Bitcoin Forum
October 01, 2016, 05:13:52 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.0 (New!) [Torrent]. Make sure you verify it.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3152 (80.4%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.2%)
Total Voters: 3916

Pages: « 1 ... 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 [224] 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 ... 1104 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3860012 times)
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
November 05, 2011, 11:50:32 PM
 #4461

Just for curiosity I changed thread poll. Please check what do you personally prefer. Of course other methods than bitcoin payouts have some additional expenses, so they're might be interesting only for people earning enough coins...

As an example, 1oz silver bar is roughly 14BTC + shipping.

1475342032
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1475342032

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1475342032
Reply with quote  #2

1475342032
Report to moderator
1475342032
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1475342032

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1475342032
Reply with quote  #2

1475342032
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1475342032
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1475342032

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1475342032
Reply with quote  #2

1475342032
Report to moderator
trilby
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 45


View Profile
November 05, 2011, 11:59:23 PM
 #4462

For me personally gold/silver would be the best option (that is till asteroid mining becomes a possibility). But this will really vary from person to person.

I will always put my faith in precious metals as they will always be required. Unfortunatly cryto-currencies will only be as strong as the algorithm they use.

Have I helped you send me a donation - 1LaZmd9ZzpmjA4gkXxiQPsmfQ8zSc5mTZo
notawake
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58


View Profile
November 06, 2011, 12:38:36 AM
 #4463

Just for curiosity I changed thread poll. Please check what do you personally prefer. Of course other methods than bitcoin payouts have some additional expenses, so they're might be interesting only for people earning enough coins...

As an example, 1oz silver bar is roughly 14BTC + shipping.

I think we have an economic incentive to keep payouts in BTC. If we want to maintain the value of each Bitcoin block we generate, we should minimize the amount of conversion to other currencies. Currently, some miners may be converting all their BTC immediately. But part of the reason Bitcoin has value is because some people are not doing this. If the pool automatically converted BTC to other currencies, the value of each block we generate would decrease.

Additionally, there's some administrative overhead involved with this extra step. Either you take less profit margin or pass on the extra cost onto the other miners. Both options are not good options.

Bitcoin: 1HZRowLTkmF6M8V11vj2dmVf2r9VK7dVfo | Namecoin: MxT6tjJZcYZeWUGNgsAMxJ7wpDgKMdub4y

Output Transactions for a Given Address to CSV Format
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
November 06, 2011, 01:02:52 AM
 #4464

I think we have an economic incentive to keep payouts in BTC.

Basically you're right, keeping bitcoins and spending them for goods in Bitcoin world is the best possibility. But of course a lot of miners directly sell coins on market, that's the reality. Refusing to offer some interesting payout methods don't make things better.

Actually there are some merchants accepting bitcoins for gold/silver, so payouts in gold *do* help the economy much better than selling them on MtGox for USD and push BTC price down. Of course pool payouts in Bitcoin will be here forever, I'm just thinking if there's enough interest to play with some alternatives.

bulanula
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518



View Profile
November 06, 2011, 01:09:09 AM
 #4465

A bit off topic but since you all wanted to know : I have spend that amount on a crazy setup that did not quite work out but I will make it work in the end. ATM I mine with different pools.
Thralen
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 123


View Profile
November 06, 2011, 01:35:42 AM
 #4466

I keep meaning to save my BTC towards more silver and gold but never quite get there. Jumped to stock up on peanut butter with the last decent size batch of BTC I had gathered (since PB prices are in the middle of going up and total price raises to consumers is estimated that it will be in the 40%-50% range). Before that it was fancy coffee... What can I say, I could get those with what I had or I would've had to wait much longer to get enough for more PMs. Aside from that I don't really make enough btc mining to be interested in alternate payouts, although if the namecoins had an option to be paid out in BTC instead of NMC, that I might go for.

Thralen

Supporting bitcoin as best I can with 1. mining, 2. buying with bitcoin, 3. selling (or trying to) for bitcoin. If you make a donation to:  1MahzUUEYJrZ4VbPRm2h5itGZKEguGVZK1  I'll get it into circulation.
notawake
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58


View Profile
November 06, 2011, 01:43:06 AM
 #4467

I think we have an economic incentive to keep payouts in BTC.

