Bitcoin Forum
September 26, 2018, 07:53:04 AM *
News: ♦♦ New info! Bitcoin Core users absolutely must upgrade to previously-announced 0.16.3 [Torrent]. All Bitcoin users should temporarily trust confirmations slightly less. More info.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 [441] 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 ... 1145 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool  (Read 4341922 times)
minerapia
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 08:30:45 PM
 #8801

Can be using IP addresses directly in cgminer?  How config file entry look?

"pools" : [
   {
      "url" : "http://1.2.3.4:3333",
      "user" : "username",
      "pass" : "password"
   }
]

donations -> btc: 1M6yf45NskQxWXknkMTzQ8o6wShQcSY4EC
                   ltc: LeTpCd6cQL26Q1vjc9kJrTjjFMrPhrpv6j
1537948384
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1537948384

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1537948384
Reply with quote  #2

1537948384
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1537948384
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1537948384

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1537948384
Reply with quote  #2

1537948384
Report to moderator
rsbriggs
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 373
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 24, 2013, 08:54:52 PM
 #8802

cgminer 3.1.1 says for this entry:  Pool 1 invalid URL.   Trying many IPs - not work.  Have 10 hostnames in cgminer.conf - all working fine.

Am thnking Windows cgminer not taking IP addresses.   Am also thinking is Windows issue having different gethostbyname() function call to UNIX:

gethostbyname Function in the API

The gethostbyname function uses the WSALookupServiceBegin function to query SVCID_INET_HOSTADDRBYNAME as the service class GUID. ...
Returns addressing information from HOSTENT in CSADDR_INFO structures, port information is defaulted to zero. Note that this routine does not resolve host names that consist of a dotted IPv4 address.

minerapia
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 09:18:30 PM
 #8803

atm cant try cgminer but bfgminer is working just fine with:
"pools" : [
   {
      "url" : "http://54.225.68.97:3333",
      "user" : "username.worker",
      "pass" : "pass",
      "pool-priority" : "0"
   }
]

if you wanna add more ips then go for:
"pools" : [
   {
      "url" : "http://54.215.3.102:3333",
      "user" : "username.worker",
      "pass" : "pass",
      "pool-priority" : "0"
   },
   {
      "url" : "http://54.225.68.97:3333",
      "user" : "username.worker",
      "pass" : "pass",
      "pool-priority" : "1"
   }
]

etc....
NB. cgminer doesnt have "pool-priority"
NB2. this is tested in windows7

donations -> btc: 1M6yf45NskQxWXknkMTzQ8o6wShQcSY4EC
                   ltc: LeTpCd6cQL26Q1vjc9kJrTjjFMrPhrpv6j
bspurloc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 24, 2013, 09:32:20 PM
 #8804

cgminer 3.1.1 says for this entry:  Pool 1 invalid URL.   Trying many IPs - not work.  Have 10 hostnames in cgminer.conf - all working fine.

Am thnking Windows cgminer not taking IP addresses.   Am also thinking is Windows issue having different gethostbyname() function call to UNIX:

gethostbyname Function in the API

The gethostbyname function uses the WSALookupServiceBegin function to query SVCID_INET_HOSTADDRBYNAME as the service class GUID. ...
Returns addressing information from HOSTENT in CSADDR_INFO structures, port information is defaulted to zero. Note that this routine does not resolve host names that consist of a dotted IPv4 address.


