I didn't think Pogba would miss the entire world cup, but that is actually better news to Juventus then him healing right before. The difference is that he would be missing Juventus games but play in world cup with recently healed injury and risk getting it injured again, compared to now where he will miss Juventus games but he would come back to play for juventus directly instead. This is horrible for their long term success rate.

Even this news itself probably changed a bit of the outright odds, didn't check it now but I guarantee you that it must be a higher odd because they would have a lower chance for sure and they know it. Let's hope for the best to Pogba.

I do agree that Bayern didn't get "that" bad, certainly not enough to be a 1.95 against Leipzig that is for sure, and PSG could be 1.36, I have absolutely no bother with that because they are certainly much better team and they will win that game.

What I do not understand is only stuck with Bayern and Bayern only, there is no comparison in my mind about PSG versus Bayern because that is not the topic here, how much better they are against each other will have no point when the real opponents are Nantes and Leipzig. It should both be under 1.50 and that would make sense, but when you give Bayern such a hard time, I will just bet on that and thank you for the free double on my money.

Oil definitely did caused the whole economy to go to ground, there is no denying that. But, you cannot expect people to not take sides, it is a war and in every war there are sides. Sure, it doesn't mean that you have to actually be there and fight the war, you could be Uganda and have nothing to do with it and you still take sides, how?

Based on what you do right after the war starts, and who you continue to do business with, because either one Ukrainian is there that will not be able to do what they want, or there would be a Russian one. Hence, I get that the economy was impacted, but it was impacted because this war started, nothing else.

Newcastle actually spent a ton of money last year to stay above, they were a level of team that could have gone down, that was basically a locked thing for a while, but then they got a takeover and then they spent something like 100 million if I am not wrong, not to get "amazing" players, not superstars, but enough type of players that it would keep them at a high level.

This is why I believe that they are not really going to spend a lot of money this summer, they are doing fine. They could probably finish the season above relegation again, and they could look to overpay for more players later on to make sure that they get better, sure at a expensive rate, but slowly they will get more success and it would be normal prices to get players.

I am not a staff of this company, which means that there are two possibilities when there is a voting going on. First of all it could be something like "team wants more money in their pockets" or it would be "team thinks this is better for the future of the project".

I cannot see how this could fill the pockets of the staff, which means that this is entirely based on how the team wants to actually do some good for us, and they are improving what they are doing and making the project better. This is why I believe that this voting should be basically all based on what they think is the best, as long as it doesn't provide them directly, how could they harm it or want to harm it?

It does make sense to spend your money on finding and extracting the gold we have in the earth right now, that makes sense of course. However, when the space flight technology becomes something that is as cheap as driving a car today and becomes the new normal, we are going to end up finding a lot of it.

Not just gold neither, we are going to start looking for all the things we needed, and oil or any kind of energy would be number one in that case. Lets realize that energy sector is a huge one for a reason, we need that to go on, everything else comes in second, maybe food and clean water as well of course. So, we are going to find resources on other places and extract and bring that back "eventually", hence why bitcoin would ALWAYS be more valuable.

I bought some before the dip, at around 40k level because I wanted to drop the average that I purchased and that makes sense because it means that I got a big drop on my average, then I boguht some more at 28k and some more at 19k. I do not mind buying at any place, I keep on buying at all prices, if tomorrow price reaches 60k I will buy some more there too.

I never regret because I think that bitcoin has always been "temporarily under 250k", never went above that price I know, but I know that it will go above that price, so whatever I buy right now, at whatever price, will be lower than what it will be in the future and I am fine with that.

As long as people get some to drop, they will drop it, they are burned so much that nobody would hold it long time aside from the team itself. Realize that they have done something wrong, maybe the failure is enough, maybe it isn't, but it has happened and that is the case here.

There isn't anything weird about people not trusting them, even if they do nothing wrong from here on out, I doubt many people will trust it. Don't get me wrong, ETH had 51% attack multiple times and people still trust it a bit, a small time, but never got too huge, and Terra will stay like that as well. I see it on the same levels as ETC and never anything bigger going to happen with them ever again.

I think it's not really that much important how "rich" you can get, it is important how long you can stay. There are a lot of newbies who do get in, and do the right thing to be fair, but then they end up making the wrong move when the bear time comes. Definitely getting in right now during the bear means would result with you making a profit when the price goes up. But, that doesn't change the question of how long you can stay.

If you can stay like this for a decade, keep investing even more, and wait for it to skyrocket and watch it go down after that, then repeat this another 2-3 times, and then sell after 10 years when it peaks, then you would make a ton of money, for sure. But, if you get worried and sell? That will cause you to lose.

When adaption of bitcoin goes massive, we should expect longer bull run within four-year cycle of bitcoin market. This way, I agree that we might be still into a bull run. Within bitcoin markets, we have seen repeating scenarios multiple times and on this regard, you spotted one which happened in 2013. We do read that microstrategy and few other institutions are into continuous buying which must be one of the factor why I agree with you. Bitcoin market always just need positive news only and this way, buying by institution must be one of such.

When common people start believing about the signs of bullish market, then we do obviously start seeing a stronger bull run. We are in exact second of this year and in first half we had bear domination hence this half must be a sideways or bullish in most sense.

