Bitcoin Forum
December 11, 2016, 08:28:22 AM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3160 (80.5%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.1%)
Total Voters: 3924

Pages: « 1 ... 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 [256] 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 ... 1105 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3934185 times)
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
March 30, 2012, 03:50:13 PM
 #5101

Looks like the pool, and website, just went down.  Hopefully it's nothing serious...

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
1481444902
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481444902

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481444902
Reply with quote  #2

1481444902
Report to moderator
1481444902
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481444902

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481444902
Reply with quote  #2

1481444902
Report to moderator
1481444902
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481444902

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481444902
Reply with quote  #2

1481444902
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481444902
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481444902

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481444902
Reply with quote  #2

1481444902
Report to moderator
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
March 30, 2012, 03:51:03 PM
 #5102

And their back.

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
disclaimer201
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316


View Profile
March 30, 2012, 05:52:02 PM
 #5103

If hoppers contribute to solving blocks faster and are losing shares on long rounds it's durable. Slush wanted to switch to DGM at some point as I remember. Anyway he does it, I'm cool. Super reliable service for the longest time now. I'm guessing he does not sleep much. But I'll shut up b4 somebody will call me a fanboy again. Cheers!

ensign_lee
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 356


View Profile
March 30, 2012, 07:47:04 PM
 #5104

Is something wrong with the way btc is being awarded? I got 0 btc for the last two rounds even though slush's site says I have an average of 2Ghash/sec. Since the max capacity for what I have is 2Ghash, that means they must have been working?
conspirosphere.tk
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1876


Revolution will be decentralized


View Profile WWW
March 30, 2012, 08:06:58 PM
 #5105

Is something wrong with the way btc is being awarded? I got 0 btc for the last two rounds even though slush's site says I have an average of 2Ghash/sec. Since the max capacity for what I have is 2Ghash, that means they must have been working?

I think you are doing something wrong.

ensign_lee
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 356


View Profile
March 30, 2012, 11:37:04 PM
 #5106

F*(&^#ing COMCAST... Cheesy
Red Emerald
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742



View Profile WWW
March 31, 2012, 12:43:21 AM
 #5107

I've actually noticed a bigger difference based on the duration of the round and I'm right around 2ghash.  I'll average about .07 on most rounds, but on shorter round, generally under 5 minutes, I'll average around .03.

The only reason I haven't said anything sooner is because this conversation has come up before.  And it was generally attributed to pool hoppers.

If the hoppers contributed to the total share of the initial 5 minutes, they increased pool's hashrate thus contributed to the success of finding the block.

But where do those hoppers go leaving the pool? solo?

I believe the hoppers move to PPS pools

organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
March 31, 2012, 12:51:45 AM
 #5108

I've actually noticed a bigger difference based on the duration of the round and I'm right around 2ghash.  I'll average about .07 on most rounds, but on shorter round, generally under 5 minutes, I'll average around .03.

The only reason I haven't said anything sooner is because this conversation has come up before.  And it was generally attributed to pool hoppers.

If the hoppers contributed to the total share of the initial 5 minutes, they increased pool's hashrate thus contributed to the success of finding the block.

But where do those hoppers go leaving the pool? solo?

I believe the hoppers move to PPS pools

They move to any pool where the expected value of a share = 1/D at any given point in a round, for example: PPLNS, DGM, SMPPS, PPS.

If they don't understand variance or can't accept variance, they'll go PPS and pay the fee or SMPPS and deal with the negative buffer issues later.

If they understand variance and can accept it, they'll go with either a DGM they suits their preferences or PPLNS.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
March 31, 2012, 02:28:53 AM
 #5109

You know, I really should have licensed those algorithms Wink

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
disclaimer201
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316


View Profile
April 04, 2012, 02:05:24 PM
 #5110

A while back I was complaining that my pool payouts would never catch up with the blocks my miners have generated. Well, the ratio looks much better now. 7 blocks to 326 BTC paid out plus Namecoins. Seems I was wrong. Looks like you really just need to keep mining long enough for it to equal out.

brucemangy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 169



View Profile
April 04, 2012, 05:45:24 PM
 #5111

A while back I was complaining that my pool payouts would never catch up with the blocks my miners have generated. Well, the ratio looks much better now. 7 blocks to 326 BTC paid out plus Namecoins. Seems I was wrong. Looks like you really just need to keep mining long enough for it to equal out.

