Bitcoin Forum
November 19, 2017, 10:14:00 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: Will you support Gavin's new block size limit hard fork of 8MB by January 1, 2016 then doubling every 2 years?
1.  yes
2.  no

Pages: « 1 ... 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 [909] 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 ... 1558 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP.  (Read 2009503 times)
inca
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162


View Profile
November 30, 2014, 08:54:56 PM
 #18161

Cypherdoc: you could be right. If so this thread could be referenced in the monetary history books Smiley

Edit: One can imagine a future student scratching his head and frowning, "teacher what are all those pages about side chains?". Smiley
1511129640
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511129640

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511129640
Reply with quote  #2

1511129640
Report to moderator
1511129640
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511129640

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511129640
Reply with quote  #2

1511129640
Report to moderator
"In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but hard to stifle." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1511129640
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511129640

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511129640
Reply with quote  #2

1511129640
Report to moderator
1511129640
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511129640

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511129640
Reply with quote  #2

1511129640
Report to moderator
1511129640
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511129640

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511129640
Reply with quote  #2

1511129640
Report to moderator
brg444
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644

Bitcoin replaces central, not commercial, banks


View Profile
November 30, 2014, 09:01:18 PM
 #18162

Also finding gold in developed world, watch this tv series: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bering_Sea_Gold    It is possible to mine gold and just pick it up off the ground right in the USA.  Not easy exactly but its there..

There is an important human & capital investment required to obtain this gold.

This same investment could be put toward mining Bitcoins. "Not easy exactly but its there..."

"I believe this will be the ultimate fate of Bitcoin, to be the "high-powered money" that serves as a reserve currency for banks that issue their own digital cash." Hal Finney, Dec. 2010
Cortex7
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210


View Profile
November 30, 2014, 09:11:53 PM
 #18163

To put things in perspective, fiat has been ~x3 better store of value than Bitcoin over the last year.
You may now return to your delirium.

Nonsense, there are infinite perspectives.

Over the past 24 hours bitcoin has proven a better investment than fiat.

We can both pick any part of the fractal to agree with our own stance.

Fiat is a faith based money, anyone with half a brain knows fiat is not tenable in the long term. It's issuance is controlled by a few families who are FAR richer than us, their wealth wasn't accrued through labor.

You should study some history rather than browsing my little pony sites.
inca
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162


View Profile
November 30, 2014, 09:17:57 PM
 #18164

Also finding gold in developed world, watch this tv series: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bering_Sea_Gold    It is possible to mine gold and just pick it up off the ground right in the USA.  Not easy exactly but its there..

There is an important human & capital investment required to obtain this gold.

This same investment could be put toward mining Bitcoins. "Not easy exactly but its there..."

The difference is that with bitcoin those mining costs also secure the network allowing it to function as a secure transaction network.

With gold mining you are left with just the gold.
STT
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540



View Profile WWW
November 30, 2014, 09:19:33 PM
 #18165

Because of this accessibility gold is unlikely to ever be forgotten by the masses

This accessibility is getting increasingly rare though. You don't see people finding "pebbles" of gold laying around anymore.

Im not saying this in absolute terms.   I'm never going to 'find' some gold.   Im just saying it does happen that some easy gold is still out there.   Maybe that keys into why gold has been used in general populations for so long

In alaska its possible to pick up gold, I really dont think its worth moving there but in some places they have some gold under rocks.   Unlikely as that seems, Im going to call that out as a dynamic that there is this 'peasant' factor to gold that even the non elite could acquire it.     In zimbabwe its sometimes possible to dig for it, spend the entire day wrecking your muscles and you might get 30 dollars if lucky.  Not worth it but I think its worth noting
Dollars for contrast, the newest dollars are handed to the richest and largest companies possible such as primary dealers to newly created debt.  While some say gold is useless, this dollar systems seems a less inclusive system, possibly self destructive and debased


what's interesting about your theory is that it's inflationary in thinking.  in essence, what you're saying is that the money supply needs to grow to match the growth in population.  and that the new money added should be "free" as in being able to be picked up off the ground.

