Bitcoin Forum
September 26, 2016, 12:16:45 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.0 (New!) [Torrent]. Make sure you verify it.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3151 (80.4%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.2%)
Total Voters: 3915

Pages: « 1 ... 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 [249] 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 ... 1104 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3853750 times)
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
February 16, 2012, 06:54:39 PM
 #4961

Interesting how the hash rate varies some days in the 100s gigahashes. Will GPUMAX involvement hurt the average (and incredibly loyal) miner in any way?

Yeah, im curious as to how much hashing power they are actually going to be adding to the network.  From what I understand a lot of their power will be provided by existing miners who sign up and decide to route their rigs through them.

Im sure they will have to have their own farm, but how big it ends up being is anyone's guess at this point...

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1474892205
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474892205

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474892205
Reply with quote  #2

1474892205
Report to moderator
1474892205
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474892205

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474892205
Reply with quote  #2

1474892205
Report to moderator
1474892205
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474892205

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474892205
Reply with quote  #2

1474892205
Report to moderator
pirateat40
Avast Ye!
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378


"Yes I am a pirate, 200 years too late."


View Profile WWW
February 16, 2012, 07:07:09 PM
 #4962

Interesting how the hash rate varies some days in the 100s gigahashes. Will GPUMAX involvement hurt the average (and incredibly loyal) miner in any way?

Yeah, im curious as to how much hashing power they are actually going to be adding to the network.  From what I understand a lot of their power will be provided by existing miners who sign up and decide to route their rigs through them.

Im sure they will have to have their own farm, but how big it ends up being is anyone's guess at this point...

GPUMAX has it's own hashing power for load balancing purchases but its nothing like the hashing power we manage through the site.  We don't disclose how much power we manage but I can tell you that we rate limit the speed on some pools that seem to struggle with bursts of power.  We realize that it's hard on any pool to instantly take on an additional 100-300GH in bursts and we're working on balancing the speeds so they slowly climb over a period of time.  Slush is a popular pool for our customers and we look forward to making it as easy as possible for Slush to manage it.

LordICE
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 27


View Profile
February 16, 2012, 10:10:33 PM
 #4963

Block explorer is still down, I'll mark block as valid manually...

Any guesses as to how many of the 8 invalid blocks over the last day and a half are actually valid?
It appears that block 166722 was found by Eligius, while the other invalid ones by Slush... I think we're okay.
cuz0882
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336



View Profile
February 16, 2012, 10:40:46 PM
 #4964

Is namecoin not working on our pool? Last 8 blocks has 0 reward..
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
February 16, 2012, 10:46:41 PM
 #4965

Blockexplorer is still down, so I marked invalid blocks as valid manually. As a bonus I paid out also unconfirmed blocks (so you can see "0 BTC" in unconfirmed balance right now). As a side effect, last few namecoin rewards are zero. Nothing wrong happen, I'll fix it tomorrow, but I'm too tired right now so I'm affraid of some stupid mistake...

iamapi
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 57


View Profile
February 17, 2012, 01:41:02 AM
 #4966

Just switched to this pool and found one block  Grin

Login   Password   Found blocks   Current shares   Score   Last share at   LP   Actions
XXXX.slush1   XXXX    1   18   4752.7459   2012-02-17 01:38:54    on   Edit |

blandead
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 46


View Profile
February 17, 2012, 05:49:58 AM
 #4967

I Found my first block too on slush during a 5 hour marathon, or right after. How do I check in block explorer my hash that found the block? Or how do I recognize it's from me?
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
February 17, 2012, 12:20:01 PM
 #4968

I Found my first block too on slush during a 5 hour marathon, or right after. How do I check in block explorer my hash that found the block? Or how do I recognize it's from me?

