Bitcoin Forum
December 03, 2016, 06:49:43 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3160 (80.5%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.1%)
Total Voters: 3924

Pages: « 1 ... 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 [267] 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 ... 1105 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3925769 times)
Shadow383
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336


View Profile
September 04, 2012, 06:06:35 PM
 #5321

Nearly 15 million shares on this block  Cheesy


what is the record share on 1 block?
current block 19 174 984 share Sad
This is the longest round I've ever seen, and we're at a CDF 99.96% on the stats.
1480747783
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480747783

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480747783
Reply with quote  #2

1480747783
Report to moderator
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
September 05, 2012, 09:42:56 AM
 #5322

The longest round had 12.2x difficulty, so it is equivalent of current 30mil shares. Yesterday's round was long, but there still was some reserve :-).

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
September 10, 2012, 08:28:38 AM
 #5323

Hi guys,

I'm finishing project on which I recently spent some time  Wink. I'm just writing official announcement and internal technical documentation. But in the meantime I would like to ask you for testing this:

https://github.com/slush0/stratum-mining-proxy (there's also prepared Windows binary)

It is proxy between "old" getwork protocol and new pool interface based on Stratum protocol (which I originally designed for a lightweight Electrum wallet). As I said, I'll post it's benefits officially later, but I'd like to do some small-scale testing for now (and hopefully find the first block outside testnet?). So if you have some spare time, please run mining proxy locally (using default parameters is fine) and point some of your miners to it (by default it listen on localhost:8332).

It is still experimental version, so don't be surprised if something will go wrong :-). Anyway, submitted shares should be accounted under your profile as normally...

P.S. As my "thank you" for your help you should see very, very low stale ratio.

P.P.S. Of course please report issues if any. Problems with installation, runtime errors, authorization errors, rejected shares, whatever...

dburdett84
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 43


View Profile
September 10, 2012, 08:51:23 AM
 #5324

Hi guys,

I'm finishing project on which I recently spent some time  Wink. I'm just writing official announcement and internal technical documentation. But in the meantime I would like to ask you for testing this:

https://github.com/slush0/stratum-mining-proxy (there's also prepared Windows binary)

It is proxy between "old" getwork protocol and new pool interface based on Stratum protocol (which I originally designed for a lightweight Electrum wallet). As I said, I'll post it's benefits officially later, but I'd like to do some small-scale testing for now (and hopefully find the first block outside testnet?). So if you have some spare time, please run mining proxy locally (using default parameters is fine) and point some of your miners to it (by default it listen on localhost:8332).

It is still experimental version, so don't be surprised if something will go wrong :-). Anyway, submitted shares should be accounted under your profile as normally...

P.S. As my "thank you" for your help you should see very, very low stale ratio.

P.P.S. Of course please report issues if any. Problems with installation, runtime errors, authorization errors, rejected shares, whatever...

I would be more then happy to point one of my miners at it, but I am afraid I don't really know how, still a new miner.  I did download it though but have no idea what to do from there.
CaptChadd
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854

Product Marketing & Promotion / Software Developer


View Profile WWW
September 10, 2012, 09:12:37 AM
 #5325

Downloading now and will give it a go.
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
September 10, 2012, 09:16:20 AM
 #5326

Hi guys,

I'm finishing project on which I recently spent some time  Wink. I'm just writing official announcement and internal technical documentation. But in the meantime I would like to ask you for testing this:

https://github.com/slush0/stratum-mining-proxy (there's also prepared Windows binary)

It is proxy between "old" getwork protocol and new pool interface based on Stratum protocol (which I originally designed for a lightweight Electrum wallet). As I said, I'll post it's benefits officially later, but I'd like to do some small-scale testing for now (and hopefully find the first block outside testnet?). So if you have some spare time, please run mining proxy locally (using default parameters is fine) and point some of your miners to it (by default it listen on localhost:8332).

It is still experimental version, so don't be surprised if something will go wrong :-). Anyway, submitted shares should be accounted under your profile as normally...

P.S. As my "thank you" for your help you should see very, very low stale ratio.

P.P.S. Of course please report issues if any. Problems with installation, runtime errors, authorization errors, rejected shares, whatever...

I would be more then happy to point one of my miners at it, but I am afraid I don't really know how, still a new miner.  I did download it though but have no idea what to do from there.


