There isn't any scenario where Real would win the league this year, in fact the league is basically over already. Barcelona got it this year, but they won basically nothing else, it was really a decent season at best and nothing more.

In order to continue, they still face a lot of financial trouble and there is no way they can go on like this, they need to figure out a way to make this work and right now it doesn't look like it will, it is really looking quite terrible in the end for them financially, even though they will be the champions. Just focus on how you could make a profit and that way they may continue, and no idea how they can do that, maybe sell a few players I guess?

Definitely a derby game, that much is certain. The hype was there, the game was very chaotic, there were a few scenes were players got angry at each other, there were controversy and many other things as well. I have to say that as a person who is not even from there and not fans of these teams, just betting interested, I would say this was the type of game that I really like to see.

This happens with England and La Liga as well, when teams have famous games, like city vs united, or Madrid vs Barcelona type of games and it becomes so much entertaining to watch. I hope that it gets better and better, but I fear that Galatasaray just took the lead for good with this.

Good god, they finally fired Potter. That was something they should have done long time ago and to be fair that was something they shouldn2t even hire at the first place. Tuchel is managing Bayern, and Chelsea is managerless, guess which one is doing better.

I feel like they have to hire someone that is big, because the yare spending unreal amounts of money for the club and in order to justify that you have to put someone that is equally good to manage such a team. No manager that has never managed a big team before, could end up starting from a 500+ million euro team on day one, that is not something you could have asked from Potter, and it obviously showed eventually.

Not like even if Marseille ended up winning, that would mean somehow that PSG would lose enough to give up the title. It was obvious from the start that PSG would be the champions and that would go on like that. I do not really support this idea of keeping the run going, in the end we are talking about a season where everyone is playing like it is going to be a big deal, but then it ends up being the most ordinary thing ever and PSG wins again.

I get that everyone goes "what if!!" every year, and Lille did it one year, that was all nice and all, but that doesn't mean that we are going to end up seeing that again, it would be too much to expect from Marseille I believe.

I highly doubt that it would be Potters fault to lose in champions league, I mean Chelsea is not a good enough team to win it if you ask me. Even after spending that much (because they overpaid on most players) they are not really good enough to face real or city for example, and that's their trouble, because they can't be winning those games and Potter failed at the league so there is no good side left. If he somehow magically manages to win it?

Then he might still get fired for how the team looked all year, no team that wins UCL should be this terrible in the league, but I am pretty sure that he would lose this turn, or the next at most.

Maybe the biggest game of the season is coming up very soon tomorrow. I really can't wait to watch it, it is going to be amazing to watch even as a non-German person living far away, I can't imagine all the Germans who like football, even if you are not fan of these two teams, if you are fan of football then this is going to be the game to watch.

I hope that it is a very entertaining match and not just a single side domination by any team. Something like a 3-3 would be amazing to see wouldn't it? I already placed my bet but I think it would be lovely to see a draw so another game would be the decider for the title in the end and not this one, it would be good to see that.

It is important to learn how to get better overtime with these things, but I am not entirely sure how easy it will be. Most people end up with a result that is either good or bad but they move on afterwards without really caring about it.

I basically do not believe that should be the case, they should look back both on their losses but also their winnings and see what they did wrong or right to make sure they can learn from it and grow. With that type of mindset they should be doing a lot better in the future without a doubt. I tried doing that for a long time, to be fair I know what is wrong before even I do it now, and yet sometimes still can't stop myself from doing it, be better than me.

Slowly but I hear they are getting in. I have a friend who works in a local exchange, and by local I mean they make billions in profit, so they are quite large but obviously not in top 10, they are in top 50. He works in marketing so he knows a thing or two about the people who join, and because there is KYC we are talking about people who actually give their information. He talks about the fact that 90% is people who are under 40 years old, and over 50% is under 35 years old as well, so that is the majority that part is guaranteed.

But just 3-4 years ago, people who were 60+ had just 1% or less, and today they have over 7% of the accounts, which is quite large, and good to see.

I think it is quite obvious that we are once again at a stagnant market right now. Which happens and that's fine, it's not really a big deal because market can't be all upwards or downwards all the time, yes we are volatile normally but not every single day of the year. So, we just need to wait around a bit to see what it will do, I believe that it's going alright and we shouldn't be worried that it's staying stable.

Obviously many people will want to see it do a lot better, and I am one of those people as well, 30k+ would have been awesome and not seeing that so far does upset a lot of people but as long as we are not going down, I am fine with the situation.

Liberty means that anyone can do whatever they want as long as they are not hurting other people. Neymar didn't gamble with anyone's money, he didn't lose anyone else's money, he didn't broadcasted it so that addicted people should watch, he didn't force anyone to watch, and he didn't lose on purpose to make others feel better about their loss neither.

It was his own money, his on computer, his on webcam, his own twitch channel, if YOU end up watching him and get a bad lesson out of this, that's your fault. You can't claim its unethical just because what he did put a wrong psychological thought into your brain, that's what you did, not him. I believe he has every right to do this as he wants.

