[4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool

[Bigpiggy01]

This is really weird but both those emails just ticked in. They must have gotten stuck somehow though I can't think of how or why.

[1714277183]

1714277183

[1714277183]

1714277183

[1714277183]

1714277183

[1714277183]

1714277183

[slush]

I didn't touch anything and all emails were sent by the server, so it was somewhere on the way. Strange...

[tnkflx]

This is really weird but both those emails just ticked in. They must have gotten stuck somehow though I can't think of how or why.

Email is not instant ;-)

[btcex]

Why are there so many invalid Namcoin Blocks in a row?

[slush]

Why are there so many invalid Namcoin Blocks in a row?

Pool is using namecoin's blockexplorer to cross-check if blocks are matured and accepted by the rest of the network. Unfortunately blockexplorer gets broken, there are not new blocks since yesterday. I reported it right now, after they fix it, pool will recalculate all namecoin blocks again and everything will be fine.

[trilby]

Slush just a quick question on the pool luck calculation. Does this calculation take in to account the difficulty of the past blocks or does it only work using the current difficulty

[slush]

It uses difficulty from the time when block was found. So it should be +/- correct.

[trilby]

It uses difficulty from the time when block was found. So it should be +/- correct.

Thanks

I don't know why I find the pool luck display really interesting but i cant stop checking it

[notawake]

Why are there so many invalid Namcoin Blocks in a row?

Pool is using namecoin's blockexplorer to cross-check if blocks are matured and accepted by the rest of the network. Unfortunately blockexplorer gets broken, there are not new blocks since yesterday. I reported it right now, after they fix it, pool will recalculate all namecoin blocks again and everything will be fine.

Has this been resolved?

[slush]

Has this been resolved?

NMC block explorer is now working correctly, I'll find a time to recalculate nmc rewards during tomorrow.

[bz]

Should BTC for bock 157519 be recalculated?

#   Block found   Duration   Total shares    BTC reward    NMC reward    Block #
9376    2011-12-14 20:03:48    0:55:03    824609    0.18219482    0.28743400    157529
9375    2011-12-14 19:08:40    0:46:21    711990    0.01990589    0.03148287    157519

EDIT: Fixed block number in question

[slush]

What's your expected block reward? I don't see anything wrong with those blocks.

Should BTC for bock 157519 be recalculated?

[bz]

What's your expected block reward? I don't see anything wrong with those blocks.

Should BTC for bock 157519 be recalculated?

I can't see what it was at the time of block 157519, but typically (like right now) it is about 0.18284650 BTC.  When I compare the two blocks listed in my post, I see that duration and shares between the two are proportionately closer than BTC reward. I thought I should see something more like 0.18 not 0.019.

[slush]

NMC block explorer is now working correctly, I'll find a time to recalculate nmc rewards during tomorrow.

NMC reward is fixed now.

[slush]

I can't see what it was at the time of block 157519, but typically (like right now) it is about 0.18284650 BTC.  When I compare the two blocks listed in my post, I see that duration and shares between the two are proportionately closer than BTC reward. I thought I should see something more like 0.18 not 0.019.

I checked those two rounds, but don't see anything wrong. It looks like your miners disconnected for some time, so your block reward was lower than usual.

[bz]

I can't see what it was at the time of block 157519, but typically (like right now) it is about 0.18284650 BTC.  When I compare the two blocks listed in my post, I see that duration and shares between the two are proportionately closer than BTC reward. I thought I should see something more like 0.18 not 0.019.

I checked those two rounds, but don't see anything wrong. It looks like your miners disconnected for some time, so your block reward was lower than usual.

I see I have a few (very few) shares on my backup pool so some of the shares probably shifted over there but what seems strange is that I was getting about the same shares per minute and yet the reward was so different:

Duration   Total shares   Shares/Minute   BTC reward    Block #
0:55:03    824609         14984               0.18219482    157529
0:46:21    711990         15367               0.01990589    157519

I haven't seen this kind of difference before so I'll just keep an eye on it to see how things run in the future. Thanks for looking into it.

[slush]

Duration   Total shares   Shares/Minute   BTC reward    Block #
0:55:03    824609         14984               0.18219482    157529
0:46:21    711990         15367               0.01990589    157519

Wait, what's "shares per minute"? It's calculated for total shares of the pool, right? So if your miner had a short outage, this value don't change...

[naypalm]

I wish my machine could do that many shares per minute 

[bz]

Duration   Total shares   Shares/Minute   BTC reward    Block #
0:55:03    824609         14984               0.18219482    157529
0:46:21    711990         15367               0.01990589    157519

Wait, what's "shares per minute"? It's calculated for total shares of the pool, right? So if your miner had a short outage, this value don't change...

My bad, thanks for the correction. I'm getting my stats messed up, different pools, etc. Is there a historical perspective on how many shares I got per block?

[slush]

Today it's exactly a year when I open the pool for public. Happy first birthday :-)