|
slush
|
 |
December 23, 2011, 09:11:25 PM |
|
I just tested connecting to your pool: [2011-12-24 08:00:33] Pool 0 http://api.bitcoin.cz:8332 active [2011-12-24 08:00:33] Long-polling activated for http://api.bitcoin.cz:8401 Then I waited for a longpoll which worked. Seems to work fine as far as I can tell. Yes, that looks fine. Great that it works! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decentralized search Search for products or services and get paid for it Join pre-ICO
25 July. 50% discount  |
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
|
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2226
Ruu \o/
|
|
December 24, 2011, 04:43:44 AM |
|
I just tested connecting to your pool: [2011-12-24 08:00:33] Pool 0 http://api.bitcoin.cz:8332 active [2011-12-24 08:00:33] Long-polling activated for http://api.bitcoin.cz:8401 Then I waited for a longpoll which worked. Seems to work fine as far as I can tell. Yes, that looks fine. Great that it works! Indeed, but it doesn't explain the bug report occurring in the first place, unless they entered the pool details wrongly into cgminer. |
|
|
|
|
slush
|
|
December 24, 2011, 01:17:35 PM |
|
Indeed, but it doesn't explain the bug report occurring in the first place, unless they entered the pool details wrongly into cgminer.
What is the original bug report? Maybe I can help to track it... |
|
|
|
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2226
Ruu \o/
|
|
December 26, 2011, 12:26:46 AM |
|
Indeed, but it doesn't explain the bug report occurring in the first place, unless they entered the pool details wrongly into cgminer.
What is the original bug report? Maybe I can help to track it... |
|
|
|
|
BinoX
|
|
December 28, 2011, 03:47:47 PM |
|
Just noticed on the stats page that the last 3 blocks have been "Processing..." for quite a long time, is there some kind of issue, or should I just be more patient?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Idzy
|
|
December 28, 2011, 05:18:30 PM |
|
Yeah and my average mhs is wrong too, I'm pushsing close to 300mhs with my 2 miners and the site is showing 156mhs.
|
|
|
|
|
Littleshop
|
|
December 28, 2011, 06:05:05 PM |
|
Just noticed on the stats page that the last 3 blocks have been "Processing..." for quite a long time, is there some kind of issue, or should I just be more patient?
Also my confirmed balance stopped rising even though a few blocks have been confirmed. |
|
|
|
|
jonathan
|
|
December 28, 2011, 06:12:52 PM |
|
seems there is a problem here too. I've been stuck on a confirmed reward of 0.96934018 BTC since this morning--it's now 6PM here. I'm watching confirmations roll past 120, one after the other. My GPU is whirring away, and my stats page at bitcoin.cz is showing my shares, but there's no change to the reward. I gotta go now, unfortunately :-O
Update: All good now. Thanks Slush :-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Littleshop
|
|
December 28, 2011, 06:19:37 PM |
|
And now it appears fixed! My confirmed has rose and a payment processed. Thanks Slush!
|
|
|
|
bz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
|
|
December 28, 2011, 10:50:58 PM |
|
From BTC stats:
9665 2011-12-28 15:04:18 1:02:26 1025518 0.16221904 0.76167915 159551 53 confirmations left
9664 2011-12-28 14:01:48 2:32:25 2379799 0.17081438 none 159547 49 confirmations left
9663 2011-12-28 11:29:19 0:03:35 60187 0.13084748 0.19946604 159534 36 confirmations left
Given NMC stats:
6923 2011-12-28 14:01:48 0:01:53 35286 41 confirmations left
6922 2011-12-28 13:59:53 0:00:50 35285 40 confirmations left
6921 2011-12-28 13:59:01 0:12:07 35284 39 confirmations left
6920 2011-12-28 13:46:52 0:19:17 35283 38 confirmations left
6919 2011-12-28 13:27:33 1:58:09 35280 35 confirmations left
6918 2011-12-28 11:29:19 0:03:34 35265 20 confirmations left
Should namecoins for BTC 9664 be none?
|
|
|
|
|
|
BinoX
|
|
December 28, 2011, 10:55:51 PM |
|
Mine is also none for namecoins on the same block, so it's possible that it's how it's supposed to be...
0.1+ bitcoins a round? What kinda hashrate you got?
|
|
|
|
|
|
slush
|
|
December 28, 2011, 11:38:36 PM |
|
I'm sorry for today issue with block rewards, everything is fixed now.
|
|
|
|
bz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
|
|
December 29, 2011, 02:08:09 AM |
|
I'm sorry for today issue with block rewards, everything is fixed now.
Looks good now, thanks! |
|
|
|
|
bz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
|
|
December 29, 2011, 02:09:10 AM |
|
Mine is also none for namecoins on the same block, so it's possible that it's how it's supposed to be...
0.1+ bitcoins a round? What kinda hashrate you got?
3.9GH (a mix of 13 GPUs in 5 systems, wish I could justify FPGAs) |
|
|
|
|
mb300sd
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Drunk Posts
|
|
December 29, 2011, 08:11:39 AM |
|
slush: did you get my PM? Would it be possible for you to send me the IP address of my miner? I'd prefer to avoid driving 100 miles round trip just to get it and can provide whatever you need to prove the account is mine.
Thanks.
|
1D7FJWRzeKa4SLmTznd3JpeNU13L1ErEco
|
|
|
Foon
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
|
|
December 29, 2011, 10:19:49 AM |
|
Hi folks,
I'm wondering why I'm seeing severely reduced performance from my 5-GPU miner when connecting to this pool? I get a constant 1650MH/s reported by Diablo when I'm on DeepBit (although DeepBit reports slightly less) but anywhere from 700-1300 on Slush, with a current 10-round hashrate of only 1161 (that's confirmed by submitted shares as well as Diablo reported hashrate). LOTS of fluctuation in hashing speed, peaking well below what I know the miner can do (and no, it's not stales, which are currently ~0.3%). If it helps my username is the same over there as here; PM me if you need more info than that.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
ensign_lee
|
|
December 29, 2011, 01:28:40 PM |
|
Does the "blocks found" counter still work? Just wondering, since it says that none of my miners have found any in basically the last several months. This could be true, but it seems like I'm several standard deviations away from normal when I've only officially found one block for the pool, but have received like 188 in payouts. Mining at like 1.7 Ghash here.
|
|
|
|
|
a2offrb
|
|
December 30, 2011, 12:03:46 PM |
|
Hi Slush!
I think you have little error calculating namecoin reward.
This block
9694 2011-12-30 11:23:21 4:18:40 4211228 0.00000036 0.00000411 159805 97 confirmations left
I have turned off miner after about 3 hour mining(this block), while hashing this bitcoin block - 6 namecoin blocks was found...
Just cannot believe that for 3 hour namecoin reward was only 0.00000411.
|
|
|
|
|
|
slush
|
|
December 30, 2011, 12:10:54 PM |
|
Does the "blocks found" counter still work?
Yes, it works. And it's nice example that without pool mining, a lot of users won't find a block in months, even with significant hashrate. Btw some of my cards didn't find a block for months, too. |
|
|
|
|
slush
|
|
December 30, 2011, 12:22:26 PM |
|
I think you have little error calculating namecoin reward.
Pool is calculating only one score for both chains, using BTC as main currency. When bitcoin block is found, pool calculate user's scores and calculate bitcoin rewards. Then it pick all namecoin blocks found during Bitcoin round and split them between users using BTC score. The overall efect for block rewards in long term is the same, however if you stop or start mining in the middle of bitcoin round, your namecoin reward can be affected significantly. |
|
|
|
|
Poll
