I don’t remember exactly, but throughout history, one of this pair failed to qualify for the World Cup final once (I think Argentina, but I could be wrong). There is always a ticket for these two teams because the level of the other opponents is low and even if someone has a strong team (like sometimes Uruguay/Paraguay) there will still be enough tickets for everyone. But the game has another equally important background - it is important for Brazil to show that South America still “belongs” to them despite the achievements of Argentina in recent years.
I know and I am certainly one of those guys who thinks that it is impossible for Brazil or Argentina to not qualify. Now there is no need to talk about Argentina as they are fine with their 15 points, but this situation could be out of control for Brazil very soon. Everyone thinks it is no issue because there are so many more games to go, but out of a sudden Brazil plays against Chile or Bolivia and what was supposed to be an easy game for them with a couple of beautiful goals in now a game that feels like a game in the knockout rounds. They shouldn't take this lightly anymore, it's getting complicated now. Well, if we assume that Brazil cannot beat Chile and Bolivia, then they probably do not deserve a place in the final part of the World Cup and there is no tragedy here. But there are really still many games ahead - 12 and Brazil has a huge number of opportunities to both improve its position and simply maintain its 6th place, which gives a direct ticket to the World Cup. In general, this is a rather funny competition: 10 participants, 6 of whom receive a direct ticket and another one gets into the play-offs, that is, out of 10 participants, 7 teams can get to the World Cup at once. Incredibly difficult tournament!  |
|
|
|
И как бы что тут удивительного если разговор идет про фиат?
В смысле, про фиат? Там же, насколько я понимаю, выведены были именно криптовалюты на биржу, и любопытно в этом то, что пусть и достаточно очевидные транзакции, но были отслежены и трансгранично было решено, что средства должны быть отправлены в Казахстан до решения суда. В чём они потом переводились в Казахстан, не знаю, но это пока что вторично. Любопытно, как в принципе будут подобные вопросы решаться.  Ну в прямом смысле: схемы включают не только перекачивание средств в офшоры, но и вывод их за пределы страны посредством приобретения криптовалюты.
Видите, речь идет о выводе средств за пределы страны и под средствами тут явно подразумеваются тенге. Если бы на территории Казахстана за крипту покупалось/продавалось что-то такое же виртуальное (хоть аккаунты/золото в компьютерных играх) то и дело бы до этого никому не было. А тут вся схема основана ради вывода средств, что естетсвенно регуляторов не устраивает. Сегодня СМИ отслеживают названные судебные процессы. Пишут о линии защиты подсудимых: серверы обменных пунктов находятся на территории других государств, криптовалюта хранится тоже за пределами РК, но за операции с тенге дома подсудимые налоги платят. В чем незаконность действий?
Из разъяснений Битанова следовало: в работе на нелегальных площадках. Опять фиат. И даже тот фиат за который налоги платят, но индульгенцию это на остальные действия не дает, так как где фиат там и обширное регулирование. |
|
|
|
I know that everybody still doesn't fear that Brazil could get into trouble in this qualification, but when you look at what they have achieved so far in the group, we are talking about a win rate of 40% with 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses. This game against Argentina will obviously be very hard for them and Argentina doesn't want to lose it either and instead reclaim their supremacy in South America. A win against Brazil would underscore that. But then Brazil would have 3 losses already and could drop further in the table.
I don’t remember exactly, but throughout history, one of this pair failed to qualify for the World Cup final once (I think Argentina, but I could be wrong). There is always a ticket for these two teams because the level of the other opponents is low and even if someone has a strong team (like sometimes Uruguay/Paraguay) there will still be enough tickets for everyone. But the game has another equally important background - it is important for Brazil to show that South America still “belongs” to them despite the achievements of Argentina in recent years. |
|
|
|
If we talk about maximizing earnings, then probably for Mbappe even last summer there was an option to move to Saudi Arabia, which would have been more profitable from a financial point of view. Next summer, when Mbappe becomes a free agent, he will be able to do this on even more favorable terms, but as we have seen so far, he is interested not only in money but also in sporting achievements, I hope he does not break down until he moves to a normal club (PSG is also a normal club , but League 1 is a weak championship).
