Bitcoin Forum
March 07, 2021, 09:55:21 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.21.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 [158] 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 ... 372 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1050 TH] BitMinter.com [1% PPLNS,Pays TxFees +MergedMining,Stratum,GBT,vardiff]  (Read 836619 times)
Paulizei
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10



View Profile
May 28, 2013, 12:42:36 PM
 #3141

Thanks for your reply. I recognized that calulations are correct. But 'supervising' a bunch of small miners by the provided live stats (my account -> workers seems) not really praticable.

Is there any kind of workaround? Haven't had a closer look at cgminer api but perhaps the bitminter api works better?
The pool API is based on the shares you submit, since that is all the pool knows, so it's accuracy over a short period of time is quite unreliable - finding shares is statistically random.

My cgminer API, on the other hand, reports the counted hashes done by the devices
(or with ICA and MMQ, it counts successful hashes and reasonably accurately estimates valid aborted hashes if configured correctly)

Thanks for your input, kano. Even my very, very slow 30Mhps-test-miner is running 24x7. Therefore calculations could be made on a reliable basis, I think. But even after some days figures on the live-stats page don't seem to become more realistic.

(I hope I don't start any shitstorm with this:) Mining with this tiny "rig" on other pools showed always nearly accurate figures there.

So I don't think submitting shares (and therefore providing enough data for exact speed calcs) is the point. At least to me (n00b) it seem's like it's more a question about the background processes running on DrHaribos servers.

With deforse mining at around 300Mbps and having the same issues it's seems not an good idea to change to this pool as I have about 8 miners with 120-180Mbps and need to see if all of them are doing their job, right?

1615110921
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1615110921

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1615110921
Reply with quote  #2

1615110921
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1615110921
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1615110921

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1615110921
Reply with quote  #2

1615110921
Report to moderator
1615110921
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1615110921

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1615110921
Reply with quote  #2

1615110921
Report to moderator
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3402
Merit: 1325


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
May 28, 2013, 12:51:51 PM
 #3142

Hi, not only to you. I have a HD6870 an hashrate ah ~300. On the site it is shown somehow ~220, to ~350. I think it is normal. The site is calculating somewhere in the middle.

Thanks for your reply. I recognized that calulations are correct. But 'supervising' a bunch of small miners by the provided live stats (my account -> workers seems) not really praticable.

Is there any kind of workaround? Haven't had a closer look at cgminer api but perhaps the bitminter api works better?
The pool API is based on the shares you submit, since that is all the pool knows, so it's accuracy over a short period of time is quite unreliable - finding shares is statistically random.

My cgminer API, on the other hand, reports the counted hashes done by the devices
(or with ICA and MMQ, it counts successful hashes and reasonably accurately estimates valid aborted hashes if configured correctly)


 So write a good gui like the doctors and then come to poach this pool while you are at it make a nice simple litecoin pool  with  a sane easy set up and you will get plenty of customers. You post here a lot take my advice don't waste time posting, write some code that competes with the doctor.  In all the world no one has a pool that is  as simple as the the doctor's is to run.  Just him.  So if you really want the Doctors customers go write some code.  If you really want to be ahead of the curve do it for litecoin.  You could be the only pool in the world like the Doctors but for litecoin not bitcoin.

 There are millions of us with GPUS  just do it and stop posting here until you can come back and say "I did what philipma1957 told me to do I read this post and realized he was correct I was wasting time trying to steal the doctors pool by posting on his thread instead I wrote the greatest gui for both litecoin and bitcoin".

 I only write this because it is true if you can write 2 pools with easy gui like the doctors gui is you would steal his customers.  As you would be superior since you had one for litecoin and one for bitcoin.  Until you do this stop wasting time. I would never switch to your pool unless you wrote a gui like the doctors for both bitcoin and litecoin.   KANO  I am doing you a favor just think how many gpus will move from the doctor to run on your god-like litecoin pool.  In under 6 months there will be millions of gpus looking for a litcoin pool to run. (Asics)  

 So please stop posting here asking us to move to your pool until you do as I say.    Once you take your ego out of the picture you would realize I am giving you good business advice.  Best regards Phil
I don't have a pool you fool.
It an inherent part of how pools work ...

