uDwcHYO
|
|
December 05, 2017, 07:32:51 PM |
|
how many do you have outdated shares because of job change ? I have 7% is this normal or I need try to change pool or something else?
|
zzz
|
|
|
thilan29
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
December 05, 2017, 07:36:01 PM |
|
xmr-stak is open-source software, can you point me the place in source code where it is (fast/slow mode depending on drivers version)?
See above post. Stak is slower (~1100h/s) with the 17.11.4 driver vs the blockchain driver. I don't believe that's what they are talking about... Of course the blockchain drivers hash more than 17.11.4 All Red was saying is if you want to play around with the 17.11.4 drivers - XMR-Stak doesn't do a driver check vs Cast which may I don't know if Stak does or doesn't do a "check" but the end result is the same, which is that it is slower, and that's what started the conversation in the first place (whether these programs can work with newer drivers and have good hash rates).
|
|
|
|
rednoW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
|
|
December 05, 2017, 07:37:07 PM |
|
xmr-stak is open-source software, can you point me the place in source code where it is (fast/slow mode depending on drivers version)?
See above post. Stak is slower (~1100h/s) with the 17.11.4 driver vs the blockchain driver. I don't believe that's what they are talking about... Of course the blockchain drivers hash more than 17.11.4 All Red was saying is if you want to play around with the 17.11.4 drivers - XMR-Stak doesn't do a driver check vs Cast which may Thanks for explanation. I wouldn't do better ))
|
|
|
|
ninjam
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 0
|
|
December 05, 2017, 09:18:13 PM |
|
how many do you have outdated shares because of job change ? I have 7% is this normal or I need try to change pool or something else?
Yes, exactly the same percentage, "job not found" on nicehash.
|
|
|
|
rambetiko
Member
Offline
Activity: 189
Merit: 10
|
|
December 05, 2017, 10:14:59 PM |
|
my cast xmr fast (1950 h/s) but i see very slow on the pool site (1200-1600 h/s) Why?
|
|
|
|
entity279
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
December 05, 2017, 10:36:51 PM |
|
my cast xmr fast (1950 h/s) but i see very slow on the pool site (1200-1600 h/s) Why?
This is a general thing in mining. The miner counts the hashes (the speed you are searching) while the pool only knows how many valid shares you've sent (so it counts the results). The two are equivalent only when avereaging on a very large time interval
|
|
|
|
wolverine5pl
|
|
December 05, 2017, 10:56:15 PM |
|
my cast xmr fast (1950 h/s) but i see very slow on the pool site (1200-1600 h/s) Why?
This is a general thing in mining. The miner counts the hashes (the speed you are searching) while the pool only knows how many valid shares you've sent (so it counts the results). The two are equivalent only when averaging on a very large time interval plug it into nicehash. nicehash has nice graphs with average hashrate on longer periods. i woudnt worry about it too much. its not easy tho. we all would love to see highest hashrate on pools all the time
|
|
|
|
uDwcHYO
|
|
December 06, 2017, 01:04:18 AM |
|
