Why do Atheists Hate Religion?

[Moloch]

So, what conspiracy are you promoting when you suggest that 99% of the scientists believe evolution is a fact?

No conspiracy, just google:
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/02/12/darwin-day/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level_of_support_for_evolution
http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2015/01/americans-believe-in-science-just-not-its-findings/384937/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/02/creationism-america-survey_n_5434107.html
http://ncse.com/blog/2013/08/how-many-creationists-science-0014996
http://www.forbes.com/sites/johnfarrell/2015/02/12/evolution-pew-and-scientific-consensus/#3d173f874dbf

[1714142519]

1714142519

[BADecker]

Not only that, but I even read "Planet of the Apes" book, saw the movie, saw a couple of the sequels, and read the some of the papers on evolution. Actual papers on evolution only suggest that evolution might be fact. Much media says it is fact. Have you seen it in "Enquirer?"

Watching you argue about fact of evolution is like watching a Christian try to argue that the bible is historically accurate...

Wherever you got your "facts", they are 100% wrong...

Do you think its a conspiracy that 99.9% of scientists accept evolution as a fact?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level_of_support_for_evolution
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/02/creationism-america-survey_n_5434107.html

Anyone can edit Wikipedia. And you haven' figured out that the media is there for sensationalism, yet?

[Moloch]

Anyone can edit Wikipedia. And you haven' figured out that the media is there for sensationalism, yet?

1) You are COMPLETE MORON to disregard Wikipedia in its entirety

2) https://www.google.com/search?q=percent+of+scientists+who+believe+in+evolution
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/02/12/darwin-day/
http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2015/01/americans-believe-in-science-just-not-its-findings/384937/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/02/creationism-america-survey_n_5434107.html
http://ncse.com/blog/2013/08/how-many-creationists-science-0014996
http://www.forbes.com/sites/johnfarrell/2015/02/12/evolution-pew-and-scientific-consensus/#3d173f874dbf

P.S. Pretending a fact does not exist, does not make the fact less true...

[BADecker]

Anyone can edit Wikipedia. And you haven' figured out that the media is there for sensationalism, yet?

1) You are COMPLETE MORON to disregard Wikipedia in its entirety

2) https://www.google.com/search?q=percent+of+scientists+who+believe+in+evolution
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/02/12/darwin-day/
http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2015/01/americans-believe-in-science-just-not-its-findings/384937/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/02/creationism-america-survey_n_5434107.html
http://ncse.com/blog/2013/08/how-many-creationists-science-0014996
http://www.forbes.com/sites/johnfarrell/2015/02/12/evolution-pew-and-scientific-consensus/#3d173f874dbf

Google and DuckDuckGo search on "Why Evolution is Impossible" to see why evolution is impossible. The reasons why evolution is impossible outweigh all the drivel of people trying to suggest or prove that it can be possible.

[Moloch]

Google and DuckDuckGo search on "Why Evolution is Impossible" to see why evolution is impossible. The reasons why evolution is impossible outweigh all the drivel of people trying to suggest or prove that it can be possible.

I'm sorry you turn a blind eye to science and evolution... but, as I said, that does not make it any less true...

The amount of evidence is support of the theory of evolution is staggering... 99.9% of scientists accept this evidence as having been independently verified, and capable of predicting future events.  This is also a requirement of a scientific theory... if a theory cannot predict future events, it is useless...

Fortunately, evolution is valid, and is the current accepted theory of how humans and other species have changed on this planet over the course of millions of years.

Granted, you might believe the world is only 5-7000 years old (half of Christians do), and its another conspiracy that science suggests it is over 4 billion years old?

[BADecker]

Google and DuckDuckGo search on "Why Evolution is Impossible" to see why evolution is impossible. The reasons why evolution is impossible outweigh all the drivel of people trying to suggest or prove that it can be possible.

I'm sorry you turn a blind eye to science and evolution... but, as I said, that does not make it any less true...

The amount of evidence is support of the theory of evolution is staggering... 99.9% of scientists accept this evidence as having been independently verified, and capable of predicting future events.  This is also a requirement of a scientific theory... if a theory cannot predict future events, it is useless...

Fortunately, evolution is valid, and is the current accepted theory of how humans and other species have changed on this planet over the course of millions of years.

Granted, you might believe the world is only 5-7000 years old (half of Christians do), and its another conspiracy that science suggests it is over 4 billion years old?

Since you are unwilling to look at the facts, but would rather believe the media lies and exaggerations, you will probably feel quite comfortable in your atheism and evolution religions. Ostrich with head in sand feel comfortable, too.

[Moloch]

Since you are unwilling to look at the facts, but would rather believe the media lies and exaggerations, you will probably feel quite comfortable in your atheism and evolution religions. Ostrich with head in sand feel comfortable, too.

The problem is... 99.9% of scientists accept evolution... why would I listen to the 0.01% who deny it?  Why do you listen to that rubbish?

I have looked at plenty of papers on evolution, I understand it in detail, and agree with the conclusions and predictions that evolution makes


You are asking me the equivalent of looking into claims that bigfoot exists, or the tooth fairy, or aliens... why would I listen to that rubbish?  I'm into facts and evidence that can be verified in a laboratory... not some wild idea from a lunatic

[BADecker]

Since you are unwilling to look at the facts, but would rather believe the media lies and exaggerations, you will probably feel quite comfortable in your atheism and evolution religions. Ostrich with head in sand feel comfortable, too.

The problem is... 99.9% of scientists accept evolution... why would I listen to the 0.01% who deny it?  Why do you listen to that rubbish?

No. The humor is that you seem to think that 99% of scientists accept evolution as truth.