Mbappe is still a young player. At the moment, he is not interested in going to Saudi Arabia. In the previous transfer window, the Saudi Arabian club made Mbappe an incredible offer of around $1 billion for 1 year. Although it was not an official offer. However, Mbappe has shown no interest. If Mbappe leaves PSG, he will go to a La Liga or Premier League club. Mbappe now wants to win the Champions League title. Perhaps he will prefer to go to Real Madrid. I think Mbappe will choose a team between Arsenal, Liverpool or Madrid. Young? In a month he will be 25 years old. This is far from young for professional sports. He literally has 5 years left when he can progress/not lose level, then after 30 years he will either try to stay close to the peak or gradually lose level. And this is in the best case, many players abruptly lose/end their careers at 32-33 years old due to injuries or simply because of physiology (not everyone is as gifted as Ibrahimovic and Ronaldo, and not everyone is such a fan of a healthy lifestyle that allows them to prolong their years sports). He literally has 5 years to shine in Real Madrid, and then he will be “in doubt”, Real Madrid does not look at past merits. |
|
|
|
There are only 8 days left for the really important match between Galatasaray and Manchester United in Turkey. Currently one of the bookmakers I saw is showing the odds like 2.50 to 2.60. Galatasaray are favoured to win the match by a slight gap of odds now. This points out how tense this match could be already. The latest match between them was just fantastic. Galatasaray performed amazingly despite playing in Old Trafford and got a legendary win for themselves which was important for their future in the group as well. Manchester United haven't changed much when it comes to performance since then. A golden opportunity is on the table waiting to be taken by Galatasaray now. Galatasaray is in a very good position before this game, as even a draw will suit them, but for United, only a win will be an acceptable result. Theoretically, Galatasaray can play “for a draw”, forcing United to open up and give chances to score on counterattacks, on the other hand, United are so bad in defense that it might be reasonable to immediately play as number one and solve the issue of reaching the 1/8 right away in this game (hardly Copenhagen will win against Bayern). |
|
|
|
A few days ago, I posed a question in this forum, wondering if, as someone who engages in gambling, you've ever considered thought of giving back to the community if you ever had a successful gambling run. I carefully went through all the responses, maintaining keen interest and taking note of each perspective. Another aspect of the inquiry involves whether you would be willing to participate in crowdfunding for a fellow gambler who reaches out to the public through social media seeking financial support after they gambled with the funds meant for an important project like, investment, school fees, rent, marriage or any other thing. And what would you say to those who go ahead to donate to these gamblers out of a sense of empathy?
I would say that sponsoring irresponsible behavior does not lead to anything good. There must be unpleasant consequences for wrong actions, it hurts but it works. If a person does not experience anything negative after doing something wrong (because someone makes up for all the losses in his place), then this only leads to the fact that he continues to behave irresponsibly. This is not higher mathematics, but simple life experience that everyone should understand by the age of 7-8 haha. |
|
|
|
Finally Italy success qualified to UEFA Euro 2024 in Germany after getting one points against Ukraine although on Group C qualifier current standing have the same points but Italy manage head to head and goals difference than Ukraine. Its most crucial for the winner of UEFA Euro 2020 Italy have on bad position in qualifier round but unfortunately success get on place for qualifying to Euro 2024. So far the national teams have been qualified to Euro 2024 and still have fewest group still one match left. - Germany as host
- Spain
- Scotland
- France
- England
- Italy
- Turkey
- Albania
- Czechia
- Belgium
- Austria
- Hungary
- Serbia
- Denmark
- Slovenia
- Romania
- Switzerland
- Portugal
- Slovakia
If miss national teams who have settle placed in Euro 2024 you can pick it below in my postQuite a slippery result for Italy (one goal could have buried them) and I don’t think the national team’s fans are happy with Spalletti’s performance. In fact, all the teams that qualified are known except for Group D, where Wales has a theoretical chance to overtake Croatia, but for this, Wales must beat Turkey, and Croatia cannot beat Armenia at home. I would give no more than 5% for such an event. |
|
|
|
Saturday star matches: 1. Manchester City Vs Arsenal 2. Newcastle Vs Chelsea
I do not understand why I always find international breaks boring such that I do not even watch the matches. Whenever there's break, I always pray for the coming weeks to approach in order to witness league weeks. As we are about to witness another exciting EPL week, let's hear your stake about the above matches.
I think that Chelsea will be able to win Newcastle since Chelsea performance is advancing positively especially after the draw with Manchester City. In the other hand, majority of Newcastle players are still injured.
