Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 08:46:19 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 [73] 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 ... 169 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows)  (Read 224866 times)
dstm (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
December 01, 2017, 09:37:38 AM
 #1441

On one miner i'm see seeing on telemetry Page.
Uptime over 6 hours. And con time only 30 minutes.

Miner is mining and everything looks good. But i have a very small share rate.

What's causing this con time error ? The last six hours Ive been basicly mining only 30 minutes ?

Contime denotes the time passed since the last reconnect in this case.
1714164379
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714164379

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714164379
Reply with quote  #2

1714164379
Report to moderator
The grue lurks in the darkest places of the earth. Its favorite diet is adventurers, but its insatiable appetite is tempered by its fear of light. No grue has ever been seen by the light of day, and few have survived its fearsome jaws to tell the tale.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714164379
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714164379

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714164379
Reply with quote  #2

1714164379
Report to moderator
1714164379
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714164379

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714164379
Reply with quote  #2

1714164379
Report to moderator
dstm (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
December 01, 2017, 09:38:06 AM
 #1442

Do you consider selling the miner without the dev fee?

Sry, no.
dstm (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
December 01, 2017, 09:43:22 AM
 #1443

Cant mine Bitcoin Gold?


Yes dstm's ZCash can mine Bitcoin Gold.  I'm using it to mine Bitcoin Gold right now

Lower the fee and you might get less complaints an more users.

They don't mind paying it but it is to high at least with CM zec miner it's adjustable i know CM Zec miner only runs AMD cards but don't look at it that way because what happens if CM decides to give it NV card support most here now will use it,don't think they won't .




I'm not sure if you're talking about Claymore's Zcash miner but that's what he states on his thread:
                                                                                                                               
This miner is free-to-use, however, current developer fee is 2% if you use secure SSL/TLS connection....
If you use unsecure connection to mining pool, current developer fee is 2.5%....
If you don't agree with the dev fee - don't use this miner, or use "-nofee" option.
-nofee   set "1" to cancel my developer fee at all. In this mode some recent optimizations are disabled so mining speed will be slower by about 5%.
benjamoyne
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 274
Merit: 101


View Profile
December 01, 2017, 09:57:24 AM
 #1444

No issues with 5.6 here on 1060 and 1080ti rigs.

Was a slight issue when I first started using 5.5, it would crash out, but I dropped the core clock back by 10 and it worked fine.

Your fee is fair.  In the grand scheme of things 2% is stuff all of what we are making. 
To put it into prospective, 2% of $1 is 2c !
Trololino
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 01, 2017, 10:15:01 AM
 #1445

No issues on 1060 and 1070, but its not working steady on my regular 1080's. Could be because of different memory, but it would be great if I could use it on all my rigs.
bigfootnz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 01, 2017, 11:41:09 AM
 #1446

Hi dstm, can you please confirm is this connection error and why is this happening?

https://ibb.co/gcsQSw

With previous versions I never had any problems like with this last one. It is not problem with network as I’ve two locations with rigs and it is not happening on all rigs at one location but randomly.
markymondie
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 01, 2017, 12:28:55 PM
 #1447

i got rejected shares on nicehash.

if you have time @dstm can u please check that. i love your miner. didnt give me a hard time unlike ewbf. no 0 sols problem on dstm.

 Grin Grin Grin
k3rt
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 01, 2017, 12:29:11 PM
 #1448

Can someone confirm which drivers work better for them on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS:
- 378 vs 384 vs (other versions) vs CUDA Toolkit?
akuci
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 01, 2017, 03:42:11 PM
 #1449

I can confirm there are rejected shares on NiceHash with any PL\Freq settings, even stock.
Can you please look into it? 'cause I'm using it only on NH, and maybe some other folks too.

Also I think you must do something to improve readability of information in miner window.
Atexor
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 155
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 01, 2017, 06:36:43 PM
 #1450

Thx for the report.                                                                                                            
Are you thinking about a unix daemon? This isn't available on windows, I don't want to diverge the versions without a good reason, I'll do ofc if there is one. If you're mainly interested in disabling the output you can redirect it to /dev/null or/and start it in your init system (e.g. using systemd).

What colors and where would improve readability?

