Bitcoin Forum
April 19, 2024, 10:38:23 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 [217] 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 ... 1154 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool  (Read 4381849 times)
bulanula
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile
November 02, 2011, 03:16:00 PM
 #4321

I think pool is down again Sad
1713566303
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713566303

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713566303
Reply with quote  #2

1713566303
Report to moderator
1713566303
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713566303

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713566303
Reply with quote  #2

1713566303
Report to moderator
1713566303
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713566303

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713566303
Reply with quote  #2

1713566303
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713566303
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713566303

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713566303
Reply with quote  #2

1713566303
Report to moderator
1713566303
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713566303

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713566303
Reply with quote  #2

1713566303
Report to moderator
1713566303
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713566303

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713566303
Reply with quote  #2

1713566303
Report to moderator
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
November 02, 2011, 03:19:16 PM
 #4322

Hm, it looks like serious issue with linux kernel and vmware. Pool is down, I need to find a solution. I'll probably try older kernels, which are reported as working.

slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
November 02, 2011, 03:57:38 PM
 #4323

Ok, now is on all backends kernel compiled directly for virtualization. Give it a try!

sd
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 730
Merit: 500



View Profile
November 02, 2011, 04:43:05 PM
 #4324

I'm also surprised by low latency on Tor network. I remember than few years ago it was nearly impossible to browse onion sites, but now it's pretty comfortable. Of course building circuit take some time, but then I'm usually having responses under one second, which is excellent.

New Tor address for pool is: poolziyzjb25aa4e.onion

That actually works? Impressive.

I might put a miner on it for a while just to see if TOR is up to low latency connections. I assumed it wasn't.
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
November 02, 2011, 04:46:29 PM
 #4325

I don't know if other miners will work without any modifications, but poclbm have some problems with DNS resolving, so it don't work yet. But I'll try to fix it as soon as I find some time when pool will be stable enough :-)

slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
November 02, 2011, 04:48:00 PM
 #4326

OK, I misused recent pool instability to some software updates, so there were few more backend restarts not related to kernel issues. But now I'm leaving it 'as is' and will see if another kernel fixed the issue (it should, but I told it about that kernel options, too).

FoxMURDER
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 02, 2011, 05:11:22 PM
 #4327

oh man and i always though the reason to use vmware is, that its working out of the box without problems ... now i'm glad i use kvm Smiley
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
November 02, 2011, 05:13:12 PM
 #4328

oh man and i always though the reason to use vmware is, that its working out of the box without problems ... now i'm glad i use kvm Smiley

I has been using Xen everytime for many years (on Linode as a customer, but also on my own boxes) and once it was running, I never had any issue with it. I'm also surprised that it don't work  out of the box.

disclaimer201
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1001


View Profile
November 02, 2011, 05:34:57 PM
 #4329

I'm also surprised by low latency on Tor network. I remember than few years ago it was nearly impossible to browse onion sites, but now it's pretty comfortable. Of course building circuit take some time, but then I'm usually having responses under one second, which is excellent.

New Tor address for pool is: poolziyzjb25aa4e.onion

That actually works? Impressive.

I might put a miner on it for a while just to see if TOR is up to low latency connections. I assumed it wasn't.


Hypothetically, say everyone would switch to Tor, would it still work on a large scale?
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
November 02, 2011, 05:36:57 PM
Last edit: November 02, 2011, 06:05:04 PM by slush
 #4330

All miners over Tor? Yes. See http://torstatus.blutmagie.de for Tor routers and their bandwith... Actually *internal* speed should be pretty good (capacity of exit nodes is different story).

Pool traffic is currently around 1MB/s and it's roughly 10% of Bitcoin hashrate. So all miners over Tor would take about 10MB/s, which is still pretty acceptable.

Edit: I'm sorry, but I cannot finish processing payments, have some important meeting now. But no coins are lost, I just need some time to recalculate crippled rounds from time out pool outages.

