Hat jemand eigentlich eine Erklärung oder Infos wieso der Preis von Uniswap so stabil bleibt obwohl nach dem Airdrop die meisten direkt verkauft haben (wenn man dem Contract Transaktionen glaubt)? Normalerweise müsste der Preis dann erstmal abstürzen, aber er bewegt sich stabil zwischen 4,10 und 4,50€. Stehen da die eingenommenen Gebühren für Ankäufe gegenüber die das stabilisieren?

To be honest, this should come as no surprise. After three matchdays, any one of the 20 teams could be at the top of the list. That is nothing special. And the opponents of Everton so far with Crystal Palace, WestBrom and Tottenham (is no longer the top team of the past years) were not a big challenge for a team with Champions League ambitions. I expect Everton to fall behind in the next few games (playing against Liverpool and ManU) and end up somewhere between 5-10th at the end of the season.

I think almost all investors have gone through this phase at the beginning. With the exception of the investors who only had Bitcoin as an investment object at the very beginning of crypto  It would be interesting to get more information about what you mean by "fundamentally strong projects". What are your decision factors to identify such projects?

If you look at the whole game, Bayern was clearly the better team. Sevilla got a controversial penalty. You can see it as a foul, but just as well as a normal duel. After that, mainly Bayern controlled the gameplay and had some good chances. Sane's goal was regular and actually Bayern should have won the game within the regular play time. In the end Sevilla still had a big chance, but you could see how the striker lost his temper when he suddenly saw Manuel Neuer in front of him  All in all it was not an outstanding game, but Bayern deserved to win.

Since I didn't have time to bet for the cup matches during the week, I'm looking forward to the third matchday in the Premier League.

Brighton vs Manchester United # win of ManU @ 1.72

WestBrom vs Chelsea # win of Chelsea @ 1.45

ManCity vs Leichester # double Chance Leichester @ 3.53
Usually I would go for a win of ManCity. But ManCity announced today that Jesus is injured and now the team does not have a real good striker for the upcoming match. Therefore I give Leichester a chance to achieve at least a draw. The odds are good as well.

Not only that, there are also examples of Scam-DeFi projects which suddenly showed up in Telegram channels without having a whitepaper, a PoC and roadmap promising an airdop which could only be conducted when a certain amount of money is collected before, and after the money was collected (I still wondering who sends money to such scammy projects) the project disappeared.

Klasse Post und Zusammenfassung! Bestätigt nur meine Vermutung, dass der ganze DeFi-Hype nichts anderes ist als ICO 2.0. Und es gibt genug neue User die die Erfahrungen nicht mitgemacht haben und blindlinks in diese Scam-Fallen laufen. Du solltest den Post am besten ins Englische übersetzen und als Warnung ins Beginner Forum posten.

Thanks for reporting! I am going to add it to the list  Do you know the season and episode of this snippet or is it a movie?


Did a quick search. Do you mean this short documentary? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6sOFXHlhuE


I am a fan of Big Bang Theory. But with the exception of one episode (which is already in the list) the series does not deal with Bitcoin and crypto currencies, although one might expect this from nerds more often.

Oh, ich hatte vor ein paar Monaten auf Uniswap mal was getauscht. Auf welche Adresse wurde der Airdrop ausgeführt? Auf die Adresse von der man gesendet hat oder auf die Adresse wo man die getauschten Token erhalten hat? Ich hab eben mal auf die schnelle geschaut, konnte auf beiden nichts finden.

Edit: Habs gefunden. Nachdem ich mich mit Metamask verbunden hab, wurde ich auf dem Claim hingewiesen.

$UNI, $MEME usw. Flashback an 2017 als man mit wenigen Klicks ganze Monatsgehälter durch Airdrops abräumen konnte Dachte eigentlich die Zeiten wären vorbei.

For me, DeFi is nothing else than ICO 2.0. So it is possible to learn from the experience of the ICO hypes of 2017 and 2018 and transfer this to DeFi to a large extent. At that time it was also the case that the very largest part of the ICO project was in the hands of only a few. Only a small part was really sold to small investors and given as bounties. This pushed up the price and kept it high for a while. After the peak of the ICO hype had been reached and it was clear to most that this would no longer work well, the few then dumped their shares, which then led to the enormous losses in value and for many such projects virtually the downfall. The same will happen when the DeFi bubble will burst sooner or later. Maybe not as blatant as three years ago, but similar.