That BOLD part is saying you cant use direct IP's. I am not familiar with cgminer in the unix environment so cant help beyond that. However if you know UNIX you can edit the hosts which is generally located in /etc aka vi /etc/hosts and add something like 54.225.68.97 ip1.slush.local
54.225.117.74 ip2.slush.local

may have to hup inetd. then use ip1.slush.local in cgminer script. see if that works. I haven't messed with unix resolving in a long time so I am just going by memory.
stephengillon
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0



View Profile
May 24, 2013, 10:22:29 PM
 #8805

What are your guys pings to the server, i feel i get less shares on this new server then the previous on short blocks (granted difficulty has got up 1-2 times since then)
Im from ontario, canada just for refrence.

stratum1.bitcoin.cz i ping about 75ms

api.bitcoin.cz:8332 i ping about 120ms

i obvously use stratum address, i also tried directly towards some of the listed ip address's its the same as stratum address.


with a tracert to the server i get some timing out after it hits amazons servers, anyone else?
vs3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 622
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
May 24, 2013, 10:56:05 PM
 #8806

What are your guys pings to the server, i feel i get less shares on this new server then the previous on short blocks (granted difficulty has got up 1-2 times since then)
Im from ontario, canada just for refrence.

stratum1.bitcoin.cz i ping about 75ms

api.bitcoin.cz:8332 i ping about 120ms

i obvously use stratum address, i also tried directly towards some of the listed ip address's its the same as stratum address.

with a tracert to the server i get some timing out after it hits amazons servers, anyone else?

Each of those domain names is actually a pool of several IPs. When pinging the name you'll be pinging only one of those IPs. A better approach would be to ping each of the IPs individually.

Also, tracing the route is somewhat irrelevant - the route may change numerous times even while you're still connected. In addition the route on the way to that IP may not be the same as the route back (e.g. packets sent from your computer will take one route to the destination but packets sent back to your computer may travel in a different way). On top of that some providers may block various kinds of packets - many (home/wireless) routers block ping by default as a semi-DoS attack prevention.

rsbriggs
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 373
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 24, 2013, 11:14:56 PM
 #8807

cgminer 3.1.1 says for this entry:  Pool 1 invalid URL.   Trying many IPs - not work.  Have 10 hostnames in cgminer.conf - all working fine.

Am thnking Windows cgminer not taking IP addresses.   Am also thinking is Windows issue having different gethostbyname() function call to UNIX:

gethostbyname Function in the API

The gethostbyname function uses the WSALookupServiceBegin function to query SVCID_INET_HOSTADDRBYNAME as the service class GUID. ...
Returns addressing information from HOSTENT in CSADDR_INFO structures, port information is defaulted to zero. Note that this routine does not resolve host names that consist of a dotted IPv4 address.


That BOLD part is saying you cant use direct IP's. I am not familiar with cgminer in the unix environment so cant help beyond that. However if you know UNIX you can edit the hosts which is generally located in /etc aka vi /etc/hosts and add something like 54.225.68.97 ip1.slush.local
54.225.117.74 ip2.slush.local

may have to hup inetd. then use ip1.slush.local in cgminer script. see if that works. I haven't messed with unix resolving in a long time so I am just going by memory.

Am familiar with UNIX/Linux and variants but using Windows7 to mine.
Edited c:/windows/system32/drivers/etc/hosts file, added list.  Can use ip1-9.slush.com now to specify IP.

# localhost name resolution is handled within DNS itself.
#   127.0.0.1       localhost

54.225.116.174      ip1.slush.com
54.225.117.74      ip2.slush.com
54.225.116.40      ip3.slush.com
54.215.3.101      ip4.slush.com
54.215.3.102      ip5.slush.com
54.225.116.221      ip6.slush.com
54.225.68.97      ip7.slush.com
54.215.3.103      ip8.slush.com
54.215.3.100      ip9.slush.com

rsbriggs
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 373
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 24, 2013, 11:16:52 PM
 #8808

What are your guys pings to the server, i feel i get less shares on this new server then the previous on short blocks (granted difficulty has got up 1-2 times since then)
Im from ontario, canada just for refrence.

stratum1.bitcoin.cz i ping about 75ms

api.bitcoin.cz:8332 i ping about 120ms

i obvously use stratum address, i also tried directly towards some of the listed ip address's its the same as stratum address.

with a tracert to the server i get some timing out after it hits amazons servers, anyone else?

