Bitcoin Forum
April 21, 2019, 01:19:36 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 [75] 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 ... 172 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows)  (Read 221812 times)
Trololino
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 01, 2017, 10:15:01 AM
 #1481

No issues on 1060 and 1070, but its not working steady on my regular 1080's. Could be because of different memory, but it would be great if I could use it on all my rigs.
1555852776
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1555852776

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1555852776
Reply with quote  #2

1555852776
Report to moderator
1555852776
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1555852776

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1555852776
Reply with quote  #2

1555852776
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1555852776
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1555852776

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1555852776
Reply with quote  #2

1555852776
Report to moderator
1555852776
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1555852776

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1555852776
Reply with quote  #2

1555852776
Report to moderator
bigfootnz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 01, 2017, 11:41:09 AM
 #1482

Hi dstm, can you please confirm is this connection error and why is this happening?

https://ibb.co/gcsQSw

With previous versions I never had any problems like with this last one. It is not problem with network as I’ve two locations with rigs and it is not happening on all rigs at one location but randomly.
markymondie
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 01, 2017, 12:28:55 PM
 #1483

i got rejected shares on nicehash.

if you have time @dstm can u please check that. i love your miner. didnt give me a hard time unlike ewbf. no 0 sols problem on dstm.

 Grin Grin Grin
k3rt
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 01, 2017, 12:29:11 PM
 #1484

Can someone confirm which drivers work better for them on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS:
- 378 vs 384 vs (other versions) vs CUDA Toolkit?
akuci
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 01, 2017, 03:42:11 PM
 #1485

I can confirm there are rejected shares on NiceHash with any PL\Freq settings, even stock.
Can you please look into it? 'cause I'm using it only on NH, and maybe some other folks too.

Also I think you must do something to improve readability of information in miner window.
Atexor
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 155
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 01, 2017, 06:36:43 PM
 #1486

Thx for the report.                                                                                                            
Are you thinking about a unix daemon? This isn't available on windows, I don't want to diverge the versions without a good reason, I'll do ofc if there is one. If you're mainly interested in disabling the output you can redirect it to /dev/null or/and start it in your init system (e.g. using systemd).

What colors and where would improve readability?

Hi, I'm using dstm on Windows on my mining PC. Unfortunately Linux is not an option. I think it shouldn't be a big problem but I understand if you don't want to implement it. It was an idea which could be useful because it won't take a space on taskbar. Also thanks for commands. It would be helpful inthe future. And about colors. This is my idea for your miner look:


What do you thing? To my mind, currently there are too many informations in the console. In my version summary for GPU(s) will appear every X minutes or shares . "+++++" instead of number is strange ideaso I changed it. More info would be avaible via telemetry.
akuci
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 01, 2017, 07:22:31 PM
 #1487

+ 1 for this idea. I just think you should add 3 colors for the temperatures. Below 65 - green. 65 to 79 - yellow, and 80+ - red. Also it will be good to see how many accepted shares, and how many rejected, also green for accepted and red for rejected. Per GPU and total. It would be much much better than this current mess of information. I cannot understand half of them, and really don't need them as an average miner.
Atexor
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 155
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 01, 2017, 11:06:02 PM
Last edit: December 01, 2017, 11:17:11 PM by Atexor
 #1488

+ 1 for this idea. I just think you should add 3 colors for the temperatures. Below 65 - green. 65 to 79 - yellow, and 80+ - red. Also it will be good to see how many accepted shares, and how many rejected, also green for accepted and red for rejected. Per GPU and total. It would be much much better than this current mess of information. I cannot understand half of them, and really don't need them as an average miner.

I though about colors for GPU temperaturs, hovewer for different models there is different level of "hot" and could be difficult do maintain and change (in config) fpr each of the cards. Also using too much colors could make it too unreadable.

Rejected shares appears sometimes for me but their form  Recently I had one. I think it could has red color and show as normal information. If everything works normally, there is no reason to color it at green every line.
Take a look:
https://i.imgur.com/5xjthIu.png
I don't know what "21" means there - number of rejected share? Also I've bringed back "*" to show where was devfee but in different place.

For me showing year in date is unpractible (month rather too but i kept it), like that accepted shares ratio too (always equal 1.0). It's not necessary to show every line Avg. Sol/s because it doesn't change so often. On summary it would be great. Of course this is my proposals and for someone other ideas could be better. Nonetheless I hope that dstm will like my suggestions.


By the way - dstm. Miner started to works better to me and it haspractically a bit more better score than EWBF. Hoverwer it needs much time to spin up. I am wondering why with ewbf/dstm miner I'm able to overclock core only to 60/75mhz max, while other people on 1070/1080ti could overclock it further than 100mhz.
babalz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 02, 2017, 06:53:25 AM
 #1489

...

