Great work once again! joker_josue and Smartprofit are killing everyone else with their activity  Summer is finished now and I am expecting activity to slowly increase in most local boards, shame we are temporary down one member since Daniel is taking a break and he was very active, so everyone else has to take this heavy burden  I have been partying
You look very good for AItalian of your age.  |
|
|
|
I was jiggling it too hard and now I'm just getting a "Something went wrong..." message, when the page can load at all.
I am getting a lot more similar messages on other websites in last few weeks, so maybe it's not just issue with Ninjastic.space. Using Tor browser different IP address usually works as a quick fix for me. |
|
|
|
Many cases opened against this lier and still he is posting freely. All DT member afraiding of him.
Yes, DT members are so scared and afraid of him that they can't sleep at night, they all expect him to pop out from screen and attack us all of the sudden.  Looks like someone is but hurt about something that happened few years ago, but I consider this to be a shit topic. And please don't use shitty alt accounts since you are not afraid of anything. |
|
|
|
A to znači i novo ažuriranje Velike Liste  Nije loš Trezor 3, ali mi nije jasno zašto nisu stavili malo veći OLED a ne isti 128x64 kako kod Trezor One novčanika. Ako možeš ubaci i nove Keystone 3 hardverske novčanike, stari prebaci u Defunct, i pogledaj ako ima još nešto drugo za ažuriranje. Ova stranica može pomoći: https://thebitcoinhole.com/ |
|
|
|
I just hope that they improve the screen durability. My last trezor suffer a small dot burnt on the screen until it got covered the whole screen to make it not visible already.
Screen is much more realiable than on ledger devices, but I think they changed the screen model in Trezor 3. It would be much better if they added bigger screen, but I am waiting to see first tests and reviews to say more about this device and screen. Is there any noticeable feature improvement on this version that is worthy to upgrade my Trezor Model T? This hardware industry is like gadgets now that keep releasing new version with just a little bit feature improvements. Next time we have pro max version for the screen. I wrote about it in my previous posts. This is NOT upgrade if you already own Trezor T, unless if you want to pay $79 for secure element or for device collectibles item |
|
|
|
Is this announced anywhere? Sorry for jumping in, I just have a trezor wallet since 2019 and I don't use it anymore, but I am curious to know.
Yeah, it's available in this BitcoinTakeover podcast, but you can also find short clips on bitcoin takeover website. I heard them announcing this before, but they said they will continue posting firmware updates. https://bitcoin-takeover.com/s14-e3-matej-zak-on-trezors-new-hardware/Since their previous models are available on Croatian market, I have no doubts that Trezor Model 3 will be available too. Regarding money, I have no problems giving few hundreds of dollars if that means I will sleep better (which I should with a more secure device).
Than I would say Foundation Passport is probably better Bitcoin only option for hardware wallet, but you will have to wait for delivery from US, customs and you will have to give your personal information online. I am more for something that can be purchased locally for cash without records of me doing it, especially if it's connected with bitcoin. For people who want to have hardware wallet with Monero support, Trezor 3 is one of the better and cheaper options... I am sure not going to buy Trezor T for over $200. |
|
|
|
Sure, but they have spent years telling everyone how not only do we not need secure elements, but that closed source secure elements can actually increase your risk. And now they implement it and call it ground breaking, as if everyone else hasn't been doing it for years already. I am following this subject for years and I know for a fact they researched and examined all available secure elements, so one they are offering now in Trezor 3 is probably best we have in the market now. Many people including me wanted to see something like this so I don't see any problem with this, and 2 years will fly very fast, Trezor One will be retired and not available anymore. There are multiple other reasons I wouldn't pick a Trezor though, even this new model or the other new model they are going to release.