I've already seen similar questions about null hashes, but I did not find an answer [05:59:47] GPU0 | 47°C | Fan 1327 RPM | 924.4 H/s [05:59:47] GPU1 | 46°C | Fan 1348 RPM | 925.7 H/s [05:59:47] GPU2 | 46°C | Fan 1318 RPM | 900.6 H/s [05:59:47] GPU3 | 45°C | Fan 1288 RPM | 0.0 H/s [05:59:49] GPU0 | 46°C | Fan 1326 RPM | 924.0 H/s [05:59:50] GPU1 | 46°C | Fan 1347 RPM | 925.3 H/s [05:59:50] GPU2 | 46°C | Fan 1314 RPM | 899.3 H/s [05:59:50] GPU3 | 46°C | Fan 1285 RPM | 0.0 H/s [05:59:50] GPU0 | 46°C | Fan 1326 RPM | 0.0 H/s [05:59:50] GPU1 | 47°C | Fan 1350 RPM | 0.0 H/s [05:59:50] GPU2 | 45°C | Fan 1313 RPM | 0.0 H/s [05:59:50] GPU3 | 45°C | Fan 1285 RPM | 235.3 H/s [05:59:53] GPU0 | 46°C | Fan 1327 RPM | 921.3 H/s [05:59:53] GPU1 | 46°C | Fan 1344 RPM | 923.7 H/s [05:59:53] GPU2 | 46°C | Fan 1317 RPM | 896.8 H/s [05:59:53] GPU3 | 45°C | Fan 1286 RPM | 0.0 H/s [05:59:55] New job received. Avg Job Time: 31.0 sec [05:59:55] GPU0 | 47°C | Fan 1329 RPM | 921.7 H/s [05:59:55] GPU1 | 46°C | Fan 1343 RPM | 921.7 H/s [05:59:55] GPU2 | 46°C | Fan 1318 RPM | 895.9 H/s [05:59:55] GPU3 | 46°C | Fan 1288 RPM | 0.0 H/s
can I do something with this problem? it can be with 1 card or 2 or 3. With the same settings, alternative miners work stably but give 7-9% less
|
zzz
|
|
|
hozerdev
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
December 06, 2017, 01:18:11 AM |
|
Trying to run this miner on RX 580 rigs. Getting "Error CL_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND calling clGetDeviceIDs for number of devices", tried different options like --opencl 0 /1. In device manager no integrated graphics, only rx 580s. Happens on all my rigs. Any advise please?
|
|
|
|
uDwcHYO
|
|
December 06, 2017, 01:31:01 AM |
|
try using this data in command line -G 0,1,2,3 -O 1 , where -G num id cards , it helped me, had the same problem
|
zzz
|
|
|
hozerdev
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
December 06, 2017, 01:57:29 AM |
|
try using this data in command line -G 0,1,2,3 -O 1 , where -G num id cards , it helped me, had the same problem
Thanks, it worked. Apparently --opencl doesn't work in 0.7. Getting just 60h/s more then claymore's miner. Overall 920 h/s per card.
|
|
|
|
duyquang06
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 0
|
|
December 06, 2017, 03:06:22 AM |
|
Can someone post complete list of configuration options, please : ( I pull --help in bat file but nothing happens....Sadly Really need readme.txt file ( Thanks u guys.
|
|
|
|
MickDaster
|
|
December 06, 2017, 03:06:34 AM |
|
try using this data in command line -G 0,1,2,3 -O 1 , where -G num id cards , it helped me, had the same problem
Thanks, it worked. Apparently --opencl doesn't work in 0.7. Getting just 60h/s more then claymore's miner. Overall 920 h/s per card. that is not that bad, which card is it again?? and what driver?
|
|
|
|
gregzinho
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
December 06, 2017, 03:17:39 AM |
|
Error CL_MEM_OBJECT_ALLOCATION_FAILURE
How i solve this issue?
|
|
|
|
xeridea
|
|
December 06, 2017, 04:12:20 AM |
|
Error CL_MEM_OBJECT_ALLOCATION_FAILURE
How i solve this issue?
Make your pagefile huge
|
Profitability over time charts for many GPUs - http://xeridea.us/chartsBTC: bc1qr2xwjwfmjn43zhrlp6pn7vwdjrjnv5z0anhjhn LTC: LXDm6sR4dkyqtEWfUbPumMnVEiUFQvxSbZ Eth: 0x44cCe2cf90C8FEE4C9e4338Ae7049913D4F6fC24
|
|
|
hozerdev
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
December 06, 2017, 04:28:41 AM |
|
that is not that bad, which card is it again?? and what driver?