@dstm, can you consider adding new equihash variant, e.g equihashzero k=192 n=7 ?
santan
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 103
Merit: 11


View Profile
December 02, 2017, 09:29:38 AM
 #1490

And about colors. This is my idea for your miner look:


What do you thing? To my mind, currently there are too many informations in the console. In my version summary for GPU(s) will appear every X minutes or shares . "+++++" instead of number is strange ideaso I changed it. More info would be avaible via telemetry.

@Atexor..... How did you got that picture Huh   dstm miner is closed source !
Atexor
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 155
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 02, 2017, 10:34:22 AM
 #1491

@Atexor..... How did you got that picture Huh   dstm miner is closed source !
Photoshop
Herbalking
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 27
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 02, 2017, 01:03:40 PM
 #1492

Hi dstm, can you please confirm is this connection error and why is this happening?

https://ibb.co/gcsQSw

With previous versions I never had any problems like with this last one. It is not problem with network as I’ve two locations with rigs and it is not happening on all rigs at one location but randomly.
I gota that problem too. And dstm want help you.
Andrey09
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 163
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 02, 2017, 05:27:34 PM
 #1493

Hi dstm, can you please confirm is this connection error and why is this happening?

https://ibb.co/gcsQSw

With previous versions I never had any problems like with this last one. It is not problem with network as I’ve two locations with rigs and it is not happening on all rigs at one location but randomly.
I gota that problem too. And dstm want help you.
I got same error time to time on BTG.
akuci
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 02, 2017, 05:51:54 PM
 #1494

I would add in miner window also power consuption in Watts. It's really useful.
ap0stol
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 02, 2017, 10:59:36 PM
 #1495

I would add in miner window also power consuption in Watts. It's really useful.


sol/s
-----  =  power consuption in Watts
sol/w

 Wink
akuci
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 02, 2017, 11:14:51 PM
 #1496

I would add in miner window also power consuption in Watts. It's really useful.


sol/s
-----  =  power consuption in Watts
sol/w

 Wink
Okay, I'm bad at math, but not that bad. Smiley
Still, it would be nice to see the power draw for each card.
Kejvu
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 03, 2017, 04:42:55 AM
 #1497

Hello, i'm asking my self is this ok for Share rate for GTX 1060 on flypool mining to have Sh: ~0.90, when my GTX 1080 Ti have around ~2.88

