Why do Atheists Hate Religion?

[BitNow]

Some aspects of science are full of nonsense. One example is the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang Theory itself is not nonsensical to look at. The thing is nonsensical about it is the way many adults consider this fictional Theory to be truth or near truth. And they parade it as truth just like a Christian might parade his Christianity as truth.

Big Bang Theory is the best theory on the creation of Universe so far.


Best regards.

[1714248700]

1714248700

[1714248700]

1714248700

[1714248700]

1714248700

[BADecker]

Some aspects of science are full of nonsense. One example is the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang Theory itself is not nonsensical to look at. The thing is nonsensical about it is the way many adults consider this fictional Theory to be truth or near truth. And they parade it as truth just like a Christian might parade his Christianity as truth.

Big Bang Theory is the best theory on the creation of Universe so far.


Best regards.

The word "universe" isn't in the Old Testament.   

[BADecker]

atheists do not hate religion, they choose not to be a part of an organized idea that has few leeway and seems absolute even thou common sense sometimes trumps their ideas.

What's the matter? Don't tell me that you can't think clearly enough to understand that science proves the existence of God, and that my explanations of it in https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg13596139#msg13596139 and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg13596385#msg13596385 are beyond your understanding.

Of course, if the things in the links are the truth - and you can't understand this stuff - how can you even make an honest suggestion common sense is against something that is proven? In this case you are borderline goofy.

[BADecker]

The word "universe" isn't in the Old Testament.   

Hey! Is you that you don't give damn about words!

Right at the moment, I am not interested in understanding the word. Thus, I am not sure if I can agree on the methodology.

You are a parrot! Are you interested in understanding this word?


Best regards.

What's the matter? Can't take it when someone shows you how nonsensical you are?

 

[BitNow]

The word "universe" isn't in the Old Testament.    

Does that makes you happy?


Best regards.

[BADecker]

The word "universe" isn't in the Old Testament.    

Does that makes you happy?


Best regards.

What exactly are you referring to when you say "that?"   

[strayanbit]

atheists do not hate religion, they choose not to be a part of an organized idea that has few leeway and seems absolute even thou common sense sometimes trumps their ideas.

What's the matter? Don't tell me that you can't think clearly enough to understand that science proves the existence of God, and that my explanations of it in https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg13596139#msg13596139 and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg13596385#msg13596385 are beyond your understanding.

Of course, if the things in the links are the truth - and you can't understand this stuff - how can you even make an honest suggestion common sense is against something that is proven? In this case you are borderline goofy.

So you claim to 'scientifically' prove the existence of god, why don't you put this up for peer review?
Moreover, lets see you prove that Zeus is not the only one true god.

[BitNow]

What exactly are you referring to when you say "that?"   

I'm referring to the word Universe.


Best regards.

[BADecker]

atheists do not hate religion, they choose not to be a part of an organized idea that has few leeway and seems absolute even thou common sense sometimes trumps their ideas.

What's the matter? Don't tell me that you can't think clearly enough to understand that science proves the existence of God, and that my explanations of it in https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg13596139#msg13596139 and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg13596385#msg13596385 are beyond your understanding.

Of course, if the things in the links are the truth - and you can't understand this stuff - how can you even make an honest suggestion common sense is against something that is proven? In this case you are borderline goofy.

So you claim to 'scientifically' prove the existence of god, why don't you put this up for peer review?
Moreover, lets see you prove that Zeus is not the only one true god.

If I claim anything about this, the facts of the science claim it a whole lot more.

Peer review is a waste of time. Most scientists don't WANT to hear it. The ones that do want to hear it, can't speak for fear of losing their jobs - politics of science lies. However, science has understood what I have shown for a long time, now.

Review it yourself rather than simply talking about me. It isn't that difficult... especially for someone who has the ability to post in a forum.

[BADecker]

What exactly are you referring to when you say "that?"   

I'm referring to the word Universe.


Best regards.

I was doing other things, and have forgotten why you were referring to the word "Universe." I see that you have capitalized it. Is there any significance in this capitalizing? Please refresh my memory with a little more detail.

[BitNow]

Right at the moment, I am not interested in understanding the word. Thus, I am not sure if I can agree on the methodology.

Peer review is a waste of time. ...omissis...

