slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
 |
September 20, 2012, 02:49:34 PM |
|
Hm, without a proxy log I cannot debug this more. It would be useful if you will be able to store proxy log when this happen next time. Btw I just relased 0.8.2 and I recommend to update the proxy.
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
 |
September 20, 2012, 02:55:15 PM |
|
New version of poclbm just released. It fixes one bug with Stratum and I strongly recommend you the update.
|
|
|
|
|
digital
|
 |
September 20, 2012, 03:04:58 PM |
|
New version of poclbm just released. It fixes one bug with Stratum and I strongly recommend you the update.
No kidding, it even qualified for bold on the news sidebar!
|
If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3 References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20 50051.100 53668.0 53788.0 53571.0 53571.0 52212.0 50729.0 114804.0 115468 78106 69061 58572 54747
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
 |
September 20, 2012, 03:07:32 PM |
|
 Yes, now poclbm has native (and tested) stratum support...
|
|
|
|
|
pekv2
|
 |
September 20, 2012, 04:20:08 PM |
|
K, I will update it.
Also, for this new poclbm, I use guiminer on windows7, can I insert this new poclbm somewhere into a directory of guiminer to have the newest version of poclbm?
|
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
 |
September 20, 2012, 04:22:27 PM |
|
pekv2, I didn't tested it myself, but replacing old binary with new one should work nicely.
Edit: I tested it and it don't work. Newest poclbm has slightly different parameters, so it requires small change in GUIminer...
|
|
|
|
|
pekv2
|
 |
September 20, 2012, 04:26:14 PM |
|
pekv2, I didn't tested it myself, but replacing old binary with new one should work nicely.
Could u point me to the right place for a howto do this? All i see on github is .py files.
|
|
|
|
|
|
pekv2
|
 |
September 20, 2012, 04:37:04 PM |
|
pekv2, I didn't tested it myself, but replacing old binary with new one should work nicely.
Edit: I tested it and it don't work. Newest poclbm has slightly different parameters, so it requires small change in GUIminer...
kk, I will leave guiminer as is, and I updated the proxyprogram. thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gr0bi42
|
 |
September 20, 2012, 06:42:14 PM Last edit: September 20, 2012, 07:37:12 PM by gr0bi42 |
|
Hi slush, I guess there is once again a missed block (199709).
Edit: ... and block 199724 is missing too.
|
Donations are welcome: 1Btf3BqUegfe5iFdWsgfBf1Ew3YsAvsrLT
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
 |
September 20, 2012, 09:04:36 PM |
|
I see. Looks like I'm going to have a nice debugging session now. Looks like mysql issue...
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
 |
September 20, 2012, 09:44:23 PM |
|
Ok, looks like I found something. One backend didn't restart succesfully on last update and it has been running on older pool source code. All "skipped" blocks were generated by him and I also found some related errors in the log. Backend is now restarted and running on latest pool sources. I'll keep eyes on him, but I expect it will be fine now. Of course I'll add skipped rewards to some following rounds.
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
 |
September 21, 2012, 01:20:16 AM |
|
Users mining for the last super-extra long round has been credited for 3x their standard block reward.
|
|
|
|
maxi75
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
 |
September 21, 2012, 06:08:07 AM |
|
I worked on this long round almost 14h with 19.5 Ghs and I got only 0.00000606 BTC, is that my 3x reward???  My reward is usually 0.52 BTC per block. Edit: Using stratum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VeeMiner
|
 |
September 21, 2012, 07:49:31 AM |
|
I worked on this long round almost 14h with 19.5 Ghs and I got only 0.00000606 BTC, is that my 3x reward???  My reward is usually 0.52 BTC per block. Edit: Using stratum. I got my usual reward, it also doesn't look like it's 3x as much as I was supposed to get, but my main miner wasn't running in the night so I guess the score system would make my reward lower...
|
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
 |
September 21, 2012, 07:55:47 AM |
|
I worked on this long round almost 14h with 19.5 Ghs and I got only 0.00000606 BTC, is that my 3x reward???  My reward is usually 0.52 BTC per block. maxi75, I'm sorry for hear this. But it looks like you had connection issues near the end of that long round. Can you check proxy log for any connection errors? Although I restarted backends on the old pool, Stratum has been stable all the time. I also see that other running miners got the expected reward for this round, so there no reason to think that your lower reward was caused by any pool issue. VeeMiner - same for you.
|
|
|
|
maxi75
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
 |
September 21, 2012, 09:10:23 AM |
|
Yes, my miners disconnected 50min before block end, and my score probably went down... But I'm asking what happend for reward for skipped blocks 199709, 199724 my miners worked for those blocks?
|
|
|
|
|
Vasilis
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
 |
September 21, 2012, 10:32:48 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
 |
September 21, 2012, 10:53:20 AM Last edit: September 21, 2012, 11:32:37 AM by slush |
|
Yes, I'm aware of this and debugging the server now. I'll keep you updated if I'll find anything. Edit: Looks like that bitcoind is occasionally timing out on block submission. I used quite strict timeout settings on bitcoind connections, so I changed it and it should help. Still don't understand why this started to happen, pool load is fine and I didn't changed anything in this area for many weeks.
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
 |
September 21, 2012, 10:55:32 AM |
|
But I'm asking what happend for reward for skipped blocks 199709, 199724 my miners worked for those blocks?
As I stated at 2am, I credited users for that super-long round by 3x of super-long round reward. Your miners worked, but because of some bug in server stats I don't have scores for these rounds, so I included reward from these blocks to the next recorded round.
|
|
|
|
maxi75
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
 |
September 21, 2012, 11:50:58 AM |
|
But I'm asking what happend for reward for skipped blocks 199709, 199724 my miners worked for those blocks?
As I stated at 2am, I credited users for that super-long round by 3x of super-long round reward. Your miners worked, but because of some bug in server stats I don't have scores for these rounds, so I included reward from these blocks to the next recorded round. hmm, but my miners was disconected next two blocks, so I got 0 there, I connected on third block after the long one and got as usual around 0,50BTC 13956 2012-09-21 07:31:57 0:44:49 1192369 0.45140752 1.34604280 199798 69 confirmations left 13955 2012-09-21 06:47:00 1:58:59 3024065 none none 199791 62 confirmations left 13954 2012-09-21 04:47:54 3:36:53 5256745 none none 199782 53 confirmations left 13953 2012-09-21 01:10:54 14:51:27 22346268 0.00000606 0.00003590 199755 26 confirmations left
|
|
|
|
|
|