Bitcoin Forum
June 07, 2020, 09:34:55 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 [234] 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 ... 1151 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool  (Read 4372875 times)
shad
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 148
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 20, 2011, 04:56:22 PM
 #4661

hi

first! i like your pool, started mining here in summer, but with my gpu and my electric costs it wasn't so nice, but i am back with a x6500 Wink

i have 2 questions
1) any chance to get the graphs from summer back? why are they deleted? or is there a max time?
2) any chance to get an email if my hashrate drops under a limit? maybe per worker? would love that Smiley

15dUzJEUkxgjrtcvDSdsEDkXu7E7RCbNN3
1591522495
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1591522495

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1591522495
Reply with quote  #2

1591522495
Report to moderator
1591522495
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1591522495

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1591522495
Reply with quote  #2

1591522495
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
-ck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3164
Merit: 1333


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
December 21, 2011, 11:30:34 AM
 #4662

ckolivas: Yes, it's still using another port, because long polling daemon is separate application. There's nothing 'dirty' on such approach; if your miner have correct support for long polling standard and follows redirects of URL correctly, it will work.
Thanks. I didn't say "dirty" I just said unique, and there really is no "standard" for anything really, just precedence, and deepbit was first. Their precedence was just a url, not a different port. Anyway I'll think about it since this is really just providing better support for slush and has no influence on any other pool.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1024



View Profile WWW
December 21, 2011, 01:36:29 PM
 #4663

Thanks. I didn't say "dirty" I just said unique, and there really is no "standard" for anything really, just precedence, and deepbit was first. Their precedence was just a url, not a different port. Anyway I'll think about it since this is really just providing better support for slush and has no influence on any other pool.

"Just a URL" - it's exactly the reason why I said I'm following deepbit's specification, as I'm using standard URL in LP response. And yes, port is the part of URL, too.

Sorry to hear that it's problem in C++, but it's currently almost impossible to change implementation to run on the same port. I hope you'll resolve the issue on your side and it will run without any problem.

kkurtmann
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 475
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
December 22, 2011, 08:03:41 AM
 #4664

anyone ever give bitcoins as x-mas gifts b4?

https://www.buytrezor.com?a=55c37b866c11   well sir, I like it!
dishwara
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1859
Merit: 1016



View Profile
December 22, 2011, 12:04:27 PM
 #4665

anyone ever give bitcoins as x-mas gifts b4?


No
So far only 2 x-mas came after bitcoin created.
& last time bitcoin is less than 1 USD when x-mas came.

Let see anyone gives this year.

ACCOUNT WAS HACKED FROM 2016-2019. NOW RECLAIMED BY ORIGINAL USER D.ISHWARA
SORRY IF ANYONE GOT CHEATED BY THE IMPOSTOR
ALL POSTS AFTER MARCH 2016 BECOMES OBSOLETE & WILL BE DELETED AFTER I READ IT.
SistaS0uljah
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 43
Merit: 0



View Profile
December 22, 2011, 05:21:46 PM
 #4666

anyone ever give bitcoins as x-mas gifts b4?


No
So far only 2 x-mas came after bitcoin created.
& last time bitcoin is less than 1 USD when x-mas came.

Let see anyone gives this year.
I'm thinking about giving my son some bitcoins this year as a gift.  He's expressed some interest in the concept, but hasn't pursued it with any enthusiasm yet (he's in college, and overwhelmed with schoolwork right now).  All I need to do is have him install the client on his Mac and then provide me with an address and then I can send him a shiny new Bitcoin, freshly mined.  He doesn't see the use for them right now, but we'll have a discussion about it when he comes home for the holidays.
-ck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3164
Merit: 1333


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
December 23, 2011, 09:06:09 PM
 #4667

Thanks. I didn't say "dirty" I just said unique, and there really is no "standard" for anything really, just precedence, and deepbit was first. Their precedence was just a url, not a different port. Anyway I'll think about it since this is really just providing better support for slush and has no influence on any other pool.

"Just a URL" - it's exactly the reason why I said I'm following deepbit's specification, as I'm using standard URL in LP response. And yes, port is the part of URL, too.

Sorry to hear that it's problem in C++, but it's currently almost impossible to change implementation to run on the same port. I hope you'll resolve the issue on your side and it will run without any problem.
I just tested connecting to your pool:
 
[2011-12-24 08:00:33] Pool 0 http://api.bitcoin.cz:8332 active                    
[2011-12-24 08:00:33] Long-polling activated for http://api.bitcoin.cz:8401                    

Then I waited for a longpoll which worked.
Seems to work fine as far as I can tell.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1024



View Profile WWW
December 23, 2011, 09:11:25 PM
 #4668

I just tested connecting to your pool:
 
[2011-12-24 08:00:33] Pool 0 http://api.bitcoin.cz:8332 active                   
[2011-12-24 08:00:33] Long-polling activated for http://api.bitcoin.cz:8401                   

Then I waited for a longpoll which worked.
Seems to work fine as far as I can tell.

