Meizirkki
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 04, 2013, 12:58:46 AM |
|
In KnC were smart they'd have shipped the boxes 400Gh as promised and later provide an overclocking FW for everyone to play with. This way they'd never had to do RMA on all the slightly underperforming units ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
Phoenix1969
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
LIR DEV
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 04, 2013, 01:00:14 AM Last edit: November 04, 2013, 01:11:45 AM by Phoenix1969 |
|
Well, this time 'round, I decided to try just 0.98, straight up... ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fx71jEGH.png&t=665&c=aZqwkKSl6YT0vA) There went the "Theoretical limit"... Oyeah. Just kidding... thats the first 5 mins, they always go back to 283, 284, 283
|
|
|
|
timmmers
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 04, 2013, 01:04:59 AM |
|
In KnC were smart they'd have shipped the boxes 400Gh as promised and later provide an overclocking FW for everyone to play with. This way they'd never had to do RMA on all the slightly underperforming units ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Too busy bragging about what ORSOC did. It pains me to call these things KNC when the lion's share of what KNC did, they did badly and ORSOC actually were the ones delivering the goods. They did miss a trick there, and compounded that by not being able to update the specs on their site too. A cock crows on it's own dunghill as my granny used to say.
|
|
|
|
timmmers
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 04, 2013, 01:07:50 AM |
|
Well, this time 'round, I decided to try just 0.98, straight up... ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fx71jEGH.png&t=665&c=aZqwkKSl6YT0vA) There went the "Theoretical limit"... Oyeah. Where? 288 is the theoretical limit. Not to mention all the messing you've been doing probably reduced the ave hash rate over time by some margin
|
|
|
|
edgar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 04, 2013, 01:14:03 AM |
|
showing the immediate ratings after reflashing is hardly 'BOOM, PoW' Etc
you know full well that these rates will fluctuate, so why go ON & ON & ON & ON?
do you really want to show you have the bestest in the barn 15 times a week, only to have to review the 'new truth' 15 more times.
you and feedback loop would do us all a great service by giving it a rest.. even a short one...
BooMM!!
|
|
|
|
FeedbackLoop
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 04, 2013, 01:30:35 AM Last edit: November 04, 2013, 01:49:24 AM by FeedbackLoop |
|
showing the immediate ratings after reflashing is hardly 'BOOM, PoW' Etc
you know full well that these rates will fluctuate, so why go ON & ON & ON & ON?
do you really want to show you have the bestest in the barn 15 times a week, only to have to review the 'new truth' 15 more times.
you and feedback loop would do us all a great service by giving it a rest.. even a short one...
BooMM!!
Nice way to squeeze Feedbackloop there for a well timed cheap shot dipshit! Feedbackloop has barely been posting stats. I understand that you need to mix accusations there to actually get some flame going my way though. The only thing I have been posting way too much these two days are replies to useless trolls like you. And you are not even a good one. Go flame the newbie forum. i removed an external room fan and raised GH/s by 0.8.
'BOOM, PoW' Etc
|
|
|
|
Searing
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1464
Clueless!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 04, 2013, 02:06:55 AM |
|
to what temp?
I got it up to 90c before I put the fan back on. I didn't wanna risk letting get any higher. I know the limit is supposed to be about 105c, but why risk it right? Anyway, I noticed that when it got to around 90, all the VRMs showed an output of 0A. So I let it cool down, and when it got to about 51c, the two normally working VRMs kicked back in. I let it slowly climb back up by blocking airflow. I noticed when it gets to 75.5c, a third VRM kicks in. Its not until it hits 80c, that the 4th VRM kicks in. As soon as the 4th VRM kick in, the temps get to 83c, and then every VRM drops back down to 0A. So from this experiment; I've gotta figure out somehow to keep one of the boards under 55c (thats where it hashes the best, and the other one between 80c - 82c, which is freaking difficult. Just a bit of airflow makes more then 2 degrees of difference. you did check for the plastic between the heatsink was taken off right..if not you should see clear piece of plastic if you look close over the edges of the heatsink/chip area? i'm running my unit all my stuff is like below 42c with 1 20c and 1 32c other 2 now at 42c...i'm in a winter coming basement kinda thing with low humidity cover off fans in front blowing crosswise anyway just in case someone missed the memo on the plastic being left on heatsink and not peeled off before thermal grease added..easy fix....take off plastic re apply some new thermal paste *unsure of best one* hope it helps all I got Searing
|
Old Style Legacy Plug & Play BBS System. Get it from www.synchro.net. Updated 1/1/2021. It also works with Windows 10 and likely 11 and allows 16 bit DOS game doors on the same Win 10 Machine in Multi-Node! Five Minute Install! Look it over it uninstalls just as fast, if you simply want to look it over. Freeware! Full BBS System! It is a frigging hoot!:)
|
|
|
DimensionsOfHell
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 04, 2013, 02:13:16 AM |
|
Okay... update... After two hours of messing about... I got the board that needs to be hot at a stable 73c, but it now shows 'FAULT' on one of the VRMs. Even with the fault, the miner is showing 260GH/s average on CGMINER and 244GH/s on the pools side, both of which are slowly climbing. My 5s averages at around 271gh/s - 302gh/s. I'm much happier with the speed now, but worried about that 'FAULT' on one of the VRMs. What do you guys think? Also, my Device Rejected rate and Pool Rejected rate has shot up from around 0.27% to now over 5%. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FkYxaZxSl.jpg&t=665&c=kAl3tvD4I-Xo4A) EDIT: Thanks Searing for the suggestion, but that is the first thing I did when I got my Miner. Keeping the temp cool isn't my problem. My problem was to actually heat it up. My miner normally ran at around 45c on one board, ad 48c on the other board. Now I have them at 65.5c on one board, and 73.5c on the other board. Never seen it run better then now. Just hoping to keep that stable.
