Bitcoin Forum
December 09, 2016, 05:31:25 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3160 (80.5%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.1%)
Total Voters: 3924

Pages: « 1 ... 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 [237] 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 ... 1105 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3931376 times)
disclaimer201
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316


View Profile
January 05, 2012, 07:22:18 AM
 #4721

Sorry if off-topic - just because we see a little btc rally are people massively selling their namecoins? Darn! Prices are ridiculously low again.

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481304685
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481304685

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481304685
Reply with quote  #2

1481304685
Report to moderator
1481304685
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481304685

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481304685
Reply with quote  #2

1481304685
Report to moderator
1481304685
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481304685

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481304685
Reply with quote  #2

1481304685
Report to moderator
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
January 05, 2012, 01:05:15 PM
 #4722

Could you change that to a css class with display:none instead of commenting it out? Makes it easier for users who want to see it to unhide it. I can post a chrome user script for anyone interested.

I'm affraid that such change will break DaCoinMinster's Greasemonkey script. Parsing comments isn't possible in chrome?

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
January 05, 2012, 01:09:47 PM
 #4723

Alternatively, instead of showing MHash for current block, save that value when the block ends and display it on the next block so it might read:
Hashrate for last round: 261 MHash

Actually it's not a bad idea. But in the real world, this will be still highly approximate for shorter rounds (don't forget that there are still people with <10Mhash/s, so they'll see "0 Mhash/s" for most of the rounds. And when users are OK with some hashrate delay, why not to use average for last 10 rounds, which is very exact?

Well, people are asking for actual hashrate very often and I feel that I should resolve this somehow. At this moment I'm thinking about new pool core implementing Stratum mining interface and also some extended features which I'm missing. As I see, providing actual hashrate should have some priority on checklist.

mb300sd
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232

Drunk Posts


View Profile WWW
January 05, 2012, 05:48:23 PM
 #4724

Could you change that to a css class with display:none instead of commenting it out? Makes it easier for users who want to see it to unhide it. I can post a chrome user script for anyone interested.

I'm affraid that such change will break DaCoinMinster's Greasemonkey script. Parsing comments isn't possible in chrome?

Didn't realize that existed. Works in chrome too, thanks.

1D7FJWRzeKa4SLmTznd3JpeNU13L1ErEco
BinoX
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140


Firstbits: 14tyj3


View Profile
January 05, 2012, 08:42:05 PM
 #4725

Well, people are asking for actual hashrate very often and I feel that I should resolve this somehow. At this moment I'm thinking about new pool core implementing Stratum mining interface and also some extended features which I'm missing. As I see, providing actual hashrate should have some priority on checklist.

Average hashrate for last 5/10 mins? Not sure how easy that would be to implement on your pool, but shouldn't be too bad assuming that you're recording timestamps when shares are being submitted...

Please give generously Wink
BTC: 14tyJ34vPEZ22LtkeJsMGPY2oBKq9VgGkE
NMC: N8tkdgUFYWRcLKtZnPv3or1gnPtgPG29Mv
kitsura
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22


View Profile
January 06, 2012, 03:44:03 AM
 #4726

Someone with bitcoin wallet of 18rAnJk5mNjM3EHSSToo3LzpZ7NRUxWnJ5 hacked into my account and tried to change the payout address to this wallet id.
My password used is not simple and also not a dictionary word so most likely was bruteforced somehow. Password already changed but beware of your accounts too.
tnkflx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 346


View Profile
January 06, 2012, 08:14:04 AM
 #4727

Someone with bitcoin wallet of 18rAnJk5mNjM3EHSSToo3LzpZ7NRUxWnJ5 hacked into my account and tried to change the payout address to this wallet id.
My password used is not simple and also not a dictionary word so most likely was bruteforced somehow. Password already changed but beware of your accounts too.

Or it was sniffed locally? Or used somewhere else?

| Operating electrum.be & us.electrum.be |
notawake
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58


View Profile
January 06, 2012, 06:38:41 PM
 #4728

Hey slush, not to put you on the spot or anything, but what do you think of Luke-Jr's alleged actions regarding Coiledcoin?

