Bitcoin Forum
March 19, 2024, 06:32:23 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 [238] 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 ... 1154 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool  (Read 4381779 times)
BinoX
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 13, 2012, 04:53:32 PM
 #4741

I'm working on a little something that might make it a bit easier, although not as easy as a normal unfortunately...

Probably looking at an "end of february"(ish) release Smiley
1710829943
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710829943

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710829943
Reply with quote  #2

1710829943
Report to moderator
1710829943
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710829943

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710829943
Reply with quote  #2

1710829943
Report to moderator
1710829943
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710829943

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710829943
Reply with quote  #2

1710829943
Report to moderator
"Bitcoin: mining our own business since 2009" -- Pieter Wuille
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1710829943
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710829943

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710829943
Reply with quote  #2

1710829943
Report to moderator
portron
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 106
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 13, 2012, 04:59:51 PM
 #4742

Namecoin needs a big name integration to make it relevant... Firefox, Tor, something of that nature...

but yeah those 8 hour blocks are  Shocked
Portnoy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2030
Merit: 1000

My money; Our Bitcoin.


View Profile
January 13, 2012, 05:16:50 PM
 #4743

Namecoin needs a big name integration to make it relevant... Firefox, Tor, something of that nature...


If some of these things like SOPA get pushed through then NMC might become a lot more popular, causing more effort to be put into developing the tech involved with using it easily and effectively. 
freshzive
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 447
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 14, 2012, 02:19:06 AM
 #4744

Can anyone comment as to what sort of payout/GH/s they're getting from this pool? Right now I'm running at around 2GH/s or higher, but only made about 1 BTC today which seems low. On ABC pool in December, I made around 1.25BTC/day from ~1.5GH/s.

Granted, difficulty has increased since then. We have also had some fairly terrible luck recently, so that may explain it as well. Obviously payout is going to have some inherit variation here due to luck as this isn't a PPS pool either.

I guess I'm just looking for someone to estimate the average BTC payout for running 1GH/s for 1 day here. Thanks!

slider1978
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 180
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 14, 2012, 04:47:00 AM
 #4745

I run right around 2.2GH and I was getting between 2-2.5 BTC per day back in December. I sort of bounce between here and Deepbit and I can say that I haven't really noticed much difference in payout between the 2 with the exception of the NMC that you get here at Slush which I feel makes up for the slightly higher variance that I "feel" between deepbit and slush.
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 14, 2012, 02:59:53 PM
 #4746

I average around 1.5ghash and have been averaging about 1.25 btc a day since the ddos attacks...

*edit*

Obviously there has been some fluctuation though, I'm just talking averages.  And if you look at the previous couple posts, luck has been way down for the last day or two.

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
tinman951
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 149
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 14, 2012, 05:25:09 PM
 #4747

Can anyone comment as to what sort of payout/GH/s they're getting from this pool? Right now I'm running at around 2GH/s or higher, but only made about 1 BTC today which seems low. On ABC pool in December, I made around 1.25BTC/day from ~1.5GH/s.

Granted, difficulty has increased since then. We have also had some fairly terrible luck recently, so that may explain it as well. Obviously payout is going to have some inherit variation here due to luck as this isn't a PPS pool either.

I guess I'm just looking for someone to estimate the average BTC payout for running 1GH/s for 1 day here. Thanks!
I run at 200mhash and in the past 715 hours (~30days) I have gotten 0.006223766 per hour.
1Gh/s would be 5 times that so 0.03111883 per hour or 0.74685192 per 24 hours.
Yes I keep detailed records... Roll Eyes

I don't earn much: donations are welcome to get me started. Smiley
18b94MMTWd7bWaUWcq7VHmizgswP2dK6fM

Free micro bitcoins: http://www.bitvisitor.com/?ref=1DFw1VncjVhqdg6GWoQ6Qtc5ncR5RHXxfP
Donate BTC: 18b94MMTWd7bWaUWcq7VHmizgswP2dK6fM
BinoX
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 14, 2012, 05:32:27 PM
 #4748

I run about 900 MHash (current rate in avatar... fluctuates between 870 and 940) and I get around 0.7BTC/day (average over the last 4 weeks)
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
January 14, 2012, 06:23:21 PM
 #4749

Granted, difficulty has increased since then. We have also had some fairly terrible luck recently, so that may explain it as well. Obviously payout is going to have some inherit variation here due to luck as this isn't a PPS pool either.

You joined the pool in very unlucky day; From the Statistics page, the luck was around 39%, which is very low. However, as you can see, monthly luck is very close to 100% (it usually fluctuates from 99% to 101%, which is expected).

naypalm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1272
Merit: 1012


afk


View Profile WWW
January 15, 2012, 01:25:00 AM
 #4750

Gratz on 10k blocks!

freshzive
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 447
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 15, 2012, 01:39:49 AM
 #4751

Thanks for all the info, going to stick with slush's pool  Grin

allinvain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3080
Merit: 1080



View Profile WWW
January 15, 2012, 01:57:55 PM
 #4752


I few days ago my reject ratio was 0.3% and now its 2-3%, and I'm getting a lot of miner idle warnings in phoenix, is this causes by my own settings/system/upgraded phoenix + kernel or is slush getting ddosed again?