I do not agree with that. Why should the bounty manager be punished? He's just doing a job and is a service provider. As long as he gets the bounties, holds them well and then distributes them properly to the participants, he is doing a good job. It can and should not be his job to check whether this is a scam project or not. Often it is also not immediately obvious if a service is legit or not. In my opinion it is rather the responsibility of the users who participate in the bounty campaign. In the end they are the ones who advertise the service and make others aware of it.

I used my Ledger Nano wallet. In the meanwhile (after almost seven hours) the transaction was rejected and marked as failed. So I can spend my tokens again, but if this happens again in the future, is there also a method to speed up transactions which were sent with Ledger Nano wallet?

Well, this is a typical behaviour of scams. It sounds devastating now, but I wouldn't get my hopes up about getting that money back. Scams also don't care if you complain in Bitcointalk or anywhere else. They will stop the service sometime and start a new business.

I took a look at the site and it shows so many red flags why you should not use it. The license in Bolivia (very strange), the technical support guy who can't help you, probably there is only one person behind the project and he is using the "shift of responsibility" method to keep you and his scam going until he can close the project down.

Furthermore, the site does not offer "affiliates" (it says so but there is no page for it), the design is minimal and comes from the service that sells the betting script. So no great effort was made.

I can continue the list a little more. In short: It's a scam, write off your money and learn from it not to bet on such dubious sites.

I sent ER20 token this morning. I thought $2,5 of transaction fees are enough but it seems it wasn't. The transaction has been pending since five hours now. Is there any way to speed up the confirmation for example by sending further tx fee (I sometimes use this in Bitcoin when a transaction is stuck)?

You don't need to create a thread to collect those information, you can easily look it up using tools like https://builtwith.com or https://www.wappalyzer.com/lookup/. Just enter the url and you get a lot of information about the technology stack a websites uses. Almost every website is covered. Here for example the technology stack of Luckygames.io https://builtwith.com/luckygames.io

I don't see Ronaldo as bad as you do. Of course he has grown older and of course he is no longer at the peak of his performance, but he is still an exceptional player who can decide matches on his own. I think he has held up better than Messi. The problem is that he has a worse overall team around him in Turin than at Real Madrid. I think this is the reason why it is unlikely that he will win the CL again. With Real Madrid I would easily believe that he could do that again.

You forget one point, even though it is very rare to happen. Donations. If you put your Bitcoin address in your profile (or in your signature) and you write very good articles (i.e. in the highly technically focused subcategories), it can happen that a generous donor donates a few mBTCs to you. This happened to me once a few years ago. Admittedly Bitcoin was worth less then, but there are still some big whales in the forum who don't mind donating $100 or more in BTC if they are excited about a contribution.

Stimme da @CryptKeeper zu. Über die Temperatur brauchst du dir keine Sorgen machen. Einerseits gibt es in der Boinc-App eine Voreinstellung (die du beliebig anpassen kannst) die die Berechnung stoppt sobald eine gewisse Temperatur erreicht ist und außerdem hat Android ebenfalls solch eine Funktion an Bord. Ist mir schon öfters passiert, dass ich im Sommer ne Weile draußen saß und plötzlich wurde das Tablet zu heiß und ging in den Ruhemodus.

Ich habe es auch eingestellt, dass Boinc nur läuft, wenn das Tablet am Ladegerät hängt. Hatte es mal vor dem Urlaub vergessen abzunehmen und hat dann 2,5 Woche komplett durchgecruncht Hatte ihm nicht geschadet. Eine erhöhte Stromrechnung gabs auch nicht 

The situation reminds me strongly on the peak of the ICO hype in 2017 and 2018, when the transaction fees in Ethereum were also extremely high on some days and were partly unaffordable. The fact that this situation is recurring now, three years later, shows how little progress Ethereum (and crypto in general) has made in handling larger transaction volumes. The mainstream adaption is still a long way off and I doubt if the switch to PoS can change that.