Odalv
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 20, 2014, 11:02:28 PM |
|
Adrian-x, how much are your losses ?
|
|
|
|
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 20, 2014, 11:02:38 PM |
|
oh wow! i'm guilty of inflation! lol!
who said spin offs are inflationary to Bitcoiner's? you? lol!
Yes I said and I can repeat - "spin-offs" is not fair scheme. (but I agree, it is profitable for you (and for me too ... only I do not like it b/c I do not scam people)) - "spin-offs" inflates money. spin-offs only allow innovation to percolate through the scam coin cloud. the ones that survive add value, the ones that dont cause no damage, there is no inflation. It seems to me there absolutely is. Money base is expanded 2x. Ledger is debased. but so are holders holdings. net effect, zero. "net effect, zero." => a) cypherdoc managed to scam $100,000 USD b) some newbies lost $100,000 USD => $0 USD WTF is wrong with you? accusing me of scamming? making stuff up now? you're a dick.
|
|
|
|
Odalv
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 20, 2014, 11:04:16 PM |
|
oh wow! i'm guilty of inflation! lol!
who said spin offs are inflationary to Bitcoiner's? you? lol!
Yes I said and I can repeat - "spin-offs" is not fair scheme. (but I agree, it is profitable for you (and for me too ... only I do not like it b/c I do not scam people)) - "spin-offs" inflates money. spin-offs only allow innovation to percolate through the scam coin cloud. the ones that survive add value, the ones that dont cause no damage, there is no inflation. It seems to me there absolutely is. Money base is expanded 2x. Ledger is debased. but so are holders holdings. net effect, zero. "net effect, zero." => a) cypherdoc managed to scam $100,000 USD b) some newbies lost $100,000 USD => $0 USD WTF is wrong with you? accusing me of scamming? making stuff up now? you're a dick. yep, I'm stupid idiot going mad ... simply dick Edit: and your scamming business will be evaporating soon. => good for bitcoin
|
|
|
|
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 20, 2014, 11:05:40 PM |
|
oh wow! i'm guilty of inflation! lol!
who said spin offs are inflationary to Bitcoiner's? you? lol!
Yes I said and I can repeat - "spin-offs" is not fair scheme. (but I agree, it is profitable for you (and for me too ... only I do not like it b/c I do not scam people)) - "spin-offs" inflates money. spin-offs only allow innovation to percolate through the scam coin cloud. the ones that survive add value, the ones that dont cause no damage, there is no inflation. It seems to me there absolutely is. Money base is expanded 2x. Ledger is debased. but so are holders holdings. net effect, zero. "net effect, zero." => a) cypherdoc managed to scam $100,000 USD b) some newbies lost $100,000 USD => $0 USD WTF is wrong with you? accusing me of scamming? making stuff up now? you're a dick. yep, I'm stupid idiot going mad ... simply dick i think you're so desperate to get this SC scam going you're resorting to all sorts of underhanded behavior. wow.
|
|
|
|
Odalv
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 20, 2014, 11:11:15 PM |
|
i think you're so desperate to get this SC scam going you're resorting to all sorts of underhanded behavior. wow.
This is THE END, of your alt-coin scam. SC will not allow pump/dump scheme anymore.
|
|
|
|
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 20, 2014, 11:14:14 PM |
|
i think you're so desperate to get this SC scam going you're resorting to all sorts of underhanded behavior. wow.
This is THE END, of your alt-coin scam. SC will not allow pump/dump scheme anymore. what are you talking about? better stop smokin that stuff...
|
|
|
|
Odalv
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 20, 2014, 11:17:29 PM |
|
i think you're so desperate to get this SC scam going you're resorting to all sorts of underhanded behavior. wow.
This is THE END, of your alt-coin scam. SC will not allow pump/dump scheme anymore. what are you talking about? better stop smokin that stuff... I'm talking about your motivation. ... seems, you are the one "smokin that stuff" and not being able to check reality.
|
|
|
|
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 20, 2014, 11:20:52 PM |
|
i think you're so desperate to get this SC scam going you're resorting to all sorts of underhanded behavior. wow.
This is THE END, of your alt-coin scam. SC will not allow pump/dump scheme anymore. what are you talking about? better stop smokin that stuff... I'm talking about your motivation. ... seems, you are the one "smokin that stuff" and not being able to check reality. the problem with you is that you think just b/c something is technically possible you automatically think its economically possible or viable. that's not true, esp with Bitcoin. you're throwing all caution to the wind. the mere fact that you'll throw out all sorts of these made up allegations show how desperate you are to capitalize on SC's.
|
|
|
|
Odalv
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 20, 2014, 11:35:53 PM |
|
i think you're so desperate to get this SC scam going you're resorting to all sorts of underhanded behavior. wow.
