phuocduong
Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 10
|
|
November 16, 2017, 06:41:27 AM |
|
so great, i see nothing different with 0.5.4
|
|
|
|
SpellEvil
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
November 16, 2017, 10:46:01 AM |
|
Bceм пpивeт. Ктo мoжeт пoдcкaзaть пoчeмy нe нaчиcляютcя zec зa мaйнинг? Oнo зaчиcляeтcя oт кaкoй тo oпpeдeлeннoй cyммы или пo вpeмeни? Cтoялo нoчь, peзyльтaт пo 0. Bидeoкapтa gtx 1050 2gb. B paзгoнe выдaeт 164 sol. Кoшeлeк Zec пpoпиcaл в start.bat
|
|
|
|
bruce81
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 0
|
|
November 16, 2017, 10:51:24 AM |
|
Bceм пpивeт. Ктo мoжeт пoдcкaзaть пoчeмy нe нaчиcляютcя zec зa мaйнинг? Oнo зaчиcляeтcя oт кaкoй тo oпpeдeлeннoй cyммы или пo вpeмeни? Cтoялo нoчь, peзyльтaт пo 0. Bидeoкapтa gtx 1050 2gb. B paзгoнe выдaeт 164 sol. Кoшeлeк Zec пpoпиcaл в start.bat
Знaчит нe пpaвильнo бaтник cocтaвил. I have this error 2017-11-16 11:54:22|gpu_id 1 2 000000052AB60400 unknown error 2017-11-16 11:54:22|gpu_id 3 2 000000055F600000 unknown error 2017-11-16 11:54:22|gpu_id 4 0 0000000579C00000 unknown error 2017-11-16 11:54:22|gpu_id 0 0 000000050DEB0200 unknown error 2017-11-16 11:54:22|gpu_id 2 6 00000005450420C0 unknown error 2017-11-16 11:54:22|gpu 2 unresponsive - check overclocking 2017-11-16 11:54:22|cudaMemcpy 1 failed 2017-11-16 11:54:22|gpu 4 unresponsive - check overclocking 2017-11-16 11:54:22|cudaMemcpy 1 failed 2017-11-16 11:54:22|gpu 1 unresponsive - check overclocking 2017-11-16 11:54:22|cudaMemcpy 1 failed 2017-11-16 11:54:22|gpu 0 unresponsive - check overclocking 2017-11-16 11:54:22|gpu 3 unresponsive - check overclocking 2017-11-16 11:54:22|cudaMemcpy 1 failed 2017-11-16 11:54:22|cudaMemcpy 1 failed
|
|
|
|
SpellEvil
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
November 16, 2017, 11:06:34 AM |
|
Я ничeгo нe cocтaвлял. Bce кaк былo изнaчaльнo, тoлькo зaмeнил кoшeлeк. Boт вce чтo в бaтникe. echo Don't forget to change your pool and login information.
zm --server eu1-zcash.flypool.org --port 3333 --user t1NFooZ82fzQeWWUH27G8uxLJvNfwMnrBKG
@echo off REM Usage: REM zm --server hostname --port port_nr --user user_name REM [--pass password] [options]... REM REM Stratum: REM --server Stratum server hostname REM prefix hostname with 'ssl://' for encrypted REM connections - e.g. ssl://mypool.com REM --port Stratum server port number REM --user Username / Workername REM --pass Worker password REM REM Options: REM --help Print this help REM --dev Space separated list of cuda devices REM --list-devices List available cuda devices REM --time Enable output of timestamps REM --logfile [=path] Append logs to the file named by 'path' REM If 'path' is not given append to 'zm.log' in REM current working directory. REM --noreconnect Disable automatic reconnection on network errors. REM REM --temp-target In C - If set, enables temperature controller. REM The workload of each GPU will be continuously REM adjusted such that the temperature stays around REM this value. It is recommended to set your fan speed REM to 100% when using this setting. REM REM --telemetry [=ip:port]. Starts telemetry server. Telemetry data REM can be accessed using a web browser(http) or by json-rpc. REM If no arguments are given the server listens on REM 127.0.0.1:2222 - Example: --telemetry=0.0.0.0:2222 REM Valid port range [1025-65535] REM Example: REM zm --server servername.com --port 1234 --user username
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
November 16, 2017, 11:09:43 AM |
|
Bceм пpивeт. Ктo мoжeт пoдcкaзaть пoчeмy нe нaчиcляютcя zec зa мaйнинг? Oнo зaчиcляeтcя oт кaкoй тo oпpeдeлeннoй cyммы или пo вpeмeни? Cтoялo нoчь, peзyльтaт пo 0. Bидeoкapтa gtx 1050 2gb. B paзгoнe выдaeт 164 sol. Кoшeлeк Zec пpoпиcaл в start.bat