Hi, I'm using dstm on Windows on my mining PC. Unfortunately Linux is not an option. I think it shouldn't be a big problem but I understand if you don't want to implement it. It was an idea which could be useful because it won't take a space on taskbar. Also thanks for commands. It would be helpful inthe future. And about colors. This is my idea for your miner look:


What do you thing? To my mind, currently there are too many informations in the console. In my version summary for GPU(s) will appear every X minutes or shares . "+++++" instead of number is strange ideaso I changed it. More info would be avaible via telemetry.
akuci
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 01, 2017, 07:22:31 PM
 #1451

+ 1 for this idea. I just think you should add 3 colors for the temperatures. Below 65 - green. 65 to 79 - yellow, and 80+ - red. Also it will be good to see how many accepted shares, and how many rejected, also green for accepted and red for rejected. Per GPU and total. It would be much much better than this current mess of information. I cannot understand half of them, and really don't need them as an average miner.
Atexor
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 155
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 01, 2017, 11:06:02 PM
Last edit: December 01, 2017, 11:17:11 PM by Atexor
 #1452

+ 1 for this idea. I just think you should add 3 colors for the temperatures. Below 65 - green. 65 to 79 - yellow, and 80+ - red. Also it will be good to see how many accepted shares, and how many rejected, also green for accepted and red for rejected. Per GPU and total. It would be much much better than this current mess of information. I cannot understand half of them, and really don't need them as an average miner.

I though about colors for GPU temperaturs, hovewer for different models there is different level of "hot" and could be difficult do maintain and change (in config) fpr each of the cards. Also using too much colors could make it too unreadable.

Rejected shares appears sometimes for me but their form  Recently I had one. I think it could has red color and show as normal information. If everything works normally, there is no reason to color it at green every line.
Take a look:
https://i.imgur.com/5xjthIu.png
I don't know what "21" means there - number of rejected share? Also I've bringed back "*" to show where was devfee but in different place.

For me showing year in date is unpractible (month rather too but i kept it), like that accepted shares ratio too (always equal 1.0). It's not necessary to show every line Avg. Sol/s because it doesn't change so often. On summary it would be great. Of course this is my proposals and for someone other ideas could be better. Nonetheless I hope that dstm will like my suggestions.


By the way - dstm. Miner started to works better to me and it haspractically a bit more better score than EWBF. Hoverwer it needs much time to spin up. I am wondering why with ewbf/dstm miner I'm able to overclock core only to 60/75mhz max, while other people on 1070/1080ti could overclock it further than 100mhz.
babalz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 02, 2017, 06:53:25 AM
 #1453

...

@dstm, can you consider adding new equihash variant, e.g equihashzero k=192 n=7 ?
santan
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 102
Merit: 11


View Profile
December 02, 2017, 09:29:38 AM
 #1454

And about colors. This is my idea for your miner look:


What do you thing? To my mind, currently there are too many informations in the console. In my version summary for GPU(s) will appear every X minutes or shares . "+++++" instead of number is strange ideaso I changed it. More info would be avaible via telemetry.

@Atexor..... How did you got that picture Huh   dstm miner is closed source !
Atexor
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 155
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 02, 2017, 10:34:22 AM
 #1455

@Atexor..... How did you got that picture Huh   dstm miner is closed source !
Photoshop
Andrey09
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 176
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 02, 2017, 05:27:34 PM
 #1456

Hi dstm, can you please confirm is this connection error and why is this happening?

https://ibb.co/gcsQSw

With previous versions I never had any problems like with this last one. It is not problem with network as I’ve two locations with rigs and it is not happening on all rigs at one location but randomly.
I gota that problem too. And dstm want help you.
I got same error time to time on BTG.
akuci
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 02, 2017, 05:51:54 PM
 #1457

I would add in miner window also power consuption in Watts. It's really useful.
ap0stol
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 02, 2017, 10:59:36 PM
 #1458

I would add in miner window also power consuption in Watts. It's really useful.


sol/s
-----  =  power consuption in Watts
sol/w

 Wink
akuci
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 02, 2017, 11:14:51 PM
 #1459

I would add in miner window also power consuption in Watts. It's really useful.


sol/s
-----  =  power consuption in Watts
sol/w

 Wink
Okay, I'm bad at math, but not that bad. Smiley
Still, it would be nice to see the power draw for each card.
Kejvu
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 03, 2017, 04:42:55 AM
 #1460