http://prntscr.com/hidlfv

Code:
2017-12-03 05.35.59|   GPU0  56C  Sol/s: 759.4  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 752.9  I/s: 401.7  Sh: 2.99   1.00 183 +++
2017-12-03 05.36.01|   GPU1  62C  Sol/s: 333.1  Sol/W: 3.27  Avg: 330.2  I/s: 176.9  Sh: 0.75   1.00 73
2017-12-03 05.36.01|   ========== Sol/s: 1092.5 Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 1083.1 I/s: 578.6  Sh: 3.74   1.00 128
2017-12-03 05.36.19|>  GPU0  57C  Sol/s: 761.1  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 753.8  I/s: 401.6  Sh: 3.33   1.00 74  ++
2017-12-03 05.36.21|>  GPU1  62C  Sol/s: 327.8  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 329.9  I/s: 176.5  Sh: 0.66   1.00 73
2017-12-03 05.36.21|   ========== Sol/s: 1088.9 Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 1083.7 I/s: 578.1  Sh: 3.99   1.00 73
2017-12-03 05.36.39|   GPU0  57C  Sol/s: 745.8  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 753.0  I/s: 400.0  Sh: 4.19   1.00 74  ++++
2017-12-03 05.36.41|   GPU1  62C  Sol/s: 330.2  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 330.0  I/s: 176.5  Sh: 0.60   1.00 73
2017-12-03 05.36.41|   ========== Sol/s: 1076.0 Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 1082.9 I/s: 576.5  Sh: 4.78   1.00 73
2017-12-03 05.36.59|   GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 743.9  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 752.2  I/s: 401.5  Sh: 4.08   1.00 75  +
2017-12-03 05.37.01|   GPU1  65C  Sol/s: 333.4  Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 330.3  I/s: 180.3  Sh: 0.54   1.00 73
2017-12-03 05.37.01|   ========== Sol/s: 1077.4 Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 1082.4 I/s: 581.7  Sh: 4.62   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.37.19|   GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 745.7  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 751.6  I/s: 401.2  Sh: 4.49   1.00 74  +++
2017-12-03 05.37.21|   GPU1  67C  Sol/s: 341.6  Sol/W: 3.19  Avg: 331.2  I/s: 183.2  Sh: 0.50   1.00 73
2017-12-03 05.37.21|   ========== Sol/s: 1087.3 Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 1082.8 I/s: 584.4  Sh: 4.99   1.00 73
2017-12-03 05.37.39|   GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 755.9  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 751.9  I/s: 401.3  Sh: 4.14   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.37.41|   GPU1  67C  Sol/s: 342.5  Sol/W: 3.16  Avg: 332.1  I/s: 183.0  Sh: 0.69   1.00 74  +
2017-12-03 05.37.41|   ========== Sol/s: 1098.4 Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 1084.0 I/s: 584.3  Sh: 4.83   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.37.59|   GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 749.6  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 751.8  I/s: 401.4  Sh: 3.85   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.38.02|   GPU1  68C  Sol/s: 346.2  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 333.1  I/s: 182.9  Sh: 0.85   1.00 74  +
2017-12-03 05.38.02|   ========== Sol/s: 1095.8 Sol/W: 3.19  Avg: 1084.9 I/s: 584.3  Sh: 4.70   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.38.19|   GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 748.8  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 751.6  I/s: 401.2  Sh: 3.79   1.00 74  +
2017-12-03 05.38.22|   GPU1  69C  Sol/s: 343.4  Sol/W: 3.12  Avg: 333.8  I/s: 182.3  Sh: 0.80   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.38.22|   ========== Sol/s: 1092.2 Sol/W: 3.18  Avg: 1085.4 I/s: 583.4  Sh: 4.59   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.38.39|   GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 749.6  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 751.5  I/s: 401.0  Sh: 3.55   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.38.42|   GPU1  67C  Sol/s: 328.0  Sol/W: 3.11  Avg: 333.4  I/s: 178.7  Sh: 0.75   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.38.42|   ========== Sol/s: 1077.6 Sol/W: 3.18  Avg: 1084.9 I/s: 579.7  Sh: 4.30   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.38.59|   GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 750.5  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 751.4  I/s: 401.1  Sh: 3.52   1.00 75  +
2017-12-03 05.39.02|   GPU1  65C  Sol/s: 327.1  Sol/W: 3.12  Avg: 333.0  I/s: 174.1  Sh: 0.88   1.00 74  +
2017-12-03 05.39.02|   ========== Sol/s: 1077.6 Sol/W: 3.18  Avg: 1084.4 I/s: 575.2  Sh: 4.40   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.39.19|>  GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 750.7  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 751.4  I/s: 401.0  Sh: 3.49   1.00 74  +
2017-12-03 05.39.22|>  GPU1  65C  Sol/s: 328.7  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 332.8  I/s: 175.0  Sh: 0.83   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.39.22|   ========== Sol/s: 1079.5 Sol/W: 3.18  Avg: 1084.2 I/s: 576.0  Sh: 4.32   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.39.39|>  GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 747.8  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 751.2  I/s: 400.9  Sh: 3.31   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.39.42|>  GPU1  65C  Sol/s: 329.6  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 332.6  I/s: 175.4  Sh: 0.79   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.39.42|   ========== Sol/s: 1077.5 Sol/W: 3.19  Avg: 1083.8 I/s: 576.3  Sh: 4.09   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.39.59|   GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 756.6  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 751.5  I/s: 400.9  Sh: 3.14   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.40.02|   GPU1  64C  Sol/s: 322.5  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 332.1  I/s: 175.7  Sh: 0.90   1.00 74  +
2017-12-03 05.40.02|   ========== Sol/s: 1079.1 Sol/W: 3.19  Avg: 1083.6 I/s: 576.6  Sh: 4.04   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.40.19|   GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 755.2  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 751.6  I/s: 400.9  Sh: 3.28   1.00 75  ++
2017-12-03 05.40.22|   GPU1  64C  Sol/s: 331.1  Sol/W: 3.15  Avg: 332.1  I/s: 174.9  Sh: 0.85   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.40.22|   ========== Sol/s: 1086.3 Sol/W: 3.19  Avg: 1083.7 I/s: 575.8  Sh: 4.13   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.40.39|   GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 739.8  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 751.1  I/s: 399.5  Sh: 3.13   1.00 75
2017-12-03 05.40.42|   GPU1  64C  Sol/s: 325.1  Sol/W: 3.15  Avg: 331.8  I/s: 174.8  Sh: 0.95   1.00 74  +
2017-12-03 05.40.42|   ========== Sol/s: 1064.9 Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 1082.9 I/s: 574.3  Sh: 4.08   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.40.59|   GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 750.1  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 751.1  I/s: 400.9  Sh: 2.99   1.00 75
2017-12-03 05.41.02|   GPU1  64C  Sol/s: 330.8  Sol/W: 3.15  Avg: 331.7  I/s: 175.8  Sh: 0.91   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.41.02|   ========== Sol/s: 1080.9 Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 1082.8 I/s: 576.6  Sh: 3.90   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.41.19|   GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 746.4  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 750.9  I/s: 400.8  Sh: 2.87   1.00 75
2017-12-03 05.41.22|   GPU1  64C  Sol/s: 328.7  Sol/W: 3.16  Avg: 331.6  I/s: 175.0  Sh: 0.87   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.41.22|   ========== Sol/s: 1075.0 Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 1082.5 I/s: 575.8  Sh: 3.74   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.41.39|   GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 745.0  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 750.6  I/s: 400.7  Sh: 2.99   1.00 74  ++
2017-12-03 05.41.42|   GPU1  64C  Sol/s: 331.4  Sol/W: 3.16  Avg: 331.6  I/s: 174.3  Sh: 0.96   1.00 74  +
2017-12-03 05.41.42|   ========== Sol/s: 1076.4 Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 1082.2 I/s: 575.1  Sh: 3.95   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.41.59|   GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 758.7  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 750.9  I/s: 400.9  Sh: 2.88   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.42.02|   GPU1  64C  Sol/s: 327.7  Sol/W: 3.16  Avg: 331.4  I/s: 174.3  Sh: 0.92   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.42.02|   ========== Sol/s: 1086.4 Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 1082.4 I/s: 575.2  Sh: 3.80   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.42.19|>  GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 737.7  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 750.4  I/s: 399.5  Sh: 2.77   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.42.23|>  GPU1  64C  Sol/s: 325.1  Sol/W: 3.17  Avg: 331.2  I/s: 174.5  Sh: 0.89   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.42.23|   ========== Sol/s: 1062.8 Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 1081.6 I/s: 574.0  Sh: 3.66   1.00 74
dadesu
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 258