Do you have any link with more information about this staying the same like in model One? I know Trezor T uses entering on device, so it should not be such a hard thing to add this in Trezor 3. |
|
|
|
In my experience https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5467802.0, I have 4 BTC wallet addresses in one trezzor with one seed phrase, because there was a problem with my trezor, I was forced to access it in the BIP39 wallet (I use a trust wallet here) where only my main BTC address appeared. Dude, you don't have hardware wallet anymore and you just exposed your seed phrase to the internet with shitty trust wallet, so don't be surprised if someone ''hacks'' in near future. You should NEVER import your offline seed to any hot wallets like you did, this is a big mistake. Instead you can use old offline phone and maybe additionally create multisig setup for better security. |
|
|
|
Trezor 3 Safe is a boring name, I expected something more exotic but in reality it is just upgraded Trezor model One, and maybe that is not such a bad thing. Trezor added usb-c connection, instead of old micro-usb used on model One, and they added EAL6+ Secure Element, but I can't find information what exact model they are using and it's OPTIGA Trust M. I also don't know what main processor they are using for Trezor 3, but it should support Monero coin, unlike Trezor One, so it's probably similar like processor from Trezor model T. Price for Trezor 3 is $79 and I think that is not bad, but don't expect to have bigger screen with Trezor 3, it's the same size as in Trezor One. If you don't own hardware wallet this would be a solid entry point that will stay updated well after Trezor One gets retired. Trezor 3 is in a sense just replacement for Model One. Note that the secure element is not open source. It's just a regular secure element. Pretty funny coming from the company that spent the best part of the last 10 years saying how closed source secure elements are a security risk and secure elements are unnecessary, while sweeping under the rug their unfixable seed extraction vulnerability.
They literally had to make compromise, when they realized how hard is to make their own open source secure element, that is coming out in 2 years. I won't critize Trezor for this new device, it's just refreshed model One, but we already spoke they need to do this long time ago. Only thing they could add is bigger screen and small camera for airgapp support, but than price would be higher than $79. Blockstream Jade has all that and costs less Jade doesn't have secure element, they have centralized server Someone asked whether the SE is open source or not. The answer was:
Thanks! This is interesting. I was looking on their website and I couldn't find what SE model they are using. It was OPTIGA Trust M secure element, and only hardware wallet that is using secure element from this manufacturer is Keevo, that is using Infineon Optiga Trust-P. I was looking forward to new Trezor models as I've been on the lookout for a new HW but if what you are saying is true, then I have to look elsewhere.
Trezor 3 is much better than ledger and old Trezor One, and maybe you can even buy it locally. You don't have much options elsewhere for this price |
|
|
|
You have created flag type 2 which should be created by the victim. But you are not the victim in this case I could not understand why you have created such a type (type 2). It would be better if the victim (Maris Lunt) would create a flag that could be type 3.
Isn't it obvious who created this flag with a simple click on the link that were provided?  |
|
|
|
Note that Secret Chats in Telegram is the only way to fully encrypt your messages without revealing their contents to the Telegram company. Moreover, Secret Chats are not available for bot communication.
And since we can't verify that ''full encryption'' we have to trust that telegram is doing what they say they are doing, and this excludes bugs and flaws in code. I also think that secret chats are only available for smartphones, not for telegram app installed on computers. |
|
|
|
I'm really struggling to find your point here. You don't suggest people to try using our service, you don't want to try our product and in the same sentence you tell us to try our own product.
My point was that you should be the one to choose someone to test your cards, not me. 10% fee just to avoid KYC? 10% everytime I load the card?
You have to pay 10% every time you load card with coins, this is what their website support told me. Way to expensive for me. |
|
|
|
At first when I read the title, I thought it was talking about an alternate service to using YouTube altogether. It turns out actually it's just a different client. Which is great because the stock youtube experience is terrible. It's riddled with ads everywhere, they've even tried to crack down on ad-blockers and 3rd party frontends to make people use the real site.
Youtube is making some changes and making it harder for adblockers to block ads, so FreeTube is even more interesting to me because of this. I have been using it daily in last few months and it works very good for me, it works good even for live streams and it can be tweaked with different settings. This is great stuff, YT has become extremely AD boring for free use. However, for bigger popularization, mobile users must be covered. I had a similar application on Android, Puretuber, with no ads and the best thing, was the video played even if the application was not in fullscreen but running in the background.
There is good open source alternative for smartphones as well, and it's called NewPipe. Has anyone compared the obtained search results between YouTube and Freetube? Are they approximately the same?