Hello, i'm asking my self is this ok for Share rate for GTX 1060 on flypool mining to have Sh: ~0.90, when my GTX 1080 Ti have around ~2.88

http://prntscr.com/hidlfv

Code:
2017-12-03 05.35.59|   GPU0  56C  Sol/s: 759.4  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 752.9  I/s: 401.7  Sh: 2.99   1.00 183 +++
2017-12-03 05.36.01|   GPU1  62C  Sol/s: 333.1  Sol/W: 3.27  Avg: 330.2  I/s: 176.9  Sh: 0.75   1.00 73
2017-12-03 05.36.01|   ========== Sol/s: 1092.5 Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 1083.1 I/s: 578.6  Sh: 3.74   1.00 128
2017-12-03 05.36.19|>  GPU0  57C  Sol/s: 761.1  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 753.8  I/s: 401.6  Sh: 3.33   1.00 74  ++
2017-12-03 05.36.21|>  GPU1  62C  Sol/s: 327.8  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 329.9  I/s: 176.5  Sh: 0.66   1.00 73
2017-12-03 05.36.21|   ========== Sol/s: 1088.9 Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 1083.7 I/s: 578.1  Sh: 3.99   1.00 73
2017-12-03 05.36.39|   GPU0  57C  Sol/s: 745.8  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 753.0  I/s: 400.0  Sh: 4.19   1.00 74  ++++
2017-12-03 05.36.41|   GPU1  62C  Sol/s: 330.2  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 330.0  I/s: 176.5  Sh: 0.60   1.00 73
2017-12-03 05.36.41|   ========== Sol/s: 1076.0 Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 1082.9 I/s: 576.5  Sh: 4.78   1.00 73
2017-12-03 05.36.59|   GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 743.9  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 752.2  I/s: 401.5  Sh: 4.08   1.00 75  +
2017-12-03 05.37.01|   GPU1  65C  Sol/s: 333.4  Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 330.3  I/s: 180.3  Sh: 0.54   1.00 73
2017-12-03 05.37.01|   ========== Sol/s: 1077.4 Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 1082.4 I/s: 581.7  Sh: 4.62   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.37.19|   GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 745.7  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 751.6  I/s: 401.2  Sh: 4.49   1.00 74  +++
2017-12-03 05.37.21|   GPU1  67C  Sol/s: 341.6  Sol/W: 3.19  Avg: 331.2  I/s: 183.2  Sh: 0.50   1.00 73
2017-12-03 05.37.21|   ========== Sol/s: 1087.3 Sol/W: 3.22  Avg: 1082.8 I/s: 584.4  Sh: 4.99   1.00 73
2017-12-03 05.37.39|   GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 755.9  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 751.9  I/s: 401.3  Sh: 4.14   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.37.41|   GPU1  67C  Sol/s: 342.5  Sol/W: 3.16  Avg: 332.1  I/s: 183.0  Sh: 0.69   1.00 74  +
2017-12-03 05.37.41|   ========== Sol/s: 1098.4 Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 1084.0 I/s: 584.3  Sh: 4.83   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.37.59|   GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 749.6  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 751.8  I/s: 401.4  Sh: 3.85   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.38.02|   GPU1  68C  Sol/s: 346.2  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 333.1  I/s: 182.9  Sh: 0.85   1.00 74  +
2017-12-03 05.38.02|   ========== Sol/s: 1095.8 Sol/W: 3.19  Avg: 1084.9 I/s: 584.3  Sh: 4.70   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.38.19|   GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 748.8  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 751.6  I/s: 401.2  Sh: 3.79   1.00 74  +
2017-12-03 05.38.22|   GPU1  69C  Sol/s: 343.4  Sol/W: 3.12  Avg: 333.8  I/s: 182.3  Sh: 0.80   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.38.22|   ========== Sol/s: 1092.2 Sol/W: 3.18  Avg: 1085.4 I/s: 583.4  Sh: 4.59   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.38.39|   GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 749.6  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 751.5  I/s: 401.0  Sh: 3.55   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.38.42|   GPU1  67C  Sol/s: 328.0  Sol/W: 3.11  Avg: 333.4  I/s: 178.7  Sh: 0.75   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.38.42|   ========== Sol/s: 1077.6 Sol/W: 3.18  Avg: 1084.9 I/s: 579.7  Sh: 4.30   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.38.59|   GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 750.5  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 751.4  I/s: 401.1  Sh: 3.52   1.00 75  +
2017-12-03 05.39.02|   GPU1  65C  Sol/s: 327.1  Sol/W: 3.12  Avg: 333.0  I/s: 174.1  Sh: 0.88   1.00 74  +
2017-12-03 05.39.02|   ========== Sol/s: 1077.6 Sol/W: 3.18  Avg: 1084.4 I/s: 575.2  Sh: 4.40   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.39.19|>  GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 750.7  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 751.4  I/s: 401.0  Sh: 3.49   1.00 74  +
