Do you realize that in order for your coin to be truly secure, a critical number of users/nodes is required? Why don't you use an existing one or fork an existing one? I would recommend Priratecoin (ARRR) regardless of creating a new coin.

Freiburg is probably one of the most grounded clubs in Germany. That's why they're fine to be currently on the third place, regardless of the result against one of the best teams in the world. For me, Freiburg is one of the biggest surprises in European football in this season. They play so strongly with such a small budget what is really great. And the club has been holding its own in the midfield of the Bundesliga for many years, despite these rather poor conditions in comparison.

If they died without many people knowing about the projects, it probably means that these projects had nothing that really added value. What is the point of a hundredth project that can do basically the same as many others that are much better known?

Another problem is that injured players who are fit again need some time to get back to their full capacity. You can see that well with Erling Haaland. He missed a few games due to injury and is back now, but he hasn't found the form he had before his injury. I'm afraid that will be similar with the other injured players.

Mir ist in dem Zusammenhang noch was nicht ganz klar, wo ich auf die Schnelle nichts finden konnten. Die $1 pro WX Token sind garantiert durch die eingenommenen USDN. Soweit so klar. Nur, steht diese sichere Deckung nur für die 50 Millionen verkauften Token zur Verfügung. Wenn aber jetzt Token aus dem Marketing-, Team- oder Community-Anteil ausgegeben werden, dann müssen diese auch irgendwie gedeckt werden. Beim Staking kann ich mir noch vorstellen, dass diese zB aus Transaktionsgebühren nach und nach finanziert werden. Aber so richtig, findet man da keine Informationen dazu. Im Prinzip fehlt langfristig eine Deckung von $950 Millionen, oder habe ich da irgendwas übersehen?

AS Roma has lost again, this weekend against FC Venice. You can also see how the management is still behind José Mourinho, but in recent weeks the formulations have softened and the coach can no longer afford many bad games, otherwise he will be fired. Perhaps Mourinho would then even be an good option for ManUnited.

Indeed, Dortmund has not been blessed with good fortune in recent months. The injury rate is already quite high and they are currently in a difficult phase. Both in the Bundesliga and in the Champions League, the important course is being set for the entire season.

Als ich mich gestern mal tiefer mit dem WX-Token beschäftigen wollte, war das IDO auch schon vorbei. 50 Mio. Token zu je $1 wurden innerhalb weniger Tage verkauft. Ich hab mich dann trotzdem näher beschäftigt, da WX ein integraler Bestandteil im Waves-Ökosystem werden soll.

Um es kurz zu machen: Letztlich war ich froh nicht investiert zu haben.

Der Grund, es wurden nur 5% aller Token überhaupt verkauft. Allein dreimal so viel ($150 Millionen) bleibt beim Team. Zehnmal soviel, also 50% aller Token, werden nach und nach an die Community verteilt, der Großteil wohl durch das Staking. Nähere Infos zu der Aufteilung des Communityparts konnte ich dazu leider nicht finden, was schon irgendwie komisch ist, denn es sind immerhin $500 Millionen, da wäre es schon interessant zu erfahren, wie diese verteilt werden sollen und über welchen Zeitraum. Zudem rund 10% nur fürs Marketing, also $100 Millionen

Auch die Early-Bird Belohnung ist wirklich nicht attraktiv. Lediglich 0,1% bzw. 1/1000 aller Token, was 1/50 pro verkauften Token ist. Nach Adam Riese müsste man also auf jeden investierten $1, 2 Cent Reward bekommen.

Einzige Vorteil den ich aktuell so sehe ist, dass der Wert von $1 je Token durch den Contract garantiert wird und man somit eigentlich nur gewinnen kann.



Alles in allem bleibe ich erstmal an der Seitenlinie. Der Anstieg nach oben dürfte eigentlich erstmal begrenzt sein, allein durch den enorm ausstehenden Anteil. Und vielleicht schnappt man auch den ein oder anderen WX Token des Communityteils auf, durch Airdrops oder sonstige Aktivitäten im Waves Ökosystem.

Using VPNs or even TOR for gambling sites is nothing new. However, I would say that TOR is much too slow, which can spoil the fun. Gambling providers usually prohibit users from accessing them for legal reasons. If you bypass this block, then such providers can easily find out, because the servers of the VPN providers are often known and therefore it is easy for the gambling provider to detect whether you use VPNs. Most of the time they do nothing at first. But if you then have a larger win, for example, then the payout can be denied quickly with the argumentation of the violation of the TOS. You then also have no legal means to sue for this profit.