Blockchain driver, Sapphire Rx580 Nitro SE, they hold 1200/2250 with 850v on core and memory. I've already seen similar questions about null hashes, but I did not find an answer ... [05:59:50] GPU3 | 46°C | Fan 1285 RPM | 0.0 H/s [05:59:50] GPU0 | 46°C | Fan 1326 RPM | 0.0 H/s [05:59:50] GPU1 | 47°C | Fan 1350 RPM | 0.0 H/s [05:59:50] GPU2 | 45°C | Fan 1313 RPM | 0.0 H/s ...
can I do something with this problem? it can be with 1 card or 2 or 3. With the same settings, alternative miners work stably but give 7-9% less I have it too, v0.7. It doesn't seem cause any problem apart that it spams into a console.
|
|
|
|
eafindme
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
December 06, 2017, 06:34:22 AM |
|
Error CL_MEM_OBJECT_ALLOCATION_FAILURE
How i solve this issue?
Make your pagefile huge Make your virtual memory multiples of your GPU's VRAM, eg, 5 pcs RX570 4G will need 5*4 = 20GB virtual memory on hard disk.
|
|
|
|
eafindme
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
December 06, 2017, 06:49:08 AM |
|
that is not that bad, which card is it again?? and what driver?
Blockchain driver, Sapphire Rx580 Nitro SE, they hold 1200/2250 with 850v on core and memory. I've already seen similar questions about null hashes, but I did not find an answer ... [05:59:50] GPU3 | 46°C | Fan 1285 RPM | 0.0 H/s [05:59:50] GPU0 | 46°C | Fan 1326 RPM | 0.0 H/s [05:59:50] GPU1 | 47°C | Fan 1350 RPM | 0.0 H/s [05:59:50] GPU2 | 45°C | Fan 1313 RPM | 0.0 H/s ...
can I do something with this problem? it can be with 1 card or 2 or 3. With the same settings, alternative miners work stably but give 7-9% less I have it too, v0.7. It doesn't seem cause any problem apart that it spams into a console. Yeah, it keeps spamming the console even though the statistics show that the GPU still running... ... [Hash Rate Avg: 3147.9 H/s] 717.4 H/s GPU0 827.7 H/s GPU1 805.1 H/s GPU2 797.8 H/s GPU3
[Shares Found: 4 | Avg Search Time: 65.0 sec] 4 (100%) Accepted 0 ( 0%) Rejected by pool 0 ( 0%) Invalid result computation failed 0 ( 0%) Could not be submit because of network error 0 ( 0%) Outdated because of job change
[14:44:04] GPU0 | 48°C | Fan 1639 RPM | 0.0 H/s [14:44:04] GPU1 | 54°C | Fan 1879 RPM | 827.1 H/s [14:44:04] GPU2 | 59°C | Fan 2070 RPM | 803.3 H/s [14:44:04] GPU3 | 54°C | Fan 2025 RPM | 793.4 H/s ...
|
|
|
|
errata
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
|
|
December 06, 2017, 10:28:41 AM |
|
Hi all! I wonder how does Cast XMR enumerate GPUs? Does it have any relation with OverdriveNTool? For example, OverdriveNTool reports cards in my system in this way: 0: iGPU 1: Nvidia 2: Vega 64 3: Vega 64 4: Vega 56 5: Vega 56 6: Vega 56 and I'm running Cast XMR like this: cast_xmr-vega.exe --remoteaccess -S pool:7777 -u address -p pass --opencl 2 -G 0,1,2,3,4 Once CAST XMR starts, I can see the list of cards: GPU0: gfx901 | 64 Compute Units GPU1: gfx901 | 64 Compute Units GPU2: gfx901 | 64 Compute Units GPU3: gfx901 | 64 Compute Units GPU4: gfx901 | 64 Compute Units but how can I tell exactly which GPUs are Vega 64s and which ones are 56s?
|
|
|
|
otidar
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
December 06, 2017, 10:36:00 AM |
|
Hello,
i got the following issue:
initially i got average around 1900h/s and after some time, it can be minutes or hours, i drops to 1500-1600h/s
Anyone having such issue and eventually a solution ?
|
|
|
|
|