Знaчит нe пpaвильнo бaтник cocтaвил. I have this error 2017-11-16 11:54:22|gpu_id 1 2 000000052AB60400 unknown error 2017-11-16 11:54:22|gpu_id 3 2 000000055F600000 unknown error 2017-11-16 11:54:22|gpu_id 4 0 0000000579C00000 unknown error 2017-11-16 11:54:22|gpu_id 0 0 000000050DEB0200 unknown error 2017-11-16 11:54:22|gpu_id 2 6 00000005450420C0 unknown error 2017-11-16 11:54:22|gpu 2 unresponsive - check overclocking 2017-11-16 11:54:22|cudaMemcpy 1 failed 2017-11-16 11:54:22|gpu 4 unresponsive - check overclocking 2017-11-16 11:54:22|cudaMemcpy 1 failed 2017-11-16 11:54:22|gpu 1 unresponsive - check overclocking 2017-11-16 11:54:22|cudaMemcpy 1 failed 2017-11-16 11:54:22|gpu 0 unresponsive - check overclocking 2017-11-16 11:54:22|gpu 3 unresponsive - check overclocking 2017-11-16 11:54:22|cudaMemcpy 1 failed 2017-11-16 11:54:22|cudaMemcpy 1 failed Hello, i got 2x10rigs (all 1070), and your miner work awesome on the first 10 rigs (+7% hash vs EWBF), The other 10 rigs have a different GPU brand and same hashpower (all 1070) but i can't get your miner to work, i experience the exact same error as bruce81, even with base clock/power on cards, i also get "memory errors" log line, but thoses rigs have worked overclocked flawlessly for months on EWBF (and still does) (All 20rigs have the same gpu, drivers, OS, SSD, ram, and so on, only the brand of the GPU change (10x rigs with EVGA's 1070, 10x rigs with KFA2 1070's) An idea what it could be ? Im willing to do some testing or advanced logging. I was wondering if you could also add something to tweak the intensity? Maybe i need to lower it a bit so that the miner doesn't explode, dunno Regards.
|
|
|
|
Nokia555
|
|
November 16, 2017, 11:30:54 AM |
|
EthMonitoring.com EthControl software has been updated to ZM dstm 0.5.5 version.
|
|
|
|
Cuzzle
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
|
|
November 16, 2017, 11:32:38 AM |
|
Been running v0.5.4 on 4 rigs, all 1080ti for 2 days, zero issues. Just changed them all over to this latest version v0.5.5 (using Tight VNC, which is totally free, to remotely roll it out to all my rigs)
What I've Noticed 1. There is a definite improvement in hash rate as indicated by my miner stats in my pool (luckpool.org). 2. The GPU's run MUCH cooler than they did with EWBF. So much cooler that I had to confirm that ZM was actually working as the fans on some cards were not even spinning some times.
Has any one else noticed that their GPU's run cooler?
Overall all big thanks for this version as there is an increase in my profit and it has been rock solid for me for days.
Feature Request Some colour would be nice like EWBF has. This way you can tell at a glance if, for example, your rigs are over heating (ie a fan dies, this actually happened to me yesterday) Being able to choose what stats show what colours would be awesome.
|
|
|
|
Vispilio
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1656
|
|
November 16, 2017, 11:41:40 AM |
|
Been running v0.5.4 on 4 rigs, all 1080ti for 2 days, zero issues. Just changed them all over to this latest version v0.5.5 (using Tight VNC, which is totally free, to remotely roll it out to all my rigs)
What I've Noticed 1. There is a definite improvement in hash rate as indicated by my miner stats in my pool (luckpool.org). 2. The GPU's run MUCH cooler than they did with EWBF. So much cooler that I had to confirm that ZM was actually working as the fans on some cards were not even spinning some times.
Has any one else noticed that their GPU's run cooler?
Overall all big thanks for this version as there is an increase in my profit and it has been rock solid for me for days.
