It's the most common mistake to think that if an exchange mentions a coin and tells you how to buy it or send it to a stake, someone is bound to think that it will cause that coin to grow. No, it won't. Binance also had similar guides about various coins, but in the end, almost 2 years passed after they were published and no listing happened. You can talk about listing only when exchange announces this listing and not when they just write about how to buy this or that coin. Do NOT try to look for any connection in these events. There is none.

Everything you described applies to any altcoin, regardless of its category, whether it is a utility token or a meme coin. All coins depend on community support and whales. Without them, there will be no demand and the creation of a certain market by market makers. If we are talking specifically about meme koins, it is a class of cryptocurrency whose demand depends only on the availability of some influencer. If a meme coin doesn't have an influencer, who will distribute mentions about the coin in social networks, then this meme coin will remain unknown and unwanted. The popularity of this or that coin depends on the degree to which it is distributed in social networks by some person, a so-called opinion leader.

Раздачи альтов на форуме запрещены. Можно заработать бан. Рекомендую убрать из своего поста эту фразу.

Об этом можете прочитать здесь https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5413279.0

The project has good backers as well as binance support. At the moment about 35% of the whole offer is available.  As a medium-term investment, you could make a purchase of 70-75 cents. There is a chance that this project could grow to at least $5 during the next bull run, which is a very good profit. But again, not investment advice, DYOR.

That's how all hypes end, actually. That's the downside of altcoins. Hype does not live long on them, but when people get some profits on altcoins, they start thinking that this will go on forever. In altcoins, the winner is always the one who knows how to stop in time and fix the real profit, not the number of tokens, which can quickly depreciate. Aptos is in high demand right now, and everyone is talking about it. Any product related to Aptos gathers a large audience. I think the hype for Aptos will continue as long as its main catalyst, NFT, is in demand. In other words, Aptos will be highly valued as long as the NFT summer on Aptos continues.

How many different business models have appeared on the crypto market. But all of them, in my opinion, have one big problem: they do not stimulate participants to develop this business model and the token or coin that supports this model. The majority of people come to these projects for earnings and are not interested in the project itself, its features, etc. The goal is only one: to make a quick buck, preferably involving the connection of many accounts and profiles. Over time, no matter what interesting models developers offer, they all fade away, the price of the token falls to the bottom and the community migrates to some new offer. As long as people don't want to develop projects and only come for earnings, all these models will continue to crumble over time.

None. Game projects don't live long in terms of popularity, because the community is always looking for more profitable ways to make money on meta universes and p2e games. Axie Infinity was good last year, but tokenomics problems quickly destroyed its popularity. These coins are good to buy at the beginning of their journey and sell at the top of the hype. Don't be under the illusion that meta-universe and gaming projects will behave like bitcoin and rise in value over time. It won't.

When you don't know where to look and expect everything to be brought to you ready-made No one will share the gems they find, and the projects they want to share with you will be the usual shilling or the result of poor analysis. There is no certainty when it comes to gems. Everyone defines gems based on their own analytics and methodology for gathering information on a particular project. If you think it is enough to ask a question and they will bring you the golden grail in the world of crypto investing, I hasten to disappoint you. They won't. Do not rely on other people's advice and analytics, which concerns altcoins, always do it yourself. If you do not know how to do it, then it is better not to invest.

Not everything is as rosy as you describe. Not all testnets are profitable. Anyone who plans to spend time on testnets should consider one truth, that 90% of all testnets will not bring you anything in terms of profit, only experience. It follows that it is not enough just to start taking part in the testnet, you still need to learn to recognize promising testnet. Newcomers who have recently heard about testnet Aptos, rushed to participate in all testnet, thinking they all bring as much profit. They don't take into account the fact that testnets like Aptos appear 3-4 times a year, and everything else just passes by.

I am not sure at all that the next hype will be some sort of mining, whether cloud or phone mining, or even hard drive mining, which was extremely popular when the CHIA coin was popular. I don't think mining is of interest to a large number of people at all because of its cost and shallow profitability. It is much more profitable to spend time on popular business models of earning token or mint NFT and any web3 initiatives. This is what the crypto community is interested in now and will be interested in the future. This is just my opinion.

