Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)

[woodaxe]

there're rumours vega'll mine at least 70 m/h after a driver update,

 yeah started by Gibbo at overclockers UK   
hes the chief buyer there so could be total B/S to drum up trade 

[1714275923]

1714275923

[1714275923]

1714275923

[1714275923]

1714275923

[1714275923]

1714275923

[NavyCuda]

there're rumours vega'll mine at least 70 m/h after a driver update,

 yeah started by Gibbo at overclockers UK   
hes the chief buyer there so could be total B/S to drum up trade 

Considering my average is approaching 40MH/s from my Vega FE's... at 852MHz core clock, I think there might be some meat to this rumor.

[Unclegogi]

Considering my average is approaching 40MH/s from my Vega FE's... at 852MHz core clock, I think there might be some meat to this rumor.

40MH is not bad at all.
852MHz is a huge downclock.
What is the power consumption in "ETH only" and "ETH+DCR" modes?

[NavyCuda]

Considering my average is approaching 40MH/s from my Vega FE's... at 852MHz core clock, I think there might be some meat to this rumor.

40MH is not bad at all.
852MHz is a huge downclock.
What is the power consumption in "ETH only" and "ETH+DCR" modes?

I lost my amp clamp years ago and I don't have a killawatt, so I honestly don't know power consumption.

Coretemp is 60C, 97% fan speed with an ambient temperature of 40C... my house gets gross in the summer.  Central air is on my long list of ambitions.

[P00P135]

System: Windows 10, 6x 1070, Driver 376.51, Dualmining (-dcri 35) with PASCAL

v9.7

21:08:01:073   1e38   ETH - Total Speed: 183.039 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
21:08:01:073   1e38   ETH: GPU0 30.600 Mh/s, GPU1 30.534 Mh/s, GPU2 30.460 Mh/s, GPU3 30.551 Mh/s, GPU4 30.389 Mh/s, GPU5 30.503 Mh/s
21:08:01:073   1e38    PASC - Total Speed: 2135.448 Mh/s, Total Shares: 4, Rejected: 0
21:08:01:089   1e38    PASC: GPU0 357.005 Mh/s, GPU1 356.232 Mh/s, GPU2 355.368 Mh/s, GPU3 356.432 Mh/s, GPU4 354.540 Mh/s, GPU5 355.871 Mh/s

v9.8

21:16:42:880   59c   ETH - Total Speed: 178.608 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:01
21:16:42:881   59c   ETH: GPU0 30.526 Mh/s, GPU1 30.093 Mh/s, GPU2 30.361 Mh/s, GPU3 30.630 Mh/s, GPU4 26.358 Mh/s, GPU5 30.639 Mh/s
21:16:42:882   59c    PASC - Total Speed: 2083.751 Mh/s, Total Shares: 5, Rejected: 0
21:16:42:883   59c    PASC: GPU0 356.137 Mh/s, GPU1 351.085 Mh/s, GPU2 354.215 Mh/s, GPU3 357.353 Mh/s, GPU4 307.504 Mh/s, GPU5 357.457 Mh/s

Which driver Version du you use for NVIDIA Cards with 9.8?

Your GPU4 doesn't seem to be OC'd or bugged in v9.8

[Skol600ml]

there're rumours vega'll mine at least 70 m/h after a driver update,

 yeah started by Gibbo at overclockers UK   
hes the chief buyer there so could be total B/S to drum up trade 

I wonder if some miner dev knows him. I wonder what miner he used for testing.

New Vegas (!) may be hot stuff, but it's hard to believe that a VGA would run smoothly without a miner developer gets a hand on and do some tweaks.

Where is that talkative furry lover?

[elVacen]

Hi guys
currently I'm running version 9.7 with my 3 ASUS 580 Dual OC 8GB but the third card is giving me low rates (ETH + SIA). Any advice?

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool us1.ethermine.org:4444 -ewal wallet -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://us-east.siamining.com:7777 -dwal Wallet -dcoin sia -dcri 25

https://i.imgur.com/xzcgGOQ.jpg

ETH - Total Speed: 66.442 Mh/s, Total Shares: 12, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:17
ETH: GPU0 26.249 Mh/s, GPU1 25.969 Mh/s, GPU2 14.223 Mh/s
 SC - Total Speed: 1661.045 Mh/s, Total Shares: 132, Rejected: 1
 SC: GPU0 656.226 Mh/s, GPU1 649.234 Mh/s, GPU2 355.585 Mh/s
GPU0 t=0C fan=0%, GPU1 t=0C fan=0%, GPU2 t=0C fan=0%
ETH: 08/03/17-16:34:30 - New job from us1.ethermine.org:4444
ETH - Total Speed: 63.288 Mh/s, Total Shares: 12, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:17
ETH: GPU0 25.077 Mh/s, GPU1 23.998 Mh/s, GPU2 14.213 Mh/s
 SC - Total Speed: 1582.193 Mh/s, Total Shares: 132, Rejected: 1
 SC: GPU0 626.930 Mh/s, GPU1 599.940 Mh/s, GPU2 355.323 Mh/s

Thanks!!