Feature Request Some colour would be nice like EWBF has. This way you can tell at a glance if, for example, your rigs are over heating (ie a fan dies, this actually happened to me yesterday) Being able to choose what stats show what colours would be awesome.
what is the improvement in hashrate ? how much do you think 0.5.5 improves over EWBF, keep in mind also you can turn off the dev fee on EWBF while here it's hard coded at 2%... Would be great if you can provide some evidence for your claims...
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
November 16, 2017, 11:51:50 AM |
|
Been running v0.5.4 on 4 rigs, all 1080ti for 2 days, zero issues. Just changed them all over to this latest version v0.5.5 (using Tight VNC, which is totally free, to remotely roll it out to all my rigs)
What I've Noticed 1. There is a definite improvement in hash rate as indicated by my miner stats in my pool (luckpool.org). 2. The GPU's run MUCH cooler than they did with EWBF. So much cooler that I had to confirm that ZM was actually working as the fans on some cards were not even spinning some times.
Has any one else noticed that their GPU's run cooler?
Overall all big thanks for this version as there is an increase in my profit and it has been rock solid for me for days.
Feature Request Some colour would be nice like EWBF has. This way you can tell at a glance if, for example, your rigs are over heating (ie a fan dies, this actually happened to me yesterday) Being able to choose what stats show what colours would be awesome.
what is the improvement in hashrate ? how much do you think 0.5.5 improves over EWBF, keep in mind also you can turn off the dev fee on EWBF while here it's hard coded at 2%... Would be great if you can provide some evidence for your claims... For me the improvement is about 6-7% (2680sols with EWBF and 2850sols with ZM), counting the 2% fee that's about 4-5% so not too bad, my cards run the same between 0.5.4 and 0.5.5, no improvement of hashrate or temperatures, but it work pretty well and pretty stable, so good job overall imho. Haven't had any issues with disconnection or anything.
|
|
|
|
Cuzzle
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
|
|
November 16, 2017, 11:55:13 AM |
|
EthMonitoring.com EthControl software has been updated to ZM dstm 0.5.5 version.
Nokia could you add luckpool.org to ethmonitoring.com?
|
|
|
|
bruce81
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 0
|
|
November 16, 2017, 12:43:01 PM |
|
Я ничeгo нe cocтaвлял. Bce кaк былo изнaчaльнo, тoлькo зaмeнил кoшeлeк. Boт вce чтo в бaтникe. echo Don't forget to change your pool and login information.
zm --server eu1-zcash.flypool.org --port 3333 --user t1NFooZ82fzQeWWUH27G8uxLJvNfwMnrBKG
@echo off REM Usage: REM zm --server hostname --port port_nr --user user_name REM [--pass password] [options]... REM REM Stratum: REM --server Stratum server hostname REM prefix hostname with 'ssl://' for encrypted REM connections - e.g. ssl://mypool.com REM --port Stratum server port number REM --user Username / Workername REM --pass Worker password REM REM Options: REM --help Print this help REM --dev Space separated list of cuda devices REM --list-devices List available cuda devices REM --time Enable output of timestamps REM --logfile [=path] Append logs to the file named by 'path' REM If 'path' is not given append to 'zm.log' in REM current working directory. REM --noreconnect Disable automatic reconnection on network errors. REM REM --temp-target In C - If set, enables temperature controller. REM The workload of each GPU will be continuously REM adjusted such that the temperature stays around REM this value. It is recommended to set your fan speed REM to 100% when using this setting. REM REM --telemetry [=ip:port]. Starts telemetry server. Telemetry data REM can be accessed using a web browser(http) or by json-rpc. REM If no arguments are given the server listens on REM 127.0.0.1:2222 - Example: --telemetry=0.0.0.0:2222 REM Valid port range [1025-65535] REM Example: REM zm --server servername.com --port 1234 --user username Я вижy твoю cтaтиcтикy, вce нopм
|
|
|
|
remix4life
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
November 16, 2017, 12:49:24 PM |
|
Hello dstm, may I suggest add failover pools feature like in ewbf and cgminer, thanks.
|
|
|
|
Cuzzle
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
|
|
November 16, 2017, 01:01:03 PM |
|
Hello dstm, may I suggest add failover pools feature like in ewbf and cgminer, thanks.
I second this feature request. (I actually thought it was already in there and I just didnt get around to setting it up yet)
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
November 16, 2017, 01:22:00 PM |
|
Hello dstm, may I suggest add failover pools feature like in ewbf and cgminer, thanks.
