j1pvt
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
December 21, 2015, 01:36:11 PM |
|
I used antpool and slush, and let me tell you, antpool got many blocks, but slush is more reliable and fair. Remember antpool cheated a lot of their miners by hiding blocks etc. Slush would never do that.. never.
I disagree, I think slush is cheating you right now, These pool owners know the tricks to manipulate the pool and fill their own wallets... Amazing how things start to rectify once 10Ph leaves the pool, This is the owner making sure he can afford that new house or vacation overseas, its just greed. One person (owner) prioritizing their needs ahead of all the workers that actually make the pool. And its definitely cheating. And it takes a real coward to do it in such a deviant and sly manner.... Still no comment from the pool owner...... You dont think thats odd.... These are hard accusatuions, can you provide some evidence? We dont have any proof and thats the problem, If we had proof at least something could be done, Do you have any proof to the contrary ? When there is no integrity there can be no trust. If antpool can do it so can slush.
|
|
|
|
trickyriky
|
|
December 21, 2015, 01:55:59 PM |
|
i now only mine my own pools, after witnessing no blocks in a period of time, then the day after blocks appearing in wrong order, claiming to be found 18 hours ago, when last block was found 2 hours ago obvious manipulation, but could also be the looking after loyal miners thing
|
|
|
|
sbtctalk
|
|
December 21, 2015, 04:47:15 PM |
|
i now only mine my own pools, after witnessing no blocks in a period of time, then the day after blocks appearing in wrong order, claiming to be found 18 hours ago, when last block was found 2 hours ago obvious manipulation, but could also be the looking after loyal miners thing How do the loyalty system works at slush pool?
|
13Sk3gsQ1ogrzmyt3xMVvByxcUvZr98kKN
|
|
|
trickyriky
|
|
December 21, 2015, 04:54:54 PM |
|
i now only mine my own pools, after witnessing no blocks in a period of time, then the day after blocks appearing in wrong order, claiming to be found 18 hours ago, when last block was found 2 hours ago obvious manipulation, but could also be the looking after loyal miners thing How do the loyalty system works at slush pool? i dont actually know for certain, but like i said above, i witnessed about an 18 hour period with no blocks found at all, the day after a block was added into my reward history which didnt fit with all the others, block above it needed something like 99 confirms, the block before it needed about 5 confirms, but the added block was confirmed 18 hours previous, im assuming this was the loyalty system, either that or they were hiding blocks from the miners, then re adding the hidden blocks at a later date... i do fully accept there could have also been pool issues, crons not running correctly and then relaunching the crons could account for the odd block in reward history. sorry i couldn't be any more helpful :/
|
|
|
|
abeandund
Member
Offline
Activity: 124
Merit: 15
|
|
December 21, 2015, 08:23:50 PM |
|
i now only mine my own pools, after witnessing no blocks in a period of time, then the day after blocks appearing in wrong order, claiming to be found 18 hours ago, when last block was found 2 hours ago obvious manipulation, but could also be the looking after loyal miners thing How do the loyalty system works at slush pool? i dont actually know for certain, but like i said above, i witnessed about an 18 hour period with no blocks found at all, the day after a block was added into my reward history which didnt fit with all the others, block above it needed something like 99 confirms, the block before it needed about 5 confirms, but the added block was confirmed 18 hours previous, im assuming this was the loyalty system, either that or they were hiding blocks from the miners, then re adding the hidden blocks at a later date... i do fully accept there could have also been pool issues, crons not running correctly and then relaunching the crons could account for the odd block in reward history. sorry i couldn't be any more helpful :/ Sounds from what you are saying, it is merely listing the newest blocks found on the top and rather than listing conformations it is stating how many conformations are left. 99 confirms left indicating the newest, 5 confirms left is 2nd newest and the 18 hour previous is obviously confirmed. seems correct order to me.
|
|
|
|
trickyriky
|
|
December 21, 2015, 10:51:49 PM |
|
i now only mine my own pools, after witnessing no blocks in a period of time, then the day after blocks appearing in wrong order, claiming to be found 18 hours ago, when last block was found 2 hours ago obvious manipulation, but could also be the looking after loyal miners thing How do the loyalty system works at slush pool? i dont actually know for certain, but like i said above, i witnessed about an 18 hour period with no blocks found at all, the day after a block was added into my reward history which didnt fit with all the others, block above it needed something like 99 confirms, the block before it needed about 5 confirms, but the added block was confirmed 18 hours previous, im assuming this was the loyalty system, either that or they were hiding blocks from the miners, then re adding the hidden blocks at a later date... i do fully accept there could have also been pool issues, crons not running correctly and then relaunching the crons could account for the odd block in reward history. sorry i couldn't be any more helpful :/ Sounds from what you are saying, it is merely listing the newest blocks found on the top and rather than listing conformations it is stating how many conformations are left. 99 confirms left indicating the newest, 5 confirms left is 2nd newest and the 18 hour previous is obviously confirmed. seems correct order to me. no normally they are always in found order, ive only ever seen it the once but it was strange to say the least :/
|
|
|
|
adyb
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
December 26, 2015, 08:27:29 PM |
|
It seems that now we're at about 40PH/s luck has taken a fall again....