|
|
|
|
FeedbackLoop
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 04, 2013, 02:32:17 AM Last edit: November 04, 2013, 02:43:07 AM by FeedbackLoop |
|
Okay... update... After two hours of messing about... I got the board that needs to be hot at a stable 73c, but it now shows 'FAULT' on one of the VRMs. Even with the fault, the miner is showing 260GH/s average on CGMINER and 244GH/s on the pools side, both of which are slowly climbing. My 5s averages at around 271gh/s - 302gh/s. I'm much happier with the speed now, but worried about that 'FAULT' on one of the VRMs. What do you guys think? Also, my Device Rejected rate and Pool Rejected rate has shot up from around 0.27% to now over 5%. https://i.imgur.com/kYxaZxSl.jpgEDIT: Thanks Searing for the suggestion, but that is the first thing I did when I got my Miner. Keeping the temp cool isn't my problem. My problem was to actually heat it up. My miner normally ran at around 45c on one board, ad 48c on the other board. Now I have them at 65.5c on one board, and 73.5c on the other board. Never seen it run better then now. Just hoping to keep that stable. For all it's worth: According to the datasheet ( http://www.lineagepower.com/oem/pdf/MDT040A0X.pdf) I would guess FAULT 4 just refers to the "IO Overcurrent" fault on bit 4 of the lower byte on page 20. We see it at a higher current than it's brothers in the same board. Maybe a tiny improvised cooler on just that vrm to make it go away? Copper coins? Old motherboard coolers? Pray for no magic smoke?
|
|
|
|
edgar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 04, 2013, 02:59:55 AM |
|
keep trying to up your game mouthpiece, your diversionary tactics don't go un-noticed. Nor your stalking..
now you are 'we' ?
Pray for you to give it a rest like you said you would, about 4 times.
|
|
|
|
Bogart
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 04, 2013, 03:08:33 AM |
|
just updated my mercury from .98 to .98.1 and HW errors went from 6.9% to around 1.5%. also, rejected was 3% to 0% now!
definitely a good upgrade. all cores functioning as well. none are off.
UPDATE: been running .98.1 for 30 mins now, hw errors down to 1.1% and dropping. still no duplicate shares!
0.98.1 was intended for those with a dead die; die 0 There is no other difference as far as I know. thats what i thought too man, but its made a big difference for me! My Saturn's currently running 0.98 with 1.2% hw errors, and only one core that keeps getting toggled on and off. cgminer reports a long term average of 283.8Ghps. Darned near the theoretical maximum of 284. I'm not gonna touch it. I must have missed something but where did that theorectical max info come from ? I was wondering what that was. Basically, each hash module has 192 cores that hash at 750MH/s each, so 144 GH/s per module. Oops, I mathed wrong. On top of that, I jinxed myself posting that. Shortly after, the unit crashed in some way where it became inaccessible IP-wise. Mercifully, off-then-on-again was all it took to make it happy again.
|
"All safe deposit boxes in banks or financial institutions have been sealed... and may only be opened in the presence of an agent of the I.R.S." - President F.D. Roosevelt, 1933
|
|
|
edgar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 04, 2013, 03:21:42 AM |
|
Bizarrely mine did the same thing...
Recovered immediately at 702Gh/s for about 3 seconds.
'Pow'..etc
|
|
|
|
FeedbackLoop
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 04, 2013, 03:32:03 AM |
|
keep trying to up your game mouthpiece, your diversionary tactics don't go un-noticed. Nor your stalking..
now you are 'we' ?
Pray for you to give it a rest like you said you would, about 4 times.
![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) Yeah! 'We' be stalking you. We're just the mouthpiece for the voices in your head. You are our reason of existence in this forum. Everything else was just a diversion. You got us uncovered now. All this buying a Jupiter and posting here and there... a FARCE! Guess precious little packages like these come with all the features don't they! Holy *&^! I thought you were just a little over-sensitive brat! lol! Did I say holy crap yet? ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) And now I have to defend both what I say and what the imaginary person you think I am says. I never thought I would meet such a precious little character like you, not even online. You were definitely the cherry on top of the cake of this weekend's trolling (quite a fruitcake it turned out to be). Ignored for a while for me not to fall to the temptation of replying again, for the sake of the poor thread, even though it would actually be pretty funny to follow you.* * But deep down you know me saying ignored is just a "diversionary tactic" right? So post away. "We" will keep tracking you down! Bizarrely mine did the same thing...