Manchester City might not be able to win Liverpool, yes I said so.
It seems to me on the contrary, Chelsea’s streak of success should end even despite the injuries to Newcastle players. Although, if we think differently: Chelsea is still in 10th place and this is clearly not where this club should be. But I still think that a double chance bet on Newcastle will be good. As for the City - Liverpool game, unfortunately, international games make this meeting very inconvenient for Liverpool - the players must return from the national teams and then go to Manchester. I don't think City will lose. |
|
|
|
Gavi's injury is trending and I see a lot of sports media reporting about it. I know it is a big loss for Gavi and Barcelona, but Barcelona should not be affected by the injury of one of its important midfielders this season. Barcelona will have an equally good line up with Gavi or without him as long as De Jong, Pedri and Gundogan are fine, but if these three players are absent then I believe Barcelona are in trouble.
De Jong reportedly will return soon and will be available for the match against Rayo Vallecano. I'm happy with the news, but I hope Xavi doesn't insist on playing De Jong if he hasn't fully recovered and got a game. Pedri, Ilkay Gundogan and Fermin Lopez can be played as midfielders, but I think Xavi will call up several other midfielders from Barcelona B to cover the lack of players.
Gavi is a first-team player, so his absence will in any case affect the club. Barcelona cannot play the whole season with 11 players, they need rotation and when the main player drops out it affects all plans. That is why Barcelona is now looking for options to replace him (and by the way, as always, they are doing this in tight financial conditions). |
|
|
|
Лиха беда начало! Вот из Казахстана поступают новости: там Костанайский департамент экономических расследований в рамках одного из судебных разбирательств по незаконным операциям с криптовалютой сумел обосновать перевод в Казахстан с биржи в Эстонии выведенные туда средства. Сейчас эти средства находятся под арестом до вынесения судом своего решения. Понятно, что пока что два криптовалютых дела в судах Костаная в настоящий момент это капля в море, но с чего-то начинать нужно ведь. Вот какая-то первая практика из Костаная, обучение 14 сотрудников правоохранительных органов Украины. Во что выльется, посмотрим. Да вроде ничего интересного - кого сумели физически схватить, того и смогли сделать виноватым. И как бы что тут удивительного если разговор идет про фиат? По факту в новости "крипту" можно заменить на что угодно - нефть/какао-бобы/драгметаллы/и т.д. и ничего не поменяется. То что биржи сотрудничают с мусорами правоохранителями тоже не новость. Думать надо прежде чем на такие помойки активы заводить: На лицензированной бирже клиент должен зарегистрироваться, пройти не только идентификацию, но и проверку личного цифрового кошелька, истории транзакций на признаки нарушения требований законодательства о противодействии легализации (отмыванию) доходов. Эх, так и тянет куда-нибудь влезть чтобы доказывать что не верблюд |
|
|
|
I agree with you and it seems that Real has taken exactly this position - as follows from the leaks, Real is not taking the initiative in negotiations with Mbappe and is waiting for him to make an offer. It's quite funny when a club waits for an offer from a player (and not vice versa), but it is quite logical after what Mbappe did in the previous round of negotiations and given that Mbappe is now in a worse position. Real is doing the smart thing in this game for a lot of money.
If Kylian Mbappe signs a new contract extension that'll keep him at the Paris Saint Germaine beyond next summer, it'll be very obvious that his decisions as a player is majorly influenced by financial rewards and packages. He had an agreement sometime in 2021 to join Real Madrid but made a last minute decision to extend his contract with Paris Saint Germaine because the club's president offered a more lucrative deal than what Real Madrid tabled but recently he's made some statements that suggests he wants to leave the club and join the Real Madrid so if he decides to extend his contract with PSG, I think it'll be majorly because of what he stands to gain financially If we talk about maximizing earnings, then probably for Mbappe even last summer there was an option to move to Saudi Arabia, which would have been more profitable from a financial point of view. Next summer, when Mbappe becomes a free agent, he will be able to do this on even more favorable terms, but as we have seen so far, he is interested not only in money but also in sporting achievements, I hope he does not break down until he moves to a normal club (PSG is also a normal club , but League 1 is a weak championship). |
|
|
|
Ronaldo's initial contract was signed sometime in mid-2022, and I guess it runs till the beginning of 2025? But then a few weeks back there were reports that he was seeking to extend the contract till 2027. Al Nassr is so far happy with his performance (although there was some hesitancy after he struggled in the initial few matches last year). And apart from this, the management in Saudi Professional League are also happy, as they have noticed the sharp increase in global audience as a result of Ronaldo's entry. Now a lot of heavyweights have joined the Saudi Professional League, such as Benzema, Mitrović, Mané and N'Golo Kanté. But then it was Ronaldo who started all of this in 2022.
