|
slush
|
 |
January 12, 2012, 08:32:34 PM |
|
Good news, NMC payouts are fixed and working again!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed
timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It
takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but
hard to stifle." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BinoX
|
|
January 12, 2012, 08:40:33 PM |
|
Just got my payment notification email, thx  |
|
|
|
|
allinvain
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2198
|
|
January 13, 2012, 12:26:08 AM |
|
woohooo...now I can finally get my *precious* namecoins..
|
|
|
|
disclaimer201
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
|
|
January 13, 2012, 01:02:57 AM |
|
woohooo...now I can finally get my *precious* namecoins..
I sold all my 36 namecoins for 0.02000000 btc at bitparking and on top of their charge of 0.4 per cent, if I want to withdraw they charge 0.01000000 so in fact I will have 0.01000000 btc all in all sent to my bitcoin client. I'm sorry, but -wtf-. It really isn't worth the bother anymore. |
|
|
|
allinvain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2198
|
|
January 13, 2012, 03:05:29 AM |
|
woohooo...now I can finally get my *precious* namecoins..
I sold all my 36 namecoins for 0.02000000 btc at bitparking and on top of their charge of 0.4 per cent, if I want to withdraw they charge 0.01000000 so in fact I will have 0.01000000 btc all in all sent to my bitcoin client. I'm sorry, but -wtf-. It really isn't worth the bother anymore. I'm with you on that one. The valuation is dog shit low. I just don't care about them anymore...just let them pile up in my NMC wallet. Now if only mtgox opened a NMC exchange I think it would really help it out a bit. I'm not just referring to NMC <---> BTC but also USD <---> NMC |
|
|
|
|
rjk
|
|
January 13, 2012, 03:09:33 AM |
|
woohooo...now I can finally get my *precious* namecoins..
I sold all my 36 namecoins for 0.02000000 btc at bitparking and on top of their charge of 0.4 per cent, if I want to withdraw they charge 0.01000000 so in fact I will have 0.01000000 btc all in all sent to my bitcoin client. I'm sorry, but -wtf-. It really isn't worth the bother anymore. is a little bit better, but its still meh. |
|
|
|
notawake
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 58
|
|
January 13, 2012, 04:41:34 AM |
|
...
I just don't care about them anymore...just let them pile up in my NMC wallet.
...
+1 I think the main issue is the lack of demand. Namecoins only have one use right now, which is the .bit naming system. There aren't enough people browsing .bit domains. Maybe if they were seamlessly integrated into tor, adoption would increase and the value of Namecoins would increase. There was a time when Bitcoins were just as new and had a similar low value compared to USD, but I don't foresee the value of Namecoins hitting US$30 within the next few years ... |
|
|
|
|
BinoX
|
|
January 13, 2012, 11:43:11 AM |
|
If you're not going to use them, turn the mining off and leave more for those of us that will use them |
|
|
|
|
2weiX
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
bitcoincommodities.com
|
|
January 13, 2012, 01:06:22 PM |
|
If you're not going to use them, turn the mining off and leave more for those of us that will use them SECONDED IN THE UTMOST ALLOWABLE MANNER /thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
rjk
|
|
January 13, 2012, 02:28:39 PM |
|
If you're not going to use them, turn the mining off and leave more for those of us that will use them SECONDED IN THE UTMOST ALLOWABLE MANNER /thanks It appears that neither of you understand how merged mining works. Each valid Bitcoin share has the potential to also be a valid Namecoin share, and only needs to be compared against the Namecoin chain - there is no extra mining or such going on. Although, if he deletes his Namecoin address, his reward will be split among the rest of the users, so that could work I suppose  |
|
|
|
|
BinoX
|
|
January 13, 2012, 02:30:46 PM |
|
Although, if he deletes his Namecoin address, his reward will be split among the rest of the users, so that could work I suppose That is what I meant (As I actually use namecoins for the purpose that they were designed for :p) |
|
|
|
|
|
freshzive
|
|
January 13, 2012, 02:41:17 PM |
|
damn we've been having some bad luck here the last day or so... a couple 7-8 hour blocks. fingers crossed for a streak of <10 minute rounds edit: 1 day pool luck is currently at 39%  |
|
|
|
2weiX
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
bitcoincommodities.com
|
|
January 13, 2012, 03:58:29 PM |
|
If you're not going to use them, turn the mining off and leave more for those of us that will use them SECONDED IN THE UTMOST ALLOWABLE MANNER /thanks Although, if he deletes his Namecoin address, his reward will be split among the rest of the users, so that could work I suppose that is exactly what I meant. |
|
|
|
|
disclaimer201
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
|
|
January 13, 2012, 04:08:36 PM |
|
Although, if he deletes his Namecoin address, his reward will be split among the rest of the users, so that could work I suppose That is what I meant (As I actually use namecoins for the purpose that they were designed for :p) Honestly, what can they be used for really? Nobody will ever go to my .bit website if they have to programme their browser. I'd love to use it, I even tried the webhosting stuff but it's pretty much pointless and makes the impression for outsiders my webpage is subcultural or suspiciously hacker related. I believe noone will update their browsers to go to hidden pages (right now). |
|
|
|
allinvain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2198
|
|
January 13, 2012, 04:21:16 PM |
|
^^^^^^^^ +1
I wish it was as easy as setting up a .com or any other such domains. If only BIND and other dns servers would jump on board and include support for NMC even as an optional feature available during compile.
|
|
|
|
|
BinoX
|
|
January 13, 2012, 04:53:32 PM |
|
I'm working on a little something that might make it a bit easier, although not as easy as a normal unfortunately... Probably looking at an "end of february"(ish) release |
|
|
|
|
|
portron
|
|
January 13, 2012, 04:59:51 PM |
|
Namecoin needs a big name integration to make it relevant... Firefox, Tor, something of that nature... but yeah those 8 hour blocks are  |
|
|
|
|
Portnoy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
My money; Our Bitcoin.
|
|
January 13, 2012, 05:16:50 PM |
|
Namecoin needs a big name integration to make it relevant... Firefox, Tor, something of that nature...
If some of these things like SOPA get pushed through then NMC might become a lot more popular, causing more effort to be put into developing the tech involved with using it easily and effectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
freshzive
|
|
January 14, 2012, 02:19:06 AM |
|
Can anyone comment as to what sort of payout/GH/s they're getting from this pool? Right now I'm running at around 2GH/s or higher, but only made about 1 BTC today which seems low. On ABC pool in December, I made around 1.25BTC/day from ~1.5GH/s.
Granted, difficulty has increased since then. We have also had some fairly terrible luck recently, so that may explain it as well. Obviously payout is going to have some inherit variation here due to luck as this isn't a PPS pool either.
I guess I'm just looking for someone to estimate the average BTC payout for running 1GH/s for 1 day here. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
slider1978
|
|
January 14, 2012, 04:47:00 AM |
|
I run right around 2.2GH and I was getting between 2-2.5 BTC per day back in December. I sort of bounce between here and Deepbit and I can say that I haven't really noticed much difference in payout between the 2 with the exception of the NMC that you get here at Slush which I feel makes up for the slightly higher variance that I "feel" between deepbit and slush.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