Relevant threads:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=56675.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=56791.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=56802
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=56830

Bitcoin: 1HZRowLTkmF6M8V11vj2dmVf2r9VK7dVfo | Namecoin: MxT6tjJZcYZeWUGNgsAMxJ7wpDgKMdub4y

Output Transactions for a Given Address to CSV Format
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
January 06, 2012, 06:46:57 PM
 #4729

notawake, as I wrote to btcguild thread few minutes ago, I'm not a fan of alternative currencies except Namecoin, because they're competing Bitcoin and splitting development effort. I think we should unite, not divide, otherwise Bitcoin will end as a bunch of crapcoins. Namecoin is different, because it's more distributed data storage paid with coins than currency itself.

On the other hand, I don't see any point in attacking those alternative projects. Let give them time and room and maybe something interesting will flourish. I personally don't want to be pulled into CoinWars. I mean - I don't want to spend my time on some alternate coins for supporting it or even damage it.

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
January 08, 2012, 11:05:54 PM
 #4730

Today the namecoin payouts break because of too fragmented namecoin. I discussed the solution on #bitcoin-dev and I have a solution, I'll resolve it duringl tomorrow (UTC). I'm sorry for troubles, NMC mining works without any problem.

cuz0882
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336



View Profile
January 09, 2012, 07:53:01 AM
 #4731

Today the namecoin payouts break because of too fragmented namecoin. I discussed the solution on #bitcoin-dev and I have a solution, I'll resolve it duringl tomorrow (UTC). I'm sorry for troubles, NMC mining works without any problem.
Good, I was worried something was wrong on my end. And yes, all these people working on alternative coins are just hurting bitcoin. Unless someone finds a major flaw in bitcoin and the solution is found in a alternative coin system there is no point. We are really lucky that bitcoin is doing so well right now, and will be even luckier if it can maintain even half its current value. We really need to keep our focus on bitcoin, its still far from stable.

Also the only thing I would personally want to see added to slush's site is some kind of email alert if a miner goes down. I would in the future like to set up something so I can receive a text or email on my phone if a miner stops running.
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
January 09, 2012, 10:29:55 PM
 #4732

Namecoin payout fix is harder than I expected. Script is currently indexing some stuff, I'll continue on it tomorrow.

Crypt_Current
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686


Shame on everything; regret nothing.


View Profile
January 09, 2012, 11:14:46 PM
 #4733

Namecoin payout fix is harder than I expected. Script is currently indexing some stuff, I'll continue on it tomorrow.

... answered my question before I asked it!  Thanks for your hard work Slush!

10% off at CampBX for LIFE:  https://campbx.com/main.php?r=C9a5izBQ5vq  ----  Authorized BitVoucher MEGA reseller (& BTC donations appreciated):  https://bitvoucher.co/affl/1HkvK8o8WWDpCTSQGnek7DH9gT1LWeV5s3/
LTC:  LRL6vb6XBRrEEifB73DiEiYZ9vbRy99H41  NMC:  NGb2spdTGpWj8THCPyCainaXenwDhAW1ZT
freshzive
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 447


View Profile
January 10, 2012, 04:11:11 AM
 #4734

Was trying to figure out why my 5970 hashrate dropped from ~700 to closer to ~600mhash. Then I read this thread and realized that I had updated to the 11.12 drivers. Guess it's time to downgrade back to 11.11, thanks Cheesy

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
January 10, 2012, 06:31:02 PM
 #4735

I'm sorry for additional delay, but it looks like namecoin's blockexplorer don't index all transactions, which break my script. It is already reported to namecoin developers, so I hope it will be fixed as fast as in previous cases...

allinvain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002



View Profile
January 11, 2012, 04:53:34 PM
 #4736

Was trying to figure out why my 5970 hashrate dropped from ~700 to closer to ~600mhash. Then I read this thread and realized that I had updated to the 11.12 drivers. Guess it's time to downgrade back to 11.11, thanks Cheesy

Yep, just remember that with 11.11 you're going to see 100% cpu utilization again :p. My solution is to upgrade to Linux Wink

Portnoy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1820

My money; Our Bitcoin.


