Ваша ссылка не реферальная, так зачем прятать адрес основного сайта? Почему просто не опубликовать его в нормальном виде? Тем более, ссылка не длинная https://www.web5project.io Зачем прятать ссылку за какими-то сервисами? UPD А если реферальная, то такие ссылки на форуме не приветствуются, тем более завуалированные с помощью сторонних сервисов. Прочтите инфо по поводу рефссылок Про реф. ссылки |
|
|
|
Why are many governments not regulating cryptocurrency?
What makes you think that many governments don't regulate cryptocurrencies? Read the report https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/llglrd/2021687419/2021687419.pdf. It says that more than 100 countries are already regulating cryptocurrencies, developing legislative and tax frameworks. Cryptocurrency regulation has come a long way in the last 3-4 years because this cryptosphere is growing a lot, the adoption is growing, crypto capitalization is growing. The proliferation of regulation is legitimate, amidst all this development. In 7-10 years, regulation will reach even greater heights. Yes, what happens is that it's a slow process, because there are many discussions before the projects are elaborated and passed by the legislative houses. Furthermore, those bureaucrats have a lot of more important matters to discuss in their respective countries, so crypto usually stays in second plan, also due to the fact just a small percentage of the population has adopted it. If most people in the world were using crypto I guess those projects would have much more attention from politicians and would be immediately implemented on every countries. Many people and governments are skeptical of anything new and unexplored. Cryptocurrencies have always evolved from total rejection to total acceptance. First people talk bad about cryptocurrency, and then a few years later they become cryptoinvestors. Everyone goes through this path, investors, banks, companies, funds, governments, etc. Governments are initially skeptical of cryptocurrencies, seeing them as something that is used in illegal transactions, but as they get better, this opinion changes and so do the laws regarding cryptocurrencies. |
|
|
|
It may take at least as many years for blockchain games to be fully adopted as bitcoin before these tokens have high value and go beyond trivial speculation. The main problem with such games is that investors are more likely to pull liquidity from some game than they are providers. As a result, the price of a token collapses as sales prevail over purchases. In the next 5-8 years, this industry may evolve a lot and there will be some foundations and benchmarks, but for now, all these blockchain games are not much different from each other, as they all depreciate equally fast over time and quickly lose interest among players.
The tokens will probably not be used like that. Many people imagine games where tens of thousands of people, even millions of people play, and then there is a in game currency that is a token, and it will be amazing thanks to that, but as long as it has financial value the games will not be played for being games, it will be played for money and that will always ruin the economy of it as well. Do not imagine some world of warcraft scenario where you will make a lot of money from just gamers, it is not going to happen. If you offer even 3 dollars a day for playing, that 90 dollars is a great amount for many people around the world, which is why it is such a hard concept. Then projects and ecosystems should create a system that will encourage players not to withdraw all liquidity from games, or developers should write smart contracts that will block part of the earnings within the game economy, thereby protecting the token price from a rapid collapse. Also, minting and token burning systems should be designed more carefully. Often game projects face the problem that burning is quite slow and game tokens become inflationary. |
|
|
|
|
As long as this token is only traded on one Pancakeswap, it will never gain much popularity or reach. What's the point of mining a token that's hard to sell and doesn't have enough liquidity? In the crypto sphere, the uniqueness of the consensus model alone is not enough. Mining is a means of making money, but in this case we can't talk about any earnings, because the coin is not supported by anyone or anywhere and has no strong investors.
|
|
|
|
|
It is too early to say that ETC will continue to increase the hash rate, which means the demand for the blockchain space will still be at a high level and the price of ETC will tend towards ATH. Perhaps this is just a temporary measure to redistribute the capacity released by the recent ETH merger. If a full-fledged hardfork happens and a POW chain of ETH is formed, which gets strong support from developers, exchanges and community, then all free capacities can be directed there and ETC will be forgotten again.
|
|
|
|
Why are many governments not regulating cryptocurrency?