It seems Ronaldo said that he was going to end his career at Al-Nassr, so it is logical that he wants to extend his contract with the club. Although his self-confidence is noteworthy: in 2027 he will be 42 years old  Given the pace at which the Saudi League is developing, it can be assumed that by then the level of competition will be much higher than now, so the desire to play at the top level at 42 years old deserves respect. |
|
|
|
I think this is true. Guardiola constantly mocks his achievements in the Champions League, some think that this is politeness and a good sense of humor, but in fact it is a clear realization that if we think globally, then Guardiola is a loser in the Champions League. He always had the best teams (perhaps even the best in history) but at the same time he won the Champions League only 3 times. Of course, he wants to get more titles in order to write his name in history more solidly.
Even of Pep Guardiola decides to quit coaching today, he'll still be regarded as one of the best managers in the history of club football because of his great achievements since he started managing the first team of Barcelona after his years as the coach of the La Nadia(Barcelona's youth team) ~ This is debatable. Just like when the driver with the best car wins all the time. It is difficult to understand how important exactly his contribution to the victory is. Guardiola coached the three best teams and he managed to buy players for these teams for more than 2 billion dollars (he is the first in this indicator). This looks extremely dubious from the point of view of “legendary” or seriousness of achievements. In my country they say about people like him that he has money like a fool has candy wrappers. And as you understand, what you can buy for money costs nothing. |
|
|
|
Именно так, 200%. Я бы ещё сказал что будут признавать асиками и пиздить уничтожать и другое оборудование (ну мало ли что там проверяющим приглянулось), но с учётом того что Абхазия это такая же помойка как днр/лнр (только чуть постарше) есть большие сомнения что там вообще что-то такое имеется (ЦОД, сервера и подобное) под контролем у обычных частников. В папуасиях всегда есть нерешаемая проблема: те, у кого есть что грабить, быстро заканчиваются.
у них может и не имеется, а приезжие бизнесмены вполне могли привезти под обещания дешевой/блатной розетки. "брат, ты мне брат, я те как брату братский подгон сделаю, брат, только денег неси брат." тут даже не столько в папуасии наверное дело, а в менталитете местном. "хотите что-то задекларировать? в англию ни ногой"(с)Snatch. Ну если эти приезжие такие тупые что поехали в непонятную дыру с непонятным (а на самом деле очень понятным) правовым статусом, то и поделом. Про тамошний менталитет наслышан. У местных такая "травма" от войны тридцатилетней давности, что они ближайший век не планируют работать, а будут только стенать про "разруху из-за войны". ~
У населения выбор платить по рублю на киловатт и латать что ломается или платить по 2 с половиной, но привлечь инвесторов из других стран и построить новые энергосети.
В реалиях их доходов ты бы за какой вариант проголосовал?
Я бы за второй. Как-то не вижу выбора между "иметь дерьмовую услугу/товар за рубль или хорошую за два". |
|
|
|
These are just rumors and far from reality. Saudi Arabia is not in Europe and they are plating in Asia. Also, teams like Al Nassr and Al Hilal or other Saudi teams are playing in the AFC Champions League. I think it's not even fair to have a team like Nassr in UEFA just because they spend lots of money on famous players. This way any team can be in UEFA by spending money.
But let's be real, such news is just a fantasy. Keep dreaming. This is like a total joke, and folks are starting to wonder if you can just "become" a European Club by throwing in enough money. The Saudi league isn't too bad. It's on the rise with better and better standards. Sure, they're putting resources into getting the best players, and there's quality for sure, but there's no chance Saudi Arabia is getting into UEFA. Why do you think that some club (not necessarily Al-Nasr) cannot play in the European Champions League using the wild card system? After the pile of crap that FIFA and UEFA did, do you think that they are incapable of coming up with something good? I think Al-Nasr's participation in the European Champions League would obviously be a more interesting and significant event than any Victoria or Red Star. Moreover, due to the change in the format of the Champions League, it would be painless for everyone since the number of places for European clubs would not decrease. |
|
|
|
~
Manchester City wants to achieve what Real Madrid has achieved, but I am sure that Guardiola will repeat on every press conference that it is impossible. But his goal is to win the Champions League a few more times.