Pool: https://kano.is - lowest fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with full block verification on all blocks - and NO empty blocks!
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3402
Merit: 1325


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
May 28, 2013, 12:57:11 PM
 #3143

Thanks for your reply. I recognized that calulations are correct. But 'supervising' a bunch of small miners by the provided live stats (my account -> workers seems) not really praticable.

Is there any kind of workaround? Haven't had a closer look at cgminer api but perhaps the bitminter api works better?
The pool API is based on the shares you submit, since that is all the pool knows, so it's accuracy over a short period of time is quite unreliable - finding shares is statistically random.

My cgminer API, on the other hand, reports the counted hashes done by the devices
(or with ICA and MMQ, it counts successful hashes and reasonably accurately estimates valid aborted hashes if configured correctly)

Thanks for your input, kano. Even my very, very slow 30Mhps-test-miner is running 24x7. Therefore calculations could be made on a reliable basis, I think. But even after some days figures on the live-stats page don't seem to become more realistic.

(I hope I don't start any shitstorm with this:) Mining with this tiny "rig" on other pools showed always nearly accurate figures there.

So I don't think submitting shares (and therefore providing enough data for exact speed calcs) is the point. At least to me (n00b) it seem's like it's more a question about the background processes running on DrHaribos servers.

With deforse mining at around 300Mbps and having the same issues it's seems not an good idea to change to this pool as I have about 8 miners with 120-180Mbps and need to see if all of them are doing their job, right?
No, I was comparing a pool API to a miner API (in this case I was referring to the cgminer API)
If you are talking about the DrHaribo miner API, then it should be accurate also.

The problem (again) with any pool API is it only knows about shares.
You get one (1diff) of them on average every ~4 billion hashes.
The miner can usually count single hashes so of course it will be way more accurate and over a much shorter period of time.

Pool: https://kano.is - lowest fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with full block verification on all blocks - and NO empty blocks!
Paulizei
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10



View Profile
May 28, 2013, 01:05:45 PM
 #3144

No, I was comparing a pool API to a miner API (in this case I was referring to the cgminer API)

The miner can usually count single hashes so of course it will be way more accurate and over a much shorter period of time.

Agree, but my point is, is there a way to see many small miners working properly on the website?

My problem could be related to the very small hashrat, my testminer provides. If this would be the case for 120-180Mhps miners too, I wouldn't recognize if one of it fails ...or at least to late.

P.S.: All others figures (e.g. 'Your Ghps' on the live stats page) are totally ok! I'd like to change to this pool but simply need to find a simple way to see if my miners are working - which is the case on at least some other pools.

Paulizei
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10



View Profile
May 28, 2013, 02:28:37 PM
 #3145

Any ideas? Anybody?

Before I can change my miners I need to know where I can get useful (near live) stats about my miners performance from...

mdude77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001



View Profile
May 28, 2013, 02:32:33 PM
 #3146

Any ideas? Anybody?

Before I can change my miners I need to know where I can get useful (near live) stats about my miners performance from...

The webpage has it, if you can get to it.  My monitoring program (windows only) has it (see link in sig), but it pulls the data from the API from the website, so if the website is down, won't help.

M

I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent!  Come join me!
Paulizei
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10



View Profile
May 28, 2013, 02:37:55 PM
 #3147

Any ideas? Anybody?

Before I can change my miners I need to know where I can get useful (near live) stats about my miners performance from...

The webpage has it, if you can get to it.  My monitoring program (windows only) has it (see link in sig), but it pulls the data from the API from the website, so if the website is down, won't help.

M


Website doesn't work for me (live stats and my account->workers show 0Mhps most of the time, jumping up to about 600% of my 'real' hashrate for some seconds)

I'll try your api client and really appreciate you help. Hope that'll fix it for me (thus api usage 'costs' 0.5% as I've seen)

mdude77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001



View Profile
May 28, 2013, 02:48:43 PM
 #3148

Any ideas? Anybody?