** This was also 'us'
|
|
|
|
edgar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 04, 2013, 04:22:22 AM |
|
you dont 'have to' do anything.
you make your own choices like the rest of us;)
btw - 'thought so'
|
|
|
|
wasubii
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 04, 2013, 05:00:07 AM |
|
Not to poke a lion... but I personally Mine for fun, in hopes of a profit... ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) +1 me too
|
|
|
|
RChevalier
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 04, 2013, 06:25:28 AM |
|
me 3.
Actually I mine because I want to sell bitcoins for a lot of money. If that happens, mining will become "fun" as well. I really don't think too much about supporting the network or contributing to blah blah and etc.
Augusto Croppo - Your name is pretty badass... like some kind of a super assassin from a gangsta movie. Also, do you have an addiction to arguing?
|
|
|
|
idee2013
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 04, 2013, 08:16:47 AM Last edit: November 04, 2013, 08:50:55 AM by idee2013 |
|
Okay... update... After two hours of messing about... I got the board that needs to be hot at a stable 73c, but it now shows 'FAULT' on one of the VRMs. Even with the fault, the miner is showing 260GH/s average on CGMINER and 244GH/s on the pools side, both of which are slowly climbing. My 5s averages at around 271gh/s - 302gh/s. I'm much happier with the speed now, but worried about that 'FAULT' on one of the VRMs. What do you guys think? Also, my Device Rejected rate and Pool Rejected rate has shot up from around 0.27% to now over 5%. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FkYxaZxSl.jpg&t=665&c=kAl3tvD4I-Xo4A) EDIT: Thanks Searing for the suggestion, but that is the first thing I did when I got my Miner. Keeping the temp cool isn't my problem. My problem was to actually heat it up. My miner normally ran at around 45c on one board, ad 48c on the other board. Now I have them at 65.5c on one board, and 73.5c on the other board. Never seen it run better then now. Just hoping to keep that stable. Same here with "Fault 4" with a VRM. Tha asic went very well up to 0 Cores OFF and about 75°C....but since 3 days...this vrm pulls more and more amps as much more i have more temps. now the asic can run only about 65 °C because the vrm at max 50.2 AMP...over that temps tha VRM pushes more and it get the message in red "fault 4" P.S. i had VRMS in a Saturn that worked with 58,8 AMPS very well. What does the "Fault 4" state exactly mean?
|
|
|
|
jimmy3dita
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 04, 2013, 09:39:28 AM |
|
me 3.
Actually I mine because I want to sell bitcoins for a lot of money. If that happens, mining will become "fun" as well. I really don't think too much about supporting the network or contributing to blah blah and etc.
Augusto Croppo - Your name is pretty badass... like some kind of a super assassin from a gangsta movie. Also, do you have an addiction to arguing?
In Italy we would politely ask why he's always behaving like he got something painful stuck up in his ass.
|
Acquista il mio libro "Investire Bitcoin": clicca qui
|
|
|
RoadStress
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 04, 2013, 10:02:45 AM |
|
Because using the RMA system makes no sense from a financial point of view. You will make more BTC mining with 420GH/s now, than send the miner back in order to mine presumably with 550GH/s in 5-7 days. I was given an RMA number on 31st and the next day Bitcoinorama was kind enough to give me the 0.98.1 Beta, which healed one of my Jupiters completely, which just shows that there is lack of communication internally between the different departments. While suggest a RMA, when there is a chance for a software fix? Currently I am 99% convinced that my other Jupiter will be healed too, which makes me wonder why people decide to send boards back. That makes no sense.
You can send only the faulty board, not the whole system, but if your calculations show you that then you are free to do as you think it's better for you. @DimensionsOfHell Tried calling them?
|
|
|
|
sickpig
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 04, 2013, 10:14:02 AM |
|
Because using the RMA system makes no sense from a financial point of view. You will make more BTC mining with 420GH/s now, than send the miner back in order to mine presumably with 550GH/s in 5-7 days. I was given an RMA number on 31st and the next day Bitcoinorama was kind enough to give me the 0.98.1 Beta, which healed one of my Jupiters completely, which just shows that there is lack of communication internally between the different departments. While suggest a RMA, when there is a chance for a software fix? Currently I am 99% convinced that my other Jupiter will be healed too, which makes me wonder why people decide to send boards back. That makes no sense.
You can send only the faulty board, not the whole system, but if your calculations show you that then you are free to do as you think it's better for you. @DimensionsOfHell Tried calling them? I'm sure that if they had put in place something along this line: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=320049.0more customers would had asked for RMA.
|
Bitcoin is a participatory system which ought to respect the right of self determinism of all of its users - Gregory Maxwell.
|
|
|
|