|
Bargraphics
|
 |
November 09, 2013, 11:17:07 PM |
|
40-50% difficulty rise would mean KnC delivers ~4ph worth of equipment in november. They delivered around 2.8ph in october. It will be closer to 25% jump more than likely.
Which will be around .3-.4 btc per day per jupiter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
Bogart
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 09, 2013, 11:20:53 PM |
|
40-50% difficulty rise would mean KnC delivers ~4ph worth of equipment in november. They delivered around 2.8ph in october. It will be closer to 25% jump more than likely.
They'd also been taking October delivery orders since early June. When did they close the window on October delivery orders? When did they start taking orders for November delivery? |
"All safe deposit boxes in banks or financial institutions have been sealed... and may only be opened in the presence of an agent of the I.R.S." - President F.D. Roosevelt, 1933
|
|
|
|
Bitcoinorama
|
|
November 09, 2013, 11:22:00 PM |
|
40-50% difficulty rise would mean KnC delivers ~4ph worth of equipment in november. They delivered around 2.8ph in october. It will be closer to 25% jump more than likely.
They'd also been taking October delivery orders since early June. When did they close the window on October delivery orders? When did they start taking orders for November delivery? Beg of September. |
Make my day! Say thanks if you found me helpful  BTC Address ---> 1487ThaKjezGA6SiE8fvGcxbgJJu6XWtZp |
|
|
|
CYPER
|
|
November 09, 2013, 11:28:33 PM |
|
By the end of this month - mid December, Jupiters are going to be earning - what? 0.1 BTC a day? 10 days per bitcoin?
If you think that the network hashrate will be 20PH/s by end of the month you are delusional. |
|
|
|
|
seanrarey
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
BuyAnythingWithBitcoin.com
|
|
November 09, 2013, 11:32:16 PM |
|
I have a payout from Bitminter that is still unconfirmed after 17 hours.
And I have no explanation why my previous 4 payouts (1 per day) have confirmed in less than an hour, but this one is being treated different.
What changed?
The maximum size of each bitcoin block is limited to 1 megabyte. This is enforced by the client. It's up to each miner (which means a pool operator or solo miner) to set their policy for what transactions get included in their blocks. They can even choose not to include any. It could be that there are a lot of competing transactions that keep yours from getting picked up, or a lot of blocks are being mined by miners with more selfish policies that don't choose to include [m]any transactions. Also the network hashrate seems to have stabilized now, so the network is about back to the intended 1 block per 10 minutes, rather than 1 per 7 minutes or so that we saw as the hashrate was climbing. (This issue would be a lot less severe if we could somehow get rid of SatoshiDice, which spams the blockchain with tons of useless transactions.) Diversifying off of the big pools can only help... just saying... fellow miners...  |
|
|
|
ImI
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
|
|
November 09, 2013, 11:38:29 PM |
|
40-50% difficulty rise would mean KnC delivers ~4ph worth of equipment in november. They delivered around 2.8ph in october. It will be closer to 25% jump more than likely.
They'd also been taking October delivery orders since early June. When did they close the window on October delivery orders? When did they start taking orders for November delivery? Beg of September. Hey Orama, are they on track for november? What do you think, how long will they need to deliver this second batch? |
|
|
|
|
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
|
|
November 09, 2013, 11:56:15 PM |
|
KnC's gen 2 in March? As opposed to a more than half Gh in a few weeks?
AFTER the stragglers have finished delivering half a dozen Ph? As opposed to more than... in a few weeks?
maybe...
WTF? |
|
|
|
|
|
The Avenger
|
|
November 09, 2013, 11:57:47 PM |
|
|
"I am not The Avenger"
1AthxGvreWbkmtTXed6EQfjXMXXdSG7dD6
|
|
|
|
CYPER
|
|
November 10, 2013, 12:06:30 AM |
|
Wow, I really hope that is no true, because I was contemplating of sending my boards back. It is a good advice to mark them though. |
|
|
|
|
FoolPartedWithMoney
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
November 10, 2013, 12:21:47 AM |
|
blockchain.info will refund to the sender after 36-48 hours or so if no miner is kind enough to include it in a block.
Troll much, or are you just misinformed? You have a different answer? Please utter it. 2 bashes now on Paladin69, (who was nice enough to answer) ...without ANY explanation.... **** Thanks guys... I really feel informed now... The easiest option is to continue to wait. No, an "automatic refund" will never happen. The only other option, which requires a good bit of technical skill, is for the sender to manually create a new transaction that spends the same inputs, but also includes a tx fee, and hope a miner picks that one up instead (which will then invalidate the original transaction). Technically you could say the funds are still in the sender's wallet, but since the transaction has been broadcast, a miner could pick it up at any time and move the funds out to their intended destination address. That makes sense... Wish I could add that doggone fee... Thank you for responding... The same thing happened to me, but for much smaller amount. I took older copy of my wallet and it got "refunded", it doesn't show this transaction in my wallet now, but is still in the blockchain with 0 confirmations. So, I am not sure whether I have access to all of my balance shown in bitcoin-qt or not. |
|
|
|
|
|
helmax
|
|
November 10, 2013, 12:51:44 AM |
|
you are crazy to buy more machines
This is greed!
instead of letting this stable for a few more days, but it's not going to do worse
are you guys remove all opportunity we win something at the same time
you want to win with a 500 GB machine BTC 0.00001
greed
the difficulty will increase 10 times by your fault
|
looking job
|
|
|
|
Henchman24
|
|
November 10, 2013, 01:09:21 AM
Last edit: November 15, 2013, 05:28:13 AM by Henchman24 |
|
Has anyone measured the power draw of a Jupiter at the wall? I'm trying to see if a Seasonic X1250 is enough to power 2 of them.
