nazarpechka
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 73
Merit: 0
|
|
April 08, 2018, 04:08:20 AM |
|
>>>>>>>>>>LuckyPool<<<<<<<<<<Get the profit you deserve! Check out new awesome mining pool for Verge blake2s. This pool was made specially for people using Claymore Ethereum miner dual mode.
Our features:
- nice fee 1% - fast dedicated server in Germany with low latency - 99% uptime, stable mining - WTM earnings (±10%) - payout every 2 hours - nice community in Telegram - NEW: Telegram Bot to check balances and workers without viewing site
How to mine?
-dpool stratum+tcp://mine.luckypool.xyz:5766 -dwal WALLET -dpsw c=XVG.WORKER -dcoin blake2s -dcri 45 - VERGE Here are examples of batch files for Claymore
Thanks for attention
|
|
|
|
potificate
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 5
|
|
April 08, 2018, 07:59:56 AM |
|
Still learning here...
The first page still says "10xx cards in Windows 10 x64: just use latest 372.54 drivers from Nvidia website"
It appears that 372.54 is about a year and a half old. Is that really best or should I use the latest (which is now 391.35)?
Thanks!
373.06 is probably the best overall driver for anything before the 1070 ti - not sure on Windows for that GPU or the 1050/1050ti but LINUX mining likes 384.98 very well indeed and that version works stable with older cards as well. Thanks! I'll give that a try... is it because it's simply stable or that one can overclock cards higher than when using newer drivers? (I have 1060 6GB cards)
|
|
|
|
rufo28
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
April 08, 2018, 12:06:28 PM |
|
Hello Gents,
I would like to share my issue using claymore (new or old) versions. My RIG consists of 3 AMD and 7 Nvidia (2x1080 and 5x1080Ti). When i ran it for mining only Ethereum, there's a "Cuda error 11 - cannot write buffer for DAG". I already put VM max to 16000MB , but still it will show this error.
Experiment 1 : I separate running my bat file for the 3 AMD ( -platform 1 , all are working and running ), then ran the 7 Nvidia bat file (-platform 2, 2-3 cards has this error) Experiment 2 : I ran in one bat file (-platform 3) all AMD and Nvidia Cards, results still the same 2-3 cards has the error. Experiment 3 : I ran in one bat file (-platform 3 , -di 01234567), AMD and Nvidia ( excluding 2 cards - either AMD or Nvidia) it works fine and continuously running..
So , is there any limitation for the claymore miner in number of cards in RIG?
Thanks and much appreciated if you can clear this up..
|
|
|
|
AzzAz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1030
Merit: 1006
|
|
April 08, 2018, 12:19:36 PM |
|
Hello Gents,
I would like to share my issue using claymore (new or old) versions. My RIG consists of 3 AMD and 7 Nvidia (2x1080 and 5x1080Ti). When i ran it for mining only Ethereum, there's a "Cuda error 11 - cannot write buffer for DAG". I already put VM max to 16000MB , but still it will show this error.
Experiment 1 : I separate running my bat file for the 3 AMD ( -platform 1 , all are working and running ), then ran the 7 Nvidia bat file (-platform 2, 2-3 cards has this error) Experiment 2 : I ran in one bat file (-platform 3) all AMD and Nvidia Cards, results still the same 2-3 cards has the error. Experiment 3 : I ran in one bat file (-platform 3 , -di 01234567), AMD and Nvidia ( excluding 2 cards - either AMD or Nvidia) it works fine and continuously running..
So , is there any limitation for the claymore miner in number of cards in RIG?
Thanks and much appreciated if you can clear this up..
Try VM 32000
|
|
|
|
rufo28
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
April 08, 2018, 12:31:54 PM |
|
Hello Gents,
I would like to share my issue using claymore (new or old) versions. My RIG consists of 3 AMD and 7 Nvidia (2x1080 and 5x1080Ti). When i ran it for mining only Ethereum, there's a "Cuda error 11 - cannot write buffer for DAG". I already put VM max to 16000MB , but still it will show this error.
Experiment 1 : I separate running my bat file for the 3 AMD ( -platform 1 , all are working and running ), then ran the 7 Nvidia bat file (-platform 2, 2-3 cards has this error) Experiment 2 : I ran in one bat file (-platform 3) all AMD and Nvidia Cards, results still the same 2-3 cards has the error. Experiment 3 : I ran in one bat file (-platform 3 , -di 01234567), AMD and Nvidia ( excluding 2 cards - either AMD or Nvidia) it works fine and continuously running..
