Bitcoin Forum
December 12, 2024, 06:54:44 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 [271] 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 ... 1154 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool  (Read 4382722 times)
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
September 20, 2012, 11:25:21 AM
 #5401

Can you tell us more about the democratic mining you propose? Would that give miners the ability to select which transactions go into a block?

Well, it's just more like a future concept than something what I'm working on right now. The very basic idea is that miners will be able to propose their own merkle trees, so they'll be able to pick transactions, but there are many open questions, mostly about pool performance. It's even not clear if this will have any significant benefits over p2pool (except that you'll be able to propose your own transactions and use PPS rewarding system, which is not possible on P2Pool now). Right now I'm not working on it, I'm more focused to giving a support for miners and miner developers for current Stratum specification, because it has huge benefits for pooled mining and it is ready for use right now.

pekv2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 502



View Profile
September 20, 2012, 02:42:16 PM
 #5402

Found this, this morning. This is from yesterday.

For about an hour it did this. To big to post an hour of these, it was like 2 or 3 of these a second for an hour + Problems communicating with bitcoin RPC errors.
Code:
2012-09-19 03:14:30: Listener for "Anonymous883.WorkerTwo": localhost:8332 19/09/2012 03:14:30, Unexpected error during authorization

I couldn't grab anything from the proxymining program as the cmd console only goes so far back.
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
September 20, 2012, 02:49:34 PM
 #5403

Hm, without a proxy log I cannot debug this more. It would be useful if you will be able to store proxy log when this happen next time. Btw I just relased 0.8.2 and I recommend to update the proxy.

slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
September 20, 2012, 02:55:15 PM
 #5404

New version of poclbm just released. It fixes one bug with Stratum and I strongly recommend you the update.

digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 500


View Profile
September 20, 2012, 03:04:58 PM
 #5405

New version of poclbm just released. It fixes one bug with Stratum and I strongly recommend you the update.

No kidding, it even qualified for bold on the news sidebar!

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
September 20, 2012, 03:07:32 PM
 #5406

Smiley Yes, now poclbm has native (and tested) stratum support...

pekv2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 502



View Profile
September 20, 2012, 04:20:08 PM
 #5407

K, I will update it.

Also, for this new poclbm, I use guiminer on windows7, can I insert this new poclbm somewhere into a directory of guiminer to have the newest version of poclbm?
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
September 20, 2012, 04:22:27 PM
 #5408

pekv2, I didn't tested it myself, but replacing old binary with new one should work nicely.

Edit: I tested it and it don't work. Newest poclbm has slightly different parameters, so it requires small change in GUIminer...

pekv2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 502



View Profile
September 20, 2012, 04:26:14 PM
 #5409

pekv2, I didn't tested it myself, but replacing old binary with new one should work nicely.

Could u point me to the right place for a howto do this?

All i see on github is .py files.
pekv2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 502



View Profile
September 20, 2012, 04:37:04 PM
 #5410

pekv2, I didn't tested it myself, but replacing old binary with new one should work nicely.

Edit: I tested it and it don't work. Newest poclbm has slightly different parameters, so it requires small change in GUIminer...

kk, I will leave guiminer as is, and I updated the proxyprogram.

thanks.
gr0bi42
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 158
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
September 20, 2012, 06:42:14 PM
Last edit: September 20, 2012, 07:37:12 PM by gr0bi42
 #5411

Hi slush, I guess there is once again a missed block (199709).

Edit: ... and block 199724 is missing too.

Donations are welcome: 1Btf3BqUegfe5iFdWsgfBf1Ew3YsAvsrLT
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
September 20, 2012, 09:04:36 PM
 #5412

I see. Looks like I'm going to have a nice debugging session now. Looks like mysql issue...

slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
September 20, 2012, 09:44:23 PM
 #5413

Ok, looks like I found something. One backend didn't restart succesfully on last update and it has been running on older pool source code. All "skipped" blocks were generated by him and I also found some related errors in the log. Backend is now restarted and running on latest pool sources. I'll keep eyes on him, but I expect it will be fine now. Of course I'll add skipped rewards to some following rounds.

slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
September 21, 2012, 01:20:16 AM
 #5414

Users mining for the last super-extra long round has been credited for 3x their standard block reward.

maxi75
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0



View Profile
September 21, 2012, 06:08:07 AM
 #5415

I worked on this long round almost 14h with 19.5 Ghs and I got only 0.00000606 BTC, is that my 3x reward??? Undecided
My reward is usually 0.52 BTC per block.

Edit: Using stratum.
VeeMiner
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 752
Merit: 500


bitcoin hodler


View Profile
September 21, 2012, 07:49:31 AM
 #5416

I worked on this long round almost 14h with 19.5 Ghs and I got only 0.00000606 BTC, is that my 3x reward??? Undecided
My reward is usually 0.52 BTC per block.

Edit: Using stratum.

I got my usual reward, it also doesn't look like it's 3x as much as I was supposed to get, but my main miner wasn't running in the night so I guess the score system would make my reward lower...
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
September 21, 2012, 07:55:47 AM
 #5417

I worked on this long round almost 14h with 19.5 Ghs and I got only 0.00000606 BTC, is that my 3x reward??? Undecided
My reward is usually 0.52 BTC per block.

maxi75, I'm sorry for hear this. But it looks like you had connection issues near the end of that long round. Can you check proxy log for any connection errors?

Although I restarted backends on the old pool, Stratum has been stable all the time. I also see that other running miners got the expected reward for this round, so there no reason to think that your lower reward was caused by any pool issue.

VeeMiner - same for you.

maxi75
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0



View Profile
September 21, 2012, 09:10:23 AM
 #5418

Yes, my miners disconnected 50min before block end, and my score probably went down...
But I'm asking what happend for reward for skipped blocks 199709, 199724 my miners worked for those blocks?
Vasilis
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0



View Profile
September 21, 2012, 10:32:48 AM
 #5419

199818, 199820 ??
http://blockchain.info/blocks/Slush
slush (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097



View Profile WWW
September 21, 2012, 10:53:20 AM
Last edit: September 21, 2012, 11:32:37 AM by slush
 #5420


Yes, I'm aware of this and debugging the server now. I'll keep you updated if I'll find anything.

Edit: Looks like that bitcoind is occasionally timing out on block submission. I used quite strict timeout settings on bitcoind connections, so I changed it and it should help. Still don't understand why this started to happen, pool load is fine and I didn't changed anything in this area for many weeks.

Pages: « 1 ... 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 [271] 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 ... 1154 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!