Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 05:37:33 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 »
701  Economy / Speculation / Re: arepo's easy TA on: April 26, 2013, 10:41:30 PM
It is not you or your TA who CAN change the price. Market is SMALL, single ENTITY can PUMP or DUMP the price where wish to have. And PANIC will HELP.

now this is an actual point of contention, not FUD, thank you.

my thinking about this goes as follows:

TA demonstrates trends, supports and resistances, and other properties of the price function that help determine which 'moves' are profitable. if someone wanted to dump their coins, they could have done so at the $120 resistance, when we were threatening to crash right through. why didn't they? probably because they think they can get better than $120 per coin -- that is, they valuate BTC as "oversold". this is exactly why i'm anticipating a leg up. the sellers have run out of coin, and this fact is observable in the data. many are on the sidelines, but the selling pressure has abated.

--arepo
702  Economy / Speculation / Re: Arepo's Detailed Price Analysis and Projections on: April 26, 2013, 10:33:10 PM
Keep up the good work, I enjoy reading this thread

thanks for the feedback Smiley

-===-

x-post from "Arepo's easy TA":

This--


...reminds me of these:



Thoughts?
good observation!

there is one very important difference. bearish wedges exhibit higher lows and higher highs, resulting in a general upward slope.

this triangle has a level top resistance, and we're consolidating bullishly so far. some evidence for this in this post.

--arepo
703  Economy / Speculation / Re: arepo's easy TA on: April 26, 2013, 10:30:38 PM
This--
[snip]

Thoughts?

good observation!

there is one very important difference. bearish wedges exhibit higher lows and higher highs, resulting in a general upward slope.

this triangle has a level top resistance, and we're consolidating bullishly so far. some evidence for this in this post.

also, this is an old thread that got necromanced, i'd like to keep all current analysis in a single thread, namely "arepo's detailed... ". i'm going to quote you there, this is good analysis.

--arepo
704  Economy / Speculation / Re: arepo's easy TA on: April 26, 2013, 10:25:11 PM
arepo TA are BS. SELL SELL SELL (we are going to single digit)

someone's got to sell at the bottom... pigs gonna pig

and gtfo of my thread with this FUD, i'm seriously tired of it. i haven't even made any bullish calls here....

that being said, discussion and presentation of analysis ITT,

thank you

--arepo

p.s. you might also get the pig award for posting this moments before we resume the uptrend -- by my measurements, within the next 2 hours (if we break out now), or in the next 24 hours (if we consolidate downwards one more time from this test of the $140 resistance ).
705  Economy / Speculation / Re: arepo's easy TA on: April 26, 2013, 09:33:32 PM
edit: the second reversal candle looks more like an inverse 'shooting star', but the small body, large volume, and large range proportional to the body are all characteristics of a reversal candle.

in fact, there's a way to understand this more intuitively. 'reversal candles' are periods of time in which the prevailing pressure (buying or selling) changes direction. since there is a struggle, or 'candle battle' between bulls and bears, the body tends to form very small, as the open and close are pulled close to each other by alternately competing forces, while the range of the shadow, or wicks, of the candles is pulled outward by strong waves in each direction.
706  Economy / Speculation / Re: arepo's easy TA on: April 26, 2013, 09:26:28 PM
also, here's a very simple ceiling-bounce/'doji'+volume hunting exercise i was doing yesterday while daytrading. very straightforward and effective method:

-===-

[img]

-===-

--arepo

Sorry for being a noob but what am I looking at here? thanks.  Smiley

no problem at all.

yesterday, i was shorting on bitfinex during the panic sell. i saw the "bounce" off of the "ceiling" of $150 (which, from previous price data, was an obvious support/resistance). this is a bearish sign.

i opened a short, and then hunted for high-volume 'dojis'. a doji is a short candle with a small body, and a symmetrical range of high and low. when these candles pattern with a spike in volume, it is a very reliable 'reversal' indicator. this is where i closed.

i used this method twice and caught two consecutive tops and bottoms this way. is that any clearer?