I think gold money supply grows slower then world economy and when usa was on gold standard it caused deflation.   It did not constrict growth of the economy but prices fell from this effect

The free part to gold is very minor, I realise the most gold mined is done by giant corporations and feeds into the largest forms of money.   Central banks then take it, store and its never used again (directly).  Lots of irony.   
I wouldnt argue that wealth must be given free or found randomly but fair distribution is a good plus to a working system.   Some possibility of getting some to masses is a big plus



                                         ▄
                 ▄▄████████▄▄         ▄▄██
 ▄▄           ▄██▀▀        ▀▀██▄    ▄███▀
 ▀███▄▄     ▄█▀                ▀█▄▄█████▀
  ▀██████▄▄█▀                ▄▄███████▀
   ▐█████████▄           ▄▄███████████
     ▀█████████▄▄      ▄█████████████
       ▀██████████    ███████████████
        ▐▀█████████  █████████████▀ ▐▌
        ▐▌ ▀▀██████ ▐███████████▀   ▐▌
        ▐▌      ▀██ ▐█████████▀     ▐▌
         █        ▀  ██████         █
         ▐█          ▐█████▄       █▌
          ▀█▄         ▀██████▄   ▄█▀
            ▀█▄         ▀█████▌▄█▀
              ▀██▄▄       ▀▄▄██▀
                ▀▀████████▀▀
T
....ANGEL TOKEN....


                                         ▄
                 ▄▄████████▄▄         ▄▄██
 ▄▄           ▄██▀▀        ▀▀██▄    ▄█▀█▀ 
 ▀█▀█▄▄     ▄█▀                ▀█▄▄█  ▄█▀ 
  ▀█  ▀▀█▄▄█▀                ▄▄██░   █▀   
   ▐▄▄  ░░░▀█▄           ▄▄█▀▀░░░   ▄█    
     ▀█▄ ░░░▒▒█▄▄      ▄██▒▒▒▒▒░    █     
       ▀▄▄ ░░▒▒▒▓█    ██▒▒▒▒▒▒░   ▄▄█     
        ▐▀█▄░░▒▒▓██  █▓▒▒▒▒▒▒░  ▄█▀ ▐▌    
        ▐▌ ▀▀█▒▓███░▐█▓▒▒▒▒░░ ▄█▀   ▐▌    
        ▐▌      ▀██ ▐█▓▓▒▒▄▄▄█▀     ▐▌    
         █        ▀  █▓█▀▀█         █     
         ▐█          ▐▄▓░ █▄       █▌     
          ▀█▄         ▀█▒░ ▀█▄   ▄█▀      
            ▀█▄         ▀█▄▄▄█▌▄█▀        
              ▀██▄▄       ▀▄▄██▀          
                 ▀▀████████▀▀             

impulse
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 151


View Profile
November 30, 2014, 09:26:44 PM
 #18166

we're fixing for a big move in the next 24 hours. 

i say UP.

What's the indicator you're seeing that's tipping you off?
Adrian-x
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372



View Profile
November 30, 2014, 09:27:41 PM
 #18167

Yea I always wonder what is the point to bitcoin difficulty.   Surely its not a self assembled mountain ready for the fresh ascent of miners every day in order to claim a prize.  It must make the protocol more secure right, some kind of offshoot benefit would be good to hear.   Not just we needed to stop it being easy to solve.   I mean if it werent for high diff we could process transactions in 1 minute or less instead maybe though I realise this makes cohesion of the chain harder

AFAIK difficulty is essential to regulate the emission schedule of newly minted coins.

This is precisely true.  (with some liberty taken on the definition of minted)

It also protects the ledger, if ever say the internet were to fail for a short duration or mining nodes where to become disconnected difficulty would prevent the chain growing too quickly and alow time for a real world fix. The economic majority would still have the longest chain,  but for eg. if 25% of mining power represented the majority the next difficulty could be delayed for up to 8 weeks, allowing other nodes to reconnect before the retargeting

Thank me in Bits 12MwnzxtprG2mHm3rKdgi7NmJKCypsMMQw
brg444
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644

Bitcoin replaces central, not commercial, banks


View Profile
November 30, 2014, 09:30:47 PM
 #18168

Because of this accessibility gold is unlikely to ever be forgotten by the masses

This accessibility is getting increasingly rare though. You don't see people finding "pebbles" of gold laying around anymore.

Im not saying this in absolute terms.   I'm never going to 'find' some gold.   Im just saying it does happen that some easy gold is still out there.   Maybe that keys into why gold has been used in general populations for so long

In alaska its possible to pick up gold, I really dont think its worth moving there but in some places they have some gold under rocks.   Unlikely as that seems, Im going to call that out as a dynamic that there is this 'peasant' factor to gold that even the non elite could acquire it.     In zimbabwe its sometimes possible to dig for it, spend the entire day wrecking your muscles and you might get 30 dollars if lucky.  Not worth it but I think its worth noting
Dollars for contrast, the newest dollars are handed to the richest and largest companies possible such as primary dealers to newly created debt.  While some say gold is useless, this dollar systems seems a less inclusive system, possibly self destructive and debased


what's interesting about your theory is that it's inflationary in thinking.  in essence, what you're saying is that the money supply needs to grow to match the growth in population.  and that the new money added should be "free" as in being able to be picked up off the ground.

