Bitcoin Forum
January 21, 2018, 05:41:50 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3210 (80.4%)
Bank transfer / USD - 410 (10.3%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 371 (9.3%)
Total Voters: 3989

Pages: « 1 ... 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 [249] 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 ... 1132 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [150+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 4322216 times)
Epoch
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 888



View Profile
February 18, 2012, 10:08:22 PM
 #4961

3 consecutive invalid blocks (10724-10726); is that right?

BTC: 1DJVUnLuPA2bERTkyeir8bKn1eSoRCrYvx
NMC: NFcfHSBBnq622pAr1Xoh9KtnBPA5CUn6id
1516513310
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1516513310

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1516513310
Reply with quote  #2

1516513310
Report to moderator
1516513310
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1516513310

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1516513310
Reply with quote  #2

1516513310
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1516513310
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1516513310

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1516513310
Reply with quote  #2

1516513310
Report to moderator
1516513310
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1516513310

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1516513310
Reply with quote  #2

1516513310
Report to moderator
rjk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448


1ngldh


View Profile
February 18, 2012, 10:17:07 PM
 #4962

3 consecutive invalid blocks (10724-10726); is that right?
Probably just blockexplorer acting up again.

Mining Rig Extraordinaire - the Trenton BPX6806 18-slot PCIe backplane [PICS] Dead project is dead, all hail the coming of the mighty ASIC!
allinvain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408



View Profile
February 19, 2012, 03:38:03 PM
 #4963

Definitely blockexplorer. It's down at the moment.

Jarredm
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 63



View Profile
February 19, 2012, 06:19:16 PM
 #4964

Just thought I'd mention that it looks like pool blocks 10739 and 10738 are currently marked invalid but appear to be valid on blockchaininfo.  I'm assuming another blockexplorer problem that'll have to be corrected manually.
conspirosphere.tk
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268


Revolution will be decentralized


View Profile
February 20, 2012, 08:49:25 AM
 #4965

There is a string of 8 invalid blocks made yesterday. I hope they are going to be fixed too.

"Those who would give up essential Decentralization to purchase a little temporary Scaling deserve neither."
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372



View Profile WWW
February 20, 2012, 09:55:52 AM
 #4966

Yes, today or tomorrow I'll rewrite validation logic to check against blockexplorer.com AND blockchain.info. This blockexplorer downtime is ridiculous...

About namecoin rewards - I didn't forget to that, but was too busy in last days. I'll fix it soon, too. Sorry for delay...

eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750



View Profile
February 20, 2012, 01:37:06 PM
 #4967

Yes, today or tomorrow I'll rewrite validation logic to check against blockexplorer.com AND blockchain.info. This blockexplorer downtime is ridiculous...

About namecoin rewards - I didn't forget to that, but was too busy in last days. I'll fix it soon, too. Sorry for delay...

Slush:  Any reason you don't just poll bitcoind for validity rather than an external website?

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
shad
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 148


View Profile
February 20, 2012, 04:09:20 PM
 #4968

Yes, today or tomorrow I'll rewrite validation logic to check against blockexplorer.com AND blockchain.info. This blockexplorer downtime is ridiculous...

About namecoin rewards - I didn't forget to that, but was too busy in last days. I'll fix it soon, too. Sorry for delay...

Slush:  Any reason you don't just poll bitcoind for validity rather than an external website?
same question here

15dUzJEUkxgjrtcvDSdsEDkXu7E7RCbNN3
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372



View Profile WWW
February 20, 2012, 05:21:09 PM
 #4969

Slush:  Any reason you don't just poll bitcoind for validity rather than an external website?

This is simple check against Sibil attack. Of course block explorers can be on the same "cluster", but it's harder than isolate just one bitcoind instance. I'm pretty paranoid and system marks block as invalid when there's even chance that something on bitcoin network is broken. Until this issue, blockexplorer had very high uptime so there wasn't any need to solve it in different way. But this week outage is really strange...

CfB
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22



View Profile
February 21, 2012, 01:20:52 AM
 #4970

Hooray! Slush has succeeded in time time travel!

#   Block found   Duration   Total shares    BTC reward    NMC reward    Block #   Validity
10771    2012-02-21 01:07:54    -1 day, 23:59:58    Processing...    167730    100 confirmations left

Congratulations, slush! Better patent the process quickly!
allinvain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408



View Profile
February 21, 2012, 02:03:00 AM
 #4971

I was going to make the same post lool  Cheesy Yeah, congrats slush!

Tapeworm3
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10


View Profile
February 21, 2012, 02:04:31 AM
 #4972

Hooray! Slush has succeeded in time time travel!

#   Block found   Duration   Total shares    BTC reward    NMC reward    Block #   Validity
10771    2012-02-21 01:07:54    -1 day, 23:59:58    Processing...    167730    100 confirmations left

Congratulations, slush! Better patent the process quickly!

I thought I was the only one who noticed. I wish I could negate a few days in my life.
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750



View Profile
February 21, 2012, 02:24:15 AM
 #4973

Hey now, Time Travelling pools were (or will be depending upon your interpretation of temporal interference) banned!  Nothing can stop a 51% attack when you can just send blocks back to the days of CPU mining!

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372



View Profile WWW
February 21, 2012, 11:45:47 AM
 #4974

lol :-). It was just small glitch in timestamp in extremely short round. Well, those two hashes has been found almost instantly (33 shares are, with current share submission rate, almost nothing). Unfortunately this block is really invalid, because backend hadn't synchronized blockchain.

BinoX
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140



View Profile
February 21, 2012, 07:36:38 PM
 #4975

Are there really 8 invalid blocks or is there some kind of problem again?
portron
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 106


View Profile
February 21, 2012, 07:57:26 PM
 #4976

Are there really 8 invalid blocks or is there some kind of problem again?

http://blockexplorer.com/
Error
Database connection timeout (likely due to overload). Try again later.
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
February 21, 2012, 08:17:14 PM
 #4977

yeah, slush has been having to validate blocks manually due to the blockexplorer issues.

But he did say that he was going to add blockchain.info to the validation process so the pool can use either one to validate the blocks.  Im guessing he's working on it right now...

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372



View Profile WWW
February 21, 2012, 09:25:52 PM
 #4978

But he did say that he was going to add blockchain.info to the validation process so the pool can use either one to validate the blocks.  Im guessing he's working on it right now...

yep, BE.com is completely messed. Unfortunately piuk (blockchain.info developer) didn't respond to one my question, so blockchain.info integration isn't done yet...

iamapi
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 57


View Profile
February 22, 2012, 01:26:58 AM
 #4979

wow, 167730 NMC!
Hooray! Slush has succeeded in time time travel!

#   Block found   Duration   Total shares    BTC reward    NMC reward    Block #   Validity
10771    2012-02-21 01:07:54    -1 day, 23:59:58    Processing...    167730    100 confirmations left

Congratulations, slush! Better patent the process quickly!

CfB
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22



View Profile
February 22, 2012, 01:48:10 AM
 #4980

Nah, that was the block number, just wasn't able to format the cut & paste properly.
Pages: « 1 ... 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 [249] 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 ... 1132 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!