The problem is that we still do not have bittrex unsold block address and that people can still deposit bitcoin buy higher and dump on the sell wall. You keep saying that as though anyone would bother wasting their time and money doing so. Nobody from SuperNET appears to care about this scandal-hit ITO and Block is so very far from having anything of substance to show for itself, there's little concern about it from their side. So who would be motivated enough to burn btc in order to stop this ITO from reaching the 850btc needed? Do you not think that it's simply a large number of returns being made by people who have changed their mind? Why keep kidding yourself it is anything other than the one thing it is most likely to be? Maybe because I witnessed the biggest FUD campaingn in crypto history EVER? I do not care about super net...super nintendo or super mario why are you mentioning it? Jez im so sick of this nonsense. Nope, you didn't. If you'd spent any time on BTT in the last couple of months you'd have seen some truly massive attacks on Monero and NXT. And, from where I'm standing, the BlockNet ITO has thrown up so many red flags that calling what we've just seen a FUD attack is misleading. I've rarely seen so many people unite on one topic on BTT before.......we'll see how this plays out over the next few months. Have you guys any idea where the money is? and have you all read this: http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/how-the-blocknet-ensures-its-funds-cannot-be-misspent
|
|
|
Just taken a look at the BlockNet thread, saw leewilsons banning (and a few others ) in the course of only about 5 pages. BlockNet is starting to look like some kind of cult, tbh. All forms of dissent, even polite, sane questioning from guys like lee, are not tolerated in their threads. There also seems to be a movement starting to get all 'true believers' to force the BlockNet team to carry on with the project even if the 850 BTC target is not reached, by refusing any refunds. It's like turkeys voting for Christmas...........and no-one has a clue about where all the cash is, even though they talk about almost nothing else. Looking on the bright side: seeing this lunacy has made me very happy about the choices that I've made so far in crypto. Before I forget: Spoetnik, have a kitten, mate..... Posted for future reference: http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/how-the-blocknet-ensures-its-funds-cannot-be-misspent
|
|
|
Doge as a long term investment isn't something I'd recommend, given the inflation rate. NXT is a very good idea for the long-term, it's cruelly underpriced right now, when you look at the features that have already been implemented, the stuff that is in development and the strength of the dev team and community. Buy now, you probably won't regret it. www.nxtforum.orgIf you need to go Proof of Work, check out Bitmark: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=660544.0I've seen how the Bitmark team have very carefully built this project up over the last 5 months: no BS, FUD or drama, just a very solid crypto.
|
|
|
I've been wondering how the BlockNet team arrived at the choice of coins to include in the BlockNet system ?
|
|
|
I posted this at the end of September on www.nxtforum.org I'm going to take the unpopular route here and point that NXT security is pretty good, NXT has no wallet.dat file to lose/corrupt/get stolen for one thing. All cryptos suffer thefts, that can't be completely avoided. There are not very many NXT thefts, but even one is too many. @shin: you are mostly correct: we need to be sure that newbies to NXT can make a safe, secure account. I think that on the dev side we do need to prioritise Account Control with 2FA, and on the marketing side to keep on pushing safe password practices to people. Password security is almost always a contributing factor to crypto thefts, and so education about passwords will help everywhere, not just for NXT applications. I have a feeling that there are at least 2 active thieves: http://nxtreporting.com/?ac=NXT-WTCT-N6HZ-CCKY-4MLJFis the guy/girl with donn2012 + 71586810(at)qq.com stolen funds: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=792600.0https://nxtforum.org/general-discussion/help!-my-nxt-account-stolen-account-for-nxt-wczn-dgql-xm69-62l3n/ These 2 are obvious Rainbow Table attacks, as the passwords used were both direct quotes from literature. and there is the gravitate thief: https://nxtforum.org/general/have-i-been-hacked/http://nxtreporting.com/?ac=NXT-URNF-7LNL-GDNW-EDRN6and then on to the old BTER hot wallet: http://nxtreporting.com/?ac=NXT-LSC3-VB9T-2W3V-BH7FBI have a feeling this is not a Rainbow Table attack, but we'll see.... And I also have the feeling that there are more smaller thefts involved with both attacks. I'm going to offer a bounty of 5000 NXT (from my own personal stash....ouch) to anyone who can help in the recovery process for the thefts above. Talking to BTER sounds like a good first step......freeworm is the guy you need. I would like to suggest that the 3 theft victims here (gravitate, donn2012, 71586810) take the lead in organising the chase....and they can qualify for the bounty for getting their own funds back. Since then there have been no new Nxt thefts, so we're left with 3 guys with a theft issue, 2 of which were definitely down to a weak password. Without Gravitates old password, figuring out how his funds were stolen is more difficult, which is one of the reasons that I suggested that these 3 guys carry out further investigation themselves. Did you guys contact freeworm/BTER ? There are extra bounties available for tracking down the thief or thieves, if you need any more incentive.
|
|
|
Swift kick.....I'd be willing to go in for a Bitcoin or two, Noble has always seemed to me to be a very good, trustworthy project, so I'm definitely going to support NobleNXT.
|
|
|
XC's main PR dude (Synechist) is English/South African, afaik. Too lazy to check, but I think I'm right.
|
|
|
Theres nothing wrong with marketing or PR or outright shilling on forums for a crypto currency......thats how the world works, ya gotta advertise.
