Bitcoin Forum
December 07, 2016, 10:51:09 AM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3160 (80.5%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.1%)
Total Voters: 3924

Pages: « 1 ... 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 [260] 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 ... 1105 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3928759 times)
disclaimer201
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316


View Profile
May 02, 2012, 05:01:49 PM
 #5181

Hi again, is there an ETA for Double Geometric? Just read somewhere now that most proportional pools are gone Deepbit and Slush are getting extra targeted for pool hopping, even if hoppers' gains are somewhat limited here at Slush's.

1481107869
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481107869

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481107869
Reply with quote  #2

1481107869
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481107869
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481107869

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481107869
Reply with quote  #2

1481107869
Report to moderator
1481107869
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481107869

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481107869
Reply with quote  #2

1481107869
Report to moderator
1481107869
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481107869

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481107869
Reply with quote  #2

1481107869
Report to moderator
Idzy
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 95


View Profile
May 05, 2012, 08:48:27 PM
 #5182

Did we really get 5 invalids in a row?


12030  2012-05-05 04:23:00   invalid



12029  2012-05-05 03:51:29  invalid



12028  2012-05-05 03:37:36  invalid



12025  2012-05-04 22:24:19  invalid

Successful Transactions with: 21after2
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
May 06, 2012, 06:48:24 AM
 #5183

No, only the last block is really orphaned, others are marked as invalid by mistake. I'll fix it today on the evening.

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
May 06, 2012, 07:12:53 PM
 #5184

Ok, invalid blocks are fixed, thanks for your patience.

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
May 08, 2012, 03:30:46 PM
 #5185

Sorry for connection issues in previous hour, it was caused by restarts of application because of update.

alexandrz
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 33



View Profile WWW
May 11, 2012, 02:38:53 PM
 #5186

Could you please send email notification when one of workers is down during two or more rounds. It would be very useful.
shad
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 148


View Profile
May 12, 2012, 04:56:26 PM
 #5187

i guess many people don't want NMC because they don't want to set up the client

at vircurex you get online wallets for all possible crypto currencies

the pool directly moves my NMCs to Vircurex and there i can trade it to BTC

0.5% fee per trade, 0.45% if you use a referral at registration
https://vircurex.com/register?referral_id=962-858

yeah sounds like shopping channel Cheesy
before vircurex i used bitparking and there you always have to request an new receive adress for each payout so you always must have a look at the balance of your pool-account because you dont want to send 2 payouts to the same adress, i guess you would only receive the first one

15dUzJEUkxgjrtcvDSdsEDkXu7E7RCbNN3
Hyphen
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 20


View Profile
May 14, 2012, 12:37:24 AM
 #5188

Any update on the double geometric payout?
disclaimer201
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316


View Profile
May 15, 2012, 11:13:38 PM
 #5189

Any update on the double geometric payout?

An update would be nice. It's been quite a while.

Jack1Rip1BurnIt
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350


Trust me, these default swaps will limit the risks


View Profile
May 19, 2012, 04:54:46 PM
 #5190

Getting a bunch of invalid blocks again. Probably incorrect, just letting slush know if he hasn't already noticed. Thanx

Successful trades with bels, misterbigg, ChrisNelson, shackleford, geniusboy91, and Isokivi.
Thralen
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 123


View Profile
May 19, 2012, 04:59:20 PM
 #5191

If you click on the block numbers you get the data. The second invalid from the bottom is orphaned, the others show main chain (in the height listing shown) and as such are showing up as incorrect invalids. Just figured I'd save Slush explaining since I had to have the shown to me before.

Thralen

Supporting bitcoin as best I can with 1. mining, 2. buying with bitcoin, 3. selling (or trying to) for bitcoin. If you make a donation to:  1MahzUUEYJrZ4VbPRm2h5itGZKEguGVZK1  I'll get it into circulation.
Clipse
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
May 19, 2012, 05:04:23 PM
 #5192

I believe its due to blockexplorer that is stuck over 20 blocks back, again.

