Dogie, in your Ares 256 review you recommended to set difficulty to 16000+ in Ghash.io pool settings. I tried increasing it to 51000 and the miner is now capable of up to 360 MH/s. Two Ares units output 680-720 MH/s, while retaining the same power consumption! Note: environment temperature is 22C.
Made no difference to me. The higher difficulty will be doing is increasing the period you have to run to get an nice average hash rate, and the only time it should make a difference is if the controller is being bombarded / overloaded by too many low diff shares. I don't see any evidence of that happening at 16k. |
|
|
|
Canary has now left me negative trust with the below message, yet he refuses to reveal why he distrusts me. Users in Level 1 or even Level 2 trust are absolutely accountable for their trust ratings, which Canary refuses to be. I absolutely do not trust dogie. No personal btc were risked, I simply do not trust him whatsoever. I think he accepted SaltySpitoon's suggestion/opinion. Now he removed you from his trust list and others who trust you can find your trust feedback in "Trusted feesback". It doesn't change anything here, he has a history of abusing his Depth 1 position and is not trustworthy enough to hold it. Not only has he spam added 100s of members to Depth 2 for his own personal gain, he also magically becomes 'distrustful' of anyone who calls him out on it. His negative trust is also enough to prevent me from affecting anyone else's ratings which is as good as an exclusion. |
|
|
|
Canary has now left me negative trust with the below message, yet he refuses to reveal why he distrusts me. Users in Level 1 or even Level 2 trust are absolutely accountable for their trust ratings, which Canary refuses to be. I absolutely do not trust dogie. No personal btc were risked, I simply do not trust him whatsoever. |
|
|
|
Isn't the warranty return address the same address as Minersource?
Better not be,you'll be sending a miner to a "blackhole"  No it is not. They were both located in the same complex if I am not mistaken until minersource ran off with peoples money and miners. That is correct, it just is / was a coincidence they were in the same complex / business park thing. |
|
|
|
No answer. So we established dogie is a liar.
No, we established dogie went outside for 2 hours  While you're here CITM, please answer the topic: I do not trust you because of your misconduct with several manufacturers, therefore I added a tilde in front of your name. That's the reason, I choose not to trust you.
Which "several manufacturers", what "misconduct"? |
|
|
|
in the last month since Spondoolies decided to go on a crazy rampage
By crazy rampage you mean stopped trying to reason with you because they saw that it was a helpless cause Its the other way around. I conclusively and undeniably proved to ST that their accusations were false, and responded by ramming their head in the sand. That's not my problem. Until your next round of lies.
Cool. If you still have some time on your hands, you can read about a week before and after this post to see that the criteria was not changed, was not changed just for you and that you were not even the first company for the methodology to be applied to. Uses preorders? Yes ... O Rly? BFL Hasn't taken preorders in months. Additionally we were and are selling off the shelf miners from the 65nm generation.
I'm not sure how you can argue you don't use preorders, you have done, and you continue to do as your main business model. 65nm (for the vast majority) and your monarchs were both sold as preorder products, delivered in 2 weeks. Unless you're talking about this split second at which point the only things you're selling are 10GH miners @ $5/GH - I can't give you a pat on the back for that. If you do sell in hand Monarchs once your queue is cleared AND then don't sell preorders on whatever comes after then you'll of course get your deserved 20 points. Heck, I'll even send you a prize in the post if I can get it through customs  Keep lying and BS-ing. LOL what? I categorically and irrefutably disprove your claims and you deny the posts' existence? Is this another conspiracy? Did Theymos plant pages of posts back in time? |
|
|
|
I do not trust you because of your misconduct with several manufacturers, therefore I added a tilde in front of your name. That's the reason, I choose not to trust you.
Hmm interesting, I don't have any say in the matter, but I am curious. Why would you not just leave Dogie negative feedback if you didn't trust him, rather than excluding him from being trusted by others? Seems a little bit harsh. I don't know too much surrounding all of the parties involved with all of the hardware producing companies and the recent shenanigans, and I don't make judgements unless I'm involved or have a significant amount of information proving something, but just because you don't trust Dogie, is your reason strong enough that others shouldn't be able to make their own decisions and add Dogie to their trust lists? Anyone can add him to their trust list if they wish. That's not how it works. Because you don't like me you've excluded me from everyone's trust lists, and your answer to that the other 465,409 members can still add me manually? Well, at least we've removed all doubt that you should be removed from DefaultTrust, because either you don't understand it (and make no effort to) or are willingly abusing it. And I'll ask again: I do not trust you because of your misconduct with several manufacturers, therefore I added a tilde in front of your name. That's the reason, I choose not to trust you.
Which "several manufacturers", what "misconduct"? |
|
|
|
I am seriously entertaining the idea of a negative rating given this is the sort of weak effort to bring people down
Its amazing how quick you are to jump on what you think is the winning ship. My actions and values have not changed in the last month since Spondoolies decided to go on a crazy rampage, nor the 10 months since you left that rating. But the second that I temporarily lose the ability to affect your rating, you withdraw your positive one and threaten a negative rating. What a coward. |
|
|
|
You honestly think I'd accept so much abuse to run a community resource wrongly in order to gain $40 $0 a month? That doesn't make sense... Inducing flame wars and bump spam in popular threads is part of that game.
Users (like you) flaming me, telling me to go kill myself is not something I can control. They're either evil people or not. Not really seen any overt abuse by CITM of the system he seems to discuss issues with others and resolves them when there are problems.