But, deliberately inflating the value of a coin (via market manipulation) to attract investors, and then dumping that coin at its market peak, leaving a load of n00b investor bagholders is actually illegal in the non-çrypto world and just as dodgy and immoral within crypto. Just isn't illegal yet........
|
|
|
@ OP; You seem to have forgotten a couple of options, like "probably not" , "Hell, no" or "You must be joking" If you have evidence of Spoetnik being a scammer, btw, lets see it. Going through his trust rating shows a lot of people who don't like him (wonder why ) but no-one who's actually lost any money. I've spent quite a lot of time arguing with S over the last year, and will probably do some more, but there is no way that you can dismiss everything he says as being BS.
|
|
|
Sorry, mate, there was a little....ummmm....accident with the paid shill payroll last week. I seem to have spent it all on Lambo's and 'bronchitis medication'........sorry, guys. I do have some very tasty kittens if you'd like......
|
|
|
I've never touched shadow coin and never will. I think SuperNET idea is stupid but not quite an outright scam. And I've posted half the threads.
Spotniek hates everything but Jackpotcoin and BCX. And he's posted the rest. Your attempts at dismissing these observations and new info on Dan being linked to a pump and dump group as simply trolls from shadowcoin when people know we aren't makes you look like a drowning cat or a pathetic clown trying to act serious (not sure which)
Maybe you should get your facts right if you want to divert the attention first and your readers will give a flying funk about what you have to say
Sucks growing your coin in a circlejerk echo chamber and then being exposed to sunlight doesn't it
Much trueness here. Trying to dismiss all of the allegations as simply (paid-for) trolling just ain't gonna work. The idea that Spoetnik would shill on behalf of SuperNet or Nxt (as gawxsz has alleged) was so fucking funny that I LOL'd as I read it.
|
|
|
Are YOU that retarded? Read the link I posted.... those are REAL court precedence. They had to pay for online slandering and defamation.
You slanderers have cost XC MILLIONS in market cap. You are playing with fire.
You can't scare me away, i know my rights and i know that you are just bluffing. Hey, I am not the one suing you. You can think of this as a game as much as you want. The fact is there for you to read. However you want to take it, it's up to you. I dealt with more resilient noobs like you, its just you think XC is so great, even XMR was better at defending their coin. Do you see BCX getting sued ? Get real. Do whatever you want, it's your life. Now, that you know that being sued for online slandering is not imaginary. Continue to do whatever. It will just help with the evidence more. Now, you no longer can say you "didn't know" when that day comes for you. How about we sue Dan for online scamming ? Like I said, if you have REAL PROOF (and not just "proof" from these fud campaign), go ahead and sue. Just ask yourself if you are joining these smear/slandering campaign without knowing what you are getting yourself into. Your life is yours and it's your right to do whatever you want, just don't join the lemmings in jumping off a cliff if your conviction isn't 100%. This is happening everyday on bitcointalk. Why do you think NxT people have their own forum ? They gone through these shit. Real proof of pump&dump is writtin in your XC chart and logs from all people around the world if you are that lazy i can show you some lines where DAN lied to their investors. One of the main reasons for moving to our own forum (says the Nxt guy) was that it was becoming impossible to run Nxt based on threads on BTT, just too much stuff that needed to be done. The constant trolling was also a factor, but not the main reason. By comparison, the grief that Spoetnik has brought on XC and Blocknet is just a little tiny droplet compared to the grief Nxt has gone through on here.......but Nxt is a solid project, and FUD means nothing in the long term. If XC/BlockNet/DanM are gonna sue based on short term price fluctuations in an insanely volatile market, good luck to them. Like I say elsewhere, I've been threatened with legal actions on 2 occasions here on BTT, so I've done a lot of research (and spoken to several lawyers) and I know that proving 'corporate defamation' is not an easy job. Libel would be much easier to prove, if there is any actual evidence that someone has libelled Dan M. I have seen XC supporters come out with obviously untrue, libellous statements about Spoetnik, btw, this sort of counter-attack will only make Dan M/XC's case much more muddled.
|
|
|
You know you've arrived when people start threatening ya with the law. I've had 2 threats of lawsuits in the last year, both of which were just BS, so welcome to the club, Spoetnik dude. On the other hand, maybe I'll sue ya as well for hurting my feelings the last time you called me a 'scammy cyber-terrorist'
|
|
|
If your currency/project can't take a Spoetnik attack, and feels the need to take legal action against him......it's not a very good sign. If S. is just trolling, then no worries, but he's not the only guy bringing up the red flags, and there is actually some evidence in the form of chatlogs.
|
|
|
So are you trying to claim that every person who has expressed concern over BlockNet is a paid shill ? That's one of the dumbest things I've seen today.
Up until a few days ago, I didn't really give a damn about BlockNet. Thought that some competition for SuperNet was a good thing, but none of the coins involved (except NHZ) actually seemed interesting, so I just put it pretty much on ignore.
Since BlockNet-Gate sprang up, I've been trying to figure out where the truth lies, and when I see XC/BlockNet supporters posting stuff that I know to be complete and utter nonsense, that really doesn't help me believe that BlockNet is a trustworthy project.
|
|
|
FreeMarket is looking very cool right now, and it'll be even better when version 2 releases.....
|
|
|
That went downhill fast.
+10 to Bytas, btw, good OP.
|
|
|
Yes, I'm sure he's 'fucked' people by working 30 hour days coding like a machine getting everything ready. Do you know who Spoetnik is? The thought of him being a paid shill is laughable. And your accusation that SuperNET pays people is childish and ridiculous. @gawzsx: See. posting stupid shit just makes you look stupid. Funny how that works..... I've been involved in one massive on-going argument with Spoetnik for a lot of the last year.........he's always carried a good solid hate for Nxt and now SuperNet, so you either have no idea of his BTT history or you're really reaching trying to get people to believe that S will get in bed with SuperNet. SuperNet doesn't pay people to shill for them. They do pay people to develop innovative and useful crypto systems, though. And, yep, James does work like a machine, even for a coder.
|
|
|
|