When bitcoiners were anticipating about 10x growth in 2017 from 2013's ATH (~$1200), we got almost 20x.
Similarly, when we were expecting another 10x in 2021 from previous ATH, we got only ~3x, thanks to pandemic.
I mean always expect the unexpected. When considering the role of institution and retail investors, I foresee at least another 10x in 2025 but the base price seems yet to be set.

Yeah, the ATH of current cycle may happen this year as well. This may not sound realistic but when considering the role of bears might have ended already (like Tesla already sold 80% of their bitcoin holding), we may get back to recovery phase now onward which may lead to a new ATH.

Like before, I am still confident about getting into $1M level in 2025 as a new ATH.

It was understandable, I mean if he was in red bull or ferrari this season, then he could had a chance to win it all over again, but he won it 4 times already, and he is the best racer I have ever seen in my entire life on "pure talent" base, he knew the car better than anyone else.

Yeah, maybe Lewis knew how to race better, who knows, I am not here to argue about that, but Vettel knew his car better than anyone else did, and on a period where Mercedes was a few seconds faster than anyone else on track, this dude gave them a run for their money when nobody got close, hell usually half of the track just got outlapped each race, and Vettel deserves to be with his family after such a compact but hardcore career.

Obviously people will never be easily impressed by the fact that we could figure out what they are up to, they will just chalk that up to being lucky. Because, they did managed to convince some people.

If you try to scam 20 million people, and only 100 people falls for it, that will "look" like you failed to 19 million 999 thousand 900 people, but for that 100 people who spent a total of tens of thousands of dollars, that would look like you were a great scammer and that is who they are after. All in all this was a weak try, but if he could take this and put it all over online, I am 100% sure that there will be some naive and gullible people who would fall for it.

When you miss that many chances to score, it was bound to go back and bite them in the back anyway. Fener didn't play a horrible game, they played as good as they could have hoped for and then some, they were unlucky for sure, there is no denying that.

But at the very least, they tried their best and that is hopefully for the future of the club. In the end we are going to see them in Europa and if they keep playing like this there, then they are going to probably do well enough. It depends on the future of the club of course, but they could at least give it a go and see where it lands them and they have the weapons to make it a possibility for sure.

In bitcoin terms, 1.4 bitcoins for a business plan and mvp execution (first the plan, but then also the website for it) but if we are talking about just the dollar terms, I paid 800 dollars for a huge name brand company to make me a logo (which I ended up not using at all) and it didn't even turn out that great, they ended up doing something way too confusing which later on didn't really took me much to see why I didn't like it.

All in all, when I spent that 1.2 btc, I didn't know btc would be this big, it was just a few hundred dollars, and I am glad to pay 800 for the logo, because since then btc went down a lot, and I can pay the same 800 to buy more btc now.

Weird that 1.90 was put on Bayern so early, that is a shocking result. I would have expected something closer to 1.30-1.40 range for them for sure, that looks like the most possible thing. Of course it is not going to be impossible, but it looks like it is quite realistic to have it anything under 1.50 range.

Maybe I am just wrong and it is not like that, maybe it is going to be something special and Leipzig will come out blazing and burn everyone to the ground, I do not know whats going to happen but I am still not seeing 1.90 as a possible horrible thing, it feels like it could be something that will be dominated by Bayern from first minute to the last minute all game.

Other than your own blog from beehiiv, do you have any other references about LG and their plans on NFTs? Because, all the crypto news portals that I am following have not covered this news yet. I just want to ensure about the credibility of this news and moreover what would be the need of having a TV when they plan up for NFTs? In my understanding NFT must be a one of recent invention by this crypto community to push rest of world to get participating with cryptocurrencies in one or another way.

Still, I could not figure out what would be role of TV on issuing and trading NFT. I usually do not follow the links from this forum; otherwise I might have got answers for my doubts if I would have visited and spent some time on your blog probably.

As per my experiences, you must have KCS and WRX in your portfolio as these are in my watch list and trading right now in lower circuit and may bounce back to 2x to 10x at any time sooner. If you buy and hold KCS within kucoin exchange then you might be getting daily bonus to improve your holding amounts which is exactly working in the similar manner how freebitco.in is providing daily interest to our BTC holding with them.

Wazirx is a sister concern of binance and its token once hit its ATH of 10k satoshi and right now trading around 1k satoshi levels which means if you invest right now then you might be getting chances of cracking easy 10x profits when it will be scaling its previous heights. Overall, I am in favor of having exchange tokens into long term portfolio  but you must need to be cautious while analyzing about exchanges.

These "hidden" gems are hidden for a reason and you know it. All these people are shilling for their shitty coins with the hopes that 3-5 more people could see it and think of how horrible you must be for hoping that a few more people would work for you and buy something.

Things I invest into require thousands of people to even make a budge, these shilled shitcoins require 5 people with a few thousand dollars to double the price all by itself. This is why if you see a hidden gem, know that it is hidden because it is shitty, not because people didn't find out about something awesome, if there is something awesome then the market will find it and take it to a high place.

Personality wise, Neymar is a cool dude and I can tell you that much, can't tell you how I know it. Dude may not be the type of player that is a leader, or a superstar aura or anything like that, dude is just the class clown that likes to have fun and that's it, he doesn't take it too much seriously. So, is it a problem or not?

Well, it is a problem when you lose to Real Madrid and you look over your shoulder and see Neymar just shooting a video for his insta or something and doesn't seem as pissed as you, but seems like a good thing when you are winning because you would want to be around a player that would make you happy. Hence, it's not really a black or white answer.