Probably disabling ICMP packets like ping as anti-DOS measure, or just not wanting to allow spying on architecture.

stephengillon
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0



View Profile
May 24, 2013, 11:38:30 PM
 #8809

What are your guys pings to the server, i feel i get less shares on this new server then the previous on short blocks (granted difficulty has got up 1-2 times since then)
Im from ontario, canada just for refrence.

stratum1.bitcoin.cz i ping about 75ms

api.bitcoin.cz:8332 i ping about 120ms

i obvously use stratum address, i also tried directly towards some of the listed ip address's its the same as stratum address.

with a tracert to the server i get some timing out after it hits amazons servers, anyone else?

Each of those domain names is actually a pool of several IPs. When pinging the name you'll be pinging only one of those IPs. A better approach would be to ping each of the IPs individually.

Also, tracing the route is somewhat irrelevant - the route may change numerous times even while you're still connected. In addition the route on the way to that IP may not be the same as the route back (e.g. packets sent from your computer will take one route to the destination but packets sent back to your computer may travel in a different way). On top of that some providers may block various kinds of packets - many (home/wireless) routers block ping by default as a semi-DoS attack prevention.


I know how DNS works, and maybe you should fully read the post before replying.

as i was simply asking for others results on ping to compare, and if anyone has a fully successful trace route.
vs3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 622
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
May 24, 2013, 11:47:44 PM
 #8810

What are your guys pings to the server, i feel i get less shares on this new server then the previous on short blocks (granted difficulty has got up 1-2 times since then)
Im from ontario, canada just for refrence.

stratum1.bitcoin.cz i ping about 75ms

api.bitcoin.cz:8332 i ping about 120ms

i obvously use stratum address, i also tried directly towards some of the listed ip address's its the same as stratum address.

with a tracert to the server i get some timing out after it hits amazons servers, anyone else?

Each of those domain names is actually a pool of several IPs. When pinging the name you'll be pinging only one of those IPs. A better approach would be to ping each of the IPs individually.

Also, tracing the route is somewhat irrelevant - the route may change numerous times even while you're still connected. In addition the route on the way to that IP may not be the same as the route back (e.g. packets sent from your computer will take one route to the destination but packets sent back to your computer may travel in a different way). On top of that some providers may block various kinds of packets - many (home/wireless) routers block ping by default as a semi-DoS attack prevention.


I know how DNS works, and maybe you should fully read the post before replying.

as i was simply asking for others results on ping to compare, and if anyone has a fully successful trace route.



Quoting an earlier comment ... Smiley
To be quoting American TV hero Homer Simpson  ....D'oh....

oroboras
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 25, 2013, 12:11:24 AM
 #8811

18195    2013-05-25 00:08:17    7:13:34    Processing...

About bloody time!! Phew, what a hard block to crack!
bitjoint
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 333
Merit: 250


Commander of the Hodl Legions


View Profile
May 25, 2013, 12:44:22 AM
 #8812

18195    2013-05-25 00:08:17    7:13:34    Processing...

About bloody time!! Phew, what a hard block to crack!

That one took ages. I went out for dinner and when I returned I was like... wtf
Gamelord
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 25, 2013, 12:55:45 AM
 #8813

I have noticed my average has gone down a bit lately.  Is this because we have more miners on lately or did the difficulty change or is it just my bad luck? 

It also appears that I got the short end of the stick on a couple blocks.  Not sure if it is on my end or not.

Anyone else notice the same or is it me?
oroboras
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 25, 2013, 01:01:24 AM
 #8814

luck went down because of the long time to crack a couple of blocks today. over 11 hours for 2 of them. More than counterbalancing the rapid ones we found.
rsbriggs
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 373
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 25, 2013, 01:03:06 AM
 #8815

I have noticed my average has gone down a bit lately.  Is this because we have more miners on lately or did the difficulty change or is it just my bad luck? 

It also appears that I got the short end of the stick on a couple blocks.  Not sure if it is on my end or not.

Anyone else notice the same or is it me?