I think this is true. Guardiola constantly mocks his achievements in the Champions League, some think that this is politeness and a good sense of humor, but in fact it is a clear realization that if we think globally, then Guardiola is a loser in the Champions League. He always had the best teams (perhaps even the best in history) but at the same time he won the Champions League only 3 times. Of course, he wants to get more titles in order to write his name in history more solidly. |
|
|
|
If Mbappé does decide to stay in PSG I’m done. This guy is really looking for money nothing else. That is if he stays in PSG. At this point, I don't think Real Madrid should actually be interested in him, to be honest. Real Madrid really wanted him and Real Madrid also offered 200 million. But he only used the name of Real Madrid to get more money out of PSG. He was never coming to Real Madrid. So now Real Madrid should say that if you want to play in Real Madrid, you as any other player. Now you are not a priority for Real Madrid because now you want to play with Vini Junior and Jude Bellingham. This could be his team, but now it is their team. If he wants to join Real Madrid on a regular wage, he can join. Otherwise, he can keep playing in PSG. Really, that’s what Real Madrid should tell him.
I agree with you and it seems that Real has taken exactly this position - as follows from the leaks, Real is not taking the initiative in negotiations with Mbappe and is waiting for him to make an offer. It's quite funny when a club waits for an offer from a player (and not vice versa), but it is quite logical after what Mbappe did in the previous round of negotiations and given that Mbappe is now in a worse position. Real is doing the smart thing in this game for a lot of money. |
|
|
|
For the upcoming games of Real Madrid, Barcelona and Atletico Madrid I can say that I'm confident about the first and last one to win. However I'm not confident about Barcelona as much as them in their next game. Because it is an away game against Vallecano. Barcelona lost to them 3 times and got a draw in their last 4 head-to-head games in the La Liga. Vallecano are holding a psychological advantage in hand because of that. In addition to that Real Madrid couldn't do better than drawing with Vallecano not long ago as well. Combining all of this it seems a little risky to bet on Barcelona here.  Barcelona have lost Gavi, possibly until the end of the season, and Real have lost Vinnie and Camavinga (presumably before the new year) so this will make further changes to the teams' chances. In general, it seems to me that after a break on international games it is better either not to bet at all or to bet on the underdogs. International games are always played against top clubs. |
|
|
|
NO
If someone say yes it means they're either not a regular gambler or they're lying, not a regular gambler is someone who gamble mostly when there's an interesting promotion or quit after making money, which is understandable and that's fine.
In general, I agree, but there are many exceptions - for example, someone who once won the jackpot and after that did not increase the size of his bet and the duration of the sessions. He can remain in the black for a very long time. And there are also professional bonus hunters, seekers of guaranteed bets, vulnerabilities, etc. They are also in the black, although this is a “special” type of gambling. In conclusion, I don't feel that bad while gambling and losing while enjoying. So Yes again I'm in profit.
Dude, do you even understand what you're saying? you're talk like you're in lose, then suddenly say you're in profit lol. It seems to me that he meant that he was satisfied with a small loss of money for the pleasure he received. A typical situation is when both the buyer and the seller believe that they have made a good deal. |
|
|
|
That match is going to be the strongest match on this weekend, for two champion to meet each other is actually going to be a tough one because the both team will put in all possible efforts to win the match but however considering there meetings all the times Manchester City has always make more wins than Liverpool.
Liverpool are far ahead of Manchester check it again if am not mistaken Liverpool got 15 wins while Manchester City got 10 wins and draw 12 in there history of meeting. The match will be talk of the weekend, the teams are known for their best performance, this is an opportunity for the both team to secure the top of the table, and also an opportunity for Arsenal to top the table only if they win against Brentford and Manchester City and Liverpool draw, I am much confidence that this match will result to draw, Manchester city are one point ahead of Liverpool, the both team will try there best to win but unfortunately is only that will win. Do you really believe that games from 10 years ago have any meaning? If this were so, City would never have risen from the bottom. As for the game, City will have some unfair advantage, Klopp has already said this - the game will take place on Saturday afternoon and the away team has significantly less time to get their affairs in order after international games which disrupt all preparation schedules. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