Basically you're right, keeping bitcoins and spending them for goods in Bitcoin world is the best possibility. But of course a lot of miners directly sell coins on market, that's the reality. Refusing to offer some interesting payout methods don't make things better.

Actually there are some merchants accepting bitcoins for gold/silver, so payouts in gold *do* help the economy much better than selling them on MtGox for USD and push BTC price down. Of course pool payouts in Bitcoin will be here forever, I'm just thinking if there's enough interest to play with some alternatives.

I thought you are suggesting the possibility of changing all payouts to something other than BTC payouts and I didn't realize that you are actually suggesting additional payout options. My apologies.

Bitcoin: 1HZRowLTkmF6M8V11vj2dmVf2r9VK7dVfo | Namecoin: MxT6tjJZcYZeWUGNgsAMxJ7wpDgKMdub4y

Output Transactions for a Given Address to CSV Format
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
November 06, 2011, 01:43:50 AM
 #4468

As somebody asked (sorry, I cannot find that post right now), I added "confirmed_nmc_reward" and "nmc_send_threshold" to user's JSON stats.

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
November 06, 2011, 01:52:15 AM
 #4469

although if the namecoins had an option to be paid out in BTC instead of NMC, that I might go for.

I has been thinking about this month ago, even before merged mining started. I realized that it's not profitable for anybody.

a) Miners interested in keeping namecoins will get much less namecoins, because now they get much more than is corresponding their hashrate (because many users don't claim their namecoin wallet).

b) Miners interested in selling namecoins to BTC will get much less bitcoins, because when pool start automatic conversion, it will push price on namecoin exchange to almost zero (pool still has over 50% of namecoin hashrate).

c) People not interested in namecoins will get virtually +0% to their btc earnings, because pool push merket price to zero.

So I decided to *not* trade namecoins automatically and let people to handle their namecoins on their own. Honestly - selling namecoins for bitcoins is a matter of few clicks once per week, so I don't think it's a big deal. I know that some other pools are trading namecoins for bitcoins automatically, but I simply don't think it's good decision for miners.

naypalm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1205


uberbills.com


View Profile WWW
November 06, 2011, 01:56:56 AM
 #4470

As somebody asked (sorry, I cannot find that post right now), I added "confirmed_nmc_reward" and "nmc_send_threshold" to user's JSON stats.

Thank you Slush!  Cheesy

Thralen
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 123


View Profile
November 06, 2011, 02:06:21 AM
 #4471

although if the namecoins had an option to be paid out in BTC instead of NMC, that I might go for.

I has been thinking about this month ago, even before merged mining started. I realized that it's not profitable for anybody.

a) Miners interested in keeping namecoins will get much less namecoins, because now they get much more than is corresponding their hashrate (because many users don't claim their namecoin wallet).

b) Miners interested in selling namecoins to BTC will get much less bitcoins, because when pool start automatic conversion, it will push price on namecoin exchange to almost zero (pool still has over 50% of namecoin hashrate).

c) People not interested in namecoins will get virtually +0% to their btc earnings, because pool push merket price to zero.

So I decided to *not* trade namecoins automatically and let people to handle their namecoins on their own. Honestly - selling namecoins for bitcoins is a matter of few clicks once per week, so I don't think it's a big deal. I know that some other pools are trading namecoins for bitcoins automatically, but I simply don't think it's good decision for miners.

Thanks for the answer, it does take into consideration some things I hadn't thought about. For now I've just been letting them build up and figured I'd get around to selling them off for BTC when I get around to it. With those couple of clicks you were talking about. I already set up the account to do it with so... Just thought it might be a time-saving step to get them awarded in BTC instead. Thanks for explaining why it would be more of a waste than a bonus.