Thanks for the information and for making the forum a little cleaner. I read this thread from time to time to find possible candidates to give out some of my merits (hope that is no problem @Ratimov), since I usually get more than I can spend. I have chosen the user you warned about as a possible candidate to give him some merits. Until I read your warning. Instead, I gave both of your posts merits

Unfortunately, however, this corresponds to the truth. Large aid organizations such as the UN spend too much of the donations on bureaucracy and other things. In the worst case, some of the money even seeps away into dark channels. Only a part of it ultimately reaches the people who need it. Elon Musk could certainly use his fame and power to make sure that he is shown exactly what is being done with the money, but I still say that 6 billion will not be enough to solve the problem.

Agree, and there will always be 'online jobs' out there, as the internet has created huge opportunities to address niche markets with extremely little effort to a worldwide customer base. And in many cases without having any specific knowledge. You only have to look at how many people already make their main income or at least have a good side income from streaming or making videos with more or less intelligent content (Twitch, Youtube, etc).

Although this actually belongs in the speculation board, a basic statement about it. A quadrupling of the current level is not very unlikely, if you take the previous price trend into account. You are welcome to read information on expotential growth, which explains why. For the human brain exponential growth is not always easy to understand, because it is trimmed to understand linear growth, which is much more common in our daily life and in nature than exponential growth. I don't know much about $SOL myself, but just by the trend so far and many patterns of other coins, it is quite possible.

That will never be enough. According to current figures, about 1-1.2 billion people suffer acutely from hunger or are at high risk of hunger. Another 1 billion or so are at risk of hunger, not acutely, but as soon as the economy is not doing well. This means that there are about 2-2.2 billion people for whom a permanent solution must be found. If you now put the 6 billion USD, then that would be about $3 per hungry person. Everyone can see that this will never be enough to get the people permanently out of hunger poverty.

I am not sure if we watched the same match, but Betis terribly lost against Leverkusen. Shortly before the end it is 4 -0 for Leverkusen. Betis had no chance at all. I didn't bet on the match, but I already saw Leverkusen as favorites after watching the club's last Bundesliga games (with the exception of the disastrous Bayern game  ).

Hab ich da jetzt etwas verpeilt? Bei mir zeigt der Countdown noch 20 Tage an.



Oder gibt es da mehrere Stages? Ich muss mich da am WE mal richtig einlesen und werde dann entscheiden ob ich da ein bei USDN reinstecken werde. Irgendwie bin ich nach dem Verfolgen der Posts hier sehr neugierig geworden 

I don't quite understand. Regardless of whether these coins are used for harvesting, it should mean that they exist, otherwise they cannot be used for harvesting. But why are they not shown in the statistics if they exist? Therefore, it makes more sense to me that the discrepancy between the 5.6 billion and 8.9 billion is due to the fact that these coins have not yet been claimed. But then the question arises, what happens to the coins that are not claimed? Could not find any info on this. Will they be burned, used for a development fund or for something else?

I think it's very risky. Promoting someone so inexperienced in coaching to head coach takes courage and a lot of hope. If Xavi goes wrong, it will be very unpleasant for Barca. They could not only be eliminated in the group stage of the CL, but also fail to qualify for the European Championships next season. I hope for Barca that this will go well.

The question should rather be how much more successful ManU would be without Ronaldo. The system of play has been changed by the signing him in such a way that it suits Ronaldo very well, but this deprives other players of their strength. Of course, Ronaldo can therefore always shine as a decision-maker, but basically at the expense of the team.
I'm convinced that ManU would be more successful than it currently is if Ronaldo wasn't in the team.

There is even a cryptocurrency that has no fees at all: IOTA [1].

Not sure if you've heard of it. The problem with IOTA up until now was that, in addition to the nodes, there was a central coordinator that centralized the network to a certain extent. But this will be removed in the near future, so that the network will be completely decentralized. The coordinator-free version is already available in beta and is running fine. Until it can be integrated into Mainnet, there are still some tests to be done.
In addition, IOTA recently introduced an alpha version that will allow all Ethereum smart contracts to be connected to the IOTA chain in the future.

https://www.iota.org/