View Profile
December 03, 2017, 06:21:31 AM
 #1498

I am using v0.5.4 version of miner and now try v0.5.6 and cant seen any difference in cpu usage.
And speed of mining are as i can se almost same.
Look like need some work on cpu consumption becouse other similar miners use take lower usage on cpu.

           ▀██▄ ▄██▀
            ▐█████▌
           ▄███▀███▄
         ▄████▄  ▀███▄
       ▄███▀ ▀██▄  ▀███▄
     ▄███▀  ▄█████▄  ▀███▄
   ▄███▀  ▄███▀ ▀███▄  ▀███▄
  ███▀  ▄████▌   ▐████▄  ▀███
 ███   ██▀  ██▄ ▄██  ▀██   ███
███   ███  ███   ███  ███   ███
███   ███   ███████   ███   ███
 ███   ███▄▄       ▄▄███   ███
  ███▄   ▀▀█████████▀▀   ▄███
   ▀████▄▄           ▄▄████▀
      ▀▀███████████████▀▀
DeepOnion
Anonymous and Untraceable
ANN  Whitepaper  Facebook  Twitter  Telegram  Discord 





      ▄▄██████████▄▄
    ▄███▀▀      ▀▀█▀   ▄▄
   ███▀              ▄███
  ███              ▄███▀   ▄▄
 ███▌  ▄▄▄▄      ▄███▀   ▄███
▐███  ██████   ▄███▀   ▄███▀
███▌ ███  ███▄███▀   ▄███▀
███▌ ███   ████▀   ▄███▀
███▌  ███   █▀   ▄███▀  ███
▐███   ███     ▄███▀   ███
 ███▌   ███  ▄███▀     ███
  ███    ██████▀      ███
   ███▄             ▄███
    ▀███▄▄       ▄▄███▀
      ▀▀███████████▀▀
.
shibob
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 153


Native Vietnamese, Professional Translator


View Profile WWW
December 03, 2017, 06:40:30 AM
 #1499

I am using v0.5.4 version of miner and now try v0.5.6 and cant seen any difference in cpu usage.
And speed of mining are as i can se almost same.
Look like need some work on cpu consumption becouse other similar miners use take lower usage on cpu.

For my test, I did see a slightly higher hashrate for GTX 1060. But with 1070, it looks like the same.
By the way, It's more stable when I use ver.0.5.6 and update window 10 to ver.1709 Fall Creator. With ver.0.5.4 and window 10 ver. 1703, miner was unexpected closed many time.

akuci
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 03, 2017, 08:21:46 AM
 #1500

Is there anyone who also have connection problems to NH pool when using this miner?

Pages: « 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 [75] 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 ... 172 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!