Im pulling on average 630-650w per at the wall all on firmware .98. I would go with what bitcoinorama said- get a PSU per. I know you said Jup, but as an additional data point - a Killawatt says my Saturn is pulling 365watts. I'm on 0.98.1 EDIT: Seems some of that high wattage was just due to an inefficient PSU. I swapped out the somewhat older PSU for an 80 Plus gold PSU and it's now pulling 342 watts. LATEST EDIT: Same setup pulls 334 watts from the wall with an 80Plus Platinum PSU. |
|
|
|
|
btc_uzr
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
let's have some fun
|
|
November 10, 2013, 01:42:32 AM |
|
you are crazy to buy more machines
This is greed!
instead of letting this stable for a few more days, but it's not going to do worse
are you guys remove all opportunity we win something at the same time
you want to win with a 500 GB machine BTC 0.00001
greed
the difficulty will increase 10 times by your fault
 if math is not your friend don't bother with it let me show you sth: 8,6 Billion Diff ~> 62PH/s => 1BTC a month with Jupiter => BTC1/30days = BTC0,033333333 a day ~$10/day if btc is @$300 ..calculate the diff / hashrate required for your mentioned BTC 0.00001 a day(?) and laugh about yourself - or was that number meant per second ? btw: with a 500GB machine you may store videos and photos but not mine coins, not even BTC 0.00001 |
..and Thou shalt spread the coin in the name of cryptography for eternity
|
|
|
Phoenix1969
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
LIR DEV
|
|
November 10, 2013, 02:25:10 AM |
|
The transaction finally confirmed....32 hours... ug... Wont make that mistake again!
Hah, "Jupiter Two". Lovin' it!
|
|
|
|
|
FeedbackLoop
|
|
November 10, 2013, 02:37:21 AM
Last edit: November 10, 2013, 03:04:22 AM by FeedbackLoop |
|
you are crazy to buy more machines
This is greed!
instead of letting this stable for a few more days, but it's not going to do worse
are you guys remove all opportunity we win something at the same time
you want to win with a 500 GB machine BTC 0.00001
greed
the difficulty will increase 10 times by your fault
yes... because if no one buys those magic petahash-spewing DRAM-machines then KNC will just use them as surströmming containers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cablez
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
I owe my soul to the Bitcoin code...
|
|
November 10, 2013, 03:18:48 AM |
|
Yes but the controller ports are not soldered on to the BBB either. Would take a bit more work I think. |
Tired of substandard power distribution in your ASIC setup??? Chris' Custom Cablez will get you sorted out right! No job too hard so PM me for a quote
Check my products or ask a question here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=74397.0
|
|
|
Phoenix1969
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
LIR DEV
|
|
November 10, 2013, 03:22:49 AM
Last edit: November 10, 2013, 03:34:24 AM by Phoenix1969 |
|
Yes but the controller ports are not soldered on to the BBB either. Would take a bit more work I think. some have them, some dont I'm eager to see what November units hashpower will be... |
|
|
|
|
Paladin69
|
|
November 10, 2013, 03:43:25 AM |
|
blockchain.info will refund to the sender after 36-48 hours or so if no miner is kind enough to include it in a block.
Troll much, or are you just misinformed? You have a different answer? Please utter it. 2 bashes now on Paladin69, (who was nice enough to answer) ...without ANY explanation.... **** Thanks guys... I really feel informed now... The easiest option is to continue to wait. No, an "automatic refund" will never happen. The only other option, which requires a good bit of technical skill, is for the sender to manually create a new transaction that spends the same inputs, but also includes a tx fee, and hope a miner picks that one up instead (which will then invalidate the original transaction). Technically you could say the funds are still in the sender's wallet, but since the transaction has been broadcast, a miner could pick it up at any time and move the funds out to their intended destination address. I speak from experiencing it first hand when sending from one of my wallets to another. I forgot to include a fee and it sat in limbo with what felt like forever. If a miner includes it, it goes through. It didn't for me. From what I understand if you don't use blockchain.info it literally will be stuck until a miner decides to include. If that happens, you can get it back by attempting to double spend the exact same amount from the wallet it came from. |
|
|
|
|
|
Paladin69
|
|
November 10, 2013, 03:45:53 AM |
|
Has anyone measured the power draw of a Jupiter at the wall? I'm trying to see if a Seasonic X1250 is enough to power 2 of them.
Im pulling on average 630-650w per at the wall all on firmware .98. I would go with what bitcoinorama said- get a PSU per. The watt usage keeps going up for me on the latest. I am now 697w at the wall with 0.981. But it is now 580-600GH. Getting very high rates. This was on a machine that had an RMA for one of the four boards. What started as my worst Jupiter is now my best one. |
|
|
|
|
|