What makes you think that many governments don't regulate cryptocurrencies? Read the report https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/llglrd/2021687419/2021687419.pdf. It says that more than 100 countries are already regulating cryptocurrencies, developing legislative and tax frameworks. Cryptocurrency regulation has come a long way in the last 3-4 years because this cryptosphere is growing a lot, the adoption is growing, crypto capitalization is growing. The proliferation of regulation is legitimate, amidst all this development. In 7-10 years, regulation will reach even greater heights. |
|
|
|
I don't get why Vitalik and team decided to push the PoS upgrade when they knew about the risks of centralization. It was nothing but a move to enrich themselves and the whales, while leaving the little guy out of the system. The future of PoS cryptocurrencies looks dark, so our only hope lies with Bitcoin as a PoW cryptocurrency that puts decentralization/censorship-resistance above all else. Who knows if 99.9% of the coins switch to PoS while only Bitcoin remains with PoW consensus? Just my thoughts  Currently more and more coins are using PoS. PoW is already becoming a very unpopular and persecuted consensus. Various governments oppose PoW, make various dubious arguments in favor of PoS, even trying to transfer bitcoin to PoS. This trend has been rapidly gaining momentum since last year. If you take the crypto industry 8-10 years ago, there many popular cryptocurrencies were on PoW, and now on PoS. Cryptocurrencies have long been moving toward regulation and centralization. |
|
|
|
Hello I am looking for a reputable crypto exchange with good 24 hr. volume/trading and a fairly reasonably priced or free listing. If you have any with some of their listing prices or fees please list them here below. Thanks again.
I doubt that reputable exchanges with good volume provide cheap or free listing of crypto projects. As it happens, if project has too small budget and they can not afford listing on big exchanges with good volume, then they have only option of little-known exchanges, where all trades volume is barely over 50-100 bitcoins. At such exchangers there are always a huge number of various little-known projects, but it is unlikely that such exchanges can be called authoritative. Authoritative exchange and free listing, as it seems to me, are incompatible concepts from different worlds. |
|
|
|
|
In fact, Optimism, MetisDAO, Lido are great long-term investments. These areas are growing very strongly and are gaining support from many services. Although these tokens grew in the last few months, but if Lido drops below $1, it will be a good opportunity to add this asset to your portfolio. You can also consider such projects as Loopring, Polygon, Astar, Immutable, Scale, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
Some dubious project offering me to buy tokens on Uniswap, via ETH swap. Tokenomics implies 80% of the entire supply in the Uniswap pool. There are no advisors, investors, etc. That is, almost all the supply will be concentrated on one exchange. What are the prospects of development of the project with such tokenomics, which keeps almost all its proposal in pool of one exchange and offers there to buy tokens in unlimited quantities? In my opinion, almost none. There are a lot of such projects that appear on DEX exchanges, but they die very quickly.
|
|
|
|
Blockchain technology has come a long way since those early days of Bitcoin, and it is clear that this blockchain technology is here to stay. Blockchain technology is about more than digital currency, of course. It is being used for so many different things, including facilitating blockchain-based gaming platforms.
In the coming years, I expect to see plenty of exciting developments in blockchain gaming. Blockchain gaming is already starting to build momentum, but I believe that in the coming years it will be more mainstream. As blockchain platform becomes more popular, and as more companies explore their potential, I expect that this innovation will continue, and it could potentially revolutionize the gaming industry along the way. But as with any emerging technology, until proven otherwise, there will always be naysayers.
It may take at least as many years for blockchain games to be fully adopted as bitcoin before these tokens have high value and go beyond trivial speculation. The main problem with such games is that investors are more likely to pull liquidity from some game than they are providers. As a result, the price of a token collapses as sales prevail over purchases. In the next 5-8 years, this industry may evolve a lot and there will be some foundations and benchmarks, but for now, all these blockchain games are not much different from each other, as they all depreciate equally fast over time and quickly lose interest among players. |
|
|
|
If you check the name itself testnet, it is for the purpose of testing whether or not you will use different Blockchain/network with your coin because in Ethereum there are different testnet network, like Ropsten. It is before deploying the actual chain or the coins itself.
