Bitcoin Forum
October 17, 2017, 11:03:50 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.0.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3187 (80.5%)
Bank transfer / USD - 408 (10.3%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 366 (9.2%)
Total Voters: 3959

Pages: « 1 ... 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 [234] 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 ... 1120 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [150+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 4265092 times)
DeepBit
Donator
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 532


We have cookies


View Profile WWW
December 17, 2011, 04:26:55 AM
 #4661

It it just me or has the pool luck been really bad lately? 66% in the last day...
Yep, recent luck is pretty strange. Pool probably celebrated too much and now have a hangover...
The entire network is affected, we are passing through an interstellar Cloud of Unluck.
Yesterday and today we had a spans of about 40~60 minutes without any block.

Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net ~ 3600 GH/s, Both payment schemes, instant payout, no invalid blocks !
Coming soon: ICBIT Trading platform
1508281430
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508281430

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508281430
Reply with quote  #2

1508281430
Report to moderator
1508281430
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508281430

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508281430
Reply with quote  #2

1508281430
Report to moderator
1508281430
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508281430

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508281430
Reply with quote  #2

1508281430
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
allinvain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2310



View Profile
December 17, 2011, 08:10:47 AM
 #4662

do not upgrade catalyst drivers from 11.11 to 11.12
 i upgraded and lost about 80 Mh/s
im back on the 11.11's and happy

That may be the case, but I prefer to have no cpu usage so I'm sticking with 11.12. - at least on windows based miners.

kkurtmann
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 475



View Profile WWW
December 17, 2011, 08:45:15 AM
 #4663

i should have been more precise... i went from 330 Mhash/s to 250 Mhash/s with the 11.12 on this machine alone, other machines had the same percentage drop in hashrate. I went back to 11.11 drivers that fixed the cpu usage issue from previous driver versions.

https://www.buytrezor.com?a=55c37b866c11   well sir, I like it!
martychubbs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476



View Profile
December 17, 2011, 11:54:08 PM
 #4664

AFAIK,11.11 did not fix the cpu usage bug...that was fixed in 11.12 (SDK 2.6)  ala the performance drop.  Slush is awesome...
sadpandatech
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504



View Profile
December 18, 2011, 01:26:56 AM
 #4665

AFAIK,11.11 did not fix the cpu usage bug...that was fixed in 11.12 (SDK 2.6)  ala the performance drop.  Slush is awesome...

  I was under the impression that 11.11 fixed the cpu issues for those running one single GPU card. Maybe I misread though. While the CPU issue is annoying, you lose more income with 0-4% cpu usage and -80MHs verses 100% of one core on a semi efficient CPU imho.

If you're not excited by the idea of being an early adopter 'now', then you should come back in three or four years and either tell us "Told you it'd never work!" or join what should, by then, be a much more stable and easier-to-use system. - GA
It is being worked on by smart people. -DamienBlack
trilby
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 45


View Profile
December 18, 2011, 10:28:12 AM
 #4666

Well pool luck seems alot better today

Have I helped you send me a donation - 1LaZmd9ZzpmjA4gkXxiQPsmfQ8zSc5mTZo
BinoX
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140



View Profile
December 18, 2011, 11:34:34 AM
 #4667

I noticed that. I seem to have made as many bitcoins today as I have over the last 4 or 5 days...
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372



View Profile WWW
December 18, 2011, 03:21:43 PM
 #4668

Agree, luck over 200% is pretty nice satisfaction for few last days.

cosurgi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 298


View Profile
December 19, 2011, 09:00:08 PM
 #4669

happy birthday! Smiley

Litt
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350


View Profile
December 20, 2011, 12:59:29 AM
 #4670

Really glad to see Slush's pool still going strong after a year when many have come and gone. Being the first pool I ever and first I mined at, it's makes me feel good celebrating it's first's B-day. Smiley

It also goes to show what great job Slush have been doing throughout the year. I wish the best and many more B-day's to celebrate in the future.

Happy belated B-day!
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2310


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
December 20, 2011, 10:04:30 AM
 #4671

Is this pool still using a port for its longpoll instead of a /lp or similar type URL? I need to know if I have to special code support for this unique approach to longpoll that no other pool uses.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372



View Profile WWW
December 20, 2011, 10:43:19 AM
 #4672

ckolivas: Yes, it's still using another port, because long polling daemon is separate application. There's nothing 'dirty' on such approach; if your miner have correct support for long polling standard and follows redirects of URL correctly, it will work.

shad
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 148


View Profile
December 20, 2011, 04:56:22 PM
 #4673

hi

first! i like your pool, started mining here in summer, but with my gpu and my electric costs it wasn't so nice, but i am back with a x6500 Wink

i have 2 questions
1) any chance to get the graphs from summer back? why are they deleted? or is there a max time?
2) any chance to get an email if my hashrate drops under a limit? maybe per worker? would love that Smiley

