aaa801
Member
Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
|
|
March 08, 2012, 12:09:04 PM |
|
Not sure why you guys are having problems
Username Password Speed Shares Stale shares Invalid shares Blocks Notify aaa801. 0.00 kH/s 94,320 266 (0.28%) 38 (0.04%) 1
|
LTC: LUUikznZrvDb65ZCNQUNCiTaCB4CWGYRSZ BTC: 1325TrScK8jkiPuMEMxNf1VXHHfnR1QtgN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
clak899
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
March 08, 2012, 07:54:29 PM |
|
Hey guys, I'm mining LTCs woth the standard Litecoin Wallet with the 2.1.4 cpuminer "minerd.exe" and its dll libraries in the wallet directory, I have an AMD phenom x6 1090t@3.4 ghz and the maximum hashing speed I can reach is 17 kh/s, on Win7 32bit. Do you think it's a fair value? Upgrading to 64bit win7 could help me reaching an higher hashing speed?
|
|
|
|
pooler (OP)
|
|
March 08, 2012, 08:10:51 PM |
|
Hey guys, I'm mining LTCs woth the standard Litecoin Wallet with the 2.1.4 cpuminer "minerd.exe" and its dll libraries in the wallet directory, I have an AMD phenom x6 1090t@3.4 ghz and the maximum hashing speed I can reach is 17 kh/s, on Win7 32bit. Do you think it's a fair value? Upgrading to 64bit win7 could help me reaching an higher hashing speed?
Using a 64-bit you would probably be able to double that hash rate. My Phenom X6 @ 3.5 GHz does about 39 kh/s.
|
BTC: 15MRTcUweNVJbhTyH5rq9aeSdyigFrskqE · LTC: LTCPooLqTK1SANSNeTR63GbGwabTKEkuS7
|
|
|
GenTarkin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2450
Merit: 1002
|
|
March 08, 2012, 09:36:43 PM |
|
Hey guys, I'm mining LTCs woth the standard Litecoin Wallet with the 2.1.4 cpuminer "minerd.exe" and its dll libraries in the wallet directory, I have an AMD phenom x6 1090t@3.4 ghz and the maximum hashing speed I can reach is 17 kh/s, on Win7 32bit. Do you think it's a fair value? Upgrading to 64bit win7 could help me reaching an higher hashing speed?
You could alternatively run win7 64bit in a virtual machine w/ miner, it still maintains about 95-97% of its speed in a VM.
|
|
|
|
clak899
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
March 09, 2012, 12:03:35 AM |
|
Hey guys, I'm mining LTCs woth the standard Litecoin Wallet with the 2.1.4 cpuminer "minerd.exe" and its dll libraries in the wallet directory, I have an AMD phenom x6 1090t@3.4 ghz and the maximum hashing speed I can reach is 17 kh/s, on Win7 32bit. Do you think it's a fair value? Upgrading to 64bit win7 could help me reaching an higher hashing speed?
You could alternatively run win7 64bit in a virtual machine w/ miner, it still maintains about 95-97% of its speed in a VM. VMware says that it supports emulation up to 4 CPUs, is it normal ? It's mining speed going to get low for the lack of 2 CPUs?
|
|
|
|
ForceField
aka Vitaliy
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 386
Merit: 250
|
|
March 09, 2012, 03:46:11 AM |
|
Current Version: 2.1.5 (March 7, 2012) - Changelog The current Changelog link in the first post has an incorrect url - 404. Shouldn't it be: https://github.com/pooler/cpuminer/blob/master/NEWS
|
PC Hardware & Electronics For BTC Traded w/: Kansattica | jduck1987 | shakaru | newdude | nitetrader | midievil | blo8i | mb300sd | juggalodarkclow | Garr255 | Tril | Ringmasta | SysRun | CrazyBlane | sokay | BCB | str4wm4n | PinkBatman | Bitobsessed | matauc12 | antimattercrusader | BryanK
|
|
|
pooler (OP)
|
|
March 09, 2012, 08:15:09 AM |
|
|
BTC: 15MRTcUweNVJbhTyH5rq9aeSdyigFrskqE · LTC: LTCPooLqTK1SANSNeTR63GbGwabTKEkuS7
|
|
|
the joint
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1020
|
|
March 10, 2012, 02:52:30 AM |
|
The newest version boosted my i7-2600k up ~2.5-3 k/hash per thread. It didn't do anything to my AMD phenom II quad-core though. I even tried downloading it twice and replacing all the .dlls and the miner.exe again. Even still, thanks
|
|
|
|
Bitbird
|
|
March 12, 2012, 11:31:40 AM |
|
Don't know how to setup it on my Mac OS 10.6.. ./autogen.sh ./autogen.sh: line 8: aclocal: command not found
|
|
|
|
pooler (OP)
|
|
March 12, 2012, 11:40:38 AM |
|
Don't know how to setup it on my Mac OS 10.6.. ./autogen.sh ./autogen.sh: line 8: aclocal: command not found You don't need to build from the git repo, there's a tarball available.