Thralen

Supporting bitcoin as best I can with 1. mining, 2. buying with bitcoin, 3. selling (or trying to) for bitcoin. If you make a donation to:  1MahzUUEYJrZ4VbPRm2h5itGZKEguGVZK1  I'll get it into circulation.
Deafboy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 484



View Profile WWW
November 06, 2011, 06:51:53 AM
 #4472

Mining for gold bars? This sounds wonderfull as optional feature!
As someone mentioned before, mined BTCs should not be exchanged directly for other currencies / comodities and should be spent in shop like any other currency instead, but this option is irresistible for me. Too cool to be true Smiley
bulanula
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518



View Profile
November 06, 2011, 09:46:38 AM
 #4473

Price of NMC will keep on being a little more stead if you exchange manually once a week than say automatically every time NMC is generated.
FoxMURDER
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49


View Profile
November 06, 2011, 10:05:13 AM
 #4474

ROFL that'd be so cool to tell friends, that im 'mining gold. on the internets!' Smiley
paraipan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
November 06, 2011, 01:32:56 PM
 #4475

ROFL that'd be so cool to tell friends, that im 'mining gold. on the internets!' Smiley

+1 totally man haha

BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
macrum
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 24


View Profile
November 06, 2011, 01:58:53 PM
 #4476

I think we have an economic incentive to keep payouts in BTC.

Basically you're right, keeping bitcoins and spending them for goods in Bitcoin world is the best possibility. But of course a lot of miners directly sell coins on market, that's the reality. Refusing to offer some interesting payout methods don't make things better.

Actually there are some merchants accepting bitcoins for gold/silver, so payouts in gold *do* help the economy much better than selling them on MtGox for USD and push BTC price down. Of course pool payouts in Bitcoin will be here forever, I'm just thinking if there's enough interest to play with some alternatives.

What a nice Idea! The only thing why I wont't use it, is the ratio between the Silver OZ and the shipping fee. It would be extreme, if they would be sended every time 14 BTC + shipping (1 to 2 BTC in my case if they are sended from CZ to AT) The next Problem would be the toll rates if the reciepent is outside of the EU.

Of course this would be a lot better than converting the BTC to USD and then into some precious metals.
Idzy
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 95


View Profile
November 06, 2011, 03:49:12 PM
 #4477

mining for gold/silver does sound interesting. 

Successful Transactions with: 21after2
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218


Gerald Davis


View Profile
November 06, 2011, 04:55:43 PM
 #4478

The largest issue becomes "friction" and "trust".

If miner cash out often & quickly they don't have to trust the pool BUT then coinage overhead and shipping overhead eats into the yield.

If miners cash out infrequently & build balances they have higher yield (less lost to coinage overhead and shipping) but need to trust the pol more.

Given how some miners freak out when a $0.50 payment is one day late that seems implausible.
kkurtmann
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 475



View Profile WWW
November 06, 2011, 05:18:31 PM
 #4479

I like the mining for gold on the internet idea. It would be nicer if the exchange value were back at July rates

https://www.buytrezor.com?a=55c37b866c11   well sir, I like it!
LoupGaroux
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420



View Profile
November 06, 2011, 06:01:21 PM
 #4480

If the mining for metals thing becomes a reality, it might make sense to have a few localized acquisition points, 1 in Europe, 1 for the Americas, 1 for Asia and Australia and so on. Buying precious in Europe and sending it to the US for example has one paying for the metals, adding fairly expensive insured shipping to the US, and then the receiver facing custom duties when it arrives, and calling a lot of attention to a flow of wealth that one might have otherwise not wanted a governmental agency to be able to monitor. Not smart to ship precious metals incognito, one loss of a couple of ounces of gold will cure you of that thinking for ever. If you had local sourcing it could be shipped domestically and handled in a much quicker and more secure manner.

You might even be able to find better values on some aspects of the conversion, and certainly save some money on shipment costs. I would be interested in this, but would want to make sure that my transactions are safe, private and cost effective.

54Gh/s bASIC Bitcoin Mining Devices
Pre-Order Yours Today!     
Only $1069.99 ! @ http://www.BitcoinASIC.com


Look^^ I'm selling my soul too!
Pages: « 1 ... 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 [224] 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 ... 1104 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!