So , is there any limitation for the claymore miner in number of cards in RIG?
Thanks and much appreciated if you can clear this up..
Try VM 32000 Thanks for the response, i will try and check.. Will inform you..
|
|
|
|
|
R0mi
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 305
Merit: 148
Theranos Coin - IoT + micro-blood arrays = Moon!
|
|
April 08, 2018, 04:20:26 PM |
|
What version Claymore's runs the best with AMD rx 570 and 580 8gb cards and what driver should I install?
On Windows, I'd go with either the blockchain driver or something around 17.11 (whatever the first WQHL version is after they added "large page" support to the mainline drivers). On LINUX, 17.50 seems a lot more stable than the blockchain drivers, but you have to modify one of the driver modules to get ANY support for undervolting or underclocking the core. The latest Adrenalin driver works perfectly well for RX cards. It's pointless to intentionally install older drivers. Does it work with BIOS modded cards? I've seen conflicting info about which Adrenalin drivers do so and which don't. That's also why Claymore's recommendation of 16.12.x made ZERO sense, as 16.11.x and up DISABLED support for BIOS modded cards while 16.9.x and 16.10.x DID work with them. You will get much better performance, in my experience, from the latest Adrenaline drivers. Here is the trick for modded bios files: If these are fresh cards, apply the bios mods using ATIFlash, install the new driver but do not restart. After installing the Adrenaline drivers on a rig whose cards have modded RX bios mods, run 1.4.6 of atikmdag-patcher.exe prior to restarting. Then restart. All should be good.
|
Walton Chain CEO Mo' Bling: "Walton Chain will be the Qualcomm + Cisco in the blockchain industry, the ‘Google’ of the Blockchain." It's December 1999, do you know how your shitcoin holdings are doing? Magic 8 ball market analysis: www.doiownashitcoin.com
|
|
|
rufo28
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
April 08, 2018, 04:40:06 PM |
|
Hello Gents,
I would like to share my issue using claymore (new or old) versions. My RIG consists of 3 AMD and 7 Nvidia (2x1080 and 5x1080Ti). When i ran it for mining only Ethereum, there's a "Cuda error 11 - cannot write buffer for DAG". I already put VM max to 16000MB , but still it will show this error.
Experiment 1 : I separate running my bat file for the 3 AMD ( -platform 1 , all are working and running ), then ran the 7 Nvidia bat file (-platform 2, 2-3 cards has this error) Experiment 2 : I ran in one bat file (-platform 3) all AMD and Nvidia Cards, results still the same 2-3 cards has the error. Experiment 3 : I ran in one bat file (-platform 3 , -di 01234567), AMD and Nvidia ( excluding 2 cards - either AMD or Nvidia) it works fine and continuously running..
So , is there any limitation for the claymore miner in number of cards in RIG?
Thanks and much appreciated if you can clear this up..
Try VM 32000 Thanks for the response, i will try and check.. Will inform you.. @AzzAz , Many thanks for your suggestion... currently after changing it to 32000 it run successfully for few minutes now. I will observed further...
|
|
|
|
janding
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 170
Merit: 6
|
|
April 08, 2018, 05:14:21 PM |
|
The E3 is NOT going to "spike" the total network hashrate for Ethereum or the other ethash coins.
It will take about 2 MILLION of those units built and operating JUST TO MATCH THE EXISTING HASHRATE.
They aren't shipping 'till mid-July timeframe.
In the almost 2 YEARS since Bitmain introduced the S9 (which was a LOT more efficient than anything else available for months, and STILL is the most efficient SHA256 miner that is shipping) they might have sold a little over ONE MILLION of them (total SHA256 network hashrate says up to 2 million, but you also have to factor in the Avalon 721/741 sales, the eBang sales, sales of whatever miners with Bitfury chips have been built, however much hashrate LW.COM has on it's internally-built miners, and at least one "smaller fry" mining operation I know of that is using their own chip).
The E3 will push network hashrate - but it's NOT going to be a "spike", there is too much EXISTING hashrate from mining rigs that are the SAME OR BETTER efficiency than the E3 announced specs.
It's a lot closer to the situation in Scrypt mining when Bitmain introduced the L3 - which STILL hasn't managed to push all "older rigs" out of profitable service if you have cheap enough electric and has a LOT of competition helping it TRY to push A2/Titan/Alcheminers out of profitability.