Just because money laundering happens in the crypto world, even with KYC in place, doesn't mean that it is not happening in the fiat world either. We all know that fiat world has money laundering schemes all in place, and we have seen many times in the movies how they do it, so we literally know the way it is being done as well.

Just watch breaking bad and how they used the car wash, they were basically purely rich and that's how they laundered the money, that was all fiat and all cash. Which is why I have to say that there is no world where crypto could ever be blamed for the money laundering that is happening in the crypto world, it's bound to happen eventually anyway.

I watched the Lakers and the Bulls game, this reaves guy is creating a name for himself without a doubt, he plays important minutes and scoring very good baskets just when the team needs him to as well. Lebron is technically back but he is not as good as he used to be, not as dominant on offense at least but he is doing very well, he is taking more efficient shots at least and that's a very good improvement for the team.

I guess that they are going to be doing fine next season if they just add in a few good players, that's it, they just need a few good players and a healthy team that's it. D'lo, Reaves, Lebron, AD that's a good enough four guys, if they add a big man and a good bench player, it's enough.

I am not entirely sure what Georgians call themselves, but that doesn't really look like Europe, does it? I mean technically speaking they are in Asia, that's for sure, when you talk about the map parts, they are in Asia, there is no argument about that at all. But looking at UEFA euro cup for example, Georgia is in euro too, and I guess in some situations they are considered European or something?

I don't really know, I just know it is not close to mainland Europe that's all I know, and geographically they are in Asia without a doubt, maybe their nation is considered European citizens or something, I wouldn't know, but it is not a hub in the middle of Europe like Germany or something, so nothing to be hyped about.

I still can't believe that AI would be considered such a big deal when in fact the other side is getting more work as well. Meaning, when AI is getting bigger, things that realizes what is AI and what is not is also getting more attention as well.

Just to give two examples, one is the fact that if students wants to write their school homework with an AI, then there are websites that uses detection programs to detect if an AI wrote it or not (not really that hard to figure out) and secondly, if a video is made by an AI, then there are detection software that also figures that one out as well. All in all I would guess that there is no need for any of this at all.

Poor people have hard time living, and they are barely able to buy things that rich do not even care about when buying. Just to give an example, buying the latest iphone is a stupid move for a poor person, why would you spend that much money on a brand new phone, there are a lot cheaper options, right?

But buying 10 brand new iphones would not even move a dent in a rich persons wallet, they do it, they live like that, they buy a new phone every time the old ones memory ends, instead of deleting photos, they buy a new one, they are that rich. So, it is normal that rich people only get a loan for smart stuff, but poor people have to get for bad stuff as well, it's normal.

I still can't believe that it happened, that's the weird part. And not like anyone is visiting Qatar or think highly of them because of the world cup neither. They overspent for it, and they are not going to get anything back from it neither, it is not going to be good at all. I feel like it is going to be something that they will regret for a long time.

In fact, I am pretty sure that they had more bad light on them because of the world cup than good, and they will be hated a long time because they basically stole the world cup from these teams in the end. I think a smaller balkan nation would have been even better, hotels, stadiums, all of that is ready in most those nations.

Formula 1 obviously. That is the thing I follow the most and I am very fond of, and it is one that you could easily bet on as well. Not really that common for people to wager on it a lot, considering even the biggest events there do not get too much betting, and the fact that Max is ahead of everyone most of the time, people just do not see the point, either you bet on Max to win and get a bad return not worthy of a bet, or you lose if Max loses, or you risk a lot by betting on someone else which very rarely ever happens.

However, it's good because I like watching it, and having a bet on it makes watching it a lot better, just like most other sports.

I think Zidane has clearly stated that he wanted a rest, being able to win 3 UCL in a row is a big deal and he feels like if he retires right now, he could stay as someone who has been great when he was a manager and done, not an all time great obviously because of longevity issue, but great when he did.

However, if he comes back, and he starts to lose, which he will lose eventually, even if he manages to win one with PSG, that won't be a single season and he won't leave, which will cause a lot of drop on his amazing short period. He probably doesn't want to give that up and that is why he is not doing it, after all why would he manage PSG and lose? What would he gain by that?

What I do is not really considered DCA, because that is dollar cost averaging and if you want to do a better version of it then you should buy when it is going down and not going up. However, I support buying when it is going up as well. Because I believe that it is going to be as good as it gets in the future and even when it goes up today, it will go up a lot more in the future.

This is why I am fine about buying when it is 10k, and fine about buying when it is 100k, both are fine for me and I will do that, there is nothing wrong about that for me. I believe that we shouldn't be worried about it and just keep on buying as much as possible.

These are obvious stuff but sometimes obvious stuff are not that easy. Imagine this for a second, if you see a very fat person, and I mean like barely able to walk type of person, someone who is 200kg+ or something, that guy is barely walking right? What would you suggest him? Do a diet, walk 30 minutes a day, and drink a lot of water, right?

That's the most common thing and there is no person on the world who would drink water, walk 30 minutes and do a diet that can't lose weight, everyone can. Then why do we have fat people? I am fat myself and I can tell this, we have them because it's not as easy as saying "do this", it's hard to do it for some people. Same with these suggestions.