Iyeman
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1183
Merit: 251



View Profile
November 02, 2011, 07:05:21 PM
 #4331

All miners over Tor? Yes. See http://torstatus.blutmagie.de for Tor routers and their bandwith... Actually *internal* speed should be pretty good (capacity of exit nodes is different story).

Pool traffic is currently around 1MB/s and it's roughly 10% of Bitcoin hashrate. So all miners over Tor would take about 10MB/s, which is still pretty acceptable.

Edit: I'm sorry, but I cannot finish processing payments, have some important meeting now. But no coins are lost, I just need some time to recalculate crippled rounds from time out pool outages.

8653   2011-11-02 17:05:54   0:00:11

wow, i hope i was lucky enough to get some shares in on that 11 second block lol

▄████████████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
 ████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀████████▄▄
█████                 ▀▀███▄
█████▄                   ▀██▄
███▀███▄                  ███
███  ▀████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄       ███
███     ▀▀▀▀▀███████████▄▄██▀
███                   ▀▀████
███      ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▀▄█▄
███   ▄███████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀   ▀██
███ ▄██▀▀                  ██
██████                    ██▀
█████                   ▄██▀
▀████▄       ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████▀
 ▀
█████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
.
billionair
A TOKEN POWERED RAFFLE PLATFORM
IN THE BSC ECOSYSTEM
▄█████████████████████▄
███████████████████████
████▀███████▀   ▀▀▀▄███
███▌  ▀▀███▌       ▄███
███▀               ████
███▄              █████
████▄            ██████
█████▄▄        ▄███████
████▄       ▄██████████
███████████████████████
▀█████████████████████▀
▄█████████████████████▄
███████████████████████
████████████████▀▀█████
███████████▀▀▀    █████
██████▀▀▀   ▄▀   ██████
███▄     ▄█▀     ██████
██████▄ █▀      ███████
███████▌▐       ███████
████████ ▄██▄  ████████
██████████████▄████████
▀█████████████████████▀
▄█████████████████████▄
█████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████
███▀ ████████████ ▀████
██  ██████▀▀▀██  █  ███
██  ████▀ ███ ▀███  ███
██  ███▀ █████ ▀██  ███
██  ███▄ █████ ▄██  ███
██  █████ ▀▀▀ ████  ███
██  ██████████████  ███
███▄ ████████████ ▄████
▀████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█████▀
▄███████▀▀▀▀████████▀▀▀▀█████████▄
█████▀  ▄▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄▄  ▀███████
█████  ▀▀▀              ▀▀▀  █████
███                            ███
██                              ██
██        ████      ████        ██
█        ██████    ██████        █
█         ████      ████         █
█                                █
█      ▀▄▄              ▄▄▀      █
██▄      ▀▀█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▀▀      ▄██
███▄▄      ██████████      ▄▄█████
███████▄▄▄████████████▄▄▄█████████
▀████████████████████████████████▀
.
JOIN AIRDROP
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 02, 2011, 07:18:04 PM
 #4332

All miners over Tor? Yes. See http://torstatus.blutmagie.de for Tor routers and their bandwith... Actually *internal* speed should be pretty good (capacity of exit nodes is different story).

Pool traffic is currently around 1MB/s and it's roughly 10% of Bitcoin hashrate. So all miners over Tor would take about 10MB/s, which is still pretty acceptable.

Edit: I'm sorry, but I cannot finish processing payments, have some important meeting now. But no coins are lost, I just need some time to recalculate crippled rounds from time out pool outages.

8653   2011-11-02 17:05:54   0:00:11

wow, i hope i was lucky enough to get some shares in on that 11 second block lol

Im guessing it will end up invalid.  Not sure why, but a lot of the blocks I've seen that short end up being marked invalid.

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
bulanula
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile
November 02, 2011, 07:23:06 PM
 #4333

OK. Hope all can be sorted by tomorrow. Thank you for the effort you are putting.
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
November 02, 2011, 07:26:10 PM
 #4334

Im guessing it will end up invalid.  Not sure why, but a lot of the blocks I've seen that short end up being marked invalid.

I'm here for a moment Smiley. No, this block is perfectly valid, you can click to blocknumber and see details on block explorer.