Thanks for that information. It’s refreshing to see an intelligent and informative comment. We need more of that.
|
|
|
|
gt_addict
|
|
April 08, 2018, 09:14:05 PM |
|
Just a query if anyone can help. I keep getting a “socket was closed remotely (by pool)” message come up since i restarted my rig. I havent changed any settings and my internet connection is working fine. I have contacted the pool (ethermine) but no response yet. Just wondered if anyone else has experienced this problem lately?
Also shares seem to be in the 1500-2000ms+ range now rather than <100ms it was before.
|
**SUPPORT SIDEHACK** Miner Development Donations to: 1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr
Donations/Tips to:- 1GTADDicTXD1uachKKgW24DZDxDGhSMdRa
Join Bitconnect: https://bitconnect.co/?ref=gtaddict
|
|
|
AzzAz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1030
Merit: 1006
|
|
April 08, 2018, 11:06:48 PM |
|
Hello Gents,
I would like to share my issue using claymore (new or old) versions. My RIG consists of 3 AMD and 7 Nvidia (2x1080 and 5x1080Ti). When i ran it for mining only Ethereum, there's a "Cuda error 11 - cannot write buffer for DAG". I already put VM max to 16000MB , but still it will show this error.
Experiment 1 : I separate running my bat file for the 3 AMD ( -platform 1 , all are working and running ), then ran the 7 Nvidia bat file (-platform 2, 2-3 cards has this error) Experiment 2 : I ran in one bat file (-platform 3) all AMD and Nvidia Cards, results still the same 2-3 cards has the error. Experiment 3 : I ran in one bat file (-platform 3 , -di 01234567), AMD and Nvidia ( excluding 2 cards - either AMD or Nvidia) it works fine and continuously running..
So , is there any limitation for the claymore miner in number of cards in RIG?
Thanks and much appreciated if you can clear this up..
Try VM 32000 Thanks for the response, i will try and check.. Will inform you.. @AzzAz , Many thanks for your suggestion... currently after changing it to 32000 it run successfully for few minutes now. I will observed further... What drivers ( AMD & NVIDIA) are you using?
|
|
|
|
Aziat
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
April 09, 2018, 04:38:51 AM |
|
Two cards in the system 5870 6870 produces this error "No ASM binary found for GPU". On xmr-stak, everything works but the hashreid is much smaller. 9.7 also works . 270 in another assembly, too, works.
|
|
|
|
big_daddy
|
|
April 09, 2018, 07:00:29 AM |
|
I'm dualmining on cryptocartel.one, I am getting only 34 XVG a day with 20Gh according to whattomine I can mine around 90-100 XVGs a day
can someone share here some other results from other pool please
|
If you don't believe it or don't get it, I don't have the time to try to convince you, sorry.
|
|
|
QuintLeo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
|
|
April 09, 2018, 09:54:42 AM |
|
Just a query if anyone can help. I keep getting a “socket was closed remotely (by pool)” message come up since i restarted my rig. I havent changed any settings and my internet connection is working fine. I have contacted the pool (ethermine) but no response yet. Just wondered if anyone else has experienced this problem lately?
Haven't ever seen it on ethermine, but I've seen it occasionally on nicehash when first starting up - seems to be a temporary "pool overloading on making new connections" issue, as it normally resolves itself in a few minutes. Dropping the wait time down from the default 20 secs to 10 secs seemed to help a little, but that might have been a coincidence as I only tried that once. I'm think Claymore dropped support for pre-GCN AMD cards somewhere along the line - he definitely has NOT added and has stated he has no plans TO add -asm cores for older cards so you might just need to reconfigure to "don't use ASM" on those.
|
I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind! Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin) 1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
|
|
|
gt_addict
|
|
April 09, 2018, 12:51:11 PM |
|
Just a query if anyone can help. I keep getting a “socket was closed remotely (by pool)” message come up since i restarted my rig. I havent changed any settings and my internet connection is working fine. I have contacted the pool (ethermine) but no response yet. Just wondered if anyone else has experienced this problem lately?
