Bitcoin Forum
May 30, 2017, 07:41:39 AM *
News: If the forum does not load normally for you, please send me a traceroute.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: Will you support Gavin's new block size limit hard fork of 8MB by January 1, 2016 then doubling every 2 years?
1.  yes
2.  no

Pages: « 1 ... 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 [622] 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 ... 1559 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP.  (Read 1907516 times)
FNG
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588


View Profile
September 19, 2014, 08:56:50 PM
 #12421

well under $6000 as that amount is not "throw away" money for anyone who is still salaried.
Depends on salary.
1496130099
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1496130099

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1496130099
Reply with quote  #2

1496130099
Report to moderator
POLONIEX TRADING SIGNALS
+50% Profit and more via TELEGRAM
ALTCOINTRADER.CO
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1496130099
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1496130099

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1496130099
Reply with quote  #2

1496130099
Report to moderator
1496130099
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1496130099

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1496130099
Reply with quote  #2

1496130099
Report to moderator
1496130099
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1496130099

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1496130099
Reply with quote  #2

1496130099
Report to moderator
Adrian-x
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile
September 19, 2014, 09:02:14 PM
 #12422

Before the agricultural revolution, it took humanity about one million years on average to develop enough infrastructure/capability to support an additional one million humans living at subsistence levels. After the agricultural revolution, that changed to talking only a few hundred years. Now, after the industrial revolution, that takes 90 minutes on average.

There are huge side effects:
http://www.worldwildlife.org/threats/soil-erosion-and-degradation

That's important but the kicker is overall economic growth, we're moving from a meme of more to a meme of better. The problem is the centers of control are working from the ideology of Co opting / controlling the supply of more. Monopolies have no value when people find alternatives,  micro electronics, alternate energy and food security technologies like aquaponics (oh and money) are reshaping everything.

Forget it, Adrian.

In economics, the Jevons paradox (/ˈdʒɛvənz/; sometimes Jevons effect) is the proposition that as technology progresses, the increase in efficiency with which a resource is used tends to increase (rather than decrease) the rate of consumption of that resource.[1] In 1865, the English economist William Stanley Jevons observed that technological improvements that increased the efficiency of coal-use led to the increased consumption of coal in a wide range of industries. He argued that, contrary to common intuition, technological improvements could not be relied upon to reduce fuel consumption.[2]

The issue has been re-examined by modern economists studying consumption rebound effects from improved energy efficiency. In addition to reducing the amount needed for a given use, improved efficiency lowers the relative cost of using a resource, which tends to increase the quantity of the resource demanded, potentially counteracting any savings from increased efficiency. Additionally, increased efficiency accelerates economic growth, further increasing the demand for resources. The Jevons paradox occurs when the effect from increased demand predominates, causing resource use to increase


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox

I'm aware of Jevons_paradox, but much smarter people than me (Satosi) know it's only supply and demand that brings it into equilibrium. The divergence in usage as a result of innovation also express it's self in an economy as art and culture ultimately this is enriched experiences.

We won't find a comfortable equilibrium with constant economic growth as managed under the target of central banks.

Thank me in Bits 12MwnzxtprG2mHm3rKdgi7NmJKCypsMMQw
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
September 19, 2014, 09:02:32 PM
 #12423

well under $6000 as that amount is not "throw away" money for anyone who is still salaried.
Depends on salary.

I already addressed this. He's got a good day job.
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
September 19, 2014, 09:39:56 PM
 #12424

well under $6000 as that amount is not "throw away" money for anyone who is still salaried.
Depends on salary.

I already addressed this. He's got a good day job.

ok, let's do it your way.  let's say he's got a low salary and only put $600 to buy 1000BTC.

at 300,000-400,000% return, which he's already claimed, he'd turn that into $1.8M-2.4M.  see, he's rich.

btw, i don't get it.  this is the title of his thread  "#1 Bitcoin and Altcoin Price Forecasts (+1,492% gains, +750% more than B&H)" and i think he downward adjusted those numbers based on other ppl's criticism.
S3052
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


BTC Up or Down? go to www.bullbearanalytics.com


View Profile WWW
September 19, 2014, 09:50:08 PM
 #12425

you forget that I distributed a lot of coins via donations along the way and bitcoinica hack

>15years analysis experience

Always do your own due diligence & consult your financial advisor. Never invest unless you can afford to lose your entire investment.

http://twitter.com/BitcoinAnalyst

Subscribe here
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
September 19, 2014, 09:53:42 PM
 #12426

you forget that I distributed a lot of coins via donations along the way and bitcoinica hack

or maybe given all the inconsistencies one finds scattered about in your claims, it's simply a matter of false advertising?
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
September 20, 2014, 03:18:38 AM
 #12427

so who sold under $400?
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
September 20, 2014, 03:28:06 AM
 #12428

recap end of day silver. 

