Bitcoin Forum
June 07, 2020, 09:32:36 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 [230] 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 ... 1151 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool  (Read 4372875 times)
fourd00rgtz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 151
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 16, 2011, 05:48:38 AM
 #4581

If anything becomes of the "mine for gold" could we also impliment "mine for silver"?

1591522356
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1591522356

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1591522356
Reply with quote  #2

1591522356
Report to moderator
AWARD-WINNING
CRYPTO CASINO
ASKGAMBLERS
PLAYERS CHOICE 2019
PROUD
PARTNER OF
1500+
GAMES
2 MIN
CASH-OUTS
24/7
SUPPORT
100s OF
FREE SPINS
PLAY NOW
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1591522356
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1591522356

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1591522356
Reply with quote  #2

1591522356
Report to moderator
1591522356
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1591522356

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1591522356
Reply with quote  #2

1591522356
Report to moderator
1591522356
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1591522356

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1591522356
Reply with quote  #2

1591522356
Report to moderator
naypalm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1271
Merit: 1010


afk


View Profile WWW
November 16, 2011, 06:02:44 AM
 #4582

If anything becomes of the "mine for gold" could we also impliment "mine for silver"?



Silver would be a very cool idea if this gets implemented  Smiley

BTCcommodities
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
November 16, 2011, 07:56:47 AM
 #4583

If anything becomes of the "mine for gold" could we also impliment "mine for silver"?



Silver would be a very cool idea if this gets implemented  Smiley

Hi,

I am currently thinking this through very thoroughly.
There's half a gazillion things to consider - most and bevore all: Is there enough interest to make this viable?

I would propose that those who are interested in saving up to gold or silver contact me via PM - the whole process would have to be initiated manually. This is how I envision it for the time being:

you contact me with the following info:
  • name / adress / email
  • what you want to save up to 
  • your savings interval

I will provide you with a payment adress you can send the BTC to. These are stored with my payment provider.

The savings interval is of importance only if you're saving for, say, Gold - and you don't want to by gramm by gramm, but only every 10 or 20 grams. Else, I will check every working day if one of the desired objects is in range and "buy" it for you. I advise harmonies, since they're most easy to buy and liquidate and sport the lowest premium, but feel free to chose whatever you want.
The prices on my website are updated every minute. I am not yet able to set an alarm for buying, so for now, we will have to to with me checking the price against your balance once a day (I will probably check more often than that, just for the fun of it).

I will then transfer BTC according to the price of the item(s) from "your" wallet adress to mine, so you can watch the process on blockexplorer. I will set aside the item(s) physically and store them seperately from the rest of my inventory.

Should you decide to cash out, contact me and I will provide you with shipping and insurance information (it might be that you may have to buy insurance and additional shipping, depending on the value of the objects and your location).

Tax and customs are, as always, entirely your concern :-D


So that's me bouncing this right into the community. Anyone interested?

BitcoinMint.US
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 284
Merit: 251



View Profile
November 16, 2011, 08:37:03 PM
 #4584

If anything becomes of the "mine for gold" could we also impliment "mine for silver"?

Silver would be a very cool idea if this gets implemented  Smiley

I agree.
BTCcommodities
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
November 18, 2011, 06:21:28 PM
 #4585

If anything becomes of the "mine for gold" could we also impliment "mine for silver"?

Silver would be a very cool idea if this gets implemented  Smiley

I agree.


I started a thread outlining it, but so far: no response.


digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 21, 2011, 03:44:39 PM
 #4586

Hey slush, looking at my acct, it looks like I should have received a nmc payout around 17:00 UTC on 11/20, and I never received a notification in regards to that payment.

My nmc addy is still correct, and I received notifications about btc payments before and after that time period.  I can't confirm whether or not I actually received the payment as I'm at work right now.  When I go to lunch I can check my nmc wallet to see if I received the payment, but at the least it looks like there is something fishy with the notifications...?

Thanks!

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 21, 2011, 04:01:34 PM
 #4587

Would just like to add that it does look like the payment has been made.  I'm pretty sure I found it in the block explorer.  Just no notification...

*edit*

And I just noticed that the signature bar doesn't seem to be working either.  I'm guessing your on top of these issues already, but just in case your not I figured I would let you know...

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
naypalm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1271
Merit: 1010


afk


View Profile WWW
November 21, 2011, 05:11:39 PM
 #4588


And I just noticed that the signature bar doesn't seem to be working either.  I'm guessing your on top of these issues already, but just in case your not I figured I would let you know...

Mine works Smiley

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1024



View Profile WWW
November 21, 2011, 05:11:59 PM
 #4589

Would just like to add that it does look like the payment has been made.  I'm pretty sure I found it in the block explorer.  Just no notification...

I bet it's some problem with mailing system, configuring it is my nightmare. I'll check...

Quote
And I just noticed that the signature bar doesn't seem to be working either.  I'm guessing your on top of these issues already, but just in case your not I figured I would let you know...

