Bitcoin Forum
December 07, 2016, 04:52:36 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 [148] 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 ... 376 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1050 TH] BitMinter.com [1% PPLNS,Pays TxFees +MergedMining,Stratum,GBT,vardiff]  (Read 775648 times)
Newar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148


https://gliph.me/hUF


View Profile
May 05, 2013, 06:15:46 AM
 #2941

Now with 8+ TH/s we should on avg be finding 16 blocks/day at current difficulty 10076293.

So far today (past 15 hrs) found 4.
Yesterday (during full 24 hr period) found 7.
I think you need to give things more time.

Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, ASICMINER started mining on Bitminter from around shift 14893 2013-05-04 08:24 UTC (an educated guesstimate).

Now, 22 hours later, at ~ 6:15 UTC we have mined 15 blocks. Looks like we are right on track.

OTC rating | GPG keyid 1DC91318EE785FDE | Gliph: lightning bicycle tree music | Mycelium, a swift & secure Bitcoin client for Android | LocalBitcoins
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481129556
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481129556

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481129556
Reply with quote  #2

1481129556
Report to moderator
1481129556
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481129556

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481129556
Reply with quote  #2

1481129556
Report to moderator
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
May 05, 2013, 07:04:02 AM
 #2942

Now with 8+ TH/s we should on avg be finding 16 blocks/day at current difficulty 10076293.

So far today (past 15 hrs) found 4.
Yesterday (during full 24 hr period) found 7.
I think you need to give things more time.

Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, ASICMINER started mining on Bitminter from around shift 14893 2013-05-04 08:24 UTC (an educated guesstimate).

Now, 22 hours later, at ~ 6:15 UTC we have mined 15 blocks. Looks like we are right on track.
Either way, it's a statistical expected average.
Give it a week or two and you still can't guarantee it to be very near the average ...

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
Newar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148


https://gliph.me/hUF


View Profile
May 05, 2013, 08:56:07 AM
 #2943

Now with 8+ TH/s we should on avg be finding 16 blocks/day at current difficulty 10076293.

So far today (past 15 hrs) found 4.
Yesterday (during full 24 hr period) found 7.
I think you need to give things more time.

Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, ASICMINER started mining on Bitminter from around shift 14893 2013-05-04 08:24 UTC (an educated guesstimate).

Now, 22 hours later, at ~ 6:15 UTC we have mined 15 blocks. Looks like we are right on track.
Either way, it's a statistical expected average.
Give it a week or two and you still can't guarantee it to be very near the average ...

Yup, my point was that you can't expect 24 hrs based "results" after just a few hours of higher hashrate.

OTC rating | GPG keyid 1DC91318EE785FDE | Gliph: lightning bicycle tree music | Mycelium, a swift & secure Bitcoin client for Android | LocalBitcoins
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582


I charge NOTHING for current signature.


View Profile
May 05, 2013, 04:44:30 PM
 #2944

All the data is available but it would take a few days work.  I did  this back in the fall and bitminter was fine for a 90 day period of time.  I will tell you what i will go back and do it again. I will go back to aug 2012.

Below is from aug 1 2012.  I used this calculator https://bitclockers.com/calc   to get the normal number.

keep in mind 50 coins a block if you try to double-check my work  until late nov.

hash power is the hash for each block made added and divided by the blocks made .  so it is a good but not perfect number.  I am up to aug 10th 2012 we made 61 blocks and normal would be 53.16


  61 blocks made vs 53.16  is huge .  1.147 to 1   or 14.7 percent over normal then toss in the namecoins.  you also need to understand that determining the true daily hash rate  is not possible I don't have enough samples of hash rate my samples are when a block is found.


DATE------------------Blocks----------------Difficulty--------------Hashpower-------------- normal blocks for this

 Aug  1 2012------------7-------------- 2,036,671------------------470.85Gh/s--------------------- 4.64
 Aug  2 2012------------3---------------2,036,671------------------534.00Gh/s----------------------5.26
 Aug  3 2012------------5---------------2,036,671------------------531.99Gh/s----------------------5.25
 Aug  4 2012------------6---------------2,036,671------------------513.04Gh/s----------------------5.07
 Aug  5 2012------------4---------------2,036,671------------------518.61Gh/s----------------------5.11
 Aug  6 2012------------3---------------2,036,671------------------552.93Gh/s----------------------5.46
 Aug  7 2012------------5---------------2,036,671------------------536.80Gh/s----------------------5.30
 Aug  8 2012------------8---------------2,036,671------------------540.74Gh/s----------------------5.34
 Aug  9 2012------------9---------------2,036,671------------------557.76Gh/s----------------------5.51  
 Aug 10 2012-----------11--------------2,036,671------------------633.70Gh/s----------------------6.26



