Bitcoin Forum
June 26, 2017, 01:59:30 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.14.2  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: Will you support Gavin's new block size limit hard fork of 8MB by January 1, 2016 then doubling every 2 years?
1.  yes
2.  no

Pages: « 1 ... 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 [892] 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 ... 1559 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP.  (Read 1922184 times)
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
November 20, 2014, 11:05:40 PM
 #17821


oh wow!  i'm guilty of inflation!  lol!

who said spin offs are inflationary to Bitcoiner's?  you?  lol!

Yes I said and I can repeat
 - "spin-offs" is not fair scheme. (but I agree, it is profitable for you (and for me too ... only I do not like it b/c I do not scam people))
 - "spin-offs" inflates money.
spin-offs only allow innovation to percolate through the scam coin cloud.
the ones that survive add value, the ones that dont cause no damage, there is no inflation.

It seems to me there absolutely is. Money base is expanded 2x. Ledger is debased.

but so are holders holdings.  net effect, zero.

"net effect, zero." =>  
 a) cypherdoc managed to scam $100,000 USD
 b) some newbies lost $100,000 USD
 => $0 USD

WTF is wrong with you?  accusing me of scamming?  making stuff up now?

you're a dick. 
yep,  I'm stupid idiot going mad ... simply dick

i think you're so desperate to get this SC scam going you're resorting to all sorts of underhanded behavior.  wow.
1498485570
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1498485570

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1498485570
Reply with quote  #2

1498485570
Report to moderator
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1498485570
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1498485570

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1498485570
Reply with quote  #2

1498485570
Report to moderator
1498485570
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1498485570

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1498485570
Reply with quote  #2

1498485570
Report to moderator
Odalv
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148



View Profile
November 20, 2014, 11:11:15 PM
 #17822

i think you're so desperate to get this SC scam going you're resorting to all sorts of underhanded behavior.  wow.

This is THE END, of your alt-coin scam. SC will not allow pump/dump scheme anymore.
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
November 20, 2014, 11:14:14 PM
 #17823

i think you're so desperate to get this SC scam going you're resorting to all sorts of underhanded behavior.  wow.

This is THE END, of your alt-coin scam. SC will not allow pump/dump scheme anymore.

what are you talking about?  better stop smokin that stuff...
Odalv
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148



View Profile
November 20, 2014, 11:17:29 PM
 #17824

i think you're so desperate to get this SC scam going you're resorting to all sorts of underhanded behavior.  wow.

This is THE END, of your alt-coin scam. SC will not allow pump/dump scheme anymore.

what are you talking about?  better stop smokin that stuff...

I'm talking about your motivation. ... seems, you are the one "smokin that stuff" and not being able to check reality.
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
November 20, 2014, 11:20:52 PM
 #17825

i think you're so desperate to get this SC scam going you're resorting to all sorts of underhanded behavior.  wow.

This is THE END, of your alt-coin scam. SC will not allow pump/dump scheme anymore.

what are you talking about?  better stop smokin that stuff...

I'm talking about your motivation. ... seems, you are the one "smokin that stuff" and not being able to check reality.

the problem with you is that you think just b/c something is technically possible you automatically think its economically possible or viable.  that's not true, esp with Bitcoin.  you're throwing all caution to the wind.  

the mere fact that you'll throw out all sorts of these made up allegations show how desperate you are to capitalize on SC's.
Odalv
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148



View Profile
November 20, 2014, 11:35:53 PM
 #17826

i think you're so desperate to get this SC scam going you're resorting to all sorts of underhanded behavior.  wow.

This is THE END, of your alt-coin scam. SC will not allow pump/dump scheme anymore.

what are you talking about?  better stop smokin that stuff...