 

[Moloch]

Since you are unwilling to look at the facts, but would rather believe the media lies and exaggerations, you will probably feel quite comfortable in your atheism and evolution religions. Ostrich with head in sand feel comfortable, too.

The problem is... 99.9% of scientists accept evolution... why would I listen to the 0.01% who deny it?  Why do you listen to that rubbish?

No. The humor is that you seem to think that 99% of scientists accept evolution as truth.

 

Google it, I'll even hand you the link again
https://www.google.com/search?q=percent+of+scientists+who+believe+in+evolution

[BADecker]

Since you are unwilling to look at the facts, but would rather believe the media lies and exaggerations, you will probably feel quite comfortable in your atheism and evolution religions. Ostrich with head in sand feel comfortable, too.

The problem is... 99.9% of scientists accept evolution... why would I listen to the 0.01% who deny it?  Why do you listen to that rubbish?

No. The humor is that you seem to think that 99% of scientists accept evolution as truth.

 

From Evolution Is Biologically Impossible at http://www.icr.org/article/evolution-biologically-impossible/:

...

Reproduction may be called a regularity because billions of people have witnessed billions of new individuals arising that way, and in no other way, for thousands of years. The origin of life was a unique event and certainly not a regularity. Therefore, according to mathematical logicians, the only possibilities left are that life either was generated by chance or by deliberate design. The standard for impossible events eliminated evolution so the only remaining possibility is that life was designed into existence. The probability of the correctness of this conclusion is the inverse of the probability that eliminated evolution, that is, 104,478,296 chances to one.

...

[Moloch]

Now Google is in on the conspiracy too?  lol... you crack me up dude...

"Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics... even if you win, you're still retarded"

[BADecker]

Since you are unwilling to look at the facts, but would rather believe the media lies and exaggerations, you will probably feel quite comfortable in your atheism and evolution religions. Ostrich with head in sand feel comfortable, too.

The problem is... 99.9% of scientists accept evolution... why would I listen to the 0.01% who deny it?  Why do you listen to that rubbish?

No. The humor is that you seem to think that 99% of scientists accept evolution as truth.

 

Google it, I'll even hand you the link again
https://www.google.com/search?q=percent+of+scientists+who+believe+in+evolution

They got you, didn't they?

From Evolution Is Biologically Impossible at http://www.icr.org/article/evolution-biologically-impossible/:

...

Reproduction may be called a regularity because billions of people have witnessed billions of new individuals arising that way, and in no other way, for thousands of years. The origin of life was a unique event and certainly not a regularity. Therefore, according to mathematical logicians, the only possibilities left are that life either was generated by chance or by deliberate design. The standard for impossible events eliminated evolution so the only remaining possibility is that life was designed into existence. The probability of the correctness of this conclusion is the inverse of the probability that eliminated evolution, that is, 104,478,296 chances to one.

...

[BADecker]

"Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics... even if you win, you're still retarded"

What is losing as badly as you have?   

[Holdaaja]

So because you think there isn't enough evidence to prove evolution you decide to trust in god which has even less evidence? Why?

[BADecker]

So because you think there isn't enough evidence to prove evolution you decide to trust in god which has even less evidence? Why?

Actually, part of the scientific proof for the existence of God is some of what destroys evolution.

Standard science maintains a law which is cause and effect. Everything operates through cause and effect. There is nothing that doesn't operate by cause and effect.

The complexity of the universe is self evident.

Entropy is a universal force(?) that attempts to equalize everything. There is no reverse entropy anywhere that we know about.

When you combine the three things, cause and effect, complexity, and entropy, the only way that the universe can exist is that it was made by intelligent design, by some Intelligence that fits our dictionary definitions of the word "God."

This brief explanation doesn't explain the attributes of God, except to say that He/It is extremely powerful, and way more intelligent than we are.

[Moloch]

So because you think there isn't enough evidence to prove evolution you decide to trust in god which has even less evidence? Why?

Actually, part of the scientific proof for the existence of God is some of what destroys evolution.

Wait, what?!?  "Science has proof for the existence of God"?!?  This must be a breaking news story from every media outlet on the planet... why haven't I heard of this?

Please provide a source for such incredible news!

[BADecker]

So because you think there isn't enough evidence to prove evolution you decide to trust in god which has even less evidence? Why?

Actually, part of the scientific proof for the existence of God is some of what destroys evolution.

Wait, what?!?  Science has proof for the existence of God?!?  This must be a breaking news story from every media outlet on the planet... why haven't I heard of this?

Wouldn't do you any good. You wouldn't understand it. But if by some chance you happened to understand, you would fight it intentionally, just like you are doing now.

[btvGainer]

There's a God and we do not need science to prove His existence to us

[BADecker]

There's a God and we do not need science to prove His existence to us

This is true. The idea is to show atheists that God exists in language they understand, before they die in their sins. Obviously, many of them will simply pull back into their shell rather than seek God and a joyful eternal life in Heaven. But a few of them will turn. And many border-line Christians will see how God truly DOES exist, and will be strengthened in their Christianity.

[Moloch]

Actually, part of the scientific proof for the existence of God is some of what destroys evolution.

Wait, what?!?  "Science has proof for the existence of God"?!?  This must be a breaking news story from every media outlet on the planet... why haven't I heard of this?

Please provide a source for such incredible news!

Wouldn't do you any good. You wouldn't understand it. But if by some chance you happened to understand, you would fight it intentionally, just like you are doing now.

Translation...

Pot: "Hey kettle, are you there?"
Kettle: "What do you want stoner?"
Pot: "You're black... like the darkness!"