Before I can change my miners I need to know where I can get useful (near live) stats about my miners performance from...

The webpage has it, if you can get to it.  My monitoring program (windows only) has it (see link in sig), but it pulls the data from the API from the website, so if the website is down, won't help.

M


Website doesn't work for me (live stats and my account->workers show 0Mhps most of the time, jumping up to about 600% of my 'real' hashrate for some seconds)

I'll try your api client and really appreciate you help. Hope that'll fix it for me (thus api usage 'costs' 0.5% as I've seen)

I'm too cheap to turn on the API as well, so I don't know if it won't jump all over the place.  I'm working on some enhancement/changes that'll require some testing, so I'll be turning it back on soon.  All my app does is show what the API reports, it doesn't do any math itself.  So if the API is hosed too, then this won't help.

M

I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent!  Come join me!
Paulizei
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10



View Profile
May 28, 2013, 02:52:37 PM
Last edit: May 28, 2013, 03:05:42 PM by Paulizei
 #3149

Any ideas? Anybody?

Before I can change my miners I need to know where I can get useful (near live) stats about my miners performance from...

The webpage has it, if you can get to it.  My monitoring program (windows only) has it (see link in sig), but it pulls the data from the API from the website, so if the website is down, won't help.

M


Website doesn't work for me (live stats and my account->workers show 0Mhps most of the time, jumping up to about 600% of my 'real' hashrate for some seconds)

I'll try your api client and really appreciate you help. Hope that'll fix it for me (thus api usage 'costs' 0.5% as I've seen)

I'm too cheap to turn on the API as well, so I don't know if it won't jump all over the place.  I'm working on some enhancement/changes that'll require some testing, so I'll be turning it back on soon.  All my app does is show what the API reports, it doesn't do any math itself.  So if the API is hosed too, then this won't help.

M

I'll give it a try. Looks exactly like what I need. Thanks a lot and if can help testing or something, give me a hint!

mdude77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001



View Profile
May 28, 2013, 03:45:40 PM
 #3150

Any ideas? Anybody?

Before I can change my miners I need to know where I can get useful (near live) stats about my miners performance from...

The webpage has it, if you can get to it.  My monitoring program (windows only) has it (see link in sig), but it pulls the data from the API from the website, so if the website is down, won't help.

M


Website doesn't work for me (live stats and my account->workers show 0Mhps most of the time, jumping up to about 600% of my 'real' hashrate for some seconds)

I'll try your api client and really appreciate you help. Hope that'll fix it for me (thus api usage 'costs' 0.5% as I've seen)

I'm too cheap to turn on the API as well, so I don't know if it won't jump all over the place.  I'm working on some enhancement/changes that'll require some testing, so I'll be turning it back on soon.  All my app does is show what the API reports, it doesn't do any math itself.  So if the API is hosed too, then this won't help.

M

I'll give it a try. Looks exactly like what I need. Thanks a lot and if can help testing or something, give me a hint!


If the API reports wild results as well, I can add an average over an hour value that shows as well as what the API report.  That should help normalize your value.

M

I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent!  Come join me!
5120-01-518-6126
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 174
Merit: 100


< My mining rig >


View Profile
May 28, 2013, 09:59:45 PM
 #3151

Just getting started with Bitminter -- running in my 8th shift (7 shifts completed) and see NMC rewards for last 11 blocks found by Bitminter, but no rewards for BTC.  Do I have to run 10+ consecutive shifts in order to start getting BTC rewards?
Mastergerund
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 114
Merit: 10



View Profile WWW
May 28, 2013, 10:08:43 PM
 #3152

Compare the most recent BTC blocks found to your shifts worked. It is possible you started during an unlucky period and no BTC blocks have been found in the shifts you have worked.

Edit:  Yes. The last BTC block found was in shift 16108, and we are now in 16118, so there were no BTC blocks found during the shifts you have worked so far. When a block is next found, you will be rewarded for your efforts in those shifts.