Just run the proxy locally (black terminal window with a lot of texts should appear). And then point your miner to "localhost:8332" instead to "api.bitcoin.cz:8332". Rest is the same. Your miner talk to proxy by old protocol and proxy talk over the Internet to the pool by new protocol.

stergium
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154



View Profile
September 10, 2012, 11:40:50 AM
 #5327

i started using the windows executable as a proxy (which by the way , i had to close the client -was configured on 8332).
It works, for starters! do you need us to report something on it?
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
September 10, 2012, 11:47:55 AM
 #5328

stergium, if you run bitcoin daemon locally, you can run the proxy with "mining_proxy.exe -gp 8331" ("getwork port", or some other port).

Just keep mining on it and report only if it will behave strangely (rejected shares, disconnected miners etc). At this stage short server restarts (up to one minute) are expected. And thank you anyway Smiley.

ninjaboon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512



View Profile WWW
September 10, 2012, 01:38:45 PM
 #5329

Testing your new stratum proxy now. Looks all ok with default settings:

2012-09-10 21:35:55,470 INFO proxy mining_proxy.add_template # New job for prevhash 99567eeddd15ed253999d36b11e0c3fdbe26251eba2ac8d80000037400000000
2012-09-10 21:36:55,493 INFO proxy mining_proxy.add_template # New job for prevhash 99567eeddd15ed253999d36b11e0c3fdbe26251eba2ac8d80000037400000000

VeeMiner
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 749


bitcoin hodler


View Profile
September 10, 2012, 02:55:12 PM
 #5330

Hi guys,

I'm finishing project on which I recently spent some time  Wink. I'm just writing official announcement and internal technical documentation. But in the meantime I would like to ask you for testing this:

https://github.com/slush0/stratum-mining-proxy (there's also prepared Windows binary)

It is proxy between "old" getwork protocol and new pool interface based on Stratum protocol (which I originally designed for a lightweight Electrum wallet). As I said, I'll post it's benefits officially later, but I'd like to do some small-scale testing for now (and hopefully find the first block outside testnet?). So if you have some spare time, please run mining proxy locally (using default parameters is fine) and point some of your miners to it (by default it listen on localhost:8332).

It is still experimental version, so don't be surprised if something will go wrong :-). Anyway, submitted shares should be accounted under your profile as normally...

P.S. As my "thank you" for your help you should see very, very low stale ratio.

P.P.S. Of course please report issues if any. Problems with installation, runtime errors, authorization errors, rejected shares, whatever...

already running my miner on the new stratum mining proxy, good luck with the project!
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
September 10, 2012, 04:07:22 PM
 #5331

Hi guys,

I'm finishing project on which I recently spent some time  Wink. I'm just writing official announcement and internal technical documentation. But in the meantime I would like to ask you for testing this:

https://github.com/slush0/stratum-mining-proxy (there's also prepared Windows binary)

It is proxy between "old" getwork protocol and new pool interface based on Stratum protocol (which I originally designed for a lightweight Electrum wallet). As I said, I'll post it's benefits officially later, but I'd like to do some small-scale testing for now (and hopefully find the first block outside testnet?). So if you have some spare time, please run mining proxy locally (using default parameters is fine) and point some of your miners to it (by default it listen on localhost:8332).

It is still experimental version, so don't be surprised if something will go wrong :-). Anyway, submitted shares should be accounted under your profile as normally...

P.S. As my "thank you" for your help you should see very, very low stale ratio.

P.P.S. Of course please report issues if any. Problems with installation, runtime errors, authorization errors, rejected shares, whatever...

hey Slush, I was wondering if you were still working on the DGM system?

Im sure its a huge project, but I was just curious if it was something that was still on the table.  We haven't heard anything about if for a bit so I figured I would ask...

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
September 10, 2012, 04:45:37 PM
 #5332

hey Slush, I was wondering if you were still working on the DGM system?

Im sure its a huge project, but I was just curious if it was something that was still on the table.  We haven't heard anything about if for a bit so I figured I would ask...