Yes, that looks fine. Great that it works!

-ck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3164
Merit: 1333


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
December 24, 2011, 04:43:44 AM
 #4669

I just tested connecting to your pool:
 
[2011-12-24 08:00:33] Pool 0 http://api.bitcoin.cz:8332 active                   
[2011-12-24 08:00:33] Long-polling activated for http://api.bitcoin.cz:8401                   

Then I waited for a longpoll which worked.
Seems to work fine as far as I can tell.

Yes, that looks fine. Great that it works!
Indeed, but it doesn't explain the bug report occurring in the first place, unless they entered the pool details wrongly into cgminer.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1024



View Profile WWW
December 24, 2011, 01:17:35 PM
 #4670

Indeed, but it doesn't explain the bug report occurring in the first place, unless they entered the pool details wrongly into cgminer.

What is the original bug report? Maybe I can help to track it...

-ck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3164
Merit: 1333


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
December 26, 2011, 12:26:46 AM
 #4671

Indeed, but it doesn't explain the bug report occurring in the first place, unless they entered the pool details wrongly into cgminer.

What is the original bug report? Maybe I can help to track it...
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1976.msg634585#msg634585

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
BinoX
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 28, 2011, 03:47:47 PM
 #4672

Just noticed on the stats page that the last 3 blocks have been "Processing..." for quite a long time, is there some kind of issue, or should I just be more patient?
Idzy
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 95
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 28, 2011, 05:18:30 PM
 #4673

Yeah and my average mhs is wrong too, I'm pushsing close to 300mhs with my 2 miners and the site is showing 156mhs.

Successful Transactions with: 21after2
Littleshop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
December 28, 2011, 06:05:05 PM
 #4674

Just noticed on the stats page that the last 3 blocks have been "Processing..." for quite a long time, is there some kind of issue, or should I just be more patient?

Also my confirmed balance stopped rising even though a few blocks have been confirmed. 

jonathan
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 81
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 28, 2011, 06:12:52 PM
Last edit: December 28, 2011, 10:10:00 PM by jonathan
 #4675

seems there is a problem here too. I've been stuck on a confirmed reward of 0.96934018 BTC since this morning--it's now 6PM here. I'm watching confirmations roll past 120, one after the other. My GPU is whirring away, and my stats page at bitcoin.cz is showing my shares, but there's no change to the reward. I gotta go now, unfortunately :-O

Update: All good now. Thanks Slush :-)
Littleshop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
December 28, 2011, 06:19:37 PM
 #4676

And now it appears fixed! My confirmed has rose and a payment processed.   Thanks Slush!

bz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 28, 2011, 10:50:58 PM
 #4677

From BTC stats:

9665    2011-12-28 15:04:18    1:02:26    1025518    0.16221904    0.76167915    159551    53 confirmations left
9664    2011-12-28 14:01:48    2:32:25    2379799    0.17081438    none    159547    49 confirmations left
9663    2011-12-28 11:29:19    0:03:35    60187    0.13084748    0.19946604    159534    36 confirmations left

Given NMC stats:

6923    2011-12-28 14:01:48    0:01:53    35286    41 confirmations left
6922    2011-12-28 13:59:53    0:00:50    35285    40 confirmations left
6921    2011-12-28 13:59:01    0:12:07    35284    39 confirmations left
6920    2011-12-28 13:46:52    0:19:17    35283    38 confirmations left
6919    2011-12-28 13:27:33    1:58:09    35280    35 confirmations left
6918    2011-12-28 11:29:19    0:03:34    35265    20 confirmations left

Should namecoins for BTC 9664 be none?
BinoX
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 28, 2011, 10:55:51 PM
 #4678

Mine is also none for namecoins on the same block, so it's possible that it's how it's supposed to be...

0.1+ bitcoins a round? What kinda hashrate you got?
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1024



View Profile WWW
December 28, 2011, 11:38:36 PM
 #4679

I'm sorry for today issue with block rewards, everything is fixed now.

bz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 29, 2011, 02:08:09 AM
 #4680

I'm sorry for today issue with block rewards, everything is fixed now.

Looks good now, thanks!
Pages: « 1 ... 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 [234] 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 ... 1151 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!