...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> Clipse

We pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)
Jack1Rip1BurnIt
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350


Trust me, these default swaps will limit the risks


View Profile
May 19, 2012, 05:22:37 PM
 #5193

Cool. I learn something new everyday. Thans again

Successful trades with bels, misterbigg, ChrisNelson, shackleford, geniusboy91, and Isokivi.
CheezWiz
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 31



View Profile
May 20, 2012, 02:03:35 AM
 #5194

I am getting much better rewards for short rounds than I used to. Did Slush already implement the new anti-hopping system? Or has there just been less hopping lately?

-------------
Cheez\/\/iz
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
May 20, 2012, 03:01:47 AM
 #5195

The current payout system is not DGM. The reason you'e seeing better rewards is probably due to the reduced pool hashrate and increased difficulty. This makes hopping less profitable. The downside is that it significantly increases variance for for fulltime miners, for rounds longer than ~ 0.1 x D.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
Meni Rosenfeld
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890



View Profile WWW
May 20, 2012, 09:16:10 AM
 #5196

The current payout system is not DGM. The reason you'e seeing better rewards is probably due to the reduced pool hashrate and increased difficulty. This makes hopping less profitable. The downside is that it significantly increases variance for for fulltime miners, for rounds longer than ~ 0.1 x D.
This doesn't make a lot of sense to me. The smaller the pool, the greater the % lost to hoppers.

1EofoZNBhWQ3kxfKnvWkhtMns4AivZArhr   |   Who am I?   |   bitcoin-otc WoT
Bitcoil - Exchange bitcoins for ILS (thread)   |   Israel Bitcoin community homepage (thread)
Analysis of Bitcoin Pooled Mining Reward Systems (thread, summary)  |   PureMining - Infinite-term, deterministic mining bond
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
May 20, 2012, 03:12:45 PM
 #5197

The current payout system is not DGM. The reason you'e seeing better rewards is probably due to the reduced pool hashrate and increased difficulty. This makes hopping less profitable. The downside is that it significantly increases variance for for fulltime miners, for rounds longer than ~ 0.1 x D.
This doesn't make a lot of sense to me. The smaller the pool, the greater the % lost to hoppers.

At a non-score proportional pool, sure. As you know, the exponential scoring system here is affected by difficulty and pool hashrate. If 'c' remains at 300 when pool hashrate decreases and difficulty increases, the 'hop point' is reduced.

Today, an expected share value of 1 occurs at about 0.1 x D, but two months ago it was about 0.16 x D. The average round profit for a strategic miner decreases as the 'hop point' decreases.



Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
Meni Rosenfeld
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890



View Profile WWW
May 20, 2012, 05:13:27 PM
 #5198

The current payout system is not DGM. The reason you'e seeing better rewards is probably due to the reduced pool hashrate and increased difficulty. This makes hopping less profitable. The downside is that it significantly increases variance for for fulltime miners, for rounds longer than ~ 0.1 x D.
This doesn't make a lot of sense to me. The smaller the pool, the greater the % lost to hoppers.
At a non-score proportional pool, sure. As you know, the exponential scoring system here is affected by difficulty and pool hashrate. If 'c' remains at 300 when pool hashrate decreases and difficulty increases, the 'hop point' is reduced.

Today, an expected share value of 1 occurs at about 0.1 x D, but two months ago it was about 0.16 x D. The average round profit for a strategic miner decreases as the 'hop point' decreases.
Right, I forgot to take into account the effects of the temporal scale of this pool.

1EofoZNBhWQ3kxfKnvWkhtMns4AivZArhr   |   Who am I?   |   bitcoin-otc WoT
Bitcoil - Exchange bitcoins for ILS (thread)   |   Israel Bitcoin community homepage (thread)
Analysis of Bitcoin Pooled Mining Reward Systems (thread, summary)  |   PureMining - Infinite-term, deterministic mining bond
werdna94
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9


View Profile
May 20, 2012, 06:53:31 PM
 #5199

Hello slush pool! I dove in for a swim yesterday for the first time, and I'm curious as to how long it takes to validate blocks and why invalid blocks exist in the first place.
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
May 20, 2012, 07:09:31 PM
 #5200

Any update on the double geometric payout?

I'm still working on update, however I had many problems to solve because of that. I even had sources with DGM online (it was that fault update few days ago), but I had to revert it to original sources. Again, I'm working on it and it will be soon...

Pages: « 1 ... 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 [260] 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 ... 1105 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!