I'm talking about your motivation. ... seems, you are the one "smokin that stuff" and not being able to check reality.

the problem with you is that you think just b/c something is technically possible you automatically think its economically possible or viable.  that's not true, esp with Bitcoin.  you're throwing all caution to the wind. 

the mere fact that you'll throw out all sorts of these allegations show how desperate you are to capitalize on SC's.

ok, I can take it.

but the problem with you is that you think
 a) you are smarter than Satoshi and all devs together (only you have no proof)
 b) you invested into Bitcoin and w/o your investment/brain-washing it is the end of universe (only I'm not sure if you invested at least 1/2 of what I did)
 
I do not know if it is not worth my time to talk with you.
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
November 20, 2014, 11:44:22 PM
 #17827

I do not know if it is not worth my time to talk with you.

it really isn't.  you're the one who started the mud slinging.

no one said they're smarter.  i'm just expressing my view.
Odalv
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148



View Profile
November 20, 2014, 11:54:55 PM
 #17828

I do not know if it is 1) not worth my time to talk with you.

it really isn't.  2) you're the one who started the mud slinging.

3) no one said they're smarter.  i'm just expressing my view.

1) I'm sorry, I'm not natural speaker.
2) really ?
3) the opposite is true ->  they're smarter

Adrian-x
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile
November 20, 2014, 11:56:40 PM
 #17829

Adrian-x, how much are your losses ?

"there is no there there" there are no losses Smiley there is no spoon,

Thank me in Bits 12MwnzxtprG2mHm3rKdgi7NmJKCypsMMQw
brg444
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644

Bitcoin replaces central, not commercial, banks


View Profile
November 21, 2014, 12:14:53 AM
 #17830

this is pretty cool
http://bitcoincore.org/~gavin/btc_dev_viz.mp4

"I believe this will be the ultimate fate of Bitcoin, to be the "high-powered money" that serves as a reserve currency for banks that issue their own digital cash." Hal Finney, Dec. 2010
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
November 21, 2014, 12:58:52 AM
 #17831

Sidechains, One Coin To Rule Them All

http://blog.bluemeanie.net/2014/11/sidechains-one-coin-to-rule-them-all.html
NewLiberty
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148


Gresham's Lawyer


View Profile WWW
November 21, 2014, 01:30:02 AM
 #17832

back up a step.  miners get paid to insert those CP records into satoshi tx's in the first place which incentivizes mining growth and thus more security and thus less chance for subsequent attack on those same satoshi tx's.  now move all these CP tx fees off to a SC that can't be MM'd.  this deprecates the MC.  and there will be thousands of these insecure SC's as i think only a few SC's will be MM'd due to mining capacity constraints.

Merge mining may tend to make a SC less secure rather than more unless it is super popular already.
Any MM SC with a shortish SPV confirmation time is going to be DOA if there is any value to be taken from a double spend.  There are a heck of a lot of ASICs out there.

FREE MONEY1 Bitcoin for Silver and Gold NewLibertyDollar.com and now BITCOIN SPECIE (silver 1 ozt) shows value by QR
Bulk premiums as low as .0012 BTC "BETTER, MORE COLLECTIBLE, AND CHEAPER THAN SILVER EAGLES" 1Free of Government
cbeast
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736

Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.


View Profile
November 21, 2014, 01:39:48 AM
 #17833

A very good case against the viability of Side Chains and unveiling ideological ulterior motives that undermine the fundamental incentives of Bitcoin.

Any significantly advanced cryptocurrency is indistinguishable from Ponzi Tulips.
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 910


View Profile
November 21, 2014, 01:42:02 AM
 #17834

A very good case against the viability of Side Chains and unveiling ideological ulterior motives that undermine the fundamental incentives of Bitcoin.

Sidechains bad?

Forgive my petulance and oft-times, I fear, ill-founded criticisms, and forgive me that I have, by this time, made your eyes and head ache with my long letter. But I cannot forgo hastily the pleasure and pride of thus conversing with you.
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296



View Profile
November 21, 2014, 01:45:12 AM
 #17835


... he's been a raving statist apologist for the worst of their crimes since he showed up in bitcoinosphere. He's wondering why bitcoin is starting to feel like paypal2.0 after advocating for his gravvy train govt. intervention paid him handsome dividends ...

cbeast
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736

Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.


View Profile
November 21, 2014, 01:48:36 AM
 #17836

A very good case against the viability of Side Chains and unveiling ideological ulterior motives that undermine the fundamental incentives of Bitcoin.