15dUzJEUkxgjrtcvDSdsEDkXu7E7RCbNN3
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2310


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
December 21, 2011, 11:30:34 AM
 #4674

ckolivas: Yes, it's still using another port, because long polling daemon is separate application. There's nothing 'dirty' on such approach; if your miner have correct support for long polling standard and follows redirects of URL correctly, it will work.
Thanks. I didn't say "dirty" I just said unique, and there really is no "standard" for anything really, just precedence, and deepbit was first. Their precedence was just a url, not a different port. Anyway I'll think about it since this is really just providing better support for slush and has no influence on any other pool.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372



View Profile WWW
December 21, 2011, 01:36:29 PM
 #4675

Thanks. I didn't say "dirty" I just said unique, and there really is no "standard" for anything really, just precedence, and deepbit was first. Their precedence was just a url, not a different port. Anyway I'll think about it since this is really just providing better support for slush and has no influence on any other pool.

"Just a URL" - it's exactly the reason why I said I'm following deepbit's specification, as I'm using standard URL in LP response. And yes, port is the part of URL, too.

Sorry to hear that it's problem in C++, but it's currently almost impossible to change implementation to run on the same port. I hope you'll resolve the issue on your side and it will run without any problem.

kkurtmann
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 475



View Profile WWW
December 22, 2011, 08:03:41 AM
 #4676

anyone ever give bitcoins as x-mas gifts b4?

https://www.buytrezor.com?a=55c37b866c11   well sir, I like it!
dishwara
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526



View Profile
December 22, 2011, 12:04:27 PM
 #4677

anyone ever give bitcoins as x-mas gifts b4?


No
So far only 2 x-mas came after bitcoin created.
& last time bitcoin is less than 1 USD when x-mas came.

Let see anyone gives this year.

BitSend ◢◤Clients | Source
www.bitsend.info
█▄
█████▄
████████▄
███████████▄
██████████████
███████████▀
████████▀
█████▀
█▀












Your Digital Network | 10MB Blocks
Algo: XEVAN | DK3 | Masternodes
Bitcore - BTX/BTC -Project












BSD -USDT | Bittrex | C.Gather | S.Exchange
Cryptopia | NovaExchange | Livecoin
CoinPayments | Faucet | Bitsend Airdrop













████
 ████
  ████
   ████
    ████
     ████
      ████
       ████
        ████
       ████
      ████
     ████
    ████
   ████
  ████
 ████
████

████
 ████
  ████
   ████
    ████
     ████
      ████
       ████
        ████
       ████
      ████
     ████
    ████
   ████
  ████
 ████
████
SistaS0uljah
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 45



View Profile
December 22, 2011, 05:21:46 PM
 #4678

anyone ever give bitcoins as x-mas gifts b4?


No
So far only 2 x-mas came after bitcoin created.
& last time bitcoin is less than 1 USD when x-mas came.

Let see anyone gives this year.
I'm thinking about giving my son some bitcoins this year as a gift.  He's expressed some interest in the concept, but hasn't pursued it with any enthusiasm yet (he's in college, and overwhelmed with schoolwork right now).  All I need to do is have him install the client on his Mac and then provide me with an address and then I can send him a shiny new Bitcoin, freshly mined.  He doesn't see the use for them right now, but we'll have a discussion about it when he comes home for the holidays.
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2310


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
December 23, 2011, 09:06:09 PM
 #4679

Thanks. I didn't say "dirty" I just said unique, and there really is no "standard" for anything really, just precedence, and deepbit was first. Their precedence was just a url, not a different port. Anyway I'll think about it since this is really just providing better support for slush and has no influence on any other pool.

"Just a URL" - it's exactly the reason why I said I'm following deepbit's specification, as I'm using standard URL in LP response. And yes, port is the part of URL, too.

Sorry to hear that it's problem in C++, but it's currently almost impossible to change implementation to run on the same port. I hope you'll resolve the issue on your side and it will run without any problem.
I just tested connecting to your pool:
 
[2011-12-24 08:00:33] Pool 0 http://api.bitcoin.cz:8332 active                    
[2011-12-24 08:00:33] Long-polling activated for http://api.bitcoin.cz:8401                    

Then I waited for a longpoll which worked.
Seems to work fine as far as I can tell.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372



View Profile WWW
December 23, 2011, 09:11:25 PM
 #4680

I just tested connecting to your pool:
 
[2011-12-24 08:00:33] Pool 0 http://api.bitcoin.cz:8332 active                   
[2011-12-24 08:00:33] Long-polling activated for http://api.bitcoin.cz:8401                   

Then I waited for a longpoll which worked.
Seems to work fine as far as I can tell.

Yes, that looks fine. Great that it works!

Pages: « 1 ... 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 [234] 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 ... 1120 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!