|
BTC: 15MRTcUweNVJbhTyH5rq9aeSdyigFrskqE · LTC: LTCPooLqTK1SANSNeTR63GbGwabTKEkuS7
|
|
|
Bitbird
|
|
March 12, 2012, 01:20:43 PM |
|
@pooler Thanks for the helped! What to do for the next step? I seen the Installation Instructions(install.txt) but couldn't process 'make' after this: ./configure CFLAGS="-O3" checking build system type... i386-apple-darwin10.8.0 checking host system type... i386-apple-darwin10.8.0 checking target system type... i386-apple-darwin10.8.0 checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... ./install-sh -c -d checking for gawk... no checking for mawk... no checking for nawk... no checking for awk... awk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... no checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no checking for style of include used by make... none checking for gcc... no checking for cc... no checking for cl.exe... no configure: error: in `/Users/bitbird/cpuminer-2.1.5': configure: error: no acceptable C compiler found in $PATH See `config.log' for more details
|
|
|
|
pooler (OP)
|
|
March 12, 2012, 04:45:14 PM |
|
@pooler Thanks for the helped! What to do for the next step? I seen the Installation Instructions(install.txt) but couldn't process 'make' after this: ./configure CFLAGS="-O3" checking build system type... i386-apple-darwin10.8.0 <snip> checking for gcc... no checking for cc... no checking for cl.exe... no configure: error: in `/Users/bitbird/cpuminer-2.1.5': configure: error: no acceptable C compiler found in $PATH See `config.log' for more details Well, it looks like you're missing the C compiler. Unfortunately I don't know much about how things work on Macs, so I'll let someone else help you there. In the meantime, have you tried using one of the precompiled binaries?
|
BTC: 15MRTcUweNVJbhTyH5rq9aeSdyigFrskqE · LTC: LTCPooLqTK1SANSNeTR63GbGwabTKEkuS7
|
|
|
Bitbird
|
|
March 13, 2012, 10:18:26 AM |
|
OK, Thanks anyway! Yes, I tried. But cannot figure out how to install them on Win XP as like OSX. I'm using cpuminer "stand version" for XP and Linux at present. I'm stupid in computer..
|
|
|
|
TravisE
|
|
March 14, 2012, 02:26:28 PM |
|
This may sound obvious, but those of you with i5/i7 CPUs might do well to make sure it's actually on. On a Linux system I recently installed, it turns out I didn't have the acpi_cpufreq kernel module loaded, so Turbo Boost wasn't active. Loading that seems to have gained me a good 6–8 Kh/s or more. Wish I had discovered that sooner.
|
|
|
|
cfiziksh
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
March 15, 2012, 10:48:53 PM |
|
What arguments do you give to minerd to make it solo mine?
|
|
|
|
Cosbycoin
|
|
March 15, 2012, 11:10:07 PM |
|
What arguments do you give to minerd to make it solo mine?
Argument #1: You're such a stupid miner that you can't pool mine! Argument #2: Your momma miner is so fat that she could't fit in the pool to mine! There ya go!
|
|
|
|
pooler (OP)
|
|
March 15, 2012, 11:18:11 PM |
|
|
BTC: 15MRTcUweNVJbhTyH5rq9aeSdyigFrskqE · LTC: LTCPooLqTK1SANSNeTR63GbGwabTKEkuS7
|
|
|
rTech
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 305
Merit: 250
Trust but confirm!
|
|
March 16, 2012, 02:22:26 PM |
|
CPU: Intel Pentium T4300 MEM: 4GB DDR3 OS.: Win 7 Home Premium SP1 32bit MD.: Pooler's Minerd 2.15 KH.: ~5.20kh/s CPU: Intel Pentium E6600 (oc @ 3.5ghz) MEM: 4GB DDR3 OS.: Win 7 Ultimate SP1 64bit MD.: Pooler's Minerd 2.15 KH.: ~15.25kh/s
|
|
|
|
moocow1452
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 240
Merit: 250
Don't mind me.
|
|
March 17, 2012, 02:58:07 AM |
|
Deploying the *nix version on the cloud, two quick (kinda noobish) questions.
1. If "-t" is unspecified, does it default to max?
2. Is there any modifier for a Lazarus mode, like the function in Scrypt Miner GUI where it can restart itself after coming back from the dead?
|
|
|
|
pooler (OP)
|
|
March 17, 2012, 11:24:04 AM |
|
Deploying the *nix version on the cloud, two quick (kinda noobish) questions.
1. If "-t" is unspecified, does it default to max?
It detects the total number of cores (virtual cores if the CPU(s) support hyperthreading) and uses that. $ ./minerd --help <snip> -t, --threads=N number of miner threads (default: number of processors)
2. Is there any modifier for a Lazarus mode, like the function in Scrypt Miner GUI where it can restart itself after coming back from the dead?
I'm not sure I understand what you mean, could you please explain?
|
BTC: 15MRTcUweNVJbhTyH5rq9aeSdyigFrskqE · LTC: LTCPooLqTK1SANSNeTR63GbGwabTKEkuS7
|
|
|
|