Please provide gpu-z, PBE screenshots...
How do you manage voltage and frequencies?

We have the same exact cards so I would agree that you should check if Crossfire has accidentally been enabled -  as this is usually the case if you're upgrading drivers as AMD like to enable them by default each and every time.

What's your GPU settings? Did you just copy 1750 > 2000 timings?
Reason is that I'm running 6x right now and with my settings, I get 28.5 tops per card @ current DAG and 540 Mh/s for sia @ 125w GPU-Z tdp.

just reset with msi afterburner and working properly again. Thanks for help

What's your GPU settings? Did you just copy 1750 > 2000 timings?
Reason is that I'm running 6x right now and with my settings, I get 28.5 tops per card @ current DAG and 540 Mh/s for sia @ 125w GPU-Z tdp.

copy 1750 > 2000 timings, no oc at the moment, only dcri -25 running

ETH - Total Speed: 105.330 Mh/s, Total Shares: 440, Rejected: 0, Time: 04:40
ETH: GPU0 26.238 Mh/s, GPU1 25.992 Mh/s, GPU2 27.077 Mh/s, GPU3 26.024 Mh/s
 SC - Total Speed: 2633.248 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1243, Rejected: 0
 SC: GPU0 655.938 Mh/s, GPU1 649.791 Mh/s, GPU2 676.930 Mh/s, GPU3 650.589 Mh/s

[mjmeans]

Referring to:
If you don't agree with the dev fee - don't use this miner, or use "-nofee" option.
Attempts to cheat and remove dev fee will cause a bit slower mining speed (same as "-nofee 1") though miner will show same hashrate.
Miner cannot just stop if cheat is detected because creators of cheats would know that the cheat does not work and they would find new tricks. If miner does not show any errors or slowdowns, they are happy.

Profit switching in MultiPoolMiner or AwesomeMiner can switch into and out of Claymore potentially ever 10 minutes. Is this safe so that Claymore will not think that it is cheating, or does the profit switching program need to make sure Claymore is run for a longer time?

[Strebba90]

which is the best driver for nvidia 1060 and version 9.8?

When will there be a chance to control fans, etc, on nvidia?
thanks for your work

[christiano88]

where is the new beta driver? Is it closed beta for now?

[megax05]

yeah..
beta driver works with 9.8

are the amd cards hashing better with this beta driver?

Yes. Got new beta to test and yes, it works. Cards bumped for 1-1.3MH/s

I cant find any link to the beta Driver
lets hope it do eliminate the dag file issue cause my new modded bios hits 32 MHs on rx 470 4GB with hynix memory but stable at 31.5 with benching at 130 dag epoch now I max 28 MHs

[sweetydady]

yeah..
beta driver works with 9.8

are the amd cards hashing better with this beta driver?

Yes. Got new beta to test and yes, it works. Cards bumped for 1-1.3MH/s

I cant find any link to the beta Driver
lets hope it do eliminate the dag file issue cause my new modded bios hits 32 MHs on rx 470 4GB with hynix memory but stable at 31.5 with benching at 130 dag epoch now I max 28 MHs

share your bios please

[santan]

Apart from summary .... How can we show at what difficulty the shares are being accepted........
Is there a way to control the difficulty ?
it looks dynamically adjusted by claymore itself.

[Gagana]

Guys, what do you dual mine with 1060 and why? I used to mine DCR with -dcri 44, but is DCR the best choice? I see that ETH+SIA gives me 10% more USD now...

[nubas1k]

Finally I can test and confirm that AMD has fixed the issue with slowdown at high DAG epochs for Vega/Polaris/Fiji cards. They are going to release new drivers in a few days.

what you know about when new drivers for polaris, this question interests many

And possible increase hashrate with optimization on new version for polaris, pascal ?

yeah..
beta driver works with 9.8

Please) you can give link ? very very need

[Trimegistus]

Apart from summary .... How can we show at what difficulty the shares are being accepted........
Is there a way to control the difficulty ?
it looks dynamically adjusted by claymore itself.

Difficulty is set by the pool in response to the variations in the overall network difficulty. Miners do not adjust difficulty!

[koya]

Hello, this is a question for Mr. Claymore

My rig has 4 gtx1080 cards (radeons and 1070s are very hard to find or overpriced )

If I solo mine LBRY (with ccminer) it gives 380 MH/s lbry per card (a bit overclocked)
If I solo mine ETH, it gives 22.5 MH/s ethash per card (pity there is no way to mod memory straps on Pascal, at least that I know of)

This is where the things get interesting for 1080 cards:

If I run dual mining ETH + LBRY, with default -dcri settings (a low one) it gives full ETH hashrate and very low LBRY hasrate.
But when I start increasing -dcri, the ETH hashrate is still goings strong (minimal losses), but LBRY hashrate has a steady increase.
The max -dcri value Clayrmore Dual Miner allows me to set is 500: at that value, ETH hashrate is STILL STRONG and LBRY hasrate went up to almost 55% of full solo mining hashrate.

