adrd
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
October 24, 2013, 10:03:00 AM |
|
At the wall, uploading video proof now, and photo of meter. Confirming i'm not crazy 623W (240V) @ the wall with a total hash rate of 1.1TH~! CRAZY! That is for 2 Jupiters!https://i.imgur.com/OVQgATi.jpg FW?? It must be for 1 jupiter, I didn't notice any difference in power consumtion between 0.97 and 0.96
|
|
|
|
realtime
Member
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
|
|
October 24, 2013, 10:09:45 AM |
|
It must be for 1 jupiter, I didn't notice any difference in power consumtion between 0.97 and 0.96
Yup...ignore the crazy australian....carry on...was 1 after third time checking my cabling.
|
|
|
|
Ytterbium
|
|
October 24, 2013, 10:31:57 AM |
|
I'm noticing an absence of HashFast Trolls in this thread for some reason. What happened cypherdoc?
|
|
|
|
FeedbackLoop
|
|
October 24, 2013, 10:56:55 AM |
|
0.97 also shows a continuous drop of hashrate for me from 500 to 470 (3 hour average eligius).
Actually.. it doesn't seem to be coming back in any previous firmware. Last value was 450 and that's where it stayed. I read compatible reports on KNC's forum. I fear 0.97 might damage bad Jupiters... Careful upgrading yours.
|
|
|
|
-Redacted-
|
|
October 24, 2013, 11:01:33 AM |
|
I'm noticing an absence of HashFast Trolls in this thread for some reason. What happened cypherdoc? I think that "a few weeks late" notice for their shipping probably shut him down for a while...
|
|
|
|
|
sickpig
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008
|
|
October 24, 2013, 12:21:29 PM |
|
KNC GUI & puTTy both show me at 541 all day - BTCG shows 480-500 most of the day.
am i missing something?
what's your % of HW error?
|
Bitcoin is a participatory system which ought to respect the right of self determinism of all of its users - Gregory Maxwell.
|
|
|
phr33
|
|
October 24, 2013, 12:36:27 PM |
|
0.97 also shows a continuous drop of hashrate for me from 500 to 470 (3 hour average eligius).
Actually.. it doesn't seem to be coming back in any previous firmware. Last value was 450 and that's where it stayed. I read compatible reports on KNC's forum. I fear 0.97 might damage bad Jupiters... Careful upgrading yours. I have a similar issue. It was running fine up until I tried 0.97, then I went from 530 to 470 (520 reported in cgminer but tons of hw errors). Going back to older fws and I still have tons of errors! The "firmwares" are arbitrary patches applied. I think KNC should provide some baseline fw that resets everything to a known state. Anyone talked to KNC regarding going backwards in FW revisions?
|
My BTC input: 1GAtPwoTGPQ35y9QugJueum5GzaEzLYjiQ My GPG ID: B0CCFD4A
|
|
|
madsusies
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 428
Merit: 250
BitcoinEvo [$XBTE]
|
|
October 24, 2013, 12:43:03 PM |
|
Any tips how solve the random miner stoping / freezing after 30-60min ? Pleseeee? It doesn't manke sense waisting more electricity then you mine back + a fact .97 decrease the speed from 100 to a 1.7Ghas
|
|
|
|
sickpig
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008
|
|
October 24, 2013, 12:46:26 PM |
|
Any tips how solve the random miner stoping / freezing after 30-60min ? Pleseeee? It doesn't manke sense waisting more electricity then you mine back + a fact .97 decrease the speed from 100 to a 1.7Ghas knc released 0.96.1 saying that it will fix cgminer stopping after 30min running, give it a try
|
Bitcoin is a participatory system which ought to respect the right of self determinism of all of its users - Gregory Maxwell.
|
|
|
soy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1013
|
|
October 24, 2013, 12:54:38 PM |
|
Alongside the list of firmwares available for download and installation, I'd like to see a list of changes each firmware has compared to the previous. I could then decide if what the upgrade offers is in my interest to apply or skip if it addresses a problem I'm not experiencing.
|
|
|
|
sickpig
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008
|
|
October 24, 2013, 01:02:40 PM |
|
Alongside the list of firmwares available for download and installation, I'd like to see a list of changes each firmware has compared to the previous. I could then decide if what the upgrade offers is in my interest to apply or skip if it addresses a problem I'm not experiencing.
I've been asking a detailed changelog for each released fw since forever. Eventually they'll release those info.
|
Bitcoin is a participatory system which ought to respect the right of self determinism of all of its users - Gregory Maxwell.
|
|
|
KS
|
|
October 24, 2013, 01:21:25 PM |
|
I'm noticing an absence of HashFast Trolls in this thread for some reason. What happened cypherdoc? No 'Orama, no need for balance
|
|
|
|
btc_uzr
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
let's have some fun
|
|
October 24, 2013, 01:23:58 PM |
|
concerning the changelogs, you could compare code on https://github.com/KnCMiner to get a clue what has been changed - but for sure it's not the same like a simple changelog you read in short time. ---------- Any tips how solve the random miner stoping / freezing after 30-60min ? Pleseeee? It doesn't manke sense waisting more electricity then you mine back + a fact .97 decrease the speed from 100 to a 1.7Ghas After reading yesterday's reports about 0.97 I was really close to upgrade - was just too tired in the evening and not in the mood to deal with possible issues. Meanwhile I'm quite happy I'm still on 0.95. UPDATE YOUR MINER TO THE LATEST FIRMWARE
Somehow I'm not sure how to rate KnCMiner's software development and quality assurance in general, as it seems they do neither proper testing, nor understand the root causes of issues since each time there's one solved, but another appears.. I'm happy they're better in hw development, otherwise Jupiter would hash with 290GH/s only while consuming 1kW, I guess Honestly I'm getting more and more disappointed about this. Especially when considering that cgminer's devs could have prevented it very very likely, but KnCMiner was so self confident they will do it better, cheaper, faster (?!). I do not like to think about the difference in mined coins until now.