Looks like it's problem of btcstats.net. You can see that hashrate in API is correct...

twmz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 737
Merit: 500



View Profile
November 21, 2011, 07:47:18 PM
 #4590

Looks like it's problem of btcstats.net. You can see that hashrate in API is correct...

The btcstats.net web server is not able to retrieve stats (it's timing out).

A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond 176.31.157.133:80

The exact same sig generating code works fine when run from my machine (i.e. my desk machine has no problem retrieving stats).  Could it be that the real btcstats.net webserver (66.209.128.147) it is blocked by your DDoS protection system or something? 

Was I helpful?  1TwmzX1wBxNF2qtAJRhdKmi2WyLZ5VHRs
WoT, GPG

Bitrated user: ewal.
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1024



View Profile WWW
November 23, 2011, 11:30:30 PM
 #4591

I just recovered pool from some strange state where it was rejecting shares for some miners in last few hours. It should be fine now.

AniceInovation
Donator
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 394
Merit: 253


Interesting.


View Profile
November 25, 2011, 05:11:50 PM
 #4592

Boy, luck isn't for this sides in the last hours Cheesy

Ghostofkobra
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 164
Merit: 100



View Profile
November 28, 2011, 11:11:04 PM
 #4593

Hi,
I am getting this error message when running cgminer against the slush pool.

XXX longpoll failed for http://api2.bitcoin.cz:8332:8404, sleeping for 30s

Is the pool using port 8404 for longpolls instead of a /LP/ like path.
In that case cgminer needs to be altered a little bit.
if not, well then where can the 8404 come from?


Best
//GoK

disclaimer201
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1001


View Profile
November 29, 2011, 12:59:18 AM
 #4594

Are you using the latest version of CgMiner?
kkurtmann
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 475
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
November 29, 2011, 01:17:29 AM
 #4595

 LP connected to api.bitcoin.cz:8407

https://www.buytrezor.com?a=55c37b866c11   well sir, I like it!
Ghostofkobra
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 164
Merit: 100



View Profile
November 29, 2011, 08:40:28 AM
 #4596

Are you using the latest version of CgMiner?

Yes, i am using 2.0.8

LP connected to api.bitcoin.cz:8407

Hmm, it makes sense if cgminer cant handle port based LP's but why am i getting 8404 if the longpolls are done on 8407?


Best
//GoK

majamalu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
November 29, 2011, 04:01:24 PM
 #4597

I just recovered pool from some strange state where it was rejecting shares for some miners in last few hours. It should be fine now.

Hi, my average hashrate is usually around 2200 Mhash/s, but the screen says 596 Mhash/s. Could it have something to do with that problem?

http://elbitcoin.org - Bitcoin en español
http://mercadobitcoin.com - MercadoBitcoin
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1024



View Profile WWW
November 29, 2011, 04:58:37 PM
 #4598

XXX longpoll failed for http://api2.bitcoin.cz:8332:8404, sleeping for 30s

Is the pool using port 8404 for longpolls instead of a /LP/ like path.

Looks like cgminer messed the parsing of URL, for some unknown reason. Port 8332 is "getwork" api, ports 8401-8410 are for LP broadcasts. That HTTP header for LP in getwork response is providing full URL for 8404 port. Can you report that to cgminer author?

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1024



View Profile WWW
November 29, 2011, 05:01:01 PM
 #4599

Hi, my average hashrate is usually around 2200 Mhash/s, but the screen says 596 Mhash/s. Could it have something to do with that problem?

Average hashrate is calculated from submitted shares in last 10 rounds. It can be explained by some connection issues or if your miner was offline for some time. Did you have some connection issues today?

Ghostofkobra
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 164
Merit: 100



View Profile
November 29, 2011, 09:34:12 PM
 #4600

XXX longpoll failed for http://api2.bitcoin.cz:8332:8404, sleeping for 30s

Is the pool using port 8404 for longpolls instead of a /LP/ like path.

Looks like cgminer messed the parsing of URL, for some unknown reason. Port 8332 is "getwork" api, ports 8401-8410 are for LP broadcasts. That HTTP header for LP in getwork response is providing full URL for 8404 port. Can you report that to cgminer author?

Done Smiley thanx

//GoK

Hi,
I am using cgminer 2.0.8 and asked this question in the slush pool thread:

XXX longpoll failed for http://api2.bitcoin.cz:8332:8404, sleeping for 30s

Is the pool using port 8404 for longpolls instead of a /LP/ like path.
In that case cgminer needs to be altered a little bit.
if not, well then where can the 8404 come from?

And i got the answers that it does but it seems like the path parsing on cgminer is not working correctly?


XXX longpoll failed for http://api2.bitcoin.cz:8332:8404, sleeping for 30s

Is the pool using port 8404 for longpolls instead of a /LP/ like path.

Looks like cgminer messed the parsing of URL, for some unknown reason. Port 8332 is "getwork" api, ports 8401-8410 are for LP broadcasts. That HTTP header for LP in getwork response is providing full URL for 8404 port. Can you report that to cgminer author?

Best
//GoK


Pages: « 1 ... 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 [230] 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 ... 1151 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!