Haven't ever seen it on ethermine, but I've seen it occasionally on nicehash when first starting up - seems to be a temporary "pool overloading on making new connections" issue, as it normally resolves itself in a few minutes. Dropping the wait time down from the default 20 secs to 10 secs seemed to help a little, but that might have been a coincidence as I only tried that once. I'm think Claymore dropped support for pre-GCN AMD cards somewhere along the line - he definitely has NOT added and has stated he has no plans TO add -asm cores for older cards so you might just need to reconfigure to "don't use ASM" on those. Thank for the reply QuintLeo, im using 1070’s so havent got to worry about the AMD thing. Ive restarted the router, updated drivers to the wireless card and tried the US pool address aswell. Still the same problem. It means its registering 207mh but because of the connection issues its paying out for only 150mh effective hashrate.
|
**SUPPORT SIDEHACK** Miner Development Donations to: 1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr
Donations/Tips to:- 1GTADDicTXD1uachKKgW24DZDxDGhSMdRa
Join Bitconnect: https://bitconnect.co/?ref=gtaddict
|
|
|
weigh2634
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
April 09, 2018, 02:09:35 PM |
|
i would like use Email Notifications in Remote manager, but it alway sending email ERROR, how do i fix it? thanks a lot. ERROR:Error connecting with SSL. Error connecting with SSL. error:1408F10B:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version number https://i.imgur.com/EpcVmXJ.png
|
|
|
|
Digital_Seytan
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 222
Merit: 2
digiseytan@walletofsatoshi.com
|
|
April 09, 2018, 04:42:42 PM |
|
Hello Claymoreminers, I have a question among the users who have experience with this farmbatchbot download link: https://github.com/Undertrey/FarmWatchBot/releaseshave used these with Claymoreminer 11.6 ---->> please share.
|
DonateSATS:Digiseytan@WALLETOFSATOSHi.COM SHOPFREE: https://satsback.com/register/1QEJyGPlg4LN5kwx ETC+Zil Pool:https://k1pool.com/invite/895eb07555
|
|
|
gt_addict
|
|
April 09, 2018, 05:31:21 PM |
|
Just a query if anyone can help. I keep getting a “socket was closed remotely (by pool)” message come up since i restarted my rig. I havent changed any settings and my internet connection is working fine. I have contacted the pool (ethermine) but no response yet. Just wondered if anyone else has experienced this problem lately?
Haven't ever seen it on ethermine, but I've seen it occasionally on nicehash when first starting up - seems to be a temporary "pool overloading on making new connections" issue, as it normally resolves itself in a few minutes. Dropping the wait time down from the default 20 secs to 10 secs seemed to help a little, but that might have been a coincidence as I only tried that once. I'm think Claymore dropped support for pre-GCN AMD cards somewhere along the line - he definitely has NOT added and has stated he has no plans TO add -asm cores for older cards so you might just need to reconfigure to "don't use ASM" on those. Thank for the reply QuintLeo, im using 1070’s so havent got to worry about the AMD thing. Ive restarted the router, updated drivers to the wireless card and tried the US pool address aswell. Still the same problem. It means its registering 207mh but because of the connection issues its paying out for only 150mh effective hashrate. I have seen the same issue with ethermine, and only on a wireless connection using SSL. Once I switch over to NON-SSL, I no longer get that issue. I noticed this because my one rigs was sending a ton of stale shares to the pool, but my other rig wasn't (wired rig) and I assumed it was a specific rig issue with wireless connectivity since it was only one rig but both are on the same internet connection. But switching back to NON-SSL should solve it until ethermine gets back to you. On occasion I would notice the discnnect message also when using SSL on any ethermine server. Thanks man. Ill give it a try later and see how i get on.
|
**SUPPORT SIDEHACK** Miner Development Donations to: 1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr
Donations/Tips to:- 1GTADDicTXD1uachKKgW24DZDxDGhSMdRa
Join Bitconnect: https://bitconnect.co/?ref=gtaddict
|
|
|
gt_addict
|
|
April 09, 2018, 05:40:47 PM |
|
Managed to remote in and change it but still the same
|
**SUPPORT SIDEHACK** Miner Development Donations to: 1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr
Donations/Tips to:- 1GTADDicTXD1uachKKgW24DZDxDGhSMdRa
Join Bitconnect: https://bitconnect.co/?ref=gtaddict
|
|
|
mantisOk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
April 09, 2018, 06:21:55 PM |
|
I have a 5 x RX570 on spread across two rigs. Since upgrading to 11.6, my GPUs randomly lose 10% of hashing power. After a few minutes they return to normal. They don't do it all at once, it's just a random one at random times. I moved back down to 11.2 and the power loss disappears. Anyone else have this issue?
seems -oldkernels 0 helped me to for stable hashrate
|
|
|
|
|