fungal
Member
 Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
|
 |
October 18, 2013, 02:22:40 AM |
|
Is anyone else getting a hell of a lot of " http://mint.bitminter.com:8332 not responding!" messages with BFGMINER? I am using 3.2.1 Also getting quite a few of "stratum share submission failure" Anyone? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
cet
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
|
October 18, 2013, 04:05:06 AM |
|
Is anyone else getting a hell of a lot of " http://mint.bitminter.com:8332 not responding!" messages with BFGMINER? I am using 3.2.1 Also getting quite a few of "stratum share submission failure" Anyone? shouldn't you be using port 3333 for stratum? /cet |
|
|
|
|
fungal
Member
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
|
|
October 18, 2013, 04:22:12 AM |
|
Is anyone else getting a hell of a lot of " http://mint.bitminter.com:8332 not responding!" messages with BFGMINER? I am using 3.2.1 Also getting quite a few of "stratum share submission failure" Anyone? shouldn't you be using port 3333 for stratum? /cet In a word.. DUNNO... It seems to pick it up most of the time and report the worker in the stats, other times it disappears... maybe I will need to jiggle with it over the weekend to see if it is just PEBKAC. |
|
|
|
|
Newar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
https://gliph.me/hUF
|
|
October 18, 2013, 07:40:12 AM |
|
Is anyone else getting a hell of a lot of " http://mint.bitminter.com:8332 not responding!" messages with BFGMINER? I am using 3.2.1 Also getting quite a few of "stratum share submission failure" Anyone? shouldn't you be using port 3333 for stratum? /cet In a word.. DUNNO... It seems to pick it up most of the time and report the worker in the stats, other times it disappears... maybe I will need to jiggle with it over the weekend to see if it is just PEBKAC. |
|
|
|
|
derekleong75
|
|
October 18, 2013, 09:37:45 AM |
|
Is there such a thing as the GBT not being able support Jupiter units well and these ASICs are unable to hash > 500GHs but the same unit would be able to do so on the stratum network?
|
|
|
|
|
fungal
Member
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
|
|
October 18, 2013, 10:15:52 AM |
|
Is anyone else getting a hell of a lot of " http://mint.bitminter.com:8332 not responding!" messages with BFGMINER? I am using 3.2.1 Also getting quite a few of "stratum share submission failure" Anyone? shouldn't you be using port 3333 for stratum? /cet In a word.. DUNNO... It seems to pick it up most of the time and report the worker in the stats, other times it disappears... maybe I will need to jiggle with it over the weekend to see if it is just PEBKAC. Ok, will probably change it over the weekend, having a look though, I am connecting to us1.bitminter.com , I would guess it is redirecting then...either way... does not matter, I will look at it further over the weekend, the bad news is later I found all my submitted blocks were all of a sudden being rejected, so the upside is I restarted BCG and now it is running all smooth again.... a tad weird, but hey it had been running for over a week solid, and we are talking about a Windows box... |
|
|
|
|
|
Flashman
|
|
October 18, 2013, 10:49:22 AM |
|
Have you tried setting "Minimum difficulty" for your worker to 512? Some people reported that it helped if the miner did not switch difficulties.
Speaking of which is there some sort of tuning guide for the new options and/or bfgminer on bitminter, or is it all buried in this monster somewhere? |
TL;DR See Spot run. Run Spot run. .... .... Freelance interweb comedian, for teh lulz >>> 1MqAAR4XkJWfDt367hVTv5SstPZ54Fwse6
Bitcoin Custodian: Keeping BTC away from weak heads since Feb '13, adopter of homeless bitcoins. |
|
|
cspindor
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
October 18, 2013, 11:37:13 AM |
|
Have you tried setting "Minimum difficulty" for your worker to 512? Some people reported that it helped if the miner did not switch difficulties.
Speaking of which is there some sort of tuning guide for the new options and/or bfgminer on bitminter, or is it all buried in this monster somewhere? The post DOC did on the new options are back around page 230 +,- a few pages. i don't have time to look back. got to go to work. good luck. |
|
|
|
|
cspindor
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
October 18, 2013, 01:53:18 PM |
|
145 TH
|
|
|
|
|
Nemo1024
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1014
|
|
October 18, 2013, 01:56:51 PM |
|
145 TH
You are behind times: 150TH/s  |
“Dark times lie ahead of us and there will be a time when we must choose between what is easy and what is right.”
“We are only as strong as we are united, as weak as we are divided.”
“It is important to fight and fight again, and keep fighting, for only then can evil be kept at bay, though never quite eradicated.”
|
|
|
cspindor
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
October 18, 2013, 02:16:49 PM |
|
So just because we get to that point in the swing we claim 150 th? My page is swinging from 144 -148 th. I did see 150 th once. Just asking how you think it should be measured. I would think its on the sustained reading.