This method has a flaw  the hash rate of bitminter is found by using the hashpower when a block was made.  so if it was a bad day and 3 blocks were made only 3 samples of hash rate were used to find  the daily hashrate.  So the hash rate could be higher and the luck is worse but more likely the average hash rate is lower .  reason is if bitminter goes down and hash rate is 0  for 1 hour no block will be made.  So my hash rate average is missing all down time.   BTW I believe that is true when you look at bitminter's luck charts.  In order to be really accurate 4 samples of hashrate every hour would be far better to know the true daily hashrate. A total of 96 samples a day.

    I think the doctors luck chart is wrong  and always reads low for the same reason. He uses the current hashrate when the block is found. Thus the luck is calculated with all down time missing.  So in a 24 hour day if the system is down 1 hour  luck will be based on 24 hours up time.  The only way to really figure out luck is for some one to write a script that gives us 4 samples(even 10 per hour)  of bitminter every hour of every day for the next month. I would be certain that the average hashrate with those numbers will be 3 to 5% less then the hash rate used by counting it only when a block is minted.

██     Please support sidehack with his new miner project Send to :

1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr

 
 ██
ineededausername
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784


bitcoin hundred-aire


View Profile
May 05, 2013, 06:32:53 PM
 #2945

Did even more downtime just happen?  Pool down to 1 TH/s Huh

(BFL)^2 < 0
Nargule
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7


View Profile
May 05, 2013, 06:44:19 PM
 #2946

I logged in to see my hashrate at 0 and cgminer was getting authentication errors. I deleted my workers and re-created them and now things are working for me.
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
May 05, 2013, 06:53:54 PM
 #2947

Sorry, a new version of the mining server was not playing nice with all miner versions in use. I quickly reverted back to the old one.

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
MajorMiner
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 71



View Profile
May 06, 2013, 12:35:29 AM
 #2948

Half hour downtime...

"From a small seed a mighty trunk may grow." -Aeschylus
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582


I charge NOTHING for current signature.


View Profile
May 06, 2013, 01:37:55 AM
 #2949

Half hour downtime...
  yeah and this down time does not get shown correctly for luck.  for instance today we mined 20 blocks which is a great day.    so if you add the hash rates at the 20 blocks which is 20 samples of hash rate for a 24 hour day then divide by 20 you get  an average hash of 8,739.616 Gh/s     even with 20 samples from today that number is high since we had a half hour down time.      remember if the server is down or ddos attack we can not earn a block so the zero samples do not get averaged in.   so if we were down for .5 hours  23.5/24 = 96.04 percent  the hash rate would need to be multiplied by that so   we were more like 8,393.527   not 8,739.616   

so  we mined 20    if you use the calculator

https://bitclockers.com/calc   it shows we should have mined 17.448 blocks   but that has not been lowered b down time today the correct number of should mined was 16.757 blocks  and we did 20.    so if you defied 16.757 into 20 you get 1.193 or 19.3 percent better then normal.   some will insist pools should have 0 done time and have  20 divided by the un adjusted 17.448 blocks.    this comes to 1.146 or 14.6 percent better then normal.

 either way it was a good day.   do not forget we also got nmc 8 percent extra is normal so today was close to a 1.27 or 1.28 rather then 1 or 28% extra.   

██     Please support sidehack with his new miner project Send to :

1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr

 
 ██
Jcw188
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532

Carpe Diem


View Profile
May 06, 2013, 02:04:51 AM
 #2950

Absolutely a great day. But luck has been down for more than one day.
AfricanHunter
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 157


View Profile
May 06, 2013, 02:37:16 AM
 #2951

Would love to see a gh/s breakdown by worker on the stats page

Thinking about doing business with johnniewalkerhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=72227?
First read this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=131841.0

Also, Join the National Rifle Association to protect 2nd Amendment Rights http://membership.nrahq.org/default.asp?campaignid=XR020022
Littleshop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316



View Profile WWW
May 06, 2013, 04:07:38 AM
 #2952

Another explanation is that some party is conducting a block withholding attack on the pool.  That is:

They direct hashpower at the pool but modify their mining software to not submit shares with a target value greater than X where X is less than the current difficulty.

The result is that they collect coins without every contributing to the pool. 

Such a strategy would be a very viable attack on competing pools.

I can think of several easy mechanisms to address such an attack, but I doubt that any pools do so today.

This is patently false. Please think about what you are saying before you start typing such things.