If you don't log submitted shares, there's no way to check in blockexplorer which block you mined. If you're loggin submitted shares, then sha256(sha256(submitted_data)) == block hash on blockexplorer.

kkurtmann
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 475



View Profile WWW
February 18, 2012, 07:35:54 PM
 #4969

so... no namecoin rewards for blocks 10688-10694?

https://www.buytrezor.com?a=55c37b866c11   well sir, I like it!
Epoch
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 916



View Profile
February 18, 2012, 10:08:22 PM
 #4970

3 consecutive invalid blocks (10724-10726); is that right?

BTC: 1DJVUnLuPA2bERTkyeir8bKn1eSoRCrYvx
NMC: NFcfHSBBnq622pAr1Xoh9KtnBPA5CUn6id
rjk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420


1ngldh


View Profile
February 18, 2012, 10:17:07 PM
 #4971

3 consecutive invalid blocks (10724-10726); is that right?
Probably just blockexplorer acting up again.

Mining Rig Extraordinaire - the Trenton BPX6806 18-slot PCIe backplane [PICS] Dead project is dead, all hail the coming of the mighty ASIC!
allinvain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918



View Profile
February 19, 2012, 03:38:03 PM
 #4972

Definitely blockexplorer. It's down at the moment.

Jarredm
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 63



View Profile
February 19, 2012, 06:19:16 PM
 #4973

Just thought I'd mention that it looks like pool blocks 10739 and 10738 are currently marked invalid but appear to be valid on blockchaininfo.  I'm assuming another blockexplorer problem that'll have to be corrected manually.
conspirosphere.tk
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792


Revolution will be decentralized


View Profile WWW
February 20, 2012, 08:49:25 AM
 #4974

There is a string of 8 invalid blocks made yesterday. I hope they are going to be fixed too.

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
February 20, 2012, 09:55:52 AM
 #4975

Yes, today or tomorrow I'll rewrite validation logic to check against blockexplorer.com AND blockchain.info. This blockexplorer downtime is ridiculous...

About namecoin rewards - I didn't forget to that, but was too busy in last days. I'll fix it soon, too. Sorry for delay...

eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
February 20, 2012, 01:37:06 PM
 #4976

Yes, today or tomorrow I'll rewrite validation logic to check against blockexplorer.com AND blockchain.info. This blockexplorer downtime is ridiculous...

About namecoin rewards - I didn't forget to that, but was too busy in last days. I'll fix it soon, too. Sorry for delay...

Slush:  Any reason you don't just poll bitcoind for validity rather than an external website?

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
shad
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 148


View Profile
February 20, 2012, 04:09:20 PM
 #4977

Yes, today or tomorrow I'll rewrite validation logic to check against blockexplorer.com AND blockchain.info. This blockexplorer downtime is ridiculous...

About namecoin rewards - I didn't forget to that, but was too busy in last days. I'll fix it soon, too. Sorry for delay...

Slush:  Any reason you don't just poll bitcoind for validity rather than an external website?
same question here

15dUzJEUkxgjrtcvDSdsEDkXu7E7RCbNN3
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
February 20, 2012, 05:21:09 PM
 #4978

Slush:  Any reason you don't just poll bitcoind for validity rather than an external website?

This is simple check against Sibil attack. Of course block explorers can be on the same "cluster", but it's harder than isolate just one bitcoind instance. I'm pretty paranoid and system marks block as invalid when there's even chance that something on bitcoin network is broken. Until this issue, blockexplorer had very high uptime so there wasn't any need to solve it in different way. But this week outage is really strange...

CfB
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22



View Profile
February 21, 2012, 01:20:52 AM
 #4979

Hooray! Slush has succeeded in time time travel!

#   Block found   Duration   Total shares    BTC reward    NMC reward    Block #   Validity
10771    2012-02-21 01:07:54    -1 day, 23:59:58    Processing...    167730    100 confirmations left

Congratulations, slush! Better patent the process quickly!
allinvain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918



View Profile
February 21, 2012, 02:03:00 AM
 #4980

I was going to make the same post lool  Cheesy Yeah, congrats slush!

Pages: « 1 ... 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 [249] 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 ... 1104 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!