--arepo

edit: the second reversal candle looks more like an inverse 'shooting star', but the small body, large volume, and large range proportional to the body are all characteristics of a reversal candle.
707  Economy / Speculation / Re: Real crash/correction coming. on: April 26, 2013, 09:12:29 PM
The caaaaaalm before the stoorm

The question is, which way

up. see my other posts.
708  Economy / Speculation / Re: Arepo's Detailed Price Analysis and Projections on: April 26, 2013, 08:51:35 PM


-===-

this is a pretty big moment for this baby bull... if we can break out of this range it'd be the first real evidence of a resumption of the uptrend -- right now we're still stuck in a bearish consolidation pennant.

edit:

further evidence for criticality: if we don't make major gains today we'll have a high-volume doji on the 3-day scale.

-===-

709  Economy / Speculation / Re: arepo's easy TA on: April 26, 2013, 08:44:53 PM
also, here's a very simple ceiling-bounce/'doji'+volume hunting exercise i was doing yesterday while daytrading. very straightforward and effective method:

-===-



-===-

--arepo
710  Economy / Speculation / Re: arepo's easy TA on: April 26, 2013, 08:39:40 PM
more evidence of the rigor of some methods of TA can be found in this thread, where the OP and i came to the same conclusion based upon wildly different techniques. that's called science.

--arepo
711  Economy / Speculation / Re: arepo's easy TA on: April 26, 2013, 08:36:59 PM
Technical Analysis is the finance equivalent of astrology. Fancy lingo, "reverse prismatic oscillations". Shut the hell up.

try "dampened oscillator" -- that's the model for a triangle consolidation pattern, and those words aren't 'lingo', they're math.

Really, then why was Aerop's defense to every attack that none of this was predictive?

because this thread was not intended to be predictive. plain and simple. this was an outline of a pattern that had already formed in completion -- how difficult is it to understand this? don't necromance my goddamn threads if you're not even going to read them critically, and find my many others if you want to see predictive TA.

Quote
There are well researched and explained reasons behind some of the patterns you see.

Maybe so. But not for predictive value. If TA was of significant use, there wouldn't be a market.


if you're feeling up to it, check out this post where TraderTimm explains the mathematical evidence for why methods of TA work.

How would I do that if I couldn't recognize:

Confirms exactly my argument. You learned that stuff and now you think it helped you.
But what you actually describe as your actions is just traders common sense. I can't see any method which uncovers hidden structures, or cretaes verifieable predictions.

Please proof that there is no other way finding out.
Please provide a complete account of all incidents, where your method gave you the right indications, and all the incidents were your method led you astray.

Unless you can do so, the conclusion is: your "method" doesn't exist.

this is garbage -- really. if there are no 'VERIFIABLE METHODS WHICH YIELD POSITIVE RESULTS AT A RATE BETTER THAN CHANCE" than how can anyone be a 'skilled' trader? what does that even mean? what has ruski learned? if the anti-TA crowd is right, and the price is a random walk, then no method whatsoever can, over long periods of time, yield returns greater than chance.

so go home and buy a lottery ticket. and for the last time, if you have something to say like "TA is bunk" or "this thread is garbage", keep in mind that you're doing exactly what you claim i am -- making groundless assertions. also for the last time, if you want to have a serious discussion about this, start your own damn threads, don't spam mine with single-line, naysaying tactics. C'mon guys...

--arepo

712  Economy / Speculation / Re: Found support where I hoped on: April 26, 2013, 08:25:59 PM
so becouse their are three points which show a matching under spike, that is considered the trend line
ahhahahahahahahha

i could show you a trend line which proves that bitcoins worth 50 dollars
that graph means nothing !

show me. 3 points makes a robust trendline...
713  Economy / Speculation / Re: so much FUD on: April 26, 2013, 08:17:55 PM
I haven't called him a scammer. I've just being sincere with him as I don't like when someone markets himself with lot of technical talk just to start a commercial service to sell that talk. I see it pointless, just like Clickbanks "How I a make 300k per year with hour of work" ebooks for 14.99$. If you're good in making 300k per year from Internet Marketing, then you won't sell those ebooks unless them make those 300k for you Smiley, it's same with this - if you're good in predicting market movements than put your money where your mouth is, selling those views is not something I find very cool. He has the right to do it though.

no marketing at all, i've been posting analysis on the forums for the last 2 years and only published a price report because many expressed their interest for such a thing. the only reason i charged is because i generally do not have the time to work on a detailed, publishable report, as i mostly just trade on my notes.

this all started just because i opened 'too many new threads' for your taste, but i was daytrading for some 20 hours yesterday and didn't have much else to do than commune with whoever was online. my threads were not FUD, or spam, or excessive, but varied in topic and relatively unique.

please stop passing judgments...