Hi digital, that damned DGM :-). Actually this project fits my plan to DGM very well; I implemented DGM on old pool core, but it was buggy and I was affraid of putting that on production. DGM, in contrary to current rewarding mechanism, needs central point of truth - DGM calculation does not depends on time like score method, but on total count of submitted shares, which is quite hard to obtain *exactly* in such distributed environment.

For that reason I'm finalizing whole new concept of the pool, which solves many major issues of original, two years old design (these days I was quite happy when pool crosses 10 GHash/s) and new framework give me not only the chance to scale the pool infinitely, but also the possibility to implement any thinkable concept of calculating block rewards.

So very soon after I get this new core stable (it looks quite nice so far, but I still need more hashpower to test it properly and find a new block) I'll change the pool rewarding system. I'm planning both DGM + PPS.

Digital, I know that DGM support is never-ending story, but now I'm really close :-). You can help me out with the testing of the new core anyway ;-).

digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
September 10, 2012, 04:47:21 PM
 #5333

Sounds good, Ill definitely chip in with the testing...

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
September 10, 2012, 04:50:30 PM
 #5334

pretty easy setup on Windows 7...

Anyone else on Windows 7 will want to make sure the firewall allows the proxy access on your network type (domain, public, or private).

Edit-

For anyone who's using GUIMINER and wants to set this up, all you need to do is install the Windows version of the proxy from the links above.  
Then when you have the command window open, change your Server settings in GUIMiner from Slush's pool to "Other", then just type localhost into the host field.  
All the other settings should be good from the previous pool setting.  Then just save it and your good to go.

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
September 10, 2012, 05:07:27 PM
 #5335

pretty easy setup on Windows 7...

I forgot to explicitly mention the fact, that you can connect to one proxy as many miners as you want. So this is recommended solution  if you're running more rigs on one place. It will save you bandwidth and reduce stales a lot.

digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
September 10, 2012, 05:46:01 PM
 #5336

pretty easy setup on Windows 7...

I forgot to explicitly mention the fact, that you can connect to one proxy as many miners as you want. So this is recommended solution  if you're running more rigs on one place. It will save you bandwidth and reduce stales a lot.

So does that mean if I have four computers in my bedroom, I can have the one running the proxy connect to localhost, and the other three connect to 192.168.1.x:8332?

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
September 10, 2012, 05:57:09 PM
 #5337

At this time, proxies cannot be "chained" together (although it is teoretically possible). However you can connect all miners to that one proxy running on one of your computer/rig. By default, proxy listen on all network interfaces, so if you allow it on firewall, it will be accessible from your home network without any further configuration.

Short summary:
1. Install the proxy
2. Run it on one machine
3. Obtain IP/hostname of this machine
4. Point all your rigs to this hostname on port 8332

I was considering if proxy should listen on all interfaces or only on internal network interface of the computer, but there's no risk involved. It is just getwork interface which cannot be misused by possible attackers in your network. In contrary theres the benefit of running one proxy for all rigs in your basement without any difficult setup...

So does that mean if I have four computers in my bedroom, I can have the one running the proxy connect to localhost, and the other three connect to 192.168.1.x:8332?

dburdett84
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 43


View Profile
September 11, 2012, 12:02:07 AM
 #5338

I have both of my workers running on it now, and it seems to be a little faster then just using gui miner to connect to the pool, I just pointed them at localhost:8332 like you suggested.

The only odd thing is that GUI miner is only showing 90khash/s on one worker, and 2.1Mhash on the other worker, but I know that it is churning out faster then it was before (280Mhash/s per worker) based on the number of shares.
Tittiez
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686



View Profile
September 11, 2012, 12:17:48 AM
 #5339

I have both of my workers running on it now, and it seems to be a little faster then just using gui miner to connect to the pool, I just pointed them at localhost:8332 like you suggested.

The only odd thing is that GUI miner is only showing 90khash/s on one worker, and 2.1Mhash on the other worker, but I know that it is churning out faster then it was before (280Mhash/s per worker) based on the number of shares.

From what I understand, with GUIMiner you don't need to use the proxy, it is built into the miner. I might be wrong, slush must clarify.
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
September 11, 2012, 12:18:50 AM
 #5340

dburdett83 - That sounds quite strange. Are you sure that you don't have multiple miners working on the same machine? Proxy itself should not affect mining in this way.

Pages: « 1 ... 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 [267] 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 ... 1105 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!