Analysis

[BTCtrader71]

I have never saw so bullish Lucif. Looks like he has sold his account.

I do seem to recall him being similarly bullish at one point - in October 2013 just at the very start of the bubble rise to $1200.

Yeah this was pretty spot on.

I reviewed masterluc's posts in oct-dec '13 and I have to say, it was like reading a crystal ball. Here is luc calling the top on Dec 4:

I think it should reach $2k-$4k in near future in a final push, especially if it will draw a triangle now 7-14 days long.

But I don't want to take a part in further market actions. I reached all my targets, dreams and so on. And now I cashed out for 80%. Thanks China. Thanks US Senate. Thanks uncle Ben, I like your Franklins in my hands.

I think selling in wave 4 of final historical 5 is not bad. I left 20% coins for final wave.

Ah, of course thanks Satoshi and community, but I am still here =) Next entering point for me is in 2016-2017 year.

Yes, it's once in lifetime epic event. And I am happy I was participated. Such stories live in generations.

I thought the end will have more epic start. Third day in a row I wake up, see charts and ask myself "Is this the end?" and third day in a row answer is "Yes".

[1714914154]

1714914154

[1714914154]

1714914154

[molecular]

I have never saw so bullish Lucif. Looks like he has sold his account.

I do seem to recall him being similarly bullish at one point - in October 2013 just at the very start of the bubble rise to $1200.

nice diggin'

[sinner]

I don't understand. I thought the next bubble would usually produce a new ATH of at least 3x the previous one. Since that was 1200, this one should be between 3000 and 4000. Care to explain ?

i could be totally wrong, but i think hes saying we're gonna get to that 3x bubble through a series of smaller ones (head fakes, the first being smaller than ATH).  i think he compared it to 2012: in summer 2012 the price ran from $5 to $16 in August (ATH was $32 at the time, but this was still a small bubble), then crashed to $6, then quickly recovered en route to $266 in the first 2013 bubble.

[inca]

Luc bought in

I suggest we all do the same!

[lebing]

I don't understand. I thought the next bubble would usually produce a new ATH of at least 3x the previous one. Since that was 1200, this one should be between 3000 and 4000. Care to explain ?

i could be totally wrong, but i think hes saying we're gonna get to that 3x bubble through a series of smaller ones (head fakes, the first being smaller than ATH).  i think he compared it to 2012: in summer 2012 the price ran from $5 to $16 in August (ATH was $32 at the time, but this was still a small bubble), then crashed to $6, then quickly recovered en route to $266 in the first 2013 bubble.

this is what i understood as well.

[Zarathustra]

I don't understand. I thought the next bubble would usually produce a new ATH of at least 3x the previous one. Since that was 1200, this one should be between 3000 and 4000. Care to explain ?

i could be totally wrong, but i think hes saying we're gonna get to that 3x bubble through a series of smaller ones (head fakes, the first being smaller than ATH).  i think he compared it to 2012: in summer 2012 the price ran from $5 to $16 in August (ATH was $32 at the time, but this was still a small bubble), then crashed to $6, then quickly recovered en route to $266 in the first 2013 bubble.

this is what i understood as well.

Yes, correct translation of our master's crypto speak.

[Joerii]

I don't understand. I thought the next bubble would usually produce a new ATH of at least 3x the previous one. Since that was 1200, this one should be between 3000 and 4000. Care to explain ?

i could be totally wrong, but i think hes saying we're gonna get to that 3x bubble through a series of smaller ones (head fakes, the first being smaller than ATH).  i think he compared it to 2012: in summer 2012 the price ran from $5 to $16 in August (ATH was $32 at the time, but this was still a small bubble), then crashed to $6, then quickly recovered en route to $266 in the first 2013 bubble.

this is what i understood as well.

Yes, correct translation of our master's crypto speak.

Thanks I love this thread. We're all acolytes of the Master, interpreting his Words.

[Felipeo]

Wow...  Just heard of you master from tradingview.com.  Heard good things about you.  I see why.  Thanks!

Same here  

[Felipeo]

Wow...  Just heard of you master from tradingview.com.  Heard good things about you.  I see why.  Thanks!

Same here  

Hi Felipeo,

I'm "Proud Clown" on trading view.  Good to see you at bitcointalk

Cheers M8

Hi, I saw You of course, I have new account now so no writing for me now.
I'm waiting and reading

BTW: https://www.whaleclub.co/ Tell them they are famous  

Best

[Joerii]

Can you guys stop spamming this thread with off topic posts ? Thanks !

[AnonymousEconomist]

you probably copied the charts ive been posting all year.

[oda.krell]

That's not exactly how the major rallies started in the past




(yes, I know. That right-most weekly bar is just a few hours old.)

[Miz4r]

Still looking good to me, healthy retrace to 280 on Greek 'deal' news after 5 green weekly candles in a row. I would have started to worry more if we just continued going up.

[Tzupy]

That's not exactly how the major rallies started in the past




(yes, I know. That right-most weekly bar is just a few hours old.)

That's probably because we are in the last local wave B (which lasts so long that it's misleading) of the bear market.

[AnonymousEconomist]

you probably copied the charts ive been posting all year.

[inca]

That's not exactly how the major rallies started in the past




(yes, I know. That right-most weekly bar is just a few hours old.)

That's probably because we are in the last local wave B (which lasts so long that it's misleading) of the bear market.

Keep clinging on to that Tzupy..

[lebing]

snip

pls make another thread if you want to promote your own ideas so heavily like this...

[BldSwtTrs]

That's not exactly how the major rallies started in the past

(yes, I know. That right-most weekly bar is just a few hours old.)

When you take the 3d graph aound 24 January 2013 and 24 October 2013, you can see that there was some kind of sharp correction when the price escaped the upper BB (respectively 18% and 24% down).

We are only down 17% from the yesterday high so far.

[Fatman3001]

That's not exactly how the major rallies started in the past

(yes, I know. That right-most weekly bar is just a few hours old.)

When you take the 3d graph aound 24 January 2013 and 24 October 2013, you can see that there was some kind of sharp correction when the price escaped the upper BB (respectively 18% and 24% down).

We are only down 17% from the high so far.

I got October 2013 flashbacks when I saw the red needle today. Looks like it could be a bumpy ride to the top. But if the pace is anything like Oct 2013... hold on to your hats!

However, Masterluc called this a small bubble. So shouldn't it be more like March 2013?

[masterluc]

Wow...  Just heard of you master from tradingview.com.  Heard good things about you.  I see why.  Thanks!

I'm sorry, what r u talking about?