I second this feature request. (I actually thought it was already in there and I just didnt get around to setting it up yet) You can probably get something similar with setting up a batch script that after it exit the miner because of disconnect (use the --noreconnect miner switch) it restart the miner on a different pool. Have to be sure the miner exit on pool error. But should work kinda like ::looppool your zm cmline pool 1 --noreconnect goto pool 2
:: pool 2 your zm cmline pool 2 --noreconnect goto pool 3
:: pool 3 your zm cmline pool 3 --noreconnect goto looppool
but i agree, config files and pool failover are awesome
|
|
|
|
remix4life
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
November 16, 2017, 02:55:40 PM |
|
You can probably get something similar with setting up a batch script that after it exit the miner because of disconnect (use the --noreconnect miner switch) it restart the miner on a different pool. Have to be sure the miner exit on pool error. But should work
Hey that's a good idea, but I don't think I can do that in my rig, I've got a strange experience using zm after running 15 hours give or take, I received an e-mail from flypool, said that my miner was offline. Then I checked my rig, Internet connection ok, zm still running and mining but not sending any shares to the pool (only reporting my hashrate, temp, etc) therefore the pool sent an e-mail. I tried to close the miner and restart it again, everything going back to normal. Now I have to set my batch file to auto restart zm every 12 hours, been running good for about a week. I tried to make a loop like you suggested but it didn't work, the miner didn't auto restarted like it used to be, it just opened new cmd window with the new backup pool address but not mining because the gpus somewhat still minning in the first cmd.
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
November 16, 2017, 05:29:45 PM |
|
You can probably get something similar with setting up a batch script that after it exit the miner because of disconnect (use the --noreconnect miner switch) it restart the miner on a different pool. Have to be sure the miner exit on pool error. But should work
Hey that's a good idea, but I don't think I can do that in my rig, I've got a strange experience using zm after running 15 hours give or take, I received an e-mail from flypool, said that my miner was offline. Then I checked my rig, Internet connection ok, zm still running and mining but not sending any shares to the pool (only reporting my hashrate, temp, etc) therefore the pool sent an e-mail. I tried to close the miner and restart it again, everything going back to normal. Now I have to set my batch file to auto restart zm every 12 hours, been running good for about a week. I tried to make a loop like you suggested but it didn't work, the miner didn't auto restarted like it used to be, it just opened new cmd window with the new backup pool address but not mining because the gpus somewhat still minning in the first cmd. Sound like a driver crash, odd that the miner doesn't crash either, you could try to kill all binaries, and do a nvidia drivers reset, then restart the miner, may work, your solution work too are you using latest version with the --noconnect ? Me i noticed another odd thing, if you use the miner multiple times throught the day, the hashrate lower gradually like 1% each time it's started, if you reboot the rig it's back up to the normal hashrate, i never noticed this with EWBF, it's kinda odd.
|
|
|
|
ivakar
|
|
November 16, 2017, 05:49:30 PM |
|
after long tests and usage my opinion about dstm for GTX1080ti is here - it is the same as ewbf why? here is why : hashrate for one gtx 1080ti aprox 770sol, so 4 x 760 = 3040 sol/s while with same settings it is 2960 sol on ewbf. so you it is 2.7% win for dstm. but, there is a dev fee 2% and ewbf we can use without devfee - that means that actual difference is less then 1% and taking into account, that ewbf is more stable for my rig, the choice is obvious
however! for 2 x gtx1070 on dstm i'm getting 960 sol/s and 920 sol/s with ewbf so it is 4.3% difference, minus 2% dev fee and we comes to 2.3% benefit.
I can accept that bonus for gtx1070
|
|
|
|
melpheos
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 557
Merit: 5
|
|
November 16, 2017, 09:09:06 PM |
|
I'm getting 390 vs 375 with my 1070 (60%, +175 core, +200 Mem) But with dev fee the added 15 sol/s turns into a net +7.5 sol Would be nice to have the dev fee to drop to 1% Great work
|
|
|
|
Cuzzle
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
|
|
November 16, 2017, 09:15:36 PM |
|
DTSM is actively developing his program so I have no issues paying a dev fee to support him. This dev fee may be meaningless if he significantly boosts the hash rate with future builds.
|
|
|
|
Edward_Teach
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
November 16, 2017, 10:53:09 PM |
|
Has anyone else noticed that when you drop the power draw on your cards, it doesn't adjust the Sol/W readings in the miner? I took mine from 85% down to 67% and after a few minutes they were still showing 3.30 Sol/W.
|
|
|
|
|