So, with -dcri 500, Claymore Dual Miner 9.7 gives 19 MH/s ETH hashrate + 205 MH/s LBRY hashrate
Calculated as a percentage of full solo mining, it is something like 85% of full ETH + 54% of the full LBRY at the same time

That is a great result!

It seems that if -dcri could go above 500, the LBRY hashrate would still increse, and hopefully ETH hashrate would decline only a bit, until the slow declining limit is reached. I want to know what is the limit
Gtx1080 cards have very strong processing power, but gddr5x memory is just not good for ethash algo. Lbry algo really relies moslty on processing power, so when doing solo LBRY mining on a gtx1080 card, you can downclock memory and hash would stay the same. Ethash relies on memory transfer, so when doing solo ETH mining on a gtx1080 card you can downclock the core waaay down and decrease power limit alot and the card would still give 22 MH/s. With dual mining, both core and the memory should be fully utilized.

Soooooooo... is it profitable to mine on -dcri 500? Sadly, it is no more profitable than mining solo LBRY. 19 MH/s ETH is similar to 180 MH/s LBRY or just below in terms of profits right now. Ofc, dual mining this way certanly won't hurt, but it is just not more profitable than simple solo LBRY.

Question for Mr. Claymore is: Can -dcri be set on more than 500 or can you make a test build with limit unlocked so we can try it?

[fr4nkthetank]

If you dont like the difficulty settings, you need to change pool.  some have static diff which may be too high for your gear, or some have vardiff.  static is better but its not one size fits all.

[scryptr]

Hello, this is a question for Mr. Claymore

My rig has 4 gtx1080 cards (radeons and 1070s are very hard to find or overpriced )

If I solo mine LBRY (with ccminer) it gives 380 MH/s lbry per card (a bit overclocked)
If I solo mine ETH, it gives 22.5 MH/s ethash per card (pity there is no way to mod memory straps on Pascal, at least that I know of)

This is where the things get interesting for 1080 cards:

If I run dual mining ETH + LBRY, with default -dcri settings (a low one) it gives full ETH hashrate and very low LBRY hasrate.
But when I start increasing -dcri, the ETH hashrate is still goings strong (minimal losses), but LBRY hashrate has a steady increase.
The max -dcri value Clayrmore Dual Miner allows me to set is 500: at that value, ETH hashrate is STILL STRONG and LBRY hasrate went up to almost 55% of full solo mining hashrate.

So, with -dcri 500, Claymore Dual Miner 9.7 gives 19 MH/s ETH hashrate + 205 MH/s LBRY hashrate
Calculated as a percentage of full solo mining, it is something like 85% of full ETH + 54% of the full LBRY at the same time

That is a great result!

It seems that if -dcri could go above 500, the LBRY hashrate would still increse, and hopefully ETH hashrate would decline only a bit, until the slow declining limit is reached. I want to know what is the limit
Gtx1080 cards have very strong processing power, but gddr5x memory is just not good for ethash algo. Lbry algo really relies moslty on processing power, so when doing solo LBRY mining on a gtx1080 card, you can downclock memory and hash would stay the same. Ethash relies on memory transfer, so when doing solo ETH mining on a gtx1080 card you can downclock the core waaay down and decrease power limit alot and the card would still give 22 MH/s. With dual mining, both core and the memory should be fully utilized.

Soooooooo... is it profitable to mine on -dcri 500? Sadly, it is no more profitable than mining solo LBRY. 19 MH/s ETH is similar to 180 MH/s LBRY or just below in terms of profits right now. Ofc, dual mining this way certanly won't hurt, but it is just not more profitable than simple solo LBRY.

Question for Mr. Claymore is: Can -dcri be set on more than 500 or can you make a test build with limit unlocked so we can try it?

IMPRESSIVE--

Thanks for the post!  NVidia cards work well with higher "-dcri" values.  But, Maxwell (900 series) cards are likely to reach maximum performance at a much lower "-dcri" value than 500.  A setting of "-dcri 75" is a good place to start for Maxwell cards.

Ethereum mining performance begins to degrade more rapidly on Maxwell cards than with Pascal cards.  Most of mine are on the shelf, it has been about a year since I experimented.  I think that Claymore may have adjusted intensity values within the code during that time.       --scryptr

[AZuley]

I apologize in advance if this question has already been raised, but I can not find an answer.

I can not understand why claymore does not control the fans of NVIDIA cards.
All the controls by the BIOS settings of the cards only.

Installed the latest drivers and claymore 9.8 - no effect.

Win 10 x64 and GTX 1070 EVGA