|
|
|
|
naska21
|
|
December 26, 2015, 09:44:27 PM |
|
It seems that now we're at about 40PH/s luck has taken a fall again.... Looks like the effective rate is around 20PH/s. The question is where the other 20s go to.
|
|
|
|
wikkidtt
|
|
December 27, 2015, 02:03:54 AM |
|
It seems that now we're at about 40PH/s luck has taken a fall again.... I agree. Bet there is something fishy going on........Hmmmmm
|
|
|
|
MikeMike
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1020
★ Ⓚ KORE TEAM Ⓚ ★
|
|
December 30, 2015, 09:43:41 AM |
|
What is going on with CZ? I am missing blocks.
|
|
|
|
gnu123
Member
Offline
Activity: 69
Merit: 10
cryptodonkey on the pool.
|
|
January 01, 2016, 07:37:44 AM |
|
Luck right now :
day 64% week 70% month 78%
And still 38,51 PH/s of people who hash, what do they know that i dont ? They dont care about 24% just dissapear ?
Do anyone know for how many months this luck have been low ?
|
|
|
|
e46btc
|
|
January 01, 2016, 07:45:37 AM |
|
Why u still staying here with such luck?
|
|
|
|
TheRealErikTheRed1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
January 01, 2016, 08:46:53 AM |
|
Why u still staying here with such luck?
That's a good question. BTC is a rock-solid algorithm, which turns many noobs off and their own impatience keeps them away from a great learning experience.
|
|
|
|
sbtctalk
|
|
January 01, 2016, 03:28:20 PM |
|
Where did that extra 10 PH come from?
It has always been the norm for 28 - 32 PH, but on random occasions, you will see that extra 10 PH which brings the total hash to 38 PH and 'luck' takes a nose dive.
|
13Sk3gsQ1ogrzmyt3xMVvByxcUvZr98kKN
|
|
|
Prelude
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 01, 2016, 04:52:58 PM |
|
I don;t get you guys... I was on slush for a long time, but something is obviously not right these days. I've since switched to kano and I couldn't be happier. How long can you guys afford to stick around telling yourselves "it'll turn around soon.."?
|
|
|
|
helipotte
|
|
January 01, 2016, 05:19:42 PM |
|
I noticed OP hasn't logged in since October 2015. Not a good sign.
|
|
|
|
biggbox
|
|
January 01, 2016, 05:50:32 PM |
|
I noticed OP hasn't logged in since October 2015. Not a good sign.
https://www.facebook.com/MiningBitcoinCz/posts/902528979833189December 25, 2015 at 6:28am · #captainspeaking Merry x-mas and happy Bitcoin year 2016. Your Captain https://www.facebook.com/MiningBitcoinCz/posts/897121790373908December 14, 2015 at 2:33pm · #captainspeaking Recent low luck has started a lot of speculation about the health of our pool. We have performed a deep analysis of our infrastructure and haven't found any issues. We are currently analyzing every piece of the deployed software along with all logs. We would really love to find THE bug that would solve the problem. However, there is NO indication of this being a software problem. We will keep you posted. Tonight, we will be deploying new version of the stratum software on all our machines that gives us even more details about all mining sessions. Your Captain https://www.facebook.com/MiningBitcoinCz/posts/891861600899927December 3, 2015 at 2:06am · #captainspeaking, AMA (ask me anything) with the Founder, Marek Palatinus, TODAY! Do not miss an opportunity to ask whatever comes to your mind.
|
1Cr9iLWm2dSGH8259VQd2wDzpkR63jGVjW
|
|
|
helipotte
|
|
January 01, 2016, 07:12:16 PM |
|
It still would be nice if the OP would check in here from time to time, update the thread title hashrate, post updates. I personally don't use Facebook at all.
|
|
|
|
gnu123
Member
Offline
Activity: 69
Merit: 10
cryptodonkey on the pool.
|
|
January 02, 2016, 02:09:05 AM |
|
Why u still staying here with such luck?
First weeks i was hoping for something.... Now i have a thread here on the forum where i let Two S7 Antminer compete against eachother on kano and slush, thats why im still inn slush with a miner. Want to se the results after some weeks. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1304449.new#new
|
|
|
|
adyb
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
January 03, 2016, 11:26:33 PM |
|
Back down at 33 PH/s - will "luck" take a turn for the better again like it did last time a substantial amount of hash left the pool?
|
|
|
|
|