There is no way to perform a MITM attack or block withholding attack where the miner withholding receives the coins instead of the pool.

He never said that.  On a PPS pool they can do that and still collect the PPS.  On a non PPS pool they also can do it, but they do not collect.  It still is an attack, it is just costly. 

organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
May 06, 2013, 07:30:41 AM
 #2953

Would love to see a gh/s breakdown by worker on the stats page

Your wish is my etc.

from http://organofcorti.blogspot.com.au/2013/05/122-pool-and-network-miner-hashrate_3.html





or you could just use the api:

/api/pool/top50

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582


I charge NOTHING for current signature.


View Profile
May 06, 2013, 01:34:29 PM
 #2954

Half hour downtime...
 yeah and this down time does not get shown correctly for luck.  for instance today we mined 20 blocks which is a great day.    so if you add the hash rates at the 20 blocks which is 20 samples of hash rate for a 24 hour day then divide by 20 you get  an average hash of 8,739.616 Gh/s     even with 20 samples from today that number is high since we had a half hour down time.      remember if the server is down or ddos attack we can not earn a block so the zero samples do not get averaged in.   so if we were down for .5 hours  23.5/24 = 96.04 percent  the hash rate would need to be multiplied by that so   we were more like 8,393.527   not 8,739.616  

so  we mined 20    if you use the calculator

https://bitclockers.com/calc   it shows we should have mined 17.448 blocks   but that has not been lowered b down time today the correct number of should mined was 16.757 blocks  and we did 20.    so if you defied 16.757 into 20 you get 1.193 or 19.3 percent better then normal.   some will insist pools should have 0 done time and have  20 divided by the un adjusted 17.448 blocks.    this comes to 1.146 or 14.6 percent better then normal.

 either way it was a good day.   do not forget we also got nmc 8 percent extra is normal so today was close to a 1.27 or 1.28 rather then 1 or 28% extra.    

It's possible you are correct.  Bitminter should show daily earnings like other pools do.  This gives you a clear indicator that can be compared with expected earnings for your hashrate and the day's luck.

But Bitminter isn't down 10% of the time, so there has to be more to it if there is soley a miscalculation going on.  And any pool that is down 10% is one to avoid, failover to backup pools costs significant transition time.


I have an idea that should be easy to do. I will get back with results in 5 days.

██     Please support sidehack with his new miner project Send to :

1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr

 
 ██
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
May 06, 2013, 02:13:08 PM
 #2955


But Bitminter isn't down 10% of the time, so there has to be more to it if there is soley a miscalculation going on.  And any pool that is down 10% is one to avoid, failover to backup pools costs significant transition time.

Can you show me your calculations for the 10% figure?

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
redtwitz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 231


View Profile
May 06, 2013, 02:16:29 PM
 #2956

Call me greedy, but are there any plans to add further altcoins? IXC and DVC together seem to make almost as much as NMC...
candoo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602


Vertrau in Gott


View Profile
May 06, 2013, 03:06:39 PM
 #2957

Whats wrong with the pool? Someone stealing blocks?


Einer trage des andern Last, so werdet ihr das Gesetz Christi erfüllen.
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
May 06, 2013, 03:24:50 PM
 #2958

Whats wrong with the pool? Someone stealing blocks?

[....]

No.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
Newar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148


https://gliph.me/hUF


View Profile
May 06, 2013, 03:26:03 PM
 #2959

Whats wrong with the pool? Someone stealing blocks?
[...]
Read the last few pages.

OTC rating | GPG keyid 1DC91318EE785FDE | Gliph: lightning bicycle tree music | Mycelium, a swift & secure Bitcoin client for Android | LocalBitcoins
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582


I charge NOTHING for current signature.


View Profile
May 06, 2013, 10:08:04 PM
 #2960

Whats wrong with the pool? Someone stealing blocks?




where did these come from?  while they look nice where  did the data come from to show this.    the problem is you need to show your sampling of how you get the pools hash rate. if you take your data from when a block is made it leaves out all down time and can be very misleading. remember no blocks are made when a pool goes down.  so any true hash rate must account for down time.

 by the way I have figured out a very good way to test the idea out that coins are too low for luck to be accountable.       I have a method that solves the problem of hash rate calculation. the pools hash rate is not important for my method .  in fact all that matters is If I run at least one worker 24/7 .  I can give 1 day result  a 2 day result a 3 day result a 4 day result and a 5 day result.

██     Please support sidehack with his new miner project Send to :

1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr

 
 ██
Pages: « 1 ... 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 [148] 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 ... 376 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!