This is THE END, of your alt-coin scam. SC will not allow pump/dump scheme anymore. what are you talking about? better stop smokin that stuff... I'm talking about your motivation. ... seems, you are the one "smokin that stuff" and not being able to check reality. the problem with you is that you think just b/c something is technically possible you automatically think its economically possible or viable. that's not true, esp with Bitcoin. you're throwing all caution to the wind. the mere fact that you'll throw out all sorts of these allegations show how desperate you are to capitalize on SC's. ok, I can take it. but the problem with you is that you think a) you are smarter than Satoshi and all devs together (only you have no proof) b) you invested into Bitcoin and w/o your investment/brain-washing it is the end of universe (only I'm not sure if you invested at least 1/2 of what I did) I do not know if it is not worth my time to talk with you.
|
|
|
|
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 20, 2014, 11:44:22 PM |
|
I do not know if it is not worth my time to talk with you.
it really isn't. you're the one who started the mud slinging. no one said they're smarter. i'm just expressing my view.
|
|
|
|
Odalv
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 20, 2014, 11:54:55 PM |
|
I do not know if it is 1) not worth my time to talk with you.
it really isn't. 2) you're the one who started the mud slinging. 3) no one said they're smarter. i'm just expressing my view. 1) I'm sorry, I'm not natural speaker. 2) really ? 3) the opposite is true -> they're smarter
|
|
|
|
Adrian-x
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 20, 2014, 11:56:40 PM |
|
Adrian-x, how much are your losses ?
"there is no there there" there are no losses there is no spoon,
|
Thank me in Bits 12MwnzxtprG2mHm3rKdgi7NmJKCypsMMQw
|
|
|
brg444
|
|
November 21, 2014, 12:14:53 AM |
|
|
"I believe this will be the ultimate fate of Bitcoin, to be the "high-powered money" that serves as a reserve currency for banks that issue their own digital cash." Hal Finney, Dec. 2010
|
|
|
cypherdoc (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 21, 2014, 12:58:52 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
NewLiberty
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
Gresham's Lawyer
|
|
November 21, 2014, 01:30:02 AM |
|
back up a step. miners get paid to insert those CP records into satoshi tx's in the first place which incentivizes mining growth and thus more security and thus less chance for subsequent attack on those same satoshi tx's. now move all these CP tx fees off to a SC that can't be MM'd. this deprecates the MC. and there will be thousands of these insecure SC's as i think only a few SC's will be MM'd due to mining capacity constraints.
Merge mining may tend to make a SC less secure rather than more unless it is super popular already. Any MM SC with a shortish SPV confirmation time is going to be DOA if there is any value to be taken from a double spend. There are a heck of a lot of ASICs out there.
|
|
|
|
cbeast
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1014
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
|
|
November 21, 2014, 01:39:48 AM |
|
A very good case against the viability of Side Chains and unveiling ideological ulterior motives that undermine the fundamental incentives of Bitcoin.
|
Any significantly advanced cryptocurrency is indistinguishable from Ponzi Tulips.
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
|
November 21, 2014, 01:42:02 AM |
|
A very good case against the viability of Side Chains and unveiling ideological ulterior motives that undermine the fundamental incentives of Bitcoin. Sidechains bad?
|
Forgive my petulance and oft-times, I fear, ill-founded criticisms, and forgive me that I have, by this time, made your eyes and head ache with my long letter. But I cannot forgo hastily the pleasure and pride of thus conversing with you.
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
|
November 21, 2014, 01:45:12 AM |
|
... he's been a raving statist apologist for the worst of their crimes since he showed up in bitcoinosphere. He's wondering why bitcoin is starting to feel like paypal2.0 after advocating for his gravvy train govt. intervention paid him handsome dividends ...
|
|
|
|
cbeast
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1014
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
|
|
November 21, 2014, 01:48:36 AM |
|
A very good case against the viability of Side Chains and unveiling ideological ulterior motives that undermine the fundamental incentives of Bitcoin. Sidechains bad? Only in their execution. I still think their is a reasonable compromise that enhances Bitcoin, like a remora to a shark.
|
Any significantly advanced cryptocurrency is indistinguishable from Ponzi Tulips.
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
|
November 21, 2014, 01:53:51 AM |
|
A very good case against the viability of Side Chains and unveiling ideological ulterior motives that undermine the fundamental incentives of Bitcoin. Sidechains bad? Only in their execution. I still think their is a reasonable compromise that enhances Bitcoin, like a remora to a shark. Many people are skeptical. They remind us of altcoins I guess. But if it is a decentralized way to achieve micropayments, for example, seems legit enough
|
Forgive my petulance and oft-times, I fear, ill-founded criticisms, and forgive me that I have, by this time, made your eyes and head ache with my long letter. But I cannot forgo hastily the pleasure and pride of thus conversing with you.
|
|
|
|