"Laziness brings on deep sleep,
    and the shiftless go hungry."
- Pro 19:15


Best regards.

[BADecker]

Right at the moment, I am not interested in understanding the word. Thus, I am not sure if I can agree on the methodology.

Peer review is a waste of time. ...omissis...

"Laziness brings on deep sleep,
    and the shiftless go hungry."
- Pro 19:15


Best regards.

However, the symptoms of tiredness and laziness are extremely similar. What does that have to do with "Universe?" Are you too lazy to clarify what you were asking about?

[BitNow]

"Laziness brings on deep sleep,
    and the shiftless go hungry."
- Pro 19:15


Best regards.

However, the symptoms of tiredness and laziness are extremely similar. What does that have to do with "Universe?" Are you too lazy to clarify what you were asking about?

You are the one that are not:

Right at the moment, I am not interested in understanding the word. Thus, I am not sure if I can agree on the methodology.

and that don't send a "paper" for review because:

Peer review is a waste of time. ...omissis...

and you ask me why I am lazy?


Best regards.

[BADecker]

and you ask me why I am lazy?


Best regards.

No, no. You misunderstand. I don't ask why you are lazy. I already know that answer. What I ask is, IF you are lazy.

 

[BitNow]

No, no. You misunderstand. I don't ask why you are lazy. I already know that answer. What I ask is IF you are lazy.

I know where laziness take, so: why facing that?

"Laziness brings on deep sleep,
    and the shiftless go hungry."
- Pro 19:15

Best regards.

[BADecker]

No, no. You misunderstand. I don't ask why you are lazy. I already know that answer. What I ask is IF you are lazy.

I know where laziness take, so: why facing that?

"Laziness brings on deep sleep,
    and the shiftless go hungry."
- Pro 19:15

Best regards.

No, no. You misunderstand. You are talking about constipation, not laziness.

 

[BitNow]

No, no. You misunderstand. You are talking about constipation, not laziness.

 

Intestinal laziness and that'a a medical term.

Doctors always invent new terms. I'm an engineer: I don't invent words.

If you try to follow doctors you will always ends up with a different word: I stick to the words and try to understand the meaning of them.

But thank you for the advice.


Best regards.

[organofcorti]

1. You state:

Because of this, we can rightfully say that religion means, simply:

a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe.

2. I explained that atheists have no beliefs concerning the purpose of the universe.

3. Therefore your simple definition does not apply to atheists.

Are you changing your simple definition or will you ignore a logical argument?

2. Some people believe the earth is flat.

3. True explanations of the shape of the earth apply to all people, even if they don't understand or believe them. Truth conquers belief.

4. I am accepting, as always, the logical ideas of using the definitions of the dictionaries and encyclopedias. What, again, are you doing?

NOTE: I added the number "4" to clarify your set. I ignored your number "1" because all you are really saying there is something like, "You are not agreeing with me."

The list was a step-by-step guide to understanding the point, which once again I failed to make.

I'll try again.

You say religion is "a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe" and say that therefore atheists are religious.

The third part of your definition, the 'purpose" part, by definition cannot apply to atheists, and therefore your definition is wrong.

[organofcorti]

Atheism is a capital sin.

Not have an imaginary friend is worthy of death?   Most atheists dont hate religion, but that sort of attitude would certainly swing a few people.

Don't call sinners people call them sinners and they will start to search for redemption.


Best regards.

You dehumanise a portion of the population that doesn't agree with you? Hmmm, where have I seen that attitude lead to genocide before? Oh yes, every time.

What's wrong with holocaust?


Best regards.

BitNow, you're a very poor advertisement for organised religions. Every time someone asks me "what's wrong with organised religion?" I can just point to the hate speech you post here.

[BitNow]

The list was a step-by-step guide to understanding the point, which once again I failed to make.

I'll try again.

You say religion is "a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe" and say that therefore atheists are religious.

The third part of your definition, the 'purpose" part, by definition cannot apply to atheists, and therefore your definition is wrong.

Purpose indicate a meaning an objective that a group of people have in regarding to something (deity, money, health, other...).

Atheists don't believe in God but they don't have a faith: so the word purpose has no meaning to them.

BitNow, you're a very poor advertisement for organised religions. Every time someone asks me "what's wrong with organised religion?" I can just point to the hate speech you post here.

I didn't used the word hate.


Best regards.