--arepo
714  Economy / Speculation / Re: so much FUD on: April 26, 2013, 08:11:44 PM

dont get me wrong im as guilty as the next guy about this (maybe not as bad as some...but wont get into that) Ill try to tone it down and just talk about bitcoin....the thing that brought us all here.

but one last thing, to all of you who sold out and hold nothing. please GTFO and go play Frisbee or go bowling. Just dont post on here if you are not holding.  thats the worst IMO. "bla bla bla i hate btc and its not going anywhere or it should go to a billion dollars. I know everything about everything about coin and life and you are doing everything wrong!!! ......but i have no coin."

uh you'd better check your house, it's made of glass Tongue
715  Economy / Speculation / Re: Arepo's Detailed Price Analysis and Projections on: April 26, 2013, 08:06:20 PM
Quote
i suspect that new traders played an important role as well, possibly panic selling after buying into the overzealous rally (panic and greed in the same week!).

You could make the same statement about every Sucker's Rally. Do you see any evidence that one just peaked? I have only my feeling from watching Moody that selling is the theme now.

i don't think it's quite fair to call that a 'sucker's rally' -- it wanted to happen, the market was oversold when we started out.

as for selling as the theme -- i rather have the feeling that after yesterdays volume, there aren't many more coins left to sell  Wink

--arepo
716  Economy / Speculation / Re: Its not bottom yet. It will crash under 100 just wait for it. on: April 26, 2013, 08:05:55 PM
Heres the evidence:



...

'consolidating'

learn2trade

--arepo
717  Economy / Speculation / Re: Yet another analyst :) on: April 26, 2013, 08:00:11 PM
I think if 120-130 level will be broken down, Houston will have a problem.

captain obvious?

bitsalame, go fuck yourself.

I think that bunch of sma's at 120-130 can be broken by bearish horizontal triangle.




RSI looks bullish here. short-term oversold, like i've been saying. also about to midline crossover upside.

MACD, also, looks like a short-term market bottom.

also, the post above me! on a larger scale, this is just a correction to a very large deviation from an inevitable trend... deflation is setting in boys, it's like the bitcoin balloon is filled with helium -- only large, sustained pressure can push it down! sideways is bullish for bitcoin Wink

--arepo
718  Economy / Speculation / Re: I feel like bitchslapping anyone who creates panic on: April 26, 2013, 07:53:37 PM
2.Don't add stress to that by EXPECTING bitcoin to crash ESPECIALLY IF U USE IT !!! TRUST THIS COIN OR FUCK OFF ! Wink dont speculate on its fall, but try to make it thrive and make it stronger !!!

the funny thing is, once everyone starts expecting a crash, and rubbing their hands greedily together as they place massive bids at $50, we can be almost sure the market won't get there. all these people are doing are bulking up supports, changing the tides on the order book, and solidifying the bottom.

markets are self-organizing -- don't worry about that. the strong hands stay around, so there will be more and more of them as time goes on. i don't think we'll EVER see panic like post-June again.

--arepo
719  Economy / Speculation / Re: Its not bottom yet. It will crash under 100 just wait for it. on: April 26, 2013, 07:44:58 PM
its not useless. We going down.

we'll, we're not going down, presently, anymore. we're consolidating. so don't you dare say this again without some evidence or support, you're a wart on the nose of this forum.
720  Economy / Speculation / Re: BitcoinATM debut today? on: April 26, 2013, 07:42:48 PM
A lot of people "involved" with Bitcoin seem to be more focused on getting people to look at their face, than actually getting shit done.

here, here.

where is our system of decentralized exchanges? or an easy, noncontroversial solution to blockchain bloat?, etc
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!