I think gold money supply grows slower then world economy and when usa was on gold standard it caused deflation.   It did not constrict growth of the economy but prices fell from this effect

The free part to gold is very minor, I realise the most gold mined is done by giant corporations and feeds into the largest forms of money.   Central banks then take it, store and its never used again (directly).  Lots of irony.   
I wouldnt argue that wealth must be given free or found randomly but fair distribution is a good plus to a working system.   Some possibility of getting some to masses is a big plus

this "peasant" factor is effectively luck.

luck is not an ideal distribution model as far as I'm concerned.

of course no one is arguing that fiat is a better model but it seems to me the accessibility of Bitcoin, considering its digital form, defeats the "luck" factor that may favors some.  

"I believe this will be the ultimate fate of Bitcoin, to be the "high-powered money" that serves as a reserve currency for banks that issue their own digital cash." Hal Finney, Dec. 2010
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
November 30, 2014, 09:35:07 PM
 #18169

I realise the most gold mined is done by giant corporations and feeds into the largest forms of money.   Central banks then take it, store and its never used again (directly).  Lots of irony.   
I wouldnt argue that wealth must be given free or found randomly but fair distribution is a good plus to a working system.   Some possibility of getting some to masses is a big plus

again, perspectives are different.

CB's hold huge stores of gold in vaults.  masses can't get at any of that.

there's still 8M BTC's to be made.  get some while you can.
justusranvier
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400



View Profile WWW
November 30, 2014, 09:52:08 PM
 #18170

Nonsense, there are infinite perspectives.

Over the past 24 hours bitcoin has proven a better investment than fiat.

We can both pick any part of the fractal to agree with our own stance.

Fiat is a faith based money, anyone with half a brain knows fiat is not tenable in the long term. It's issuance is controlled by a few families who are FAR richer than us, their wealth wasn't accrued through labor.

You should study some history rather than browsing my little pony sites.
Over the past year, holding Bitcoin has provided a 0% risk of being confiscated via negative interest rates.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-11-29/financial-terrorists-road-krugman-and-rogoff-peddling-toxic-advice

The increase in purchasing power of fiat relative to Bitcoin over the last year has correspond with an increased amount of risk.

Whether or not that makes Bitcoin or fiat a "better" investment depends on one's preferences.

Adrian-x
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372



View Profile
November 30, 2014, 09:52:29 PM
 #18171

I realise the most gold mined is done by giant corporations and feeds into the largest forms of money.   Central banks then take it, store and its never used again (directly).  Lots of irony.   
I wouldnt argue that wealth must be given free or found randomly but fair distribution is a good plus to a working system.   Some possibility of getting some to masses is a big plus

again, perspectives are different.

CB's hold huge stores of gold in vaults.  masses can't get at any of that.

there's still 8M BTC's to be made.  get some while you can.
They were very easy to find just 3 years ago, you just had to look and you could find about 1 BTC a day you just had to have basic computer skills and a couple of old computers the driving factor was the inclination to look. Now it's a lot harder but people are still almost giving them away.

 Smiley Get some while you can.

Thank me in Bits 12MwnzxtprG2mHm3rKdgi7NmJKCypsMMQw
NotLambchop
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378


View Profile
November 30, 2014, 10:17:53 PM
 #18172

Nonsense, there are infinite perspectives.

Over the past 24 hours bitcoin has proven a better investment than fiat.

We can both pick any part of the fractal to agree with our own stance.

Fiat is a faith based money, anyone with half a brain knows fiat is not tenable in the long term. It's issuance is controlled by a few families who are FAR richer than us, their wealth wasn't accrued through labor.

You should study some history rather than browsing my little pony sites.
Over the past year, holding Bitcoin has provided a 0% risk of being confiscated via negative interest rates.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-11-29/financial-terrorists-road-krugman-and-rogoff-peddling-toxic-advice

The increase in purchasing power of fiat relative to Bitcoin over the last year has correspond with an increased amount of risk.

Whether or not that makes Bitcoin or fiat a "better" investment depends on one's preferences.

@Cortex7:
Over the past year, Bitcoin has proven itself to be a horrendous store of value, losing ~65% of its buying power. 
Your bit about "a few families [controlling fiat]" makes it clear that, with your understanding of economics, all would benefit if you spent your idle time "browsing my little pony sites" instead of posting your ignorant, paranoid drivel in adult fora.

