57:13 AM
Last edit: June 05, 2014, 08:17:17 AM by Keyboard-Mash
 #113

2*r9 280x + 5770

06/05/14-10:55:53 - New job received
Speed: 578 h/s, TotalHashes: 218K, DevHashes: 10K Mining time: 00:06
06/05/14-10:55:59 - SHARE FOUND! - (GPU 0)


80% faster than my single core i7, 4 cores (OC-ed). 3 high-end VGA card combined <> 1 single core i7 CPU, 4 cores


Another comparison (excluding pool/exchange fees/taxes):

Processor: 4820k, 4 cores w/ AES accel, 126w resting, 171w mining, 45w used for mining. Delivers 180 hash/sec. 4 hash/watt. Cost: $324 New. Hash/$ = .56 . Monthly Power cost (me): $5.185. Net @ 4.47M# = (.002532BTC/MRO * 29.18MRO/Month * $645.97/BTC) = $47.73. Net = $42.54. ROI = 7.6 months

GPU: r9 290, stock clocks, 216w used for mining (Comp w/ GPU mining - Comp w/ no GPU hooked to pwr.), 437.5 h/s. 2.02 hash/watt. Cost: ~$420 New. Hash/$ = 1.04 . Monthly Power cost (me): $24.4. Net @ 4.47M# = (.002532BTC/MRO * 70.92MRO/Month * $645.97/BTC) = $91.6. ROI = 4.6 months

GPU has about a 1.65:1 edge over the CPU for ROI
CPU has about a 1.97:1 edge over the GPU for hash/watt operating costs
GPU has about a 1.86:1 edge over the CPU for Hash/$ investment

Really interesting numbers .. too close to call it for either one at this point. Every update or optimization changes these numbers and there's been lots, for at least the CPU over the last month. Anyone know any other PoW that has such a small gap between CPU's and GPU's?


Edit: Forgot to mention this is on windows, you probably see much better numbers for at least the CPU on linux

trankil
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 539


View Profile WWW
June 05, 2014, 08:01:09 AM
 #114

any linux miner on plan?
loremipsum
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 501


View Profile
June 05, 2014, 08:32:28 AM
 #115

I don't see how MRO is better than QCN Tongue

QCN is a Monero clone which bring the following "advantages":

+ Incompetent dev: see commits from QCN devs in github  Wink
+ Weak network: orphan blocks all the time (too many, too frequent). Find them in any QC pool
+ Weak community

Also Monero is a Bytecoin clone which:

Had an unfair launch
Has a too steep emission curve

rajapatr1
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 189
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 05, 2014, 08:32:41 AM
 #116

1324H on 4x R9 280x
seljak
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 101
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 05, 2014, 08:35:26 AM
 #117

is there a pool that we can we mine QCN with a gpu ?
loremipsum
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 501


View Profile
June 05, 2014, 08:41:07 AM
 #118

is there a pool that we can we mine QCN with a gpu ?

http://qcn.extremepool.org/ on port 1111

ozzy1926
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 05, 2014, 08:50:17 AM
 #119

is there a pool that we can we mine QCN with a gpu ?

http://qcn.extremepool.org/ on port 1111

it gives timeout
seljak
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 101
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 05, 2014, 08:51:00 AM
 #120

is there a pool that we can we mine QCN with a gpu ?

http://qcn.extremepool.org/ on port 1111
...failed to connect?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 ... 326 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!