You can never know whether a project would pay you, since it will always be a risk to the bounty hunters if they will believe in the project and hold the coin or something. Just choose something that you believe in.
The occupation of testnets is risky. The fact is that they often yield nothing, especially those that are free and do not require any real liquidity. 95% of such testnets turn out to be a waste of time. Occupations of testnets absolutely do not guarantee future rewards, this is exactly the main risk. Those testnets, which require real liquidity, adding real altcoins turn out to be solvent most of the time, but such testnets do not gather a large audience, because not everyone is ready to spend their altcoins in some test events without any guarantees. |
|
|
|
I can't mine ETH or any other coins right now but I do find a way that might look good but bad to many, I can mine a meme coin called Baby Doge, I can get 609,000,000 of this token per day but that's because the max supply of the project is enormous, what do you think about Baby Doge, some time back there are a lot of noise about this project, any believer here?
If you think that the number of coins generated per day is considered some kind of good sign, that's not really true. Projects with a large circulating supply are the hardest to grow unless they have some kind of additional support from influencers or large holders. These coins are highly inflationary, so there isn't much value in having a lot of them. It's more of a psychological factor than an economic one. There are times when some investors choose to PoS mine coins that are the cheapest. They think there will be more rewards that way, but they don't consider other factors where that cheapness starts to cost them a lot and they lose money. |
|
|
|
Hi all
I have Bitcoin and Ethererum and a few other top 20 cryptos but looking at adding a few micro cap altcoins in the hope one or two 100x or more over the next few years.
Be interesting to hear who is for and against micro cap altcoins?
If you own any what is your plan with them and if not why do you not believe in them?
Altcoins with microcapitalization more often than others can give many thousands of percent in a short period of time. But capitalization alone is not enough, because without the interest of large holders and Influencers no one will need this project. There are hundreds and thousands of such projects with microcapitalization, and almost all of them are scam, dead tokens. Pay attention to other metrics that will allow you to discern a microcapitalization project as a potential gem. Study the tokenomics and investors of the project. |
|
|
|
The rumors about usdt reserve backing have been circulating for so long keeping people in doubt, it is better they clear the air so that investors will be confident enough and have the trust to store their assets with usdt.
It is very unhealthy for any investor to use usdt store the money when it is not transparent, see what happened with ust, even though the scenario is different but it still boils down to trust, many investors trust terra ust enough to store thousands and millions of dollars with it but at the end, things went really bad and people lose money.
Nobody wants a repetition of such a situation with usdt, it is better they own up and do as instructed by the court.
The comparison with UST is highly incorrect because USDT is a centralized stablecoin backed by dollars and securities. UST is an algorithmic stablcoin and has been backed by the dollar through a link to risky and volatile assets such as LUNA and BTC. Keeping money in algorithmic stablecoins is definitely not a good idea, as they are at maximum risk of de-peg. |
|
|
|
|
We should not expect the emergence and rapid development of AAA-level projects in the Play2Earn sector of cryptocurrencies right now. But there is no need to give up watching this industry. If you closely monitor the development of some new high-profile projects and invest in them at an early stage of their formation, before another crypto-hype happens, it can be very, very profitable. Now the whole industry is in decline, there is not much liquidity there, and there is no general excitement observed in 2021.
|
|
|
|
It would make sense if it was the other way around, but like I said before, hitman24 posted first. He couldn't copy amzad00's post by mistake.
Yeah, I didn't pay attention to that right away. I noticed it later. |
|
|
|
Look at these two posts, they are identical. In bounty, some users use previous posts as a sample, they copy that post and then edit it to suit themselves. Ninjastic remembers the post in its original form, which is why such mishaps occur. These two users are not really alts. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