Sidechains bad?
Only in their execution. I still think their is a reasonable compromise that enhances Bitcoin, like a remora to a shark.

Any significantly advanced cryptocurrency is indistinguishable from Ponzi Tulips.
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 910


View Profile
November 21, 2014, 01:53:51 AM
 #17837

A very good case against the viability of Side Chains and unveiling ideological ulterior motives that undermine the fundamental incentives of Bitcoin.

Sidechains bad?
Only in their execution. I still think their is a reasonable compromise that enhances Bitcoin, like a remora to a shark.

Many people are skeptical. They remind us of altcoins I guess. But if it is a decentralized way to achieve micropayments, for example, seems legit enough

Forgive my petulance and oft-times, I fear, ill-founded criticisms, and forgive me that I have, by this time, made your eyes and head ache with my long letter. But I cannot forgo hastily the pleasure and pride of thus conversing with you.
NewLiberty
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148


Gresham's Lawyer


View Profile WWW
November 21, 2014, 01:54:38 AM
 #17838

spin-offs is inflationary (you have N x amount)  but SC is not inflationary b/c you CAN use BTC only in 1 chain at the same time.
Hmmm....
Unless a side chain reorganizes after the contest period.  If there are enough different SC that are MM, this is very possible.
Does a chain re-org cause SPV linked chains to re-org too?
I'd assume not in most any case, though it should invalidate the SPV for the re-org'd TXs, yes?

I could see a possible workaround on this if somehow the contest period were relative to the difficulty of each chain, but not sure how that would work in practice as that would be a flexible metric within the relevant period.  There could still be a way to game it.


FREE MONEY1 Bitcoin for Silver and Gold NewLibertyDollar.com and now BITCOIN SPECIE (silver 1 ozt) shows value by QR
Bulk premiums as low as .0012 BTC "BETTER, MORE COLLECTIBLE, AND CHEAPER THAN SILVER EAGLES" 1Free of Government
cbeast
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736

Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.


View Profile
November 21, 2014, 02:11:18 AM
 #17839

A very good case against the viability of Side Chains and unveiling ideological ulterior motives that undermine the fundamental incentives of Bitcoin.

Sidechains bad?
Only in their execution. I still think their is a reasonable compromise that enhances Bitcoin, like a remora to a shark.

Many people are skeptical. They remind us of altcoins I guess. But if it is a decentralized way to achieve micropayments, for example, seems legit enough
Of course, but the method Blockstream is proposing is too destructive. It's like ebola.

Any significantly advanced cryptocurrency is indistinguishable from Ponzi Tulips.
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
November 21, 2014, 02:19:05 AM
 #17840

A very good case against the viability of Side Chains and unveiling ideological ulterior motives that undermine the fundamental incentives of Bitcoin.

Sidechains bad?
Only in their execution. I still think their is a reasonable compromise that enhances Bitcoin, like a remora to a shark.

Many people are skeptical. They remind us of altcoins I guess. But if it is a decentralized way to achieve micropayments, for example, seems legit enough

read more carefully.

his pt is that a SC for micropmts would increase data demands on full nodes thus increasing centralization and thus exposure to gvt intervention and surveillance.  pretty devastating article against SC's:

Secondly we have the problem of block chain scaling.  If everything is going to be on ONE block chain, how will we store all this information in every p2p node?  So this contributes to the problem of an ongoing theme in the Bitcion world, that of Centralization.  This theme has many sub-motifs such as mass surveillance, monetary dominance, market rigging, and other factors to which average users are averse.  It seems this theme is rather virulent and some forces have a lot invested in maintaining programs to progress this goal and hide their agenda from the public.  The problem of moving value between different chain types was already solved by Cryptocoin exchanges, however Sidechains privileges a new group- the group that traces and tracks coin usage ie. surveillance interests.  In an cryptocoin exchange scenario, ownership qualities are destroyed the moment coins enter into an exchange.
Pages: « 1 ... 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 [892] 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 ... 1559 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!