DutchBrat
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1000


View Profile
November 02, 2011, 08:05:12 PM
 #4335

It looks like we are having some good luck to make up for the outage  Grin

Looking good and stable,

Thanks Slush !!!
RobertRibbeck
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 221
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 02, 2011, 08:07:16 PM
 #4336

Im guessing it will end up invalid.  Not sure why, but a lot of the blocks I've seen that short end up being marked invalid.

I'm here for a moment Smiley. No, this block is perfectly valid, you can click to blocknumber and see details on block explorer.

Enough with the added extras
more important
   how about processing payout since this all day outage

We've been WAITING on namecoin payout for 3 days

Please "Clear your browser cookies" then use http://bitcoinpyramid.com/r/3360 to Join BitCoin Pyramid
  use my referral & I'll refund a % of your first deposit back to your account
  Deposit .5 BTC or more and I'll give back 50% of what I receive

First Deposit of 1 BTC will get 75% of what I get back
Thralen
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 123
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 02, 2011, 08:17:04 PM
 #4337

Im guessing it will end up invalid.  Not sure why, but a lot of the blocks I've seen that short end up being marked invalid.

I'm here for a moment Smiley. No, this block is perfectly valid, you can click to blocknumber and see details on block explorer.

Enough with the added extras
more important
   how about processing payout since this all day outage

We've been WAITING on namecoin payout for 3 days

clicking on the block number isn't a recently added extra, it has been there for a long time.

1. Strange, re: waiting three days since I believe my last namecoin payout from Slush occurred two days ago.
2. The webpage says (although down at the moment) that payouts should be processed by Nov 3rd at 12:00 UTC

Thralen

Supporting bitcoin as best I can with 1. mining, 2. buying with bitcoin, 3. selling (or trying to) for bitcoin. If you make a donation to:  1MahzUUEYJrZ4VbPRm2h5itGZKEguGVZK1  I'll get it into circulation.
DutchBrat
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1000


View Profile
November 02, 2011, 08:19:19 PM
 #4338

It looks like we are having some good luck to make up for the outage  Grin

Looking good and stable,

Thanks Slush !!!

Lol,

Looks like I jinxed it !

Pools having issues again  Grin
ajareselde
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000

Satoshi is rolling in his grave. #bitcoin


View Profile
November 02, 2011, 08:20:51 PM
 #4339

It looks like we are having some good luck to make up for the outage  Grin

Looking good and stable,

Thanks Slush !!!

Lol,

Looks like I jinxed it !

Pools having issues again  Grin

this is starting to look bad
RobertRibbeck
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 221
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 02, 2011, 08:43:22 PM
 #4340

Im guessing it will end up invalid.  Not sure why, but a lot of the blocks I've seen that short end up being marked invalid.

I'm here for a moment Smiley. No, this block is perfectly valid, you can click to blocknumber and see details on block explorer.

Enough with the added extras
more important
   how about processing payout since this all day outage

We've been WAITING on namecoin payout for 3 days

clicking on the block number isn't a recently added extra, it has been there for a long time.

1. Strange, re: waiting three days since I believe my last namecoin payout from Slush occurred two days ago.
2. The webpage says (although down at the moment) that payouts should be processed by Nov 3rd at 12:00 UTC

Thralen


Funny I've been checking every hr & never saw said notice

This IS BAD up & down for at least 3 days is BS
playing with tor instead of TCB
I've been getting http timeouts for 2 wks but only on one machine and yes it's using api2 address

I was trying to check namecoin stuff and have been waiting for funds to build & process

at this point I've gotten more straight pay out from deepbit in the last 24hrs
than slushes proportional pay scheme for every day last week

putting it mildly I"m not a happy camper



Please "Clear your browser cookies" then use http://bitcoinpyramid.com/r/3360 to Join BitCoin Pyramid
  use my referral & I'll refund a % of your first deposit back to your account
  Deposit .5 BTC or more and I'll give back 50% of what I receive

First Deposit of 1 BTC will get 75% of what I get back
Pages: « 1 ... 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 [217] 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 ... 1154 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!