Be going back 10 pages and reading.  Or back 15, 20, 30, or even 50 pages and reading....

pikeadz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 25, 2013, 01:10:43 AM
 #8816

So... regarding the missed blocks and payments, you guys aren't upset about it?  It just gets overlooked because we've been lucky lately? 

I am not being a dick, but my normal reward per round is ~.03 and there were like 3 that were .006 or less, not due to any downtime on my miner.  I may be back if I can't do better elsewhere, but I'm going to check out btcguild until these issues are fixed. 
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 25, 2013, 01:21:55 AM
 #8817

Seeing shares submitted but not shown on pool page. 16 minutes since last share... Sad Come on Slush can't you fix it? I'm afraid to move anything big to your pool...
oroboras
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 25, 2013, 01:39:10 AM
 #8818

That is odd - one of my 2 workers isn't getting shares showing either. Hmm...

worker1    my password    0    292    18878.7756    16 minutes    226.746    yes    1    Edit |
worker2    is secret, ok?   0    908    7028947.4441    0 minutes    705.086    yes    1    Edit |


Luckily it's my 7850, not my 7970.
bspurloc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 25, 2013, 01:42:09 AM
 #8819

So... regarding the missed blocks and payments, you guys aren't upset about it?  It just gets overlooked because we've been lucky lately? 

I am not being a dick, but my normal reward per round is ~.03 and there were like 3 that were .006 or less, not due to any downtime on my miner.  I may be back if I can't do better elsewhere, but I'm going to check out btcguild until these issues are fixed. 

Slush hasnt acknowledged block 237574 was missed so he gets all 25BTC.
I see block 237575 got adjusted scoring me on 237574's shares so I made .00131371 when I should have gotten around .0066x.
My friend who is mining 2.5gh/s like me his block 237575 got adjusted to .014x when it should have been .0077x so he essentially got paid for block 237574 and 237575 where I got absolutely nothing for 237574 and only 1/6 payment for 237575.

not much you can do if Slush doesnt acknowledge it happened.
bspurloc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 25, 2013, 01:45:56 AM
 #8820

cgminer 3.1.1 says for this entry:  Pool 1 invalid URL.   Trying many IPs - not work.  Have 10 hostnames in cgminer.conf - all working fine.

Am thnking Windows cgminer not taking IP addresses.   Am also thinking is Windows issue having different gethostbyname() function call to UNIX:

gethostbyname Function in the API

The gethostbyname function uses the WSALookupServiceBegin function to query SVCID_INET_HOSTADDRBYNAME as the service class GUID. ...
Returns addressing information from HOSTENT in CSADDR_INFO structures, port information is defaulted to zero. Note that this routine does not resolve host names that consist of a dotted IPv4 address.


That BOLD part is saying you cant use direct IP's. I am not familiar with cgminer in the unix environment so cant help beyond that. However if you know UNIX you can edit the hosts which is generally located in /etc aka vi /etc/hosts and add something like 54.225.68.97 ip1.slush.local
54.225.117.74 ip2.slush.local

may have to hup inetd. then use ip1.slush.local in cgminer script. see if that works. I haven't messed with unix resolving in a long time so I am just going by memory.

Am familiar with UNIX/Linux and variants but using Windows7 to mine.
Edited c:/windows/system32/drivers/etc/hosts file, added list.  Can use ip1-9.slush.com now to specify IP.

# localhost name resolution is handled within DNS itself.
#   127.0.0.1       localhost

54.225.116.174      ip1.slush.com
54.225.117.74      ip2.slush.com
54.225.116.40      ip3.slush.com
54.215.3.101      ip4.slush.com
54.215.3.102      ip5.slush.com
54.225.116.221      ip6.slush.com
54.225.68.97      ip7.slush.com
54.215.3.103      ip8.slush.com
54.215.3.100      ip9.slush.com


Good job Wink
Pages: « 1 ... 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 [441] 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 ... 1145 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!