Consider the following :
I'm at 198 BTC and no block found ^^
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
April 04, 2012, 06:00:57 PM
 #5112

Yeah, it is pretty random.  But generally over time, it tends to even out.

Im at 4 blocks found and around 240 btc paid out...

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
Tittiez
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686



View Profile
April 04, 2012, 07:37:30 PM
 #5113

A while back I was complaining that my pool payouts would never catch up with the blocks my miners have generated. Well, the ratio looks much better now. 7 blocks to 326 BTC paid out plus Namecoins. Seems I was wrong. Looks like you really just need to keep mining long enough for it to equal out.

Consider the following :
I'm at 198 BTC and no block found ^^


Lol I'd start solo mining, and hope that variance and luck catch up with me.
Red Emerald
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742



View Profile WWW
April 04, 2012, 11:08:47 PM
 #5114

A while back I was complaining that my pool payouts would never catch up with the blocks my miners have generated. Well, the ratio looks much better now. 7 blocks to 326 BTC paid out plus Namecoins. Seems I was wrong. Looks like you really just need to keep mining long enough for it to equal out.

Consider the following :
I'm at 198 BTC and no block found ^^


Lol I'd start solo mining, and hope that variance and luck catch up with me.
If only luck and variance worked like that

max in montreal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
April 04, 2012, 11:20:26 PM
 #5115

it does work like that...if it was the opposite then it would be bad luck...
Red Emerald
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742



View Profile WWW
April 04, 2012, 11:43:01 PM
 #5116

it does work like that...if it was the opposite then it would be bad luck...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambler's_fallacy

FoxMURDER
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49


View Profile
April 05, 2012, 04:12:58 PM
 #5117

as per variance ... im perfectly without luck. good or bad ...

103BTC mined, 2 blocks found Smiley
mellowhead
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98


View Profile
April 06, 2012, 07:42:43 AM
 #5118

Is this the best place to make requests/suggestions to the pool operator?
It would be cool to have an option for email notification of a dead miner. Like an adjustable timer for a miner not producing any shares...

Also, thanks for doing a great job keeping the pool up and running so consistently.  Smiley

11 Cheers for binary currency!
1BxQsmtVtzJD9uEe5MxcyqFaohpgb76ohs
Crypt_Current
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686


Shame on everything; regret nothing.


View Profile
April 06, 2012, 09:23:38 AM
 #5119

Is this the best place to make requests/suggestions to the pool operator?
It would be cool to have an option for email notification of a dead miner. Like an adjustable timer for a miner not producing any shares...

Also, thanks for doing a great job keeping the pool up and running so consistently.  Smiley

^this

thanks Slush.  :-)

10% off at CampBX for LIFE:  https://campbx.com/main.php?r=C9a5izBQ5vq  ----  Authorized BitVoucher MEGA reseller (& BTC donations appreciated):  https://bitvoucher.co/affl/1HkvK8o8WWDpCTSQGnek7DH9gT1LWeV5s3/
LTC:  LRL6vb6XBRrEEifB73DiEiYZ9vbRy99H41  NMC:  NGb2spdTGpWj8THCPyCainaXenwDhAW1ZT
jproulx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8


View Profile
April 06, 2012, 07:29:15 PM
 #5120


I'm having odd connection problems.  from miners on the the same network some connect fine others never get a response from the pool (tcpdump shows only outbound syn on the wire never anything at all back) using cgminer 2.3.2 on all systems

I've check local packet filter rules (there are none), really seems like the pool decided to hate on most of my IP space though that doesn't really make sense as pulling my account would be simpler and more effective way to punish any crimes on my part so still looking for local causes but it's been about a week since most of my running miners started loosing (and stopped running) and I've got nothing.

I can proxy all the traffic through one of the non cursed hosts but that seems to be choking things.  Any guesses as to what rocks I may not have turned over?
Pages: « 1 ... 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 [256] 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 ... 1105 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!