What version of phoenix are you running? I used to have the same problem as you until I upgraded to 1.7.3. Also do you have a manually set "ask rate" (in the phoenix command line argument) ?


allinvain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3080
Merit: 1080



View Profile WWW
January 15, 2012, 02:46:08 PM
 #4753


I few days ago my reject ratio was 0.3% and now its 2-3%, and I'm getting a lot of miner idle warnings in phoenix, is this causes by my own settings/system/upgraded phoenix + kernel or is slush getting ddosed again?

What version of phoenix are you running? I used to have the same problem as you until I upgraded to 1.7.3. Also do you have a manually set "ask rate" (in the phoenix command line argument) ?


I don't have a manual set ask rate, I'm using 1.7.3 and this kernel: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=25135.0

Ah that explains it. There is some bug in the latest phoenix version when running with that kernel (checkout the phoenix thread for details). I would suggest going back to phatk2 to see if it makes a difference.

allinvain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3080
Merit: 1080



View Profile WWW
January 16, 2012, 03:36:42 AM
 #4754


I few days ago my reject ratio was 0.3% and now its 2-3%, and I'm getting a lot of miner idle warnings in phoenix, is this causes by my own settings/system/upgraded phoenix + kernel or is slush getting ddosed again?

What version of phoenix are you running? I used to have the same problem as you until I upgraded to 1.7.3. Also do you have a manually set "ask rate" (in the phoenix command line argument) ?


I don't have a manual set ask rate, I'm using 1.7.3 and this kernel: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=25135.0

Ah that explains it. There is some bug in the latest phoenix version when running with that kernel (checkout the phoenix thread for details). I would suggest going back to phatk2 to see if it makes a difference.
Nope, I tried 1.7.2 again with that kernel and its still having issues.

Hmm, ok, next thing to try would be a different mining program. If you get the same issue then it must be the pool or somehow your internet connection. Does this happen on all your miners (if you have more than 1)?

Oh I forgot to mention did you also try 1.7.0?

From what I can gather in this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=6458.new;topicseen#new

It seems this has something to do with PyOpenCL.

Epoch
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 922
Merit: 1003



View Profile
January 16, 2012, 03:47:37 AM
 #4755

Thanks for all the info, going to stick with slush's pool  Grin

In the long run, Slush's pool (like any other) will converge to the same expected payout. Daily variances can be large, weekly as well, so don't base your decisions on that.

For your earlier question about expected per-day payout for a 1Ghash rate: at today's difficulty you can expect to get 0.784BTC (0.8BTC minus the 2% fee that Slush charges). Here's a handy calculator: http://www.alloscomp.com/bitcoin/calculator.php
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
January 16, 2012, 02:45:23 PM
 #4756

Gratz on 10k blocks!

Heh, I didn't noticed that, thanks! :-)

slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
January 16, 2012, 02:46:52 PM
 #4757

damn we've been having some bad luck here the last day or so... a couple 7-8 hour blocks.
edit: 1 day pool luck is currently at 39%  Cry

Yep, it was insane day. But we're now at 130% in one day and 99% in seven day average, which is pretty good.

BinoX
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 16, 2012, 02:57:14 PM
 #4758

Hoping that the luck continues Smiley
shad
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 148
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 17, 2012, 04:44:44 PM
 #4759

feature request: payout time intervall

my problem is that i want a daily payout, i am doing this right now by setting payout_limit to 7day average, but i am a little unhappy that the intervall in which my payments get send is so variable

i would like somethink like
Quote
if last_payment_time + payment_timeintervall < actual_time && payout_limit > btc_balance then
PAYOUTTIME

i think that is the easiest way to explane about what i think, no language problems in code Cheesy
i think payment_timeintervall should be in days and the payout_limit which already can't be set under 0.01 afaik will secure that there aren't to tiny payouts

what do you think?


15dUzJEUkxgjrtcvDSdsEDkXu7E7RCbNN3
sadpandatech
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 18, 2012, 01:35:17 AM
 #4760

Hmm I'm having issues again, using phoenix and phatk modified kernel: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=25135.0
 -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS2 AGGRESSION=16 WORKSIZE=64 FASTLOOP=false
On a unlocked 6950, running at 930 mhz core and 1430 mhz memory.

It was working perfectly but yesterday my isp did some maintenance and now the program will only mine 9 shares and after that it "hangs"
I tried disabling long polling, went back to phoenix 1.7.2 and tried 2 different modified kernels.

If you are running the latest phatk, try removing the 'FASTLOOP=FALSE' from your arguments.
If that does not change anything try with the normal vectors, aggr, etc. i.e, 'VECTORS AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=256'
That memory sounds awfully high for running vectors2 as well. Though if it worked for you in the past then it may not be the issue. I would try lowering it to about 800 if using vectors2

If you're not excited by the idea of being an early adopter 'now', then you should come back in three or four years and either tell us "Told you it'd never work!" or join what should, by then, be a much more stable and easier-to-use system.
- GA

It is being worked on by smart people.  -DamienBlack
Pages: « 1 ... 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 [238] 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 ... 1154 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!