Edit now 142 TH
|
|
|
|
|
Nemo1024
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1014
|
|
October 18, 2013, 02:22:27 PM |
|
Yeah, I was just pulling your leg. A sustained average over 24h is a better measure.
But the writing is not the wall: KnC's are still coming en-masse.
|
“Dark times lie ahead of us and there will be a time when we must choose between what is easy and what is right.”
“We are only as strong as we are united, as weak as we are divided.”
“It is important to fight and fight again, and keep fighting, for only then can evil be kept at bay, though never quite eradicated.”
|
|
|
cspindor
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
October 18, 2013, 02:37:39 PM |
|
Yes they are!!! I wish I had one or five of them on the way. I am still saving to order on. The in flow of TH's to bitminter is a good thing I think. I am only running around 30 gh's. And I think I am minting more now than I was a month ago. Got to love the speed of the nasty blocks!!!
|
|
|
|
|
DrHaribo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1034
Needs more jiggawatts
|
|
October 18, 2013, 02:51:00 PM |
|
Have you tried setting "Minimum difficulty" for your worker to 512? Some people reported that it helped if the miner did not switch difficulties.
Speaking of which is there some sort of tuning guide for the new options and/or bfgminer on bitminter, or is it all buried in this monster somewhere? I wrote a bit about work submits per minute here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=27062.msg3142713#msg3142713The minimum difficulty option was added after that. Many suggest to set it to your hashrate in gigahashes divided by 1.4. The server will still auto adjust your difficulty, but the minimum diff gives a smoother start when you connect to the pool, so that the server doesn't have to bring you up from difficulty 1. |
|
|
|
cspindor
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
October 18, 2013, 03:27:39 PM |
|
Doc I started with Bitminter when the pool was around 15 th's. A few short months later the pool is doing well! 130-135 th's! I don't know a lot about website building. But I say you got this!!!
Great to work with Bitminter!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dot99lr
|
|
October 20, 2013, 01:51:24 AM |
|
The luck today blows...Somebody save us!
Our luck won't get much better with blocks taking over an hour on the blockchain  |
|
|
|
|
|
smoothrunnings
|
|
October 20, 2013, 02:17:14 AM |
|
Is there a problem with Bitminter?
I don't understand why I am seeing expected block of 0.00562295?
I checked out one of the other sites and my expected block count is much higher at 226GH/s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
derekleong75
|
|
October 20, 2013, 07:22:17 AM |
|
Any Jupiter owners mining on Bitminter?
Been trying the following :
0.90 w/enablecores
0.94
0.95
0.96 w/enablecores
Difficulty 256
Hashing @ 450 GHs avg on the GBT network. Unfortunately, I am not sure if stratum would give better results as my workplace blocks stratum access.
Please let me know how much your Jupiter hashes at and your details. If push comes to shove, I might have to bring it home if it's related to GBT/stratum.
Regards.
Derek
|
|
|
|
|
|
TheQuin
|
|
October 20, 2013, 07:40:48 AM |
|
Is there a problem with Bitminter?
I don't understand why I am seeing expected block of 0.00562295?
I checked out one of the other sites and my expected block count is much higher at 226GH/s.
There is no problem with Bitminter. You are only looking at half the equation. A pool with half the hash rate will pay twice as much per block found but will find half as many blocks making it the same. |
|
|
|
DrHaribo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1034
Needs more jiggawatts
|
|
October 20, 2013, 07:58:02 AM |
|
Doc I started with Bitminter when the pool was around 15 th's. A few short months later the pool is doing well! 130-135 th's! I don't know a lot about website building. But I say you got this!!!
Great to work with Bitminter!!
Thanks  15 TH... things are moving quickly in the Bitcoin world. Any Jupiter owners mining on Bitminter?
I believe most on the top 50 use Jupiter. I would guess most use Stratum. You could get lower bandwidth usage and perhaps slightly less rejected work with Stratum, but otherwise I think GBT should work fine. Maybe some Jupiter users can give some advice on upping the hashrate. Is there a problem with Bitminter?
I don't understand why I am seeing expected block of 0.00562295?
I checked out one of the other sites and my expected block count is much higher at 226GH/s.
If you didn't mine full speed during the last 10 shifts then the pay per block won't be as high as if you had. More work means more pay. Plus what TheQuin said. If pool hashrate goes up and your hashrate stays the same then your pay per block will go down but you will get paid for more blocks per day. Your average pay actually stays the same, but the variance decreases. Some info here: http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/10731/mining-pool-hashrate-effect-on-a-miners-income |
|
|
|
|