Until bitcoin decides on the price movement and trend direction, ETH will definitely hang around in a sideways trend as well. Now the whole market has sharply decreased activity and trading activity as well. No matter what the trading indicators show, if bitcoin will stagnate, ETH will follow it too. It would be too naive to expect that a single coin, in contradiction to the whole market, will start some growth. If a further dump happens, the main thing is for ETH to be able to keep the $1,000 price.

Нет, к сожалению это не та монета. В принципе, я нашёл что это за монета - Wounded Warrior Coin.

Задание остаётся в силе для тех, кто найдёт инфо по этой монете. Особенно меня интересует кошелёк.

5 меритов первому, кто найдёт информацию о проекте, которому принадлежат адреса такого вида WW1WHhywWmBkjMyMyzASouNP56xJuJc2yR

There is a big mistake in your reasoning. The fact is that there are no coins in the top-300 that can give you x100 in the next bull run. There are projects in the top 300 that have already grown noticeably and gained significant capitalization. If you're hunting for potential gems, you need to look at coins that are ranked ~800-1500. These are young projects that have a small capitalization and are not yet very widespread in the market. If a project has a capitalization of $1 million, it's much easier for it to grow 100 times than a project that is in the top 300 and already has a capitalization of $200 million. It's simple math. So you're looking for x100 gems in the wrong place. In the top 300 you should be looking for projects for conservative investment.

Maybe if it doesn't abuse censorship in the future and keeps its deflationary model. If, however, the centrality and centralization that is now gaining momentum in ETH grows strongly, it could prompt a migration of investors and users. The demand for the blockchain space will decline and ETH's leadership will diminish markedly. ETH's competitors are not napping. Something similar is now happening in the stablecoin sector, where censored USDT is slowly losing market share to USDC.

I wouldn't call it dark, I would call it as logical and realistic as possible. Look around you, almost the entire industry has been influenced by kyc and regulators. Most countries around the world have created their legislative frameworks and taxation for cryptocurrencies. And all of this is part of centralization and control. Any centralized exchange that supports kyc and aml policies can block and confiscate cryptocurrencies. Also, cryptocurrencies have political censorship and sanctions that prevent certain citizens from using cryptocurrencies and using services. That's a full-fledged control and regulation.  How do I see the future of cryptocurrencies? Fully regulated. Alas, there is no trace of the original intent of cryptocurrencies themselves. Cryptocurrencies were supposed to fight the oppression of central banks and governments, but that's not how it turned out. These same bankers and governments control cryptocurrencies and dictate their terms. People do not use cryptocurrencies as an alternative to fiat, they seek to exchange cryptocurrencies for fiat, through various speculations.

Governments will continue to increase control and regulation. The reason for this is that once worthless coins, once worth very little and taken seriously by few, have become worth very much and a huge value has been transferred through the blockchain. Billions of dollars. Now it is a full-fledged industry, and governments, along with banks, will not miss the opportunity to make it all work for them.

They are paid huge royalties for promotion, which allows them to make money on that coin, as opposed to the crowd of naive investors who believed the Influencer. Influencers have always gotten a lot of money for promoting a product to their audience. I think if there were any modest sums involved, these celebrities wouldn't cooperate. If they're spending their time and their media resources, that means there are some extremely lucrative contracts out there.

None. All the big PoS projects that provide a platform for smart contracts are centralized and subject to censorship. Do you think other networks offer something decentralized and free of regulators? Not likely. Ethereum was apparently the last platform to run on RoW. Blockchain is slowly buckling under centralization and regulation. Tokens and coins are trying to fit under securities law so that they can be regulated and fully controlled.

I cannot agree with you that tesnets, and especially nodes, are simple. Some tesnets require some knowledge when you test some platform or service. If you have no experience in navigating nets, bridges, and wallets, even with a guide, it can take you a long time to figure it all out, and it can take hours to get through the whole testnet.

With nodes, everything is simple until you start setting it all up. If the user is completely unfamiliar with setting up his own server and the command line in Ubuntu, even with a ready-made manual it will be difficult for him to figure out all those console line commands, what works and how to set it up. You need at least minimal technical knowledge to successfully participate in the nodes.