My main point is, that this kind of sloppyness and shady action must come to an end. These are big money business products (like you said mr.) and they need to be worth every single BTC/USD. There is plenty of money for that with the current pricing scheme (lots of profit).
|
|
|
And how is Bitmain innocent, when they are trying to block Segregated witness in every possible way and only care about company's personal profit (Asicboost)?
|
|
|
Don't you start to moan just like previously in the underclocking discussion again, this is nothing like that topic.
This is a serious security preach, which was only taken seriously after big public notice.
edit: I use Kubuntu, so I don't care or give comment about Microsoft's things.
|
|
|
These are reasonable concerns. I can not make sense why you always take Bitmain's side mr. Genie, no matter what case.
If nobody would have talked anything about this, NOTHING WOULD HAVE CHANGED!
I can bet my ass on that.
|
|
|
Pretty much everything that Bitmain wants today with Bitcoin is related to the company's personal profit, so it is not easy to believe in things in a good sense.
|
|
|
Bitmain gave an official comment on the "Antbleed" case. Antminer Firmware Update - April 2017https://blog.bitmain.com/en/antminer-firmware-update-april-2017/There is a new controversy regarding a feature in the firmware of Bitmain’s Antminer series of Bitcoin miners which allegedly claims that Bitmain can remotely shut down Antminers. This is feature was designed and coded by the same team that is responsible for the firmware of Antminers. As the firmware has always been open-source, the feature was never intended to be malicious.
We need to clarify the intention of having this feature. We planned to add this feature to the code to empower customers to control their miners which often times can be hosted outside their premises. This was after more than one incident of miners being stolen from a mining farm or being hijacked by the operator of the mining farm:
In 2014, around 1,000 Antminers were withheld from the owner by a hosting service provider in Shenyang, China. In 2015, around 2,000 units of Antminers were withheld from the owner by a hosting service provider in Georgia. In 2017, Bitmain’s own miners were withheld and sold without its consent in Canada. This feature was intended to allow the owners of Antminer to remotely shut down their miners that may have been stolen or hijacked by their hosting service provider, and to also provide law enforcement agencies with more tracking information in such cases. We never intended to use this feature on any Antminer without authorization from its owner. This is similar to the remote erase or shutdown feature provided by most famous smartphone manufacturers.
However, this feature was never completed. We started to develop this feature since Antminer S7 and wanted to finish its development on the Antminer S9. We hoped to make it a useful feature that we could advertise to our customers. But, due to some technical problems, we were unable to finish the development of this feature and shut down the testing server in December 2016. It is a bug to leave the code there before the feature is fully complete and acknowledged to the users. This bug has now been pointed out in context of Bitcoin’s scaling roadmap debate and has caused considerable misunderstandings within the Bitcoin community. We apologize for this.
Following are the models affected by this bug:
Antminer S9 Antminer R4 Antminer T9 Antminer L3 Antminer L3+ Since MITM and DNS hijacks can exploit this bug we would like to apologize to our customers for a degraded level of security caused by this. We should also note that the existing stratum protocol is vulnerable to MITM and DNS hijacks, and that the mining industry needs to work together on design of the next generation mining protocol.
Moving on, we have released the new updated source-code on GitHub and new firmware on our website which removes this bug. We recommend all Antminer owners to upgrade their firmware to the updated firmware from the list below and strongly advise to not download any firmware provided by a third-party which can lead to unexpected outcomes in function and can also be potential phishing attacks.
Source code on GitHub
Source-code for Antminer S9, T9 and R4: https://github.com/bitmaintech/bmminer-mix Source-code for Antminer L3 and L3+: https://github.com/bitmaintech/setup-A8 which includes https://github.com/bitmaintech/ltc_frimware inside.
Alternatively, we advise owners of mining farms that run Antminers to set the DNS record on their routers of auth.minerlink.com to 127.0.0.1 in the /etc/hosts file by the following method:
1. Use ssh to login to the miner 2. Run command: echo “127.0.0.1 auth.minerlink.com” >> /etc/hosts 3. Run command: sync
The controversy around this code has brought our attention to improve the design in order to address vulnerabilities that were pointed out by the community recently. For this, we thank the community for pointing out bugs and contributing to our open-source codebase. We would also like to take this opportunity to express our solidified belief in the open source community and express our renewed commitment to improving the quality and testing methods of our code.
We will continue the development of this feature to provide a technical protection for mining rig owners to host their miners in remote locations. We will add a switch to this feature, and this switch will be closed by default. Customers will be able to set up and configure their own authentication server. Before we finish this development, such a code will not be in the firmware we release from now on.
|
|
|
You need a bigass online UPS. But that is most likely going to hurt your profit.
Basic things for mining hardware: -stable electricity -stable internet -appropriate cooling
Check out GE LanPro series for example and contact a professional electrician, find out price and other details.
|
|
|
Yeah it used to be a service, but why hasn't it been modified in recent firmwares? This is a security breach in my opinion because it can be used in a wrong way. I commonly worried about device internet security safety, mostly with "internet of things" devices but now with a good reason with bitcoin miners as well. It is something that should be looked into 100% or we will be fucked up. We should pay more attention in general at device security.
Well as I posted in the other thread, yes it should be removed as part of due-diligence. And as with most embedded networked devices seems the designers just-don't- give-a-shit. http://www.electronicdesign.com/embedded-revolution/beware-brickerbot-iot-killer is one Robin Hood's shot at IoT 'security' Yeah, we are definitely at the same page. I'm just interested if Bitmain would have any comment to this or will they be quiet as usual.
|
|
|
Yeah it used to be a service, but why hasn't it been modified in recent firmwares? This is a security breach in my opinion because it can be used in a wrong way. I commonly worried about device internet security safety, mostly with "internet of things" devices but now with a good reason with bitcoin miners as well. It is something that should be looked into 100% or we will be fucked up. We should pay more attention in general at device security.
|
|
|
BITMAIN: What is your official answer on this "Antbleed" -case?
|
|
|
See the down left part of this page that says "Move topic". Click it.
Then find "Economy --- Computer hardware" from the list and click Move topic.
Easy.
|
|
|
If this friend still keeps going in the mining business, then the best thing for him/her to do would be upgrading those S3's with Hotmine upgrade kit ( en.hotmine.io) or with Sidehack's upgrade boards, which are coming soon (this year?). The resale value for S3 is from pretty low to close nothing. I can not come up with any other reasonable idea for use with them than using them with these upgrade kits.
|
|
|
I reported this thread to a forum moderator.
|
|
|
You are in a tough situation in the sense of ROI with this need for UPS system.
|
|
|
First you need to know your costs (electricity etc.). Then you can choose your miner and try to estimate if you can make profit (preferably current gen. like Antminer S9, Antminer T9, AvalonMiner741, Ebit E9...).
If noise is an issue, then you can't go with any of the miner models above.
|
|
|
Yes you can just make sure you ground the 2 PSUs together and make sure not to mix any 12V together between the PSUs.
Meaning if a GPU requires 6+8 pin, don't connect the 6 pin to 1 PSU and the other to the alternate one.
THIS. Do not mix the two power supplies in a same circuit. They start "fighting" each other.
|
|
|
SCAM ALERT
One thing also is, that why do you need a separate bitcointalk account to announce this when you could use the original one? Are you really expecting scam people's money and get away with it this easily? You're the lowest scum and I try my best here at the forum to cut this kind of shit off right away.
|
|
|
Hey man, you are wrong. To correct baikal is the one with www
Yeah thanks, corrected. It seems to lead to their e-mail service when not adding www. in front of the address.
|
|
|
|