Results are almost identical and in some cases I get better results with Freetube. |
|
|
|
Interesting update from Stack wallet is release of new version of multicoin wallet that works on all platforms, including Linux, Mac and wind0ws! I have been testing this wallet in last few days on computer and it's not bad at all, they added Tor support (not working for Monero), and interface is nice, but warning that this is still pre-release v1.8.0, so expect some bugs. It looks like Stack was working with Passport Foundation developers on this project: https://github.com/cypherstack/stack_wallet/releases/tag/build_191 |
|
|
|
I was really pissed what youtube has turned into lately so I was trying to find alternatives for every day use and watching videos. Best option I found so far for desktop computers (Linux, Mac, wind0ws) is youtube client called FreeTube.Interesting thing that FreeTube is totally free, open source community made app, that respects privacy and accepts Bitcoin donations (so far they accepted 0.06738718 BTC)!  What advantages I noticed compared to using Youtube in browser?- No Ads, and no adblockers. - It works much faster and it takes less resources, so it's great for low spec devices, raspberry pi, old computers, etc. - Subscriptions can be made without account, for following channels and new videos, live shows, shorts. - Open source and Private. - Bitcoin donations accepted. FreeTube Githhub page: https://github.com/FreeTubeAppIf you like FreeTube consider supporting developers with Liberapay or Bitcoin donations: If you like FreeTube, consider supporting the project by donating to one of the following Cryptocurrency addresses:
BTC: 1Lih7Ho5gnxb1CwPD4o59ss78pwo2T91eS https://freetubeapp.io/ |
|
|
|
No surprise here that ledger is laying off their employees, village garage is getting smaller and smaller every day Let's not forget they also fired their co-founder aka reddit evil moderator BTChip for doing ''amazing'' work in last few years By the way, I don't think I mentioned that I used to be a fan of Ledger despite the warnings by dkbit98 in particular but now have turned 180 degrees....so that makes me an anti-fan, I suppose. I didn't force anyone to hate ledger, I just presented information from my research, and something was stinking from start. |
|
|
|
You can listen to this podcast on Spotify, Apple Podcasts & YouTube.
Thank you JL0! It was good interview and I listened important parts, and I am little disappointed to say that this new hardware wallet won't have trezor's new secure element, that won't happen until 2025 or 2026 Another information I heard from Matej is that new device will have physical buttons, some new options, and price will be between €69 and €219, probably less than €100. I was a bit overly optimistic when I first heard the news. Since this will be something new from Trezor, the price will surely be higher than their previous flagship model (model T). $250-300?
Interview posted above explains everything. Price will be less than $250 for sure. |
|
|
|
Hello, my brother and I made an ecommerce platform that runs on Bitcoin.
We are currently in testing and would like your thoughts and feedback.
A bit more information and explanation would be nice. Are you using any third party websites for ordering and delivering ordered items, or you already own them and sell directly? It would be better to enable additional checkout for guest accounts, for people who want to purchase something without registering accounts. |
|
|
|
Since you cant delete your account here, and deleting posts manually one by one is a pain, i made a python script to automatically delete all posts that can be deleted, and to edit those which can only be edited (changes subject and message to "x")
I agree with other users who said that it would be a good idea to move all edited X posts to archive board as a last step. Note that all posts are archived by Ninjastic.space, Loyce.club and probably few other archiving websites like WaybackMachine and Archive.is, so we can't really delete anything. If someone wants to find old posts they will find a way to do it. I'm pretty sure this falls under rule #1:
Is there any better option to force moderators to nuke and delete all your posts? That might be a good option if you don't want to leave any X posts in archival board. |
|
|
|
Meh. I didn't do this work with payment in mind (like I said to Stunna in the PM I sent in July: I was committed to finishing this before I was even aware of the bounty). That being said, if Stunna is a hardcore sticking-to-my-word type, then I'll certainly hold out my cup. You deserve it, and not just because of this patch or for discovering bugs in forum. I was secretly hoping you might take over work or help with implementing of new forum software, mostly for better mobile support, so this could be great motivation for you. If 2FA gets introduced this year it would be one of the biggest forum upgrade in years. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