@justusranvier:  There was no "increase in purchasing power of fiat" over the past year.  My dollar doesn't buy any more than it did one year ago.
There was a decrease in Bitcoin's buying power, tho.  ~65%.  Nice going.
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050



View Profile
November 30, 2014, 10:19:45 PM
 #18173

@NotLambchop:

 Grin

Forgive my petulance and oft-times, I fear, ill-founded criticisms, and forgive me that I have, by this time, made your eyes and head ache with my long letter. But I cannot forgo hastily the pleasure and pride of thus conversing with you.
brg444
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644

Bitcoin replaces central, not commercial, banks


View Profile
November 30, 2014, 10:20:22 PM
 #18174

Nonsense, there are infinite perspectives.

Over the past 24 hours bitcoin has proven a better investment than fiat.

We can both pick any part of the fractal to agree with our own stance.

Fiat is a faith based money, anyone with half a brain knows fiat is not tenable in the long term. It's issuance is controlled by a few families who are FAR richer than us, their wealth wasn't accrued through labor.

You should study some history rather than browsing my little pony sites.
Over the past year, holding Bitcoin has provided a 0% risk of being confiscated via negative interest rates.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-11-29/financial-terrorists-road-krugman-and-rogoff-peddling-toxic-advice

The increase in purchasing power of fiat relative to Bitcoin over the last year has correspond with an increased amount of risk.

Whether or not that makes Bitcoin or fiat a "better" investment depends on one's preferences.

@Cortex7:
Over the past year, Bitcoin has proven itself to be a horrendous store of value, losing ~65% of its buying power. 
Your bit about "a few families [controlling fiat]" makes it clear that, with your understanding of economics, all would benefit if you spent your idle time "browsing my little pony sites" instead of posting your ignorant, paranoid drivel in adult fora.

@justusranvier:  There was no "increase in purchasing power of fiat" over the past year.  My dollar doesn't buy any more than it did one year ago.
There was a decrease in Bitcoin's buying power, tho.  ~65%.  Nice going.

subjective timeframe is subjective

"I believe this will be the ultimate fate of Bitcoin, to be the "high-powered money" that serves as a reserve currency for banks that issue their own digital cash." Hal Finney, Dec. 2010
NotLambchop
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378


View Profile
November 30, 2014, 10:28:53 PM
 #18175

^There is no such thing as a "subjective timeframe."  In logic nerd terms, what you maked thar is an ill-formed statement.

If you wish to suggest the timeframe is random, you're wrong.  Nothing random about choosing a year when discussing yearly inflation.
brg444
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644

Bitcoin replaces central, not commercial, banks


View Profile
November 30, 2014, 10:36:50 PM
 #18176

^There is no such thing as a "subjective timeframe."  In logic nerd terms, what you maked thar is an ill-formed statement.

If you wish to suggest the timeframe is random, you're wrong.  Nothing random about choosing a year when discussing yearly inflation.

Well how about I suggest discussing historical inflation.

"I believe this will be the ultimate fate of Bitcoin, to be the "high-powered money" that serves as a reserve currency for banks that issue their own digital cash." Hal Finney, Dec. 2010
NotLambchop
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378


View Profile
November 30, 2014, 10:48:19 PM
 #18177

You can suggest it, though that's not what is being currently discussed.  Further, Bitcoin's lifespan is so laughably short, "historical" was probably not the word you were looking for Undecided
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
November 30, 2014, 11:17:47 PM
 #18178

nice gap down, baby.

Gold collapsing.  Bitcoin UP:

brg444
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644

Bitcoin replaces central, not commercial, banks


View Profile
November 30, 2014, 11:18:54 PM
 #18179

You can suggest it, though that's not what is being currently discussed.  Further, Bitcoin's lifespan is so laughably short, "historical" was probably not the word you were looking for Undecided

And a year is even more short.

Bottom line is the purchasing power of Bitcoin over USD has considerably increased over its lifetime.


Maybe you'd like to read gain what Cortex posted :

Nonsense, there are infinite perspectives.

Over the past 24 hours bitcoin has proven a better investment than fiat.

We can both pick any part of the fractal to agree with our own stance.

Your perspective is supported by a laughably short sample of time in the context of store of value.

"I believe this will be the ultimate fate of Bitcoin, to be the "high-powered money" that serves as a reserve currency for banks that issue their own digital cash." Hal Finney, Dec. 2010
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile
November 30, 2014, 11:26:21 PM
 #18180

remember the VIX chart i posted on Friday?  it looks like we're due for a new bit of volatility in equity markets.  i also would suggest that a rising USD, which is continuing tonite, is BAD for stocks in the long run.  money is debt and debt is money.  since most stock bulls are fueled by debt, a rising USD severely limits returns in stocks.  a lot of factors are coming into convergence right about now which could propel Bitcoin upwards:

Pages: « 1 ... 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 [909] 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 ... 1558 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!