geezuz, just look at that!  icebreaker and Goat are gonna be rich!  this is what happens when you complete the 3rd stage of criticality:



cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
September 20, 2014, 03:34:24 AM
 #12429

actually, this one is much prettier where i've drawn the 2 yr chart with the 3rd breach @18.17.  note how red candle just punched right thru on volume.  just beautiful.  no wonder ZSL simultaneously punched UP thru 2 resistance levels in the same day:

cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
September 20, 2014, 03:44:05 AM
 #12430

note the $DXY finished just a smidge above resistance at the close.  thats good for the USD.  let's see if we blast off Monday morning as technically it's freely cleared this level.  right now, i think the daily cycle bottom got put in on 9/16.  if so, it should blast off UP, while driving everything else down:

cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
September 20, 2014, 03:57:47 AM
 #12431

uh oh.  moar blackhole sh*t:

cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
September 20, 2014, 04:00:47 AM
 #12432

uh oh
vipgelsi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120


Solarcoin.org


View Profile
September 20, 2014, 04:07:07 AM
 #12433

If gold goes lower i will trade some bitcoins for some ounces of it. Cool

cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
September 20, 2014, 04:11:01 AM
 #12434

If gold goes lower i will trade some bitcoins for some ounces of it. Cool

that's the spirit.

just make sure you wear thick gloves.
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
September 20, 2014, 04:19:44 AM
 #12435

nice OKCoin bid wall there.
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
September 20, 2014, 04:20:06 AM
 #12436

oh yes
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
September 20, 2014, 04:21:32 AM
 #12437

oh yes

listen to me.  i sound like i'm having an orgasm.
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268



View Profile
September 20, 2014, 05:58:42 AM
 #12438

The market cap is now below both "Metcalfe Value" estimates (num TXs  / num addrs)--something that hasn't happened since early 2013.  Note that I'm taking the 7-day moving average of each time series, so the recent drop in price hasn't been fully "averaged in" (i.e., if the price stays low, the divergence between Metcalfe value and market cap will grow).





Peter R. much appreciated for this update Smiley

Have you considered fitting onto a long term network adoption curve? Like say a sigmoid with final market cap at $2 trillion? Or similarly with a final target saturated transaction network or similar?

User705
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658



View Profile
September 20, 2014, 07:08:27 AM
 #12439

2 trillion is either way too high or way to low.   If bitcoin passes 1 trillion valuation then it will be worth more then any single public stock so it will likely go on to at least duplicate/replace golds value which is about 10 trillion.
Zarathustra
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952



View Profile
September 20, 2014, 07:15:41 AM
 #12440

Before the agricultural revolution, it took humanity about one million years on average to develop enough infrastructure/capability to support an additional one million humans living at subsistence levels. After the agricultural revolution, that changed to talking only a few hundred years. Now, after the industrial revolution, that takes 90 minutes on average.

There are huge side effects:
http://www.worldwildlife.org/threats/soil-erosion-and-degradation

That's important but the kicker is overall economic growth, we're moving from a meme of more to a meme of better. The problem is the centers of control are working from the ideology of Co opting / controlling the supply of more. Monopolies have no value when people find alternatives,  micro electronics, alternate energy and food security technologies like aquaponics (oh and money) are reshaping everything.

Forget it, Adrian.

In economics, the Jevons paradox (/ˈdʒɛvənz/; sometimes Jevons effect) is the proposition that as technology progresses, the increase in efficiency with which a resource is used tends to increase (rather than decrease) the rate of consumption of that resource.[1] In 1865, the English economist William Stanley Jevons observed that technological improvements that increased the efficiency of coal-use led to the increased consumption of coal in a wide range of industries. He argued that, contrary to common intuition, technological improvements could not be relied upon to reduce fuel consumption.[2]

The issue has been re-examined by modern economists studying consumption rebound effects from improved energy efficiency. In addition to reducing the amount needed for a given use, improved efficiency lowers the relative cost of using a resource, which tends to increase the quantity of the resource demanded, potentially counteracting any savings from increased efficiency. Additionally, increased efficiency accelerates economic growth, further increasing the demand for resources. The Jevons paradox occurs when the effect from increased demand predominates, causing resource use to increase


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox

I'm aware of Jevons_paradox, but much smarter people than me (Satosi) know it's only supply and demand that brings it into equilibrium. The divergence in usage as a result of innovation also express it's self in an economy as art and culture ultimately this is enriched experiences.

We won't find a comfortable equilibrium with constant economic growth as managed under the target of central banks.


With or without central banks: "a comfortable equilibrium with constant economic growth" is an oxymoron.
An economy is a collectivist organisation (state bastard), and:

"Essentially, the economy is an engine that transforms resources into waste."

http://www.financialsense.com/contributors/ugo-bardi/2011/07/22/entropy-peak-oil-and-stoic-philosophy-part-2

"Staat nenne ich's, wo alle Gifttrinker sind, Gute und Schlimme: Staat, wo alle sich selber verlieren, Gute und Schlimme:
Staat, wo der langsame Selbstmord aller – »das Leben« heisst."
Pages: « 1 ... 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 [622] 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 ... 1559 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!