Have you read anything I've presented? He has clearly abused the trust system, NOT discussed the issues and has straight up refused to address any problems. Dogie has no real leg to stand on given his abuses of the trust system.
....Which are? |
|
|
|
I do not trust you because of your misconduct with several manufacturers, therefore I added a tilde in front of your name. That's the reason, I choose not to trust you.
Which "several manufacturers", what "misconduct"? And that is not the method nor venue of how to "not to trust" people. I'll let you reply to this before I submit any evidence as maybe you have a different conspiracy theory today. |
|
|
|
I like the miner but it eats up too much electricity 2kw for only 256MHZ that's crazy power use
Seems to auto clock itself based on temps to always achieve hashrate, so the higher the ambient the higher the power consumption. Mine is about 2500W @ 35C. Have you tried putting in a cooler environment? like 15c or less? it's help a lot if you could show the graph of consumption/temp I don't have a testing cell big enough to temp control 2500W at the moment. For a unit this size I don't think its feasible for people to be running at 20C anyway. |
|
|
|
On the C1s, if I reboot (GUI) they do not come back up cleanly, you have to reset the power switch. When I say they don't come back up cleanly, I mean the hash rate does not return to the 1000GH/s. Maybe 760 GH/s. Often times the ASICs on chain #2 or chain #3 hashing boards come up all --s or ..s
That appears to be how these boards like their power and like a hard reboot to reinitialise. It may be firmware but its more likely to be a characteristic of the boards themselves. |
|
|
|
It ia really helpful. I could exclude CanaryInTheMine and other, who are trusted by persons I trust, who misuses trust system. Canaryinthemine is clearly negligent in maintaining his trust list at the very best if not purposely exploiting it for personal gain and to protect his buddies.
He isn't ready to invest some time on pruning his trust list though it is mist for him if he wants to be in DefaultTrust trust list. The major problem is that CITM is at depth 1, it gives him power above all else especially when he abuses the system for his own gain by selling seats to 50% of DefaultTrust. And in his persuance of that, no one else can stop him removing others from DefaultTrust. There could be 200 other depth 2s that add someone to their trust, but as long as CITM removes them, that's it. Lets take a look at who is at depth 1: The first category is comprised of staff Theymos - We trust him implicitly as an admin BadBear - We trust him implicitly as an admin SaltySpitoon - Global moderator Maged - Global moderator HostFat - Staff dserrano5 - Staff OldScammerTag - Defunct but just how that 'feature' worked The second includes escrows and account markers Tomatocage - Marked 100s of false accounts and acts as an escrow escrow.ms - Marked many false accounts and acts as an escrow OgNasty - Acts as an escrow DeaDTerra - Runs investment securities Then some left over accounts dooglus - Runs just-dice, marks many likely HYIPs [arguably conflict of interest] philipma1957 - Bought and sold some hardware And finally we have CanaryInTheMine, someone who bought and sold some hardware, and then aggressively abused the hell out of the trust system. That doesn't make any sense. |
|
|
|
Yeah, seems stupid to buy old boards. Unless you remember the old board still has enough overhead to support 50 Avalon4.1 units stable off a full Linux install because it's more powerful than an entire desktop computer was ten years ago and there's no reason anyone would ever need a friggin' quad-core processor to run cgminer for anything less than about half a petashash worth of gear. Actually I'd be surprised if cgminer could multithread and take advantage of multicore architecture just for serial comms anyway, so there's zero reason to get the new board over the old one except it makes your penis bigger.
Its also worth pointing out that there are already 3+ million original Pis in existence, and so from that perspective should remain the focus of development. Yes it is extremely annoying that you can't buy the originals any more, and that they're not cross compatible but that is the fault of the foundation. |
|
|
|
Even if the software turns out to be amazing, who's going to maintain it? Proprietary forum software developed by a temporary association of overpriced devs is a security disaster waiting to happen. Im pretty sure this will also prove why companies usually dont put inexperienced ~18 year olds in charge of large software development projects
I give it 3 to 6 months before this 1.5M software is dumped in favor of some standard platform.
That's exactly what happens in even the biggest companies (including Google). You make something proprietry, it works okay for a year or two, then the off the shelf systems start overtaking it. Then - because you didn't learn last time - you start planning the next proprietry system. |
|
|
|
He was selling a 48Gh board for ~$1800, that's not really the same thing as trying to remain $ efficient for $2-3 worth of chips + controller. |
|
|
|
Actually, you should talk to him. He may not have seen your feedback as relevant and excluded you. In overall, I agree with you! He is misusing his power.
I have tried to, he does not respond. I gave him some time to do so before posting here. |
|
|
|
Is there also an option to simply replace the one existing fan?
Yes, there are lots of variants of Delta 120x38mm fans, at varying cost and specifications (one being the Delta FFB1212VHE). I can't say any of them is drastically quieter though. |
|
|
|
The only viable way this could change would be massive amounts of small devices integrated into home electronics.
I've heard you talk about this web of things type model before, it will never ever ever be even remotely close to viable. Putting single / quad chip PCBs + own controllers + wifi is so incredibly expensive compared to even an S5 formfactor. While I think the idea on it's own is dumb (non starter), devices that are already internet capable can have a sha256 asic integrated at very low cost. Not to mention a lot of the components you listed are cheap as hell when purchased in volume. A controller isn't cheap per GH when we're talking about 5-30W worth of chips. |
|
|
|
I have exhausted the list of potential causes I believe, we need to come up with a new cause.
You can also try them on a different computer, there are a lot of variables included in each computer which aren't easy to identify externally. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