   ⚡⚡ PRiVCY ⚡⚡   ▂▃▅▆█ ✅ PRiVCY ($PRIV) is a new PoW/PoS revolutionary privacy project ● ☞ ✅ Best privacy crypto-market! ● █▆▅▃▂
    Own Your Privacy! ─────────────────║ WebsiteGithub  |  Bitcointalk  |  Twitter  |  Discord  |  Explorer ║─────────────────
   ✯✯✯✯✯                 ✈✈✈[Free Airdrop - Starts 9th June]✅[Bounty]✈✈✈ ║───────────║ Wallet ➢ ✓ Windows  |  ✓ macOS  |  ✓ Linux
matt4054
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708
Merit: 1011


BitcoinQueue.com


View Profile WWW
May 28, 2013, 10:13:51 PM
 #3153

It's just a very unlucky round. It happens. Stay tuned for the next series of blocks Cheesy
5120-01-518-6126
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 174
Merit: 100


< My mining rig >


View Profile
May 28, 2013, 10:15:44 PM
 #3154

Compare the most recent BTC blocks found to your shifts worked. It is possible you started during an unlucky period and no BTC blocks have been found in the shifts you have worked.

Ah, thanks -- looks like Bitminter is becalmed Smiley
Mastergerund
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 114
Merit: 10



View Profile WWW
May 28, 2013, 10:27:10 PM
 #3155

Compare the most recent BTC blocks found to your shifts worked. It is possible you started during an unlucky period and no BTC blocks have been found in the shifts you have worked.

Ah, thanks -- looks like Bitminter is becalmed Smiley

Everybody blow really hard at the sails...  Wink

   ⚡⚡ PRiVCY ⚡⚡   ▂▃▅▆█ ✅ PRiVCY ($PRIV) is a new PoW/PoS revolutionary privacy project ● ☞ ✅ Best privacy crypto-market! ● █▆▅▃▂
    Own Your Privacy! ─────────────────║ WebsiteGithub  |  Bitcointalk  |  Twitter  |  Discord  |  Explorer ║─────────────────
   ✯✯✯✯✯                 ✈✈✈[Free Airdrop - Starts 9th June]✅[Bounty]✈✈✈ ║───────────║ Wallet ➢ ✓ Windows  |  ✓ macOS  |  ✓ Linux
Taxidermista
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1143
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 28, 2013, 11:26:29 PM
 #3156

Compare the most recent BTC blocks found to your shifts worked. It is possible you started during an unlucky period and no BTC blocks have been found in the shifts you have worked.

Ah, thanks -- looks like Bitminter is becalmed Smiley

Everybody blow really hard at the sails...  Wink

Why is so low the hash power blowing the sails? Fall from 12 TH/s to 7 TH/s and didn't recover.

organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
May 28, 2013, 11:27:16 PM
 #3157

Compare the most recent BTC blocks found to your shifts worked. It is possible you started during an unlucky period and no BTC blocks have been found in the shifts you have worked.

Ah, thanks -- looks like Bitminter is becalmed Smiley

Everybody blow really hard at the sails...  Wink

Why is so low the hash power blowing the sails? Fall from 12 TH/s to 7 TH/s and didn't recover.

ASICMiner moved over to solomining.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
May 29, 2013, 12:26:01 AM
 #3158

Okay we will make a block in under 10 or 15 minutes. Tips are not asked for or required. So far I am 2 for 2 with this type of prediction.

On the other  hand, I'll take bets!

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
GuiltySpark343
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10



View Profile
May 29, 2013, 02:38:36 AM
 #3159

LOL After nearly 11 hours I think we mined a dud. STALE.  Angry

I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
Ƀ:17wbDetEw2aESM5oWXbm5ih9NSdDruyWNT
Dunkelheit667
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1045
Merit: 1157


no degradation


View Profile
May 29, 2013, 03:06:09 AM
 #3160

The 6th in one week. Cry

"And the machine keeps pushing time through the cogs, like paste into strings into paste again, and only the machine keeps using time to make time to make time.
And when the machine stops, time is an illusion that we created free will.
" - an unnamed Hybrid
Pages: « 1 ... 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 [158] 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 ... 372 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!