2017-12-03 05.39.22|>  GPU1  65C  Sol/s: 328.7  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 332.8  I/s: 175.0  Sh: 0.83   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.39.22|   ========== Sol/s: 1079.5 Sol/W: 3.18  Avg: 1084.2 I/s: 576.0  Sh: 4.32   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.39.39|>  GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 747.8  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 751.2  I/s: 400.9  Sh: 3.31   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.39.42|>  GPU1  65C  Sol/s: 329.6  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 332.6  I/s: 175.4  Sh: 0.79   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.39.42|   ========== Sol/s: 1077.5 Sol/W: 3.19  Avg: 1083.8 I/s: 576.3  Sh: 4.09   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.39.59|   GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 756.6  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 751.5  I/s: 400.9  Sh: 3.14   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.40.02|   GPU1  64C  Sol/s: 322.5  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 332.1  I/s: 175.7  Sh: 0.90   1.00 74  +
2017-12-03 05.40.02|   ========== Sol/s: 1079.1 Sol/W: 3.19  Avg: 1083.6 I/s: 576.6  Sh: 4.04   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.40.19|   GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 755.2  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 751.6  I/s: 400.9  Sh: 3.28   1.00 75  ++
2017-12-03 05.40.22|   GPU1  64C  Sol/s: 331.1  Sol/W: 3.15  Avg: 332.1  I/s: 174.9  Sh: 0.85   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.40.22|   ========== Sol/s: 1086.3 Sol/W: 3.19  Avg: 1083.7 I/s: 575.8  Sh: 4.13   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.40.39|   GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 739.8  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 751.1  I/s: 399.5  Sh: 3.13   1.00 75
2017-12-03 05.40.42|   GPU1  64C  Sol/s: 325.1  Sol/W: 3.15  Avg: 331.8  I/s: 174.8  Sh: 0.95   1.00 74  +
2017-12-03 05.40.42|   ========== Sol/s: 1064.9 Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 1082.9 I/s: 574.3  Sh: 4.08   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.40.59|   GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 750.1  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 751.1  I/s: 400.9  Sh: 2.99   1.00 75
2017-12-03 05.41.02|   GPU1  64C  Sol/s: 330.8  Sol/W: 3.15  Avg: 331.7  I/s: 175.8  Sh: 0.91   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.41.02|   ========== Sol/s: 1080.9 Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 1082.8 I/s: 576.6  Sh: 3.90   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.41.19|   GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 746.4  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 750.9  I/s: 400.8  Sh: 2.87   1.00 75
2017-12-03 05.41.22|   GPU1  64C  Sol/s: 328.7  Sol/W: 3.16  Avg: 331.6  I/s: 175.0  Sh: 0.87   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.41.22|   ========== Sol/s: 1075.0 Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 1082.5 I/s: 575.8  Sh: 3.74   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.41.39|   GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 745.0  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 750.6  I/s: 400.7  Sh: 2.99   1.00 74  ++
2017-12-03 05.41.42|   GPU1  64C  Sol/s: 331.4  Sol/W: 3.16  Avg: 331.6  I/s: 174.3  Sh: 0.96   1.00 74  +
2017-12-03 05.41.42|   ========== Sol/s: 1076.4 Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 1082.2 I/s: 575.1  Sh: 3.95   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.41.59|   GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 758.7  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 750.9  I/s: 400.9  Sh: 2.88   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.42.02|   GPU1  64C  Sol/s: 327.7  Sol/W: 3.16  Avg: 331.4  I/s: 174.3  Sh: 0.92   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.42.02|   ========== Sol/s: 1086.4 Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 1082.4 I/s: 575.2  Sh: 3.80   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.42.19|>  GPU0  59C  Sol/s: 737.7  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 750.4  I/s: 399.5  Sh: 2.77   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.42.23|>  GPU1  64C  Sol/s: 325.1  Sol/W: 3.17  Avg: 331.2  I/s: 174.5  Sh: 0.89   1.00 74
2017-12-03 05.42.23|   ========== Sol/s: 1062.8 Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 1081.6 I/s: 574.0  Sh: 3.66   1.00 74
Pages: « 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 [73] 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 ... 169 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!