View Profile
January 11, 2012, 06:44:28 PM
 #4737

Was trying to figure out why my 5970 hashrate dropped from ~700 to closer to ~600mhash. Then I read this thread and realized that I had updated to the 11.12 drivers. Guess it's time to downgrade back to 11.11, thanks Cheesy

Did downgrading back to 11.11 work for you?  It didn't for me.  I went from ~440 to ~420 so I uninstalled catalyst 11.12 and reinstalled 11.11 and I am still at ~420 mhash/sec.  Hmm...

Buy Bitcoin from CoinbaseXapo
Faucets & Earn Bitcoin Sites: FreeBitco.in; BitsForClicks; Moonbit
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218


Gerald Davis


View Profile
January 11, 2012, 06:59:06 PM
 #4738

Was trying to figure out why my 5970 hashrate dropped from ~700 to closer to ~600mhash. Then I read this thread and realized that I had updated to the 11.12 drivers. Guess it's time to downgrade back to 11.11, thanks Cheesy

Did downgrading back to 11.11 work for you?  It didn't for me.  I went from ~440 to ~420 so I uninstalled catalyst 11.12 and reinstalled 11.11 and I am still at ~420 mhash/sec.  Hmm...

You need to reinstall SDK 2.5.  By default AMD doesn't downgrade SDK.  It is the SDK 2.6 (included in 11.12 or later) which reduces performance.  If you search the forum you will find steps to manually replace SDK 2.6 w/ SDK 2.5 or earlier.
Portnoy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1820

My money; Our Bitcoin.


View Profile
January 11, 2012, 09:10:23 PM
 #4739

Was trying to figure out why my 5970 hashrate dropped from ~700 to closer to ~600mhash. Then I read this thread and realized that I had updated to the 11.12 drivers. Guess it's time to downgrade back to 11.11, thanks Cheesy

Did downgrading back to 11.11 work for you?  It didn't for me.  I went from ~440 to ~420 so I uninstalled catalyst 11.12 and reinstalled 11.11 and I am still at ~420 mhash/sec.  Hmm...

You need to reinstall SDK 2.5.  By default AMD doesn't downgrade SDK.  It is the SDK 2.6 (included in 11.12 or later) which reduces performance.  If you search the forum you will find steps to manually replace SDK 2.6 w/ SDK 2.5 or earlier.

Thanks.  The solution offered at this link worked for me: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=54693.msg651989#msg651989

Buy Bitcoin from CoinbaseXapo
Faucets & Earn Bitcoin Sites: FreeBitco.in; BitsForClicks; Moonbit
freshzive
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 447


View Profile
January 12, 2012, 12:56:41 AM
 #4740

Was trying to figure out why my 5970 hashrate dropped from ~700 to closer to ~600mhash. Then I read this thread and realized that I had updated to the 11.12 drivers. Guess it's time to downgrade back to 11.11, thanks Cheesy

Did downgrading back to 11.11 work for you?  It didn't for me.  I went from ~440 to ~420 so I uninstalled catalyst 11.12 and reinstalled 11.11 and I am still at ~420 mhash/sec.  Hmm...

You need to reinstall SDK 2.5.  By default AMD doesn't downgrade SDK.  It is the SDK 2.6 (included in 11.12 or later) which reduces performance.  If you search the forum you will find steps to manually replace SDK 2.6 w/ SDK 2.5 or earlier.

Thanks.  The solution offered at this link worked for me: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=54693.msg651989#msg651989

Yeah this worked for me as well, simply installing 11.11 again didn't do anything. Thanks!

EDIT: As a bonus, my CPU usage still seems to be low (<25% for 2x5970s). Not sure how that worked out so well  Grin

Pages: « 1 ... 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 [237] 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 ... 1105 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!