|
..and Thou shalt spread the coin in the name of cryptography for eternity
|
|
|
r3animation
|
|
October 24, 2013, 01:28:16 PM |
|
I haven't had the issue of hashrate dropping on 0.97 yet. Running for more then 12 hours.
|
|
|
|
madsusies
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 428
Merit: 250
BitcoinEvo [$XBTE]
|
|
October 24, 2013, 01:34:45 PM |
|
Any tips how solve the random miner stoping / freezing after 30-60min ? Pleseeee? It doesn't manke sense waisting more electricity then you mine back + a fact .97 decrease the speed from 100 to a 1.7Ghas knc released 0.96.1 saying that it will fix cgminer stopping after 30min running, give it a try At 96.1 the speed is only 55Ghas
|
|
|
|
Nemo1024
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1014
|
|
October 24, 2013, 01:35:20 PM |
|
I do not like to think about the difference in mined coins until now. Well, you mined fewer coins, but so did everyone else using the same software, so proportionally you have no loss. Those of us hosted customers, who got skipped in the queue, and are still waiting for our miners to get deployed, however....
|
“Dark times lie ahead of us and there will be a time when we must choose between what is easy and what is right.” “We are only as strong as we are united, as weak as we are divided.” “It is important to fight and fight again, and keep fighting, for only then can evil be kept at bay, though never quite eradicated.”
|
|
|
edgar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 24, 2013, 01:37:13 PM Last edit: October 24, 2013, 02:14:28 PM by edgar |
|
concerning the changelogs, you could compare code on https://github.com/KnCMiner to get a clue what has been changed - but for sure it's not the same like a simple changelog you read in short time. ---------- Any tips how solve the random miner stoping / freezing after 30-60min ? Pleseeee? It doesn't manke sense waisting more electricity then you mine back + a fact .97 decrease the speed from 100 to a 1.7Ghas After reading yesterday's reports about 0.97 I was really close to upgrade - was just too tired in the evening and not in the mood to deal with possible issues. Meanwhile I'm quite happy I'm still on 0.95. UPDATE YOUR MINER TO THE LATEST FIRMWARE
Somehow I'm not sure how to rate KnCMiner's software development and quality assurance in general, as it seems they do neither proper testing, nor understand the root causes of issues since each time there's one solved, but another appears.. I'm happy they're better in hw development, otherwise Jupiter would hash with 290GH/s only while consuming 1kW, I guess Honestly I'm getting more and more disappointed about this. Especially when considering that cgminer's devs could have prevented it very very likely, but KnCMiner was so self confident they will do it better, cheaper, faster (?!). I do not like to think about the difference in mined coins until now. i think this( cheaper) was their only concern. faster & better are non-existent terms with these guys - confidence - bucketsfull im now on .96.1 - WU is below 8000 again - GH/s is slowly climbing back to 520 - see whats up in a few hrs FFS - its like a sick joke!! - Mining Status CGMiner Status Running (pid=1755) Last Checked Thu Oct 24 13:54:49 UTC 2013 Avg. Hash Rate 0 Gh/s WU 0Difficulty Accepted 192000 HW Status ASIC slot #1 42.0 ℃ ASIC slot #2 - ASIC slot #3 48.0 ℃ ASIC slot #4 46.5 ℃ ASIC slot #5 43.0 ℃ ASIC slot #6 - puTTy avg showing as 3.555Mh/sWTFF?!
|
|
|
|
FeedbackLoop
|
|
October 24, 2013, 01:57:52 PM |
|
KNC GUI & puTTy both show me at 541 all day - BTCG shows 480-500 most of the day.
am i missing something?
Yes you are. Stop measuring speeds at cgminer or go through Kano's posts for how to get the hashrate numbers using the hardware error numbers and so on. It's really annoying all these people posting meaningless hashrates...
|
|
|
|
btc_uzr
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
let's have some fun
|
|
October 24, 2013, 01:58:51 PM |
|
I do not like to think about the difference in mined coins until now. Well, you mined fewer coins, but so did everyone else using the same software, so proportionally you have no loss. Those of us hosted customers, who got skipped in the queue, and are still waiting for our miners to get deployed, however.... I've to admit that hosted miners are suffering way more (but they got some BTC compensation as far as I know). However difference in mined coins was meant in regards of total amount in the wallet, not in relation to the network or hosted customers or sth else. Yes, I'm happy with my device at 540+ (shown by pool), however it could even be a little better with the help of cgminer devs I assume - and that's all I like to point out in regards to GH/s and hw-errors concerning my quoted statement.
|